Connect with us

NEWS

Data Protection Act Amendments: SERAP Threatens Legal Action Against National Assembly Leadership

Published

on

 

The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has urged the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Tajudeen Abbas “to immediately withdraw the repressive bill for an act to amend the Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023, which seeks to regulate the activities of bloggers operating within the ‘territorial boundaries of Nigeria.’”

Details of SERAP’s position was contained in a statement on Sunday night in Abuja by its Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare.

Olwadare posited that the SERAP urged Akpabio and Abbas “to ensure that any amendment to the Nigeria Data Protection Act promotes and protects the rights of bloggers and other journalists and does not undermine the fundamental human rights of Nigerians.”

The SERAP also urged Akpabio and Abbas “to end the imposition of unnecessary restrictions on the rights of Nigerians online and Internet-based content.”

ALSO READ: 2027: Okpebholo Banks On Edo, Delta States To Swing Tinubu’s Reelection

There is currently a bill titled “A Bill for an Act to Amend the Nigeria Data Protection Act, 2023, to Mandate the Establishment of Physical Offices within the Territorial Boundaries of the Federal Republic of Nigeria by Social Media Platforms and for Related Matters” (the “bill”).

The bill among others seeks to regulate bloggers including by requiring all bloggers to register local offices and join recognised national association for bloggers. The bill has passed its first and second reading in the Senate.

In the letter dated 12 April 2025 and signed by Oluwadare, the organisation stated thus, “This bill is a blatant attempt to bring back and fast-track the obnoxious and widely rejected social media bill by the back-door.”

The SERAP said, “If passed, the bill would also be used to ban major social media platforms—including Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, WhatsApp, YouTube, TikTok, and independent bloggers if they ‘continuously fail to establish/register and maintain physical offices in Nigeria for a period of 30 days.’”

The letter, read in part: “Lawmakers should not become arbiters of truth in the public and political domain. Regulating the activities of bloggers and forcing them to associate would have a significant chilling effect on freedom of expression and lead to censorship or restraint.”

“The bill may also be used to block access of Nigerians to social media platforms. Blocking access to social media platforms is a flagrant violation of fundamental rights.”

“In addition to infringing on Nigerians’ right to access to information and digital technology, the proposed bill would also severely hamper business operations in the country, as many are reliant on foreign tools, services and technologies for their operations, as well as other sectors that rely on online information.”

“The bill would force international tech companies out of the Nigerian information landscape by requiring them to establish/register and maintain physical offices in the country. It would violate the requirement that the right to freedom of expression applies ‘regardless of frontiers.’”

“Should the National Assembly and its leadership fail to withdraw the bill to regulate the activities of bloggers, and should any such bill be assented to by President Bola Tinubu, SERAP would consider appropriate legal action to challenge the legality of any such law and ensure it is never implemented in the public interest.”

“The regulation of bloggers may be used to muzzle any dissenting voice and to silence any form of criticism or negative opinion on the policies and practices of the ruling party or the Government.”

“Authorities may also use the proposed regulation as a pretext to punish bloggers solely for the peaceful exercise of their human rights.”

“The bill seems to be directed at bloggers living in Nigeria and elsewhere, with severe adverse effects on the freedom of expression of a very wide range of individuals.”

“The proposed amendment to the Nigeria Data Protection Act, 2023 fails to meet the requirements of the Nigerian Constitution 1999 [as amended] and international human rights treaties to which the country is a state party.”

“The amendment, if passed would adversely affect unregistered bloggers operating ‘within the territorial boundaries of Nigeria.’”

“The proposed amendment may also be used to violate the rights to privacy, freedom of peaceful assembly and of association as protected by the Nigerian Constitution 1999 [as amended] and international human rights standards.”

“The proposed amendment is entirely inconsistent and incompatible with Nigeria’s obligations to respect and ensure the effective realisation of the right to freedom of opinion and expression. The amendment would disproportionality suppress a wide range of expressive conduct essential to a democratic society.”

“The bill would pose major barriers and threats to any individuals, especially journalists, human rights defenders and civil society organisations who may be critical of the government, as well as stifle democracy and media freedom.”

“Mandatory regulation of journalism is incompatible with the right to freedom of expression. There is no legitimate reason why bloggers – or in fact members of the general public – should be subject to mandatory regulation or licensing to express themselves.”

“Blogging plays an invaluable role in the free flow of information. Bloggers should never be required to register with the government or other official agencies to blog.”

“The bill may also be used as a pretext to force bloggers to disclose their sources. The right to protect sources is a cornerstone of freedom of the press, without which sources may be deterred from assisting the press in informing the public on matters of public interest.”

“The Nigerian Constitution and human rights treaties which the country has ratified protect everyone’s right [including bloggers] to maintain an opinion without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers and through any media.”

“Nigerian authorities including the National Assembly have legal obligations to ensure an environment in which a diverse range of opinions and ideas can be freely and openly expressed and debated.”

“The requirement of necessity implies an assessment of the proportionality of restrictions, with the aim of ensuring that restrictions target a specific objective and do not unduly intrude upon the rights of targeted persons.”

“As noted in the 2005 Joint Declaration of the special rapporteurs on freedom of expression, ‘[n]o one should be required to register with or obtain permission from any public body to operate an Internet service provider, website, blog or other online information dissemination system, including Internet broadcasting.’”

“In their 2011 Joint Declaration on Freedom of Expression and the Internet, the four special mandates for the protection of freedom of expression highlighted that regulatory approaches in the telecommunications and broadcasting sectors cannot simply be transferred to the Internet.”

NEWS

2027: ‘Even If Insecurity Worsens, Power Will Not Change Hands’ – Okpebholo Declares

Published

on

Governor Monday Okpebholo of Edo State has insisted that political power in Nigeria will remain unchanged even if insecurity in the country worsens, declaring that the ruling party remains firmly in control ahead of future elections.

Okpebholo made the statement on Tuesday during the flag-off of the All Progressives Congress (APC) campaign for the upcoming local government council elections in Edo South Senatorial District.

The governor said the recent rise in insecurity across parts of the country is being politicised, alleging that some actors are deliberately worsening the situation to discredit President Bola Tinubu’s administration.

SEE ALSO: Army Releases Six Kwara Vigilantes Arrested Along Edo Highway

He maintained that such efforts would not succeed in altering the political direction of the country.

“Even if insecurity worsens, power will not change hands. They can even kidnap all of us—there is no vacancy in Aso Rock,” Okpebholo declared.

He further argued that those behind the alleged political manipulation of insecurity have no viable alternative agenda, stressing that violence would only harm ordinary citizens rather than achieve political gain.

The governor also defended the performance of the federal government, noting that key policy decisions, including the removal of fuel subsidy, were beginning to translate into visible development projects across states.

He commended candidates of the All Progressives Congress who emerged from the party primaries for the forthcoming council polls, urging them to take the party’s message of development to grassroots communities.

Okpebholo expressed confidence that the party’s performance at the local government elections would strengthen its position ahead of the 2027 general elections.

The event also featured the official unveiling of APC candidates for various positions in Edo South Senatorial District.

Continue Reading

NEWS

Senate Queries SEDC Over N153m Abuja Office Rent, Demands Full Spending Breakdown

Published

on

Why Orji Kalu should return to Senate — Abia North constituent

The Senate has raised concerns over the financial operations of the South East Development Commission (SEDC), questioning alleged expenditures including N153 million reportedly spent on renting a single-room liaison office in Abuja.

The matter was raised during an investigative hearing of the Senate Committee on the South East Development Commission, chaired by Senator Orji Uzor Kalu, as lawmakers examined the commission’s 2025 budget implementation and spending records.

The committee disclosed that the SEDC received N16.6 billion in December 2025, with about N13 billion reportedly remaining in its account, suggesting that roughly N3.6 billion had already been expended.

ALSO READ: Kalu Dubs SEDC As Historic Milestone

Lawmakers expressed dissatisfaction with the financial report submitted by the commission, insisting that several figures were unclear and required detailed justification.

A key concern was the alleged N153 million spent on office rent in Abuja, despite the commission’s headquarters being located in Enugu.

Senator Orji Uzor Kalu described the financial submission as unacceptable and demanded proper accountability.

“This committee is disappointed with the financial report presented. It is completely unacceptable,” Kalu said.

Other members of the committee also questioned additional expenditures reflected in the report, including about N2.5 billion described as unclear or insufficiently explained.

Responding to the concerns, the Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of the SEDC, Mark Okoye, defended the commission’s spending, insisting that all expenditures were carried out prudently and within available resources.

Okoye explained that the commission operates based on actual cash releases rather than full budgeted allocations, noting that this approach helps prevent financial mismanagement.

“For example, having a budget of N140 billion does not automatically mean that N140 billion in cash is available. It would be irresponsible to award contracts worth the entire budget if only N10 billion or N20 billion has actually been released,” he said.

However, the committee was not satisfied with the explanations and directed the commission to submit full documentation of all expenditures, including contract details, payment records, and supporting documents, on or before June 23.

Senator Kalu added that the committee would review the documents before fixing another date for further appearance.

“By the 23rd, we want to have the complete documentation. Once we receive and review the documents, we will determine the date for your next appearance before the committee,” he stated.

The hearing was thereafter adjourned, with lawmakers insisting on full transparency and accountability in the management of public funds allocated to the commission.

Continue Reading

NEWS

‘Enough of the Speeches’ – Sharia Council Demands Immediate Action on Insecurity

Published

on

The Supreme Council for Shariah in Nigeria has called on the Federal Government to move beyond promises and take urgent, decisive action to address the worsening security crisis across the country.

The Council, in a statement issued by its Secretary-General, Nafiu Baba Ahmad, expressed concern over the persistent wave of killings, kidnappings, banditry and terrorism, saying Nigerians continue to live in fear despite repeated assurances from authorities that security challenges are being tackled.

According to the Council, the security situation has reached an alarming stage, with recent incidents in Borno, Oyo, Niger and Zamfara states underscoring the vulnerability of communities already struggling with years of violence and criminal activities.

SEE ALSO: ‘Enough Is Enough!’ — NLC, TUC Threaten Nationwide Strike Over Insecurity

The Council also cited the recent abduction of a retired Army General and his wife in Katsina State, describing it as further evidence of the growing reach of kidnappers and armed gangs across the country.

It noted that many attacks occurring in rural and underserved areas often go unreported, suggesting that the true extent of the crisis may be far greater than official figures indicate.

Citing reports from security monitoring and human rights organisations, the Council said thousands of Nigerians have been killed, displaced or abducted in recent months.

It added that reports indicate more than 1,000 people were kidnapped across northern Nigeria during the first quarter of the year.

Expressing frustration over what it described as a lack of meaningful progress, the Council said repeated appeals by traditional rulers, religious leaders, civil society organisations and concerned citizens for stronger security measures have yet to produce significant results.

“Nigerians are tired of speeches, promises, condolences, committees and official rhetoric that are not matched by concrete action and measurable outcomes. What the nation requires now is decisive intervention and visible results,” the statement read.

The Council reminded the Federal Government that the protection of lives and property remains one of its core constitutional responsibilities, stressing that no administration can be considered successful while citizens continue to face threats from criminal elements.

While acknowledging the sacrifices and commitment of military personnel and other security operatives, the Council said its criticism was directed at broader leadership and strategic shortcomings in the fight against insecurity.

It also called for greater transparency and accountability in the management of public funds allocated to the security sector, insisting that citizens deserve to know how resources earmarked for defence and intelligence operations are being utilised.

The Council further urged the government to embrace innovative and proactive measures, including improved intelligence gathering, deployment of modern technology, stronger collaboration among security agencies, enhanced community participation and tighter border security.

Warning against complacency, the Council said Nigerians are expecting competent leadership, concrete action and measurable progress in restoring peace and security across the country.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2022. Biztellers, powered by Alphaxristi.

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x