Politics
Adichie Challenges US Characterization Of Nigerian Election In Open Letter To Biden
Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, a renowned author, has expressed her disapproval of the United States’ congratulatory message to Bola Tinubu, the President-elect who was declared the winner of the February 25 presidential election.
Following the declaration of Bola Tinubu as the winner of the Nigerian presidential election on February 25, a spokesperson for the US State Department issued a statement commending Nigeria on the outcome while emphasizing the need for calm amidst allegations of voter fraud and technical difficulties.
The spokesperson acknowledged that many Nigerians and political parties have expressed their dissatisfaction with the conduct of the election process, particularly the use of new technical elements that were implemented for the first time in a presidential election cycle.
In an open letter addressed to US President Joe Biden and published in The Atlantic on Thursday, Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie expressed her puzzlement over the US description of the Nigerian presidential election as a “competitive election” that marks a new period for Nigerian politics and democracy.
She went on to argue that American intelligence cannot possibly be so incompetent as to not recognize the flaws and irregularities that have been reported in the electoral process.
Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie also sounded the alarm about the growing anger among young people in Nigeria. She expressed concern about the palpable discontent, despair, and tension that have not been this intense in years.
She pointed to Biden’s past advocacy for a global community for democracy and his emphasis on standing up for justice and the rule of law as reasons to expect a more nuanced understanding of the situation in Nigeria.
Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie argued that a global community for democracy cannot flourish in the face of indifference from its most influential member.
The letter partly reads, “Something remarkable happened on the morning of February 25, the day of the Nigerian presidential election. Many Nigerians went out to vote holding in their hearts a new sense of trust. Cautious trust, but still trust. Since the end of military rule in 1999, Nigerians have had little confidence in elections. To vote in a presidential election was to brace yourself for the inevitable aftermath: fraud.
“Elections would be rigged because elections were always rigged; the question was how badly. Sometimes voting felt like an inconsequential gesture as predetermined “winners” were announced.
“A law passed last year, the 2022 Electoral Act, changed everything. It gave legal backing to the electronic accreditation of voters and the electronic transmission of results, in a process determined by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
“The chair of the commission, Professor Mahmood Yakubu, assured Nigerians that votes would be counted in the presence of voters and recorded in a result sheet, and that a photo of the signed sheet would immediately be uploaded to a secure server.
“When rumors circulated about the commission not keeping its word, Yakubu firmly rebutted them. In a speech at Chatham House in London (a favorite influence-burnishing haunt of Nigerian politicians), he reiterated that the public would be able to view “polling-unit results as soon as they are finalized on election day.
“Nigerian democracy had long been a two-party structure—power alternating between the APC and the Peoples Democratic Party—until this year, when the Labour Party, led by Peter Obi, became a third force. Obi was different; he seemed honest and accessible, and his vision of anti-corruption and self-sufficiency gave rise to a movement of supporters who called themselves “Obi-dients.”
“Unusually large, enthusiastic crowds turned up for his rallies. The APC considered him an upstart who could not win, because his small party lacked traditional structures. It is ironic that many images of altered result sheets showed votes overwhelmingly being transferred from the Labour Party to the APC.
“I hope, President Biden, that you do not personally share this cordial condescension. You have spoken of the importance of a “global Community for Democracy,” and the need to stand up for “justice and the rule of law.” A global community for democracy cannot thrive in the face of apathy from its most powerful member. Why would the United States, which prioritizes the rule of law, endorse a president-elect who has emerged from an unlawful process?
“I hope it will not surprise you, President Biden, if I argue that the American response to the Nigerian election also bears the faint taint of that word, compromised, because it is so removed from the actual situation in Nigeria as to be disingenuous.
“I supported Peter Obi, the Labour Party candidate, and hoped he would win, as polls predicted, but I was prepared to accept any result, because we had been assured that technology would guard the sanctity of votes.”
“The smoldering disillusionment felt by many Nigerians, according to the author, is not so much because their candidate did not win as because the election they had dared to trust was, in the end, so unacceptably and unforgivably flawed.
“Congratulating its outcome, President Biden, tarnishes America’s self-proclaimed commitment to democracy. Please do not give the sheen of legitimacy to an illegitimate process. The United States should be what it says it is,” added.
Politics
INEC Opens Online Access to Voters’ Register After Public Outcry
The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has announced plans to make the preliminary register of voters for the 2027 general elections available online following concerns over its accessibility.
This comes after reports of delays in uploading the preliminary register online, despite the completion of the nationwide physical display exercise, raising concerns about public access to the document ahead of the 2027 general elections.
ALSO READ: ‘Impartiality in Doubt’ – ADC Urges Senate to Reject INEC Nominee Over Sokoto Governor Link
In a press statement issued on Monday, October 26, 2026, Mohammed Kudu Haruna, Chairman of INEC’s Information and Voter Education Committee (IVEC), said the commission had taken note of concerns expressed by Nigerians and other stakeholders regarding the need to make the register accessible online.
INEC disclosed that it conducted the physical display of the Preliminary Register of Voters at Registration Areas nationwide from October 9 to 15, 2026.
According to the commission, the exercise was carried out in accordance with Section 19 of the Electoral Act, 2026, to provide registered voters with an opportunity to inspect their particulars and submit claims and objections as prescribed by law.
Responding to the concerns, INEC said it had decided to make the same preliminary register available through its online platform.
“Accordingly, and in furtherance of its commitment to transparency, accessibility and public confidence in the electoral process, the Commission has decided to make available on its online platform display.inecnigeria.org the same Preliminary Register of Voters earlier displayed at the Registration Areas,” the statement said.
The commission explained that the additional measure would complement the physical display already conducted and provide wider access to the register.
“This additional measure complements the physical display already undertaken and is intended to facilitate wider public access to the Register,” INEC stated.
The commission added that it was continuing to process claims and objections arising from the exercise in accordance with the Electoral Act, 2026.
INEC said the process would precede the certification and publication of the Final Register of Voters, scheduled for December 15, 2026.
The commission also appreciated Nigerians and other stakeholders for their continued interest and engagement, reiterating its commitment to transparency, accountability and credible elections.
“The Commission appreciates the continued interest and constructive engagement of Nigerians and stakeholders and reiterates its commitment to transparency, accountability and the faithful implementation of the Electoral Act, 2026 in delivering credible elections,” the statement added.
Politics
ADC Replies Alake, Says APC’s ‘Falsehood’ Cannot Hide Tinubu’s Failures
The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has accused the All Progressives Congress (APC) of using propaganda to distract Nigerians from the failures of President Bola Tinubu’s administration, following allegations that the opposition party owes its staff more than 12 months’ salaries.
In a press statement dated October 26, 2026, and signed by its National Publicity Secretary, Mallam Bolaji Abdullahi, the ADC described the allegations by the APC Presidential Campaign Council as an “irresponsible falsehood” and an attempt to divert attention from the country’s economic challenges.
SEE MORE: ‘How Did Tinubu Graduate Before School Existed?’ – ADC Challenges Shettima Over Atiku
The controversy began after the APC Presidential Campaign Council, through its spokesperson, Dele Alake, accused the ADC’s National Working Committee, led by Senator David Mark as national chairman and Rauf Aregbesola as national secretary, of failing to pay party workers for more than a year.
According to the statement, the APC described the alleged non-payment of salaries as “wicked and reprehensible”, arguing that a party seeking to govern Nigeria should be able to meet its obligations to its workforce.
“We find it unconscionable that a political party that has made many grandiose promises to hoodwink Nigerians owes its workers for more than 12 months,” Alake said.
The APC campaign council also accused former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar, whom it identified as the ADC’s presidential candidate, of having a history of owing employees at businesses associated with him, including Gotel Communication.
Alake further criticised Aregbesola’s record on workers’ salaries and pension payments during his eight-year tenure as governor of Osun State.
The council alleged that Aregbesola’s administration introduced quarter-salary and, at times, half-salary payments for workers, while pensioners allegedly went for more than four years without receiving their entitlements.
Based on these allegations, the APC campaign council urged Nigerians to reject the ADC, Atiku and other candidates of the party in the 2027 general elections, arguing that a party unable to manage its workforce should not be entrusted with the country’s affairs.
Responding to the allegations, the ADC dismissed the APC’s claims as an attempt to mislead Nigerians and divert attention from the performance of the Tinubu administration.
“We find it rather amusing that a government that has presided over one of the most painful periods of economic hardship in our country’s recent history now considers itself qualified to lecture anyone about the welfare of workers,” the statement read.
The opposition party argued that the ruling party was making allegations against its political opponents because it lacked achievements to defend.
“When a government has no achievements to defend, it must manufacture allegations to discuss,” it added.
Rejecting the allegation of unpaid salaries, the ADC challenged the APC to provide evidence to support its claims.
“The ADC categorically rejects this allegation as an irresponsible falsehood, deliberately concocted to mislead Nigerians and distract attention from the monumental failures of the Tinubu administration. If the APC has any credible evidence to support its claims, it should produce it rather than continue to insult Nigerians with fabricated stories masquerading as press statements,” the statement said.
The ADC maintained that the allegations against it were an attempt by the ruling party to shift public attention away from the challenges facing Nigerians.
According to the party, the country’s major concerns include the rising cost of living, unemployment among young people and insecurity affecting lives, livelihoods and communities.
“The real issue is not the imaginary crisis that the APC is desperately trying to manufacture within the ADC. The real issue is the crisis that President Bola Tinubu and his government have created in the homes of millions of Nigerians,” the statement read.
“The real issue is the cost of living. The real issue is the absence of jobs and opportunities for our young people. The real issue is the insecurity that continues to threaten lives, livelihoods, and communities across the country.”
The opposition party said these were the issues on which the Tinubu administration should be judged, insisting that allegations against political opponents could not erase the government’s record.
The ADC also accused the APC of concentrating on allegations against opposition parties instead of presenting its achievements ahead of the 2027 general elections.
“It is becoming increasingly clear that the APC has decided to run its 2027 campaign on allegations against the opposition rather than achievements of its own. That is what happens when a government has spent years making promises it cannot keep and excuses it cannot defend,” the statement said.
The party advised Alake and his colleagues to focus on explaining why Nigerians should support the ruling party for another term, given what it described as the hardship, insecurity and economic uncertainty experienced over the past three years.
It further argued that although the APC controls the machinery of government, it cannot control the daily experiences of Nigerians.
“The APC may control the machinery of government, but it cannot control the lived experiences of Nigerians. And no amount of propaganda targeted at the opposition can erase the monumental record of the ruling APC,” the statement added.
The ADC said the cost of living would remain a central issue in its engagement with the Tinubu administration, adding that it would not be distracted by allegations against the party.
“This election is about one issue only: the cost of living that the Tinubu administration has pushed beyond the reach of the majority of Nigerians. The ADC will stay focused on this issue. We will not be distracted. We will continue to hold this government accountable on the issues that matter to Nigerians,” the statement read.
The party concluded by challenging the APC to defend its record and present solutions to the country’s challenges rather than make allegations against the opposition.
“If the APC has a record to defend, let it defend it. If it has solutions, let it present them. But it should stop insulting the intelligence of Nigerians with these increasingly desperate distractions,” Abdullahi said.
Politics
‘How Did Tinubu Graduate Before School Existed?’ – ADC Challenges Shettima Over Atiku
The African Democratic Congress (ADC) Presidential Campaign Council has challenged Vice-President Kashim Shettima to address questions surrounding President Bola Tinubu’s academic records following his criticism of former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar’s educational background.
The council’s Director of Strategic Communication, Phrank Shaibu, made the challenge in a statement on Monday, October 26, 2026, following Shettima’s remarks at the 32nd Nigerian Economic Summit in Abuja.
Shaibu accused Shettima of mocking Atiku for attending the Kano School of Hygiene instead of addressing the economic challenges facing Nigerians, including rising food prices, transportation costs and fuel prices.
SEE ALSO: ₦2.3tn Kaduna Rally Claim: APC Accuses Atiku, ADC of Fake News Plot
“While Shettima debates school records, families are skipping meals, workers cannot afford the journey to work, and his government calls their suffering reform,” Shaibu said.
He questioned why Atiku’s educational background had become a subject of ridicule, arguing that the former Vice-President had pursued further training and built his career through work.
“What, exactly, is shameful about Atiku’s education? He completed secondary school, pursued further training and built a life through work. Millions of Nigerians have travelled the same road,” he said.
According to Shaibu, many Nigerians have worked hard to obtain education and improve their lives despite financial challenges, adding that Atiku’s educational journey should not be used to ridicule him.
ADC Raises Questions About Tinubu’s Academic Records
Turning the criticism towards Tinubu, Shaibu challenged Shettima to explain an alleged discrepancy involving the President’s educational history.
He claimed that a document associated with Tinubu’s Chicago State University records listed Government College Lagos as a school he graduated from in 1970, four years before the institution was established in 1974.
“If Shettima wants to examine school records, he should begin with the man he serves,” Shaibu said.
He added that the Vice-President should explain the alleged discrepancy rather than mock Atiku for attending an institution that existed when he studied there.
Shaibu also questioned the name “Tinubu Bola Adekunle,” which he said appeared on the National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) certificate submitted by the President to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
He noted that Atiku had challenged the discrepancy in court and argued that questions concerning Tinubu’s documents deserved answers.
The ADC spokesman further referenced Tinubu’s Chicago State University documents and a 1993 forfeiture proceeding in Chicago arising from a narcotics investigation, describing the issues as matters of public interest.
The claims were presented by Shaibu as part of his criticism of the President and Vice-President. They should not be interpreted as independent findings of wrongdoing.
ADC Accuses Shettima of Ignoring Economic Hardship
Shaibu also criticised the Federal Government over the economic difficulties confronting Nigerians, arguing that the administration should focus on addressing the rising cost of living.
He cited poverty and food insecurity as major concerns, maintaining that families struggling to afford food and transportation needed practical solutions rather than political exchanges over educational qualifications.
“Poverty is not a future threat to these families. It is the life they are struggling through today,” he said.
He further argued that Nigerians struggling to pay transport fares and provide meals for their families did not need the Vice-President to explain the meaning of poverty.
Shaibu also defended Atiku’s proposal for a targeted and capped subsidy tied to petrol refined in Nigeria, subject to independent auditing.
He challenged Shettima to demonstrate why the proposal would be unworkable and present an alternative that could help reduce fuel prices.
“If Shettima thinks it cannot be funded, he should show his figures and offer a better way to lower prices,” he said.
“Insulting Atiku will not fill a cooking pot, pay a bus fare or put fuel in a tank,” Shaibu added.
ADC Looks Ahead to 2027 Elections
Shaibu concluded by criticising the Tinubu administration and predicting that Nigerians would express their views on the government’s performance in the 2027 general election.
He described Tinubu’s emergence as President in 2023 as an electoral error and argued that voters would have an opportunity to reconsider their choice.
“Nigerians will answer the Vice-President’s mockery and his boss’s record with their votes,” he said.





