NEWS
Delta: Elumelu, Nwaobi Locked In Bitter Feud Over Road Project Credit
A political confrontation has erupted between two lawmakers in Delta State over who should be credited for attracting a key road project.
The feud involves Hon. Ndudi Elumelu, the immediate past Minority Leader of the House of Representatives, and Hon. Emeka Nwaobi, Majority Leader of the Delta State House of Assembly.
Read Also: BREAKING: VP Shettima Embarks On A 2-day Visit To Sweden
The dispute centers on the Issele-Asagba/Otulu road project, a vital infrastructure initiative in the Aniocha/Oshimili federal constituency.
Nwaobi’s Media Support Group, led by Patrick Ochei, sparked the controversy by claiming in a recent publication that Nwaobi was responsible for securing the project.
They further alleged that the construction contract was awarded to Elumelu.
Elumelu’s team swiftly dismissed these claims, issuing a strongly worded statement denouncing the report as false and accusing Nwaobi’s camp of distorting the facts for political gain.
According to Elumelu’s Media Office, the project was attracted by Elumelu himself, and this is clearly stated on the project’s signpost.
The contractor for the project, they added, is Diamond Leeds Limited—not Elumelu, as Nwaobi’s group implied.
“It is deeply troubling that the Nwaobi Media Support Group would resort to such blatant falsehoods,” the statement from Elumelu’s Media Office read.
“The project signboard clearly credits Hon. Ndudi Elumelu for attracting the project, and it is disappointing to see such deliberate misinformation.”
Elumelu’s office provided further context, stating that the project was initially included in the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) 2019/2020 budget but was delayed.
Elumelu reportedly pushed for the road’s construction in meetings with the current governor of Delta State, who ultimately approved the contract after it was included in the state’s budget.
Elumelu’s team accused Nwaobi’s camp of trying to claim credit for their principal’s efforts and urged them to stop spreading “falsehoods” in an attempt to score political points.
They also demanded an immediate retraction of the article and an apology within seven days, warning that the false claims were “embarrassing” and could lead to legal action.
The road project, which links Aniocha North and Aniocha South, is crucial for development in the area, making the stakes in this political battle particularly high.
As of now, Nwaobi’s camp has not responded to the demand for an apology, leaving tensions simmering between the two lawmakers.
NEWS
Again, Dangote Reduces PMS Gantry Price to N1,125/Litre
The Dangote Petroleum Refinery and Petrochemicals (DPRP) has announced a further reduction in the gantry price of Premium Motor Spirit (PMS), commonly known as petrol, from N1,175 to N1,125 per litre.
A statement from the company on Thursday has it that this latest adjustment reflects the refinery’s ongoing commitment to ensuring price stability, improving affordability, and supporting Nigeria’s energy security objectives.
ALSO READ: NBS: Kerosene Price Dips as Diesel, Petrol Costs Rise
The price review underscores Dangote Refinery’s responsiveness to prevailing market conditions and its efforts to pass on cost efficiencies to downstream partners and consumers.
“Dangote Refinery remains focused on its broader mission of contributing to economic growth, enhancing fuel availability, and fostering a more competitive and sustainable petroleum sector in Nigeria,” the statement added.
NEWS
Why SEC Ordered Immediate Refunds Over Dangote Refinery IPO Promotions
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has explained why it directed capital market operators to immediately refund funds collected from investors in connection with a purported Initial Public Offering (IPO) by Dangote Petroleum Refinery & Petrochemicals FZE.
In a public notice issued on Tuesday, the Commission revealed that it had observed the circulation of advertisements, flyers, digital banners, and electronic messages across social media and investment platforms inviting members of the public to invest in the refinery through an alleged IPO.
ALSO READ: ‘Nigerian Marketers Import Dangote Fuel Via Lome Hub’
According to the SEC, the purported offer has not received regulatory approval, as the Commission has neither received nor approved any application from Dangote Petroleum Refinery & Petrochemicals FZE for a public offering.
The regulator expressed concern that some registered capital market operators were actively promoting the unapproved offer and soliciting subscriptions from prospective investors.
Explaining the reason for its directive, the SEC stated that the campaign was misleading and amounted to market manipulation capable of creating false expectations among investors and undermining confidence in Nigeria’s capital market.
The Commission noted that invitations encouraging members of the public to open accounts, pre-fund investments, or reserve guaranteed share allocations for the alleged IPO violate provisions of the Investments and Securities Act as well as existing market regulations.
As a result, the SEC ordered all registered operators, including stockbrokers and promoters of digital investment platforms, to immediately cease all advertising and promotional activities relating to the purported offer.
The Commission further directed operators to remove all related promotional materials from their websites, social media pages, and other communication channels within 24 hours.
In addition, firms were instructed to stop accepting deposits, investment commitments, account registrations, or expressions of interest linked to the alleged public offering.
To protect investors from potential losses, the SEC ordered any operator that had already collected funds in connection with the purported IPO to refund such monies within 24 hours.
The regulator warned that any operator that fails to comply with the directive risks facing sanctions under the Investments and Securities Act 2025 and the SEC Rules and Regulations.
The Commission also advised Nigerians to rely only on information released through approved regulatory channels and to ignore unofficial promotional campaigns or investment solicitations concerning the refinery.
SEC added that if Dangote Petroleum Refinery & Petrochemicals FZE eventually decides to proceed with a public offering and secures regulatory approval, an authorised prospectus will be published in line with the law.
The directive comes amid reports that the Dangote Group is considering listing a 10 per cent stake in its $20 billion refinery through a Pan-African IPO expected in 2026.
NEWS
‘Tissue of Lies’ — Dangote Refinery Explodes Over Claims of Fuel Re-Importation Through Togo
Dangote Petroleum Refinery has strongly dismissed allegations that its petroleum products are exported to Lomé, Togo, and later re-imported into Nigeria, describing the claims as a “tissue of lies” and lacking both factual and commercial basis.
In a statement released by its management on June 23, 2026, the refinery said the allegations were not supported by available trade flows or commercial logic, insisting that reports suggesting its products are routed through Togo before returning to Nigeria are false.
SEE ALSO: Crude Supply Crisis Hits Dangote
The company stated that although it typically avoids responding to what it described as baseless and unsubstantiated claims, it was compelled to address the issue to set the record straight and preserve the facts for posterity.
“As a matter of policy, we do not respond to baseless and unsubstantiated claims, given our current determination and focus in ensuring energy security in Nigeria and Africa as a whole. However, we have decided to clear the air on these ill-motivated web of falsehoods for posterity,” the statement read.
Dangote Refinery said one of its primary objectives is to maintain and strengthen its position as a leading supplier of refined petroleum products in Nigeria, noting that facilitating imports that directly compete with its own products would contradict its business goals.
According to the company, its sales contracts and tender agreements expressly prohibit buyers from reselling or re-importing products into Nigeria.
The refinery further argued that the economics of such a trade arrangement make no sense.
It explained that transporting petroleum products from the refinery to Lomé and subsequently back into Nigeria would cost between $82 and $90 per metric tonne, significantly reducing profitability and making such transactions commercially unattractive.
It added that it does not provide export discounts large enough to offset those logistics costs or create any viable arbitrage opportunity between export and domestic markets.
“Simply put, there is no evident commercial incentive for a producer to incur additional shipping, storage, financing and handling costs only for the product to return and compete in its largest and closest market,” the company said.
Dangote Refinery also highlighted its strict product traceability and compliance measures, revealing that it maintains detailed records of all product sales, including lifting locations, nominated vessels, counterparties and destination declarations where applicable.
The company maintained that any suggestion it knowingly facilitates the re-importation of its products is inconsistent with its contractual restrictions and established compliance procedures.
Reaffirming its commitment to Nigeria’s energy independence, the refinery said it has consistently advocated for reducing the country’s dependence on imported petroleum products, warning that increased imports undermine local refining efforts, place pressure on foreign exchange reserves and weaken domestic industrial development.
“It would therefore be inconsistent with both the refinery’s commercial interests and its publicly stated position to support or encourage practices that increase imports into Nigeria,” the statement added.
The refinery concluded that there is neither a strategic rationale nor a commercial incentive for it to export products to neighbouring countries for subsequent re-importation into Nigeria, stressing that the allegations are not supported by the economics of the trade, contractual arrangements, product traceability records or its long-standing commitment to strengthening domestic refining capacity.





