The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has disclosed how the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, is expected to approach the 2027 presidential election amid his support for President Bola Tinubu.

PDP National Publicity Secretary, Haruna Jungudo, said Wike would not ask Nigerians to vote for the All Progressives Congress (APC), despite his support for Tinubu’s presidential bid.

Jungudo made this known on Wednesday during an interview with News Central TV.

ALSO READ: 2027: ‘Nobody Owns Rivers Votes’ — ADC Fires Back at Wike

He maintained that Wike remains a member of the PDP and has continued to support the party’s candidates, except at the presidential level.

“The distinction is very clear that Wike is a member of the PDP. He has never hidden that, and he is supporting every single candidate of the PDP, with the exception of the presidential,” Jungudo said.

According to the PDP spokesman, Wike remains a politician whose support would be sought by political parties because of his political influence and experience.

“No political party today, looking at the pedigree that Wike encompasses, won’t want to have him in their own political party,” he said.

Jungudo further stated that Wike would not campaign for the APC in the 2027 election, but would only support Tinubu at the presidential level.

“Wike can’t and would never come out to say vote for APC in 2027. He would only say vote President Tinubu,” he added.

The comments come amid an ongoing disagreement between Wike and members of the APC over the Rainbow Coalition in Rivers State.

The APC governors had warned that the coalition could affect Tinubu’s re-election chances in 2027.

Wike, however, dismissed the concerns and described the governors as “lazy politicians.”

The National Working Committee of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), led by National Chairman Senator David Mark, on Wednesday held a meeting with the party’s presidential candidate, former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar, and its vice-presidential candidate, Rt. Hon. Rotimi Amaechi.

ALSO READ: 2027: ‘Nobody Owns Rivers Votes’ — ADC Fires Back at Wike

The party announced the meeting in a post on its official X account on Wednesday, accompanied by photographs of David Mark, Atiku and Amaechi at the gathering.

The meeting comes as political parties and their candidates continue preparations ahead of the 2027 general elections.

See photos below:

The Obidient Movement has demanded answers from the Independent National Electoral Commission over the whereabouts and official engagements of its Chairman, Prof. Joash Amupitan, following his absence from a key meeting on preparations for the 2027 general elections.

The demand was contained in a statement released by the movement’s Media and Communications Directorate on Wednesday.

The group’s reaction followed the appearance of National Commissioner, Rhoda Gumus, as Acting Chairman of INEC at the Commission’s headquarters in Abuja on Tuesday, where she represented Amupitan during a meeting with an African Union Pre-Election and Needs Assessment Mission.

SEE MORE: Obi’s Birthday Echoes Loud in Sokoto as ‘Obidients’ Shower Patients with Gifts

The AU delegation, led by former Ethiopian Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister, Demeke Mekonnen, is assessing Nigeria’s preparedness ahead of the 2027 elections.

The mission is examining issues including voter registration and register integrity, electoral technology, logistics, funding, inclusion, transparency, dispute resolution, security coordination and results management.

At the meeting, Gumus reaffirmed INEC’s commitment to an independent, neutral and professional electoral process, saying the Commission was working towards a transparent, credible, inclusive and peaceful 2027 election.

However, the Obidient Movement said Nigerians had not been adequately informed about the circumstances surrounding Amupitan’s absence.

The group consequently demanded that INEC disclose Amupitan’s current location, his official schedule and the circumstances under which Gumus assumed responsibility for representing him at the AU engagement.

The Obidients specifically asked INEC to explain when the chairman left Abuja, the purpose of any official trip, who authorised his absence and whether he had travelled outside the country.

They also demanded disclosure of his official meetings and engagements since his reported absence, including whether he had met, or was scheduled to meet, President Bola Tinubu, the national chairman of the All Progressives Congress, or representatives of the ruling party who, according to the group, had also travelled outside the country.

“INEC must tell Nigerians where its chairman is and what he is doing,” the group said.

According to the movement, the questions have become necessary because of the strategic importance of INEC and the increasing political activity ahead of the 2027 elections.

It argued that the leadership of the electoral commission should operate with maximum transparency, particularly as preparations for the next general elections intensify.

The group also questioned what it described as the absence of a publicly communicated handover arrangement before Gumus represented Amupitan at the AU engagement.

The Obidient Movement said the AU meeting underscored the importance of INEC’s leadership and its responsibility to maintain public confidence as the country approaches another election cycle.

The group said INEC’s assurances about an independent and credible electoral process would carry greater weight if the commission’s leadership also demonstrated transparency in its own official activities.

It said Nigerians should not be left to speculate about the whereabouts or engagements of the person constitutionally responsible for leading the nation’s electoral body as the country approaches another crucial election cycle.

The movement further urged INEC to make public the circumstances surrounding the chairman’s absence and provide Nigerians with sufficient information to dispel questions over his official activities.

It maintained that electoral credibility was not only about conducting elections but also about ensuring that the institution responsible for organising them remained accountable to the Nigerian public.

The Obidients also alleged that concerns over the perceived political neutrality of the electoral commission had contributed to a crisis of confidence and argued that INEC should take steps to avoid any situation capable of deepening public suspicion.

The group maintained that the electoral commission belonged to Nigerians and that its leadership should therefore be accountable to the public.

With the 2027 elections drawing closer, the development has placed renewed attention on INEC’s leadership, its public communication and the steps being taken to assure political parties, civil society groups and voters of the Commission’s independence.

The Obidient Movement therefore challenged INEC to provide answers to the questions surrounding Amupitan’s absence, insisting that transparency was essential to building confidence in the electoral process.

“INEC must tell Nigerians where its chairman is and what he is doing,” the statement concluded.