Connect with us

NEWS

Audit Query: Reps panel Probes NPA, Terminal Operator over $68.473m debts

Published

on

Audit Query: Reps panel Probes NPA, Terminal Operator over $68.473m debts

…As NPA Boss Gives Details Of Transactions

By John Danjuma

The Public Account Committee, (PAC) of the House of Representatives is investigating the Nigerian Port Authority, NPA and Terminal Operators (Nigeria) Limited over $68,473m debts owed the Federal Government on lease and Throughput fair between 2006 and June 2022.

The Committee being Chaired by Hon Busayo Oluwole Oke (PDP Osun) is also investigating the Terminal Operator for using own exchange rate different from the official one approved by the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN in calculating revenue accuring to the Federal government
All were contained in the query from the office of the Auditor General of the Federation.

The Managing Director of the Nigeria Port Authority (NPA) Mohammed Bello-Koko had indicated in a submission to the Committee that one of the Port operators in charge of the Rivers Port, and Terminal Operators (Nigeria) Limited used its own exchange rate in calculating revenue accruing to the Nigerian government
The NPA boss stated in the Submission that PTOL used N116 to the dollar at a time when the official exchange rate was fixed at N305 to the dollar by the Central Bank of Nigeria in 2016.

The submission dated 27th July, 2022 which was in response to a letter from the committee also revealed that even while using another exchange rate of N151 agreed to after reconciliation, the terminal operator was still indebted to the government to the tune of $68.473 million as at 13th October, 2021.

The Auditor General of the Federation had indicted the company for not paying its lease fees and throughout fee to the government as at when due.

However, in its submission, the company claimed that contrary to the report of the Auditor General, it had been paying its lease fees and Throughput fee to the Nigeria Port Authority as at when due contrary to the AuGF report.

A supporting document submitted by the NPA to the House committee tabulated the payments made by two concessionaires (BUA and PTOL) on lease and Throughput fees between 2006 and June 2022.

A close study of the document however showed a huge disparity in the figures being owed the government by the company.

For example, while the document suggested that in 2008, PTOL was given a bill of $11,333,333.31 and paid $3,333,333.31, outstanding balance against them was put at $17,194,444.67 instead of $8,000,000.

Similarly, in 2019, the bill given to the company for its operation at the Rivers Port Complex stood at $10,080,000.00.

However, while the document indicated that they paid $3,000,000, outstanding balance against them was put at $102,714,749.66, a figure far above the bill given to it as its lease fee.

However, the NPA letter reads: “Your letter dated 20th, July 2022 to the Authority refers to the historical background of the debt profile of PTOL to NPA dated back to – the inception of the concession, in 2006.

“These issues revolve around the inability of the Operator to make payment on its lease fees as signed with BPE and NPA.
PTOL gave the following reasons among others for its indebtedness to NPA:

“Amortization of berth 1-3. The difference in-amortization carried out by PTOL and what was recognized by NPA was significant when converted from dollar to naira.

“NPA relied on the existing exchange rate given by CBN at 305 as at year 2016, at the time of reconciliation while PTOL used N116 to a dollar, being the -rate of dollar at the time of reconstruction.

“After reconciliation, a N151 to dollar was adopted, as stipulated in the supplemental agreement. The difference in valuation amounted to $11,068,187.16 and a credit note was issued on the 5th June, 2020.

“PTOL claimed no operation happened at the berth during the construction period of 2007 – 2009, hence loss of revenue. PTOL claimed 6 vessels were handled by NPA after the signing of the lease’ agreement. And a refund of 50% stevedoring element was considered.

“Huge disparity in lease fees charged compared to BUA. Disparity in existing draft with the initial advertised draft of 10 meters.
Security concerns at the Eastern Port. Oil and Gas related cargo vessel diversion to Onne Port, which they claimed affected their revenue.”

The letter said further that the outstanding debt profile as at June, 2019 against PTOL in NPA records stood at $100,985,846.82 while PTOL acknowledge only $77 ,976,788.81.

READ ALSO: Reps to Mount Diplomatic Pressure for Ekweremadu

It indicated further that at a joint meeting with BPE, PTOL and NPA on the 14th December 2021 on resolving the outstanding debts of the terminal operator, a further reconciliation was carried out by NPA and PTOL at the Rivers Port.

It said the highlights of the reconciliation showed that “an implementation of a further reduction of 25% lease fee review granted by the Ministry of Transport and BPE in June, 2015.

“This was predicated on the terminal operator paying a Guarantee Minimum Tonnage (GMT) penalty of $2,849,404.41. This review was not Implemented by failure of PTOL to pay the stipulated penalty. A further agreement to issue a credit note of $1,940,821.16 for the
period the detained vessels were at the PTOL berth. These vessels were detained by various government agencies.”

The letter also said that a credit note of $11,821,500.16 was raised for the non-utilization in the berth during the reconstruction of berth 1 – 3 undertaken by PTOL.

It stressed that the second round of reconciliation report is yet to be approved by the Board of the NPA before its dissolution by the Honorable Minister of Transport, while the
report has been forwarded to the reconstituted board and is currently being considered.

It said that after these reconciliations, PTOL debt profile to NPA stood at $68,473,637.72 as at 13th October,2021.

Determined to get to the root of the matter, Committee has directed both the NPA boss and the terminal Operator to appear before it on Tuesday for further investigation.

NEWS

Obi Asks World Bank, Banks to Verify Anambra Debt Claims

Published

on

Former Anambra State Governor Peter Obi has called on the World Bank and Nigerian banks to verify records relating to the debt claims made against his administration, insisting that the figures being presented by the state government should be subjected to documentary scrutiny.

Obi made the call during an interview on Arise TV’s Prime Time programme on Thursday, September 24, 2026, while responding to the Anambra State Government’s claims over loans allegedly incurred during his eight-year tenure.

ALSO READ: 2027: Peter Obi Disowns OK Movement Campaign Council, Says ‘It Is Wrong’

The former governor specifically urged the World Bank to provide records showing the actual drawdowns from the facilities linked to Anambra, rather than relying on the total amount originally approved or contracted.

“Please publish these documents. I’m urging you, please. The World Bank is in Abuja; they can give you the history of the drawdowns,” Obi said.

He also challenged the relevant Nigerian banks to verify the financial records he said were contained in his 2014 handover documents.

“The banks mentioned here are Nigerian banks; you have access to their headquarters. Ask them whether this money was there,” he added.

Obi’s comments came amid a dispute over the Anambra Government’s earlier claim that eight external loan facilities associated with his administration had an outstanding balance of about N127.4bn as of June 30, 2026.

The state had linked the loans to projects in areas including education, healthcare, erosion control and malaria prevention.

The former governor disputed the presentation, arguing that approved loan facilities should not automatically be treated as money borrowed or spent if the funds were not actually drawn down.

He maintained that some of the funding arrangements involved Federal Government-backed concessionary financing and said the World Bank records could establish when the money was accessed.

The controversy has since shifted towards the actual amount drawn from some of the facilities.

Anambra State Commissioner for Information and Value Reorientation, Law Mefor, reportedly acknowledged during an Arise TV appearance that the government had not properly verified the amount actually drawn from a $123m facility before citing the larger figure. He said the government would seek clarification from the relevant authorities.

The development has added another layer to the disagreement between Obi and the Anambra Government over the state’s financial position at the end of his administration.

Obi has consistently maintained that he left office in March 2014 without outstanding salaries, pensions, gratuities or certified contractor obligations, while the state government has continued to dispute aspects of his account of the state’s inherited liabilities.

Continue Reading

NEWS

‘Where Is the President?’ — Peter Obi Questions Tinubu’s Prolonged Absence

Published

on

Presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), Peter Obi, has questioned President Bola Tinubu’s prolonged absence from Nigeria, saying Nigerians deserve to know the President’s whereabouts amid the country’s security challenges.

Obi made the remarks on Arise TV on Thursday while discussing the President’s absence from the country and the situation surrounding other senior government officials.

According to Obi, the issue was not simply that Tinubu was outside Nigeria, but that he had remained abroad beyond the period initially announced for his trip.

ALSO READ: ‘Borrowed Funds Not Spent Cannot Be Counted as Debt Left Behind’ -Peter Obi

“It’s not just that he’s out of the country. He’s out of the country beyond the days he was supposed to be. Beyond the days they even said he was going for,” Obi said.

He also noted that Vice-President Kashim Shettima was outside the country, while Senate President Godswill Akpabio was also reportedly abroad and the Senate was not in session.

“The Vice President is not in the country. And I understand the Senate President is out of the country, the Senate is not in session,” he said.

Obi expressed concern about the situation against the backdrop of insecurity and recent incidents involving the deaths of suspected illegal miners in Niger State.

“We don’t need this level of rascality at this moment in time, when Nigerians are being kidnapped, being killed, things are… we need a country where we have somebody, where we have competence, capacity, and compassion,” he said.

Referring to the deaths recorded in Niger State, Obi said the presence of the country’s chief executive was particularly important during a crisis.

“Look at Niger State now, where 10 people… where some young people have died for nothing,” he said.

The former Anambra State governor argued that while there is a chain of command within government, delegation should not replace the physical presence of the country’s leader during critical situations.

“It is… the CEO being present is critical at a time of crisis. Not delegation. Yes, you have a chain of command,” Obi said.

He subsequently asked where the President was and insisted that Nigerians should be informed.

“Where is the President? Nigerians ought to know,” he said.

Obi also said that, if elected president in 2027, he would make his whereabouts publicly known whenever he travelled.

“If I travel today, I tell people where I am. When I become President, Charles, people will know where I am 24 hours,” he said

“That is public space, public office,” Obi added.

The comments come amid continuing public debate over the absence of the President and Vice-President from Nigeria.

Continue Reading

NEWS

‘Borrowed Funds Not Spent Cannot Be Counted as Debt Left Behind’ – Peter Obi

Published

on

The presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) for the 2027 election, Peter Obi, has challenged the way government borrowing is accounted for, arguing that funds borrowed but not actually drawn down should not be treated as debt left behind by an administration.

Obi made the remarks during an interview on Arise TV on Thursday while explaining his position on borrowing during his tenure as governor of Anambra State.

“That is a wrong public accounting. Even if I had gone to bank and borrowed money, but I did not spend the money, you cannot call it debt I left,” Obi said.

RELATED NEWS: 2027: Obi Wants to Transform Nigeria After 8 Years of Failure in Anambra — Onanuga

He illustrated his argument with a hypothetical ₦10 billion loan facility, saying that where only ₦500 million was actually drawn, it would be inaccurate to describe the entire ₦10 billion as money owed.

“They gave me a loan of 10 billion Naira, and Charles, I only drew down 500 million. You cannot say I’m owing 10 billion, because you know the amount,” he said.

The NDC candidate said such a practice would amount to improper public-sector accounting.

“That’s why I said it is not proper public sector accounting,” Obi said.

He also cited the former Director-General of the Debt Management Office, Abraham Nwankwo, whom he said served for 10 years, in support of his claim about his borrowing record as Anambra governor.

Obi recalled that Nwankwo invited him to his send-off ceremony and publicly explained why he had selected Obi as chairman of the event.

“He announced it to everybody in that party that the reason why he made me chairman is because I was the only governor in Nigeria who never came to his office for approval to borrow money,” Obi said.

Anambra Debt Controversy

Obi’s comments come against the backdrop of continuing debate over the debt profile he left behind after serving as Anambra State governor from 2006 to 2013.

The former governor has consistently defended his administration’s financial record, while figures and claims about Anambra’s debt during and after his tenure have generated public debate.

 

 

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2022. Biztellers, powered by Alphaxristi.

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x