Connect with us

Banking

China’s Central Bank Leads Effort to Regulate Internet Finance

Published

on

BEIJING — China’s technology giants are marching onto the turf of the country’s state-controlled banks, soaking up tens of billions of dollars’ worth of investor money.

Now, Chinese regulators are taking notice.

China’s central bank is leading a government effort to stem potential risk from a new generation of popular online Chinese investment products, according to people with direct knowledge of the matter. Officials are looking to develop regulations aimed squarely at products offered by an affiliate of e-commerce giant Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. as well as by rivals Tencent Holdings Ltd. TCEHY -0.12% and Baidu Inc. BIDU +1.92%

The products offer higher yields than bank deposits and are easy to access with smartphones and other gadgets. But some Chinese officials worry that investors often don’t know where their money is being placed and are vulnerable to personal information theft. The worries come amid broader concerns about potential disruptions in China’s vast but opaque shadow banking system.

Officials stressed that they hope the Internet companies could still play a role in making China’s creaky financial system more competitive, improving the flow of lending to small businesses and encouraging greater competition from China’s stodgy state-run banks. “The goal is not to crack down on the sector, but to foster its healthy development,” said an official at the People’s Bank of China, China’s central bank.

Still, how tightly the government regulates tech firms’ financial offerings could indicate Beijing’s willingness to relax its decades-long hold in China’s banking system.

“If Internet finance products cause [financial] problems, no doubt the banking regulator and the PBOC will step in,” said He Fan, a senior economist at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. “If the products are successful, the banking regulator and the PBOC will step in in the name of fair play. They will be pushed by the commercial banks.”

The amounts are small compared with China’s massive 46 trillion yuan ($7.59 trillion) in bank deposits but growing rapidly. Yu’E Bao, or “leftover treasure,” a money market fund-like product offered by Alibaba online payment affiliate Alipay, was launched last summer but had more than 49 million customers with more than $40 billion in investments as of mid-January, according to the firm. According to investment research firm Morningstar Inc., the fund’s $30.6 billion as of the end of December made it the world’s fourth-largest money-market fund.

Currently Yu’E Bao offers rates of about 6%, compared with the current maximum of 3.3% banks can offer on deposits under Chinese regulations. Alipay says the money is invested in debt, currencies, deposits and other liquid assets. Tencent and Baidu now offer their own Yu’E Bao-like investments.

This week Alipay moved to offer online its first wealth-management product, a popular type of investment in China similar to bank deposits but with higher yields. On Friday it is set to roll a one-year, principal-guaranteed product with an advertised annualized return of 7%. Wealth-management products are typically a staple of banks, which compete with higher returns to win investor money. Alipay said the product would invest in bank deposits, the property sector, equities and other instruments.

Alipay processes payments for Alibaba’s Taobao and Tmall online shopping services, so it is already familiar to China’s legions of online shoppers.

The PBOC—working with China’s banking, securities and insurance regulators—is trying to put in place this year measures that would protect consumer information from being stolen or misused, ensure adequate risk disclosure over the Internet-based investment products, and prohibit illegal fundraising activities, said the people knowledgeable about the talks.

They also said Chinese officials are responding to the recent collapses among a separate group of small Internet-based lending firms. Those firms, known as peer-to-peer lenders, link individuals looking for better returns on their funds with borrowers starved for cash.

Big Chinese banks, including Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd. and Bank of China Ltd., are moving to counterattack by offering money-market funds or slightly raising rates on cash deposits. ICBC and Bank of China declined to comment. Deposit rates in China are set by the government, with limited competition allowed, and banks often pay interest rates near or below the rate of inflation—whetting the appetite of depositors for higher yields.

Fostering Internet finance could help change the politics on one of the central bank’s major priorities: liberalizing interest rates. For decades, China’s largest banks have opposed liberalizing deposit rates because that would increase their costs. But the pressure from Internet financing could turn the banks into proponents of liberalization, say advisers to China’s central bank, because that would give the banks a way to compete for funds.

The PBOC has been trying to move China to a system where interest rates are set more by the market, figuring that would force financial institutions to make lending decisions based on potential payoff. That could direct more lending to smaller, newer firms, rather than to the banks’ largest customers, namely big state-owned companies.

So far, the tech firms have been targeting a demographic underserved by those large state-run banks: small businesses and the average consumer. In the past two years, Alibaba has been extending loans to the hundreds of thousands of merchants on its e-commerce websites based on the company’s records of the performance of those merchants. The company said it had a loan book of about $2 billion as of the end of last year. Less than 2% of those loans were nonperforming as of July, it said.

“Creative disruptions to the traditional banking sector will gain, not fade, in the coming year,” predicted Steve Wang, head of China research at Reorient Financial Markets Ltd., a Hong Kong-based investment bank.

– WALLSTREET JOURNAL

Click to comment
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Banking

SERAP sues CBN over failure to ‘account for missing N3 trillion of public funds’

Published

on

By

Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) announced that it has filed a lawsuit against the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) “over the failure to account for and explain the whereabouts of the missing or diverted N3 trillion of public funds, including the over N629 billion paid to ‘unknown beneficiaries’ as part of the Anchor Borrowers’ Programme.”

The lawsuit followed the grave allegations contained in the latest annual report by the Auditor-General of the Federation, which was published on 9 September 2025.

In the suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/250/2026 filed last week at the Federal High Court in Abuja, SERAP stated that it is seeking “an order of mandamus to direct and compel the CBN to account for and explain the whereabouts of the missing or diverted N3 trillion of public funds, including detailed reports of how exactly the funds were spent.”

In the suit, SERAP is arguing that, “These grim allegations by the Auditor-General suggest grave violations of the public trust, the provisions of the Nigerian Constitution 1999 [as amended], the CBN Act, and anticorruption standards.”

SERAP is also arguing that, “These grave violations also reflect a failure of CBN accountability more generally and are directly linked to the institution’s persistent failure to comply with its Act and to uphold the principles of transparency and accountability.”

CBN Gov, Olayemi Cardoso

According to SERAP, “These violations have seriously undermined the ability of the CBN to effectively discharge its statutory functions and the public trust and confidence in the bank. The CBN ought to be committed to transparency and accountability in its operations.”

SERAP also stated in its suit that, “Nigerians have the right to know the whereabouts of the missing or diverted public funds. Granting the reliefs sought would advance the right of Nigerians to restitution, compensation and guarantee of non-repetition.”

SERAP said, “Section 15(5) of the Nigerian Constitution requires public institutions to abolish all corrupt practices and abuse of power. Section 13 of the Constitution imposes clear responsibility on the CBN to conform to, observe and apply the provisions of Chapter 2 of the constitution.”

The suit filed on behalf of SERAP by its lawyers Oluwakemi Agunbiade and Valentina Adegoke, read in part: “According to the Auditor-General, the CBN in 2022 failed to remit over N1 trillion [N1,445,593,400,000.00] of ‘the Federal Government’s portion of operating surplus’ into the Consolidated Revenue Fund (CRF) account.”

“The Auditor-General fears that the money may have been ‘diverted.’ He wants the money recovered and remitted to the treasury.”

“The CBN also failed to recover over N629 billion [N629,040,000,000.00] paid to ‘unknown beneficiaries’ as part of the Anchor Borrowers’ Programme, a programme ‘meant to support farmers to ensure sustainable food production in the country.’”

“But ‘the numbers of beneficiaries who collected the money are unknown.’ The CBN has also failed to ‘recover the money.’ The Auditor-General fears ‘the money may have been diverted’, which could have ‘contributed to the difficulty in sustaining food security in the Nation.’”

“He wants the money recovered and remitted to the treasury.”

“The CBN has also failed to recover over N784 billion [N784,410,108,864.47] ‘being 32 unpaid, overdue loans and interventions disbursed by the Bank between 2018 and May 2022.’”

“The Auditor-General said ‘there was no evidence that the Bank was doing enough to recover the loans/interventions, which ought to have been paid.’ He wants the money recovered and remitted to the treasury.”

“The CBN in 2022 also spent over N125 billion [N125,374,000,000.00] ‘on questionable intervention activities.’ The CBN claimed it spent the money ‘on intervention activities in connection with national security, the federal government, state securities, armed forces and to build the capacity of the financial sector’.”

“But the Auditor-General is concerned that the money may have been spent ‘without the approval of the National Assembly.’ There was also no document to ‘support the expenditure.’”

“The ‘expenditure also may not have been in the public interest and consistent with the objectives of the CBN in section 2 of the CBN Act.’ The Auditor-General fears the money may have been ‘diverted.’ He wants the money recovered and remitted to the treasury.”

“The CBN in 2022 also ‘unjustifiably’ spent over N1 billion [N1,792,769,160.00] to buy 43 operational vehicles for the Nigeria Immigration Service (NIS).”

“According to the Auditor-General, ‘the spending is unjustified because there is no connection with buying operational vehicles for the NIS and the objectives of the CBN as stated in section 2 of the CBN Act.’”

“The NIS also ‘failed to provide any evidence to show that the vehicles were actually supplied and delivered.’ There ‘were also no procurement and payment records or documents.’ The Auditor-General fears the money may have been ‘diverted’. He wants the money recovered and remitted to the treasury.”

“The CBN also awarded 43 contracts for over N189 billion [N189,50,066,756.73]. The Auditor-General said that ‘the contractors deliberately delayed completion of these contracts by seeking extension of the completion period.’”

“The contractors then ‘requested for variation of the contracts due to extension of completion period.’ Following the request, the CBN paid the contractors over N9 billion [N9,270,849,691.61] ‘irregular variation of contract price.’”

“There ‘were no relevant procurement documents such as contract files, procurement records, and payment vouchers’ for the payment. The Auditor-General fears ‘the money may have been diverted’ and the projects may have been abandoned.’ He wants the money recovered and remitted to the treasury.”

“The Katsina state branch of the CBN also failed to recover over N90 million [N90,163,610.00] being ‘outstanding loans and interventions disbursed to 33 small and medium enterprises during Covid 19 in 2020.’”

“The Auditor-General fears ‘the money may have been ‘diverted’ or ‘mismanaged’. He wants the money recovered and remitted to the treasury.”

“Paragraph 3112(ii) of the Financial Regulations 2009 provides: ‘Where a public officer fails to account for government revenue, such officer shall be surcharged for the full amount involved and such officer shall be handed over to either the EFCC or the ICPC.’”

“Section 51 of the Fiscal Responsibility Act provides that, ‘A person shall have legal capacity to enforce the provision of this Act by obtaining prerogative orders or other remedies at the Federal High Court, without having to show any special particular interest.’”

“The Nigerian Constitution, Freedom of Information Act, and the country’s anti-corruption and human rights obligations rest on the principle that citizens should have access to information regarding their public institutions’ activities.”

No date has been fixed for the hearing of the suit.

Continue Reading

Banking

Millions of customers still stranded worldwide 24 hours after GT Bank online operations suffered attacks

Published

on

By

GTCO Acquires Funds Management, Pension Firms

By Yemie ADEOYE

GT Bank, one of Nigeria’s leading banks, with operations across Africa and the United kingdom, and with an asset base of about US$3.11 trillion is under a cyber attack which has left millions of its customers across the world stranded in the last 24 hours.

The bank which was renowned for its seamless online operations at inception has suffered dwindling online efficiency in recent years and this current attack didn’t come as a surprise to many of its numerous customers. However, it is becoming worrisome that over 24 hours after its online operations went down, the bank has not been able to arrest the situation and restore its online services.

Stranded GT Bank customers outside the banks premises

Several customers of the bank took to their X (formerly known as twitter) handles to express their frustrations at the bank, as several of the customers in the diaspora are unable to access their accounts and carry on with their transactions.  A customer , Jeff55 who lamented on his X handle about the development, stated that it is a thing of shock that a bank of this size couldn’t afford to have the necessary tools and experts to ensure a full protection of its online operations in this age and time.

Another customer Dimma stated that while Cybersecurity training may seem tedious, the recent #GTBank hack is a stark reminder that everyone is just a click away from a devastating attack.

Several media organisations had reported that hackers have stolen GT Bank website, and intercepted customers Data in massive phishing operation.

At the time of filing this report, Biztellers.com.ng checks on the banks website shows that it is still down and unaccessible, and neither GT Bank media and communications unit nor any of its agencies or surrogates have commented officially on the development.

Continue Reading

Banking

Tinubu commends increased crude production to 1.61 mbpd

Published

on

By

Says output surge buoyed by reforms he announced in May 2024 to address gaps in PIA

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu on Sunday declared a resurgence in the oil & gas industry, commending the increased crude production to 1.6 million barrels per day.

The president, who said this in a national broadcast, maintained that the resurgence was buoyed by the reforms he announced in May 2024 to address the gaps in the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA).

Nigeria’s crude oil output got a boost to 1.61 million barrels per day in July 2024 through the president’s directive and the industry leadership provided by the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL).

Acknowledging what he called a resurgence of the once-declining oil and gas industry in his Sunday-morning broadcast to the nation, President Tinubu said that oil investors are coming back to Nigeria.

He said; “Our once-declining oil and gas industry is experiencing a resurgence on the back of the reforms I announced in May 2024 to address the gaps in the Petroleum Industry Act. Last month, we increased our oil production to 1.61 million barrels per day, and our gas assets are receiving the attention they deserve. Investors are coming back, and we have already seen two Foreign Direct Investments signed of over half a billion dollars since then.

Read Also : BREAKING: Sell Crude To Dangote Refinery In Naira – Tinubu To NNPC Ltd

“Fellow Nigerians, we are a country blessed with both oil and gas resources, but we met a country that had been dependent solely on oil-based petrol, neglecting its gas resources to power the economy.

We were also using our hard-earned foreign exchange to pay for and subsidise its use. To address this, we immediately launched our Compressed Natural Gas Initiative (CNG) to power our transportation economy and bring costs down.

This will save over two trillion Naira a month, being used to import PMS and AGO and free up our resources for more investment in healthcare and education.

“To this end, we will be distributing a million kits of extremely low or no cost to commercial vehicles that transport people and goods and who currently consume 80% of the imported PMS and AGO.

“We have started the distribution of conversion kits and the setting up of conversion centres across the country in conjunction with the private sector. We believe that this CNG initiative will reduce transportation costs by approximately 60 per cent and help to curb inflation.”

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2022. Biztellers, powered by Alphaxristi.

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x