NEWS
Intrigues Of Crime, Politics At Osun’s Temple Of Justice
The Osun State Chapter of the Judiciary Staff Union (JSU) has thrown its hat into the ring in the ongoing theatricals involving the state’s judiciary, the legislature and the executive.
The world woke up to the JSU demonstrating in support of embattled Chief Justice (CJ) of Osun State, Hon Justice Adepele Ojo, allegedly suspended, sacked or replaced by an acting CJ in the person of Justice Olayinka David Afolabi.
The theatre of justice in Osun State has been experiencing a movie series, melodramatic, some might say, involving the three arms of government, which by the assertions of a group going by the name “Concerned Osun Citizens” could be said to be fueled by the blood of a certain Timothy Adegoke.
Recall that the public was jolted with news of Adegoke, then a post-graduate student of the Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU) being murdered in November 2021, while lodging at Hilton Honours Hotel, Ile-Ife.
Following successful prosecution, Justice Ojo sentenced the owner of Hilton Honours Hotel, Chief Ramon Adedoyin to death by handing on Tuesday May 30, 2023.
It would now appear that Chief Adedoyin had counted on his strong social, business and political ties to evade justice in the matter.
Adegoke’s Blood Crying For Justice
It would seem that the more the high and the mighty teamed up to silence the blood of Adegoke, the more it cried for justice.
Or how would it be better to describe the ‘confusion’ that has characterised the ongoing intrigues of crime, politics and justice at the hallowed temple of justice in Osun State?
The state dominated the headlines across the Nigerian news-space for the better part of the last seven days, with negative vibes.
Watchers of public events consider the unfolding melodrama the crying of innocent blood from the grave and the desperation of ‘soiled hands’ to compromise justice.
This allegedly surmised what led to the travails of Justice Ayodele, suspended and replaced, albeit, “unlawfully”.
Concerned voices from the judicial segment of the society felt intrigued at the speed of ‘removal’, ‘suspension’, ‘appointment of acting CJ by the governor’, ‘denial of appointing acting CJ’, ‘willingness to cooperate with civil society’, and ‘apprising the Chief Justice of the Nigeria (CJN) and the National Judiciary Council (NJC)’, and ‘claim of being blackmailed’.
Justice Ojo had asked for a judicial intervention or interpretation of her removal from office, but the camp of the Osun State Governor, Ademola Adeleke postured that their principal was not party to the litigation and couldn’t be bound by the outcomes.
This has seen the executive and legislative arms of the Osun State Government oscillating.
In a move, generally perceived as part of desperate efforts to shield Gov Adeleke, the Osun State Government (OSG) has issued media statements almost on daily basis, starting from November 16, when it claimed that the governor approved the Osun State House of Assembly’s (OSHA) resolution for the CJ, Justice Ojo to ‘step aside’.
According to the statement, the OSHA alleged that “the State Assembly on the premise that an official cannot be on the seat whilst investigation is ongoing, asked the Chief Judge to step aside.”
Signed by the Hon Commissioner for Information and Public Enlightenment, Osun State, Hon Kolapo Alimi, the statement added that “The Governor only acted on the Resolution of the House.”
Could the governor acting on, have meant giving effect to or executive backing to legislative resolution?
In the same resolution, the OSHA recommended to the governor, not the NJC or the CJN, that the person next in rank to the CJ be sworn-in to replace her, albeit on acting basis.
In the bid to clarify the actions taken by his principal, Hon Alimi stated, “To ensure there is no vacuum, the Governor appointed an Acting Chief Judge, as prescribed by the Constitution in a situation like this.”
This was how Justice Olayinka David Afolabi found himself as the acting CJ of Osun State.
Appointment Of Acting CJ, NBA’s Ire
In another statement, from the executive, this time signed by Spokesperson to the State Governor, Olawale Rasheed, Justice Afolabi was announced as Justice Ojo’s replacement.
It was issued under the subject, “Governor Adeleke Appoints Justice Olayinka David Afolabi as Acting CJ,” on November 16, 2023.
It read, “Governor Ademola Adeleke has appointed Justice Olayinka David Afolabi as the acting Chief Judge of Osun state with immediate effect following the approval of the resolution of the House of Assembly.”
This development drew the ire of the and reaction of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA).
Probably this saw the statement denied by the OSG via another statement by Hon Alimi.
The NBA, through its National Publicity Secretary, Akorede Lawal, declared last Saturday that it would not accept the appointment of Justice Afolabi as the acting chief judge.
Lawal made it clear that the NBA’s stance is rooted in the constitutional principle of the separation of powers and the crucial independence of the judiciary.
He said, “The tenure of a judicial officer cannot and should not be subject to the mood of politicians.”
The perception minders of Gov Adeleke wants the world to believe that their principal is a law abiding leader, which had seen them apprise the CJN and the NJC.
In another statement issued by Hon Alimi on Sunday November 19, 2023, he averred that it was the OSHA and not the governor who was taking actions on the matter.
According to Hon Alimi, the OSG vehemently denied allegations that “Governor Ademola Adeleke has removed the Chief Judge and appointed an acting Chief Judge.”
What they want the world to believe is that “Governor Adeleke has only duly notified the Chief Justice as the Chairman of the National Judicial Council (NJC) in writing about the resolutions of the House of Assembly following a series of petitions made against the sitting Chief Judge of Osun State.
“In the communication, Mr Governor intimated the CJN of the recommendation of the House that the Chief Judge should step aside and included his own submission for an acting appointment to fill the vacuum while the NJC reviews and decides on the petition.
“To that end, the Governor in the same letter recommended to the CJN, the appointment of the most senior judicial officer, Hon. Justice Olayinka David Afolabi for thorough consideration and further processing by the same NJC through the CJN.”
. . . And Concerned Citizens Become Dramatis Personae
However, a group that goes by the name, Concerned Osun Citizens (COC) has risen up against the moves to remove Justice Ojo.
The group had gone public that the allegations of fraud and other things against Justice Ojo were merely made-up to smear her and find a reason to shunt a patriotic law officer out of the way to make way for crime and injustice.
The group alleged in a flyer making the rounds online that personal and family interests were being enthroned over public and national interests in propelling Gov Adeleke to move the hand of the OSHA on the matter.
The COC in the flyer, under the subject, “When Patriots Are Persecuted”, averred that, “The Chief Judge of Osun State, Honourable Justice Ojo, from Ede, has been removed by the state government, because she chose to be patriotic when they asked her to set criminals free. Who are the criminals in question?
“One is Dr Ramon Adedoyin, owner of the Ile-Ife hotel, where OAU student, Timothy Adegoke was killed last year.
“The CJ sentenced Adedoyin to death, for being responsible for Adegoke’s murder, even though the CJ was asked to set Adedoyin free. She insisted, no sinner should go unpunished.
“Governor Adeleke, his sister, Dupe Adeleke-Sanni and Commissioner for Justice, Wole Bada are family friends of killer, Adedoyin. And they are the powerful forces persecuting the innocent CJ.
“Another CJ from Ile-Ife, who is a relative of Adedoyin, has been sworn-in, as the acting CJ to give freedom to Ramon Adedoyin.
“Why should a patriot suffer for doing the right thing?”
The OSG denies all the allegations, insisting that Gov Adeleke was being blackmailed.
Rasheed, alleged that the image of his principal was being tarnished with blatant falsehood by political opponents.
The statement read, “Our attention has been drawn to a defamatory fake news alleging that Governor Ademola Adeleke and his family are after the State’s Chief Judge because of the sentencing of Chief Raheem Adedoyin.
“The truth, which the public must be aware of, is that Mr Governor is being blackmailed with the Adedoyin case for refusing to shield and protect the Chief Judge, his town woman, from corruption probe.
“The blackmail is a falsehood without any foundation in truth. Chief Adedoyin is not and has never, in whatever form, been a friend of the Adelekes.
“Secondly, neither the Governor nor his family had any contact or interference in the Adedoyin case while it lasted. From the beginning to the end, no member of the Adeleke family was involved in any way in the legal process.
“Thirdly, Adedoyin was never in any way involved with the PDP, the party of the Governor. If anything, Adedoyin was a strong APC loyalist and an ally of the former Governor of Osun state.
“What is more, throughout the trial, Adedoyin’s legal team was manned by prominent APC lawyers from the beginning to the end. No single PDP lawyer was involved with the Adedoyin team.
“We affirm that the crisis rocking the state judiciary has to do with a series of petitions from judicial officers on alleged misconduct of the Chief Judge. On each occasion, those petitions always ended up unprocessed over deliberate blackmail with the Adedoyin matter until recent action by the State Assembly.
“The Governor’s sin is his consistent refusal to accept overtures to protect his kinswoman, the Chief Judge, from probe on alleged corruption. Mr Governor has always maintained his ground that if as a Governor he is not immune from accountability questions, why should he use his office to protect another official because of blood or town kinship?
“With all sense of responsibility, we declare that neither Governor Adeleke nor any member of his family has anything to do with the travails of the Chief Judge.
“The Governor’s refusal to shield his town people from corruption probe including the Chief Judge is largely responsible for the failed attempt to blackmail the Governor with the Adeoyin case. We reject the shameful linkage on alleged corruption within the judiciary and the Adedoyin matter. Public officials are not immune from accountability issues.
“We assert strongly that the Governor is not in any way linked with either the petition against the Chief Judge or the infamous Adedoyin case. The Number One Citizen will not use his office to shield anybody from accountability questions even if that person is from his family.
“The Governor has subsequently directed the state law officers to prosecute anybody peddling such defamatory and libelous publications as such fake news has no foundation in truth or reality.”
President of Dangote Industries Limited, Aliko Dangote, has revealed that the much-awaited initial public offering of the Dangote Refinery will open within the next 10 to 12 days.
Dangote disclosed this on Friday while speaking with investors and analysts in Botswana, according to Reuters.
The $20bn Lagos-based refinery is expected to raise about $5bn through the IPO, which could become the largest public offering on the African continent.
ALSO READ: Dangote Investments are Catalysts for Africa’s Economic Growth – AFC
Dangote said the planned listing would support the group’s ambition to further expand the refinery’s capacity.
He said, “Our dream is that we want to make sure we double the capacity of the refinery… which will take us to 1.4 million barrels per day. The IPO will open in the next 10 to 12 days.”
The refinery, currently Africa’s largest, reached its full designed capacity of 650,000 barrels per day in February. It has since pushed production beyond that level, reaching 700,000 barrels per day during testing.
The IPO is part of a broader expansion strategy by the Dangote Group.
Dangote also disclosed that Dangote Cement is expected to secure a secondary listing on the London Stock Exchange, potentially in October, in a move aimed at giving the company access to a wider pool of international investors.
The businessman further confirmed plans to establish a new refinery on Kenya’s coast in partnership with East African governments.
The proposed refinery is expected to supply refined petroleum products to Kenya and neighbouring countries while helping reduce the region’s dependence on fuel imports.
Construction of the Kenyan facility is expected to take up to three years and would represent the Dangote Group’s biggest refining investment outside Nigeria.
The planned refinery IPO and expansion projects underline Dangote Industries’ growing ambitions to strengthen its position in Africa’s energy and industrial sectors.
Former Vice President and African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar, has raised the alarm over reports that some young Nigerians are resorting to selling their kidneys for as little as ₦1.7 million to cope with the country’s worsening cost-of-living crisis.
Atiku made the remarks in a statement on Friday, expressing concern that economic hardship was pushing young Nigerians towards increasingly desperate measures simply to survive.
SEE MORE: 2027: ‘Do I Look 80’ — Atiku Fires Back at Critics Over His Age
He described the reported development as “frightening,” stressing that young Nigerians should be using their talents, ideas and creativity to build better lives rather than being forced to consider selling their body organs.
“Young people should be selling dreams, ideas and innovation, not their body organs,” Atiku said.
According to him, the rising cost of essential goods and services, including food, transportation, rent, school fees, medicine and electricity, has placed enormous pressure on Nigerians.
He blamed the economic direction of the administration of President Bola Tinubu for what he described as the worsening hardship confronting citizens.
“In Tinubu’s Nigeria, almost everything required to live with dignity is becoming more expensive by the day: food, transport, rent, school fees, medicine and electricity,” he said.
Atiku said the reported sale of kidneys for as little as ₦1.7 million was evidence that the crisis had moved beyond ordinary economic hardship.
“When young Nigerians begin to see their kidneys as emergency savings, we are no longer talking about ordinary economic hardship. We are talking about desperation at its most frightening,” he added.
The former vice president noted that Nigeria already has laws prohibiting commercial organ sales and organ trafficking.
However, he argued that enforcement alone would not solve the underlying poverty and desperation exposing vulnerable Nigerians to exploitation.
“Laws alone cannot cure the poverty and desperation that make vulnerable young people easy prey for criminal networks,” Atiku said.
He called for economic reforms that would have a direct impact on the living conditions of ordinary Nigerians, including measures to make food and transportation more affordable, improve access to healthcare and create decent employment opportunities.
Atiku further urged the government to pursue policies capable of restoring hope among young Nigerians.
“Our young people should be selling their ideas, talents and innovation to the world and not their kidneys for ₦1.7 million just to survive at home,” he said.
His comments come amid reports of alleged organ sales and a police investigation into an alleged organ-harvesting and human-trafficking operation involving four suspects, including two nephrologists.
Atiku described the situation as a disturbing reflection of what he called the “human cost” of Nigeria’s cost-of-living crisis.
The Presidency has clarified that President Bola Tinubu is not on trial in the United States, describing the ongoing legal proceedings involving records linked to him as a civil dispute over access to government documents.
The clarification was made by the Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, amid renewed attention to the case before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.
According to the Presidency, the matter arose from requests submitted under the US Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) for records relating to Tinubu.
SEE MORE: No Gov’t Reprisal for Criticism — Tinubu Assures Journalists
“For clarity, the matter is a civil records-disclosure dispute under the United States Freedom of Information Act. It is not a criminal case against President Tinubu, nor has the court found him guilty of any criminal wrongdoing,” the Presidency stated.
The government explained that Aaron Greenspan submitted FOIA requests to several US government agencies in 2022, seeking records relating to the President.
After some agencies withheld certain records or declined to confirm or deny their existence, Greenspan commenced Civil Action No. 23-1816 before the US District Court for the District of Columbia in 2023.
The court subsequently permitted President Tinubu to participate in the proceedings as an intervenor.
The Presidency said some of the agencies invoked the “Glomar defence”, a legal position that allows US government agencies, under certain circumstances, to neither confirm nor deny the existence of particular investigative records.
It added that the court subsequently granted summary judgment in favour of the CIA, Executive Office for United States Attorneys, Department of State, Department of the Treasury and Internal Revenue Service, effectively removing them from the proceedings.
However, aspects of the case involving the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Drug Enforcement Administration remained subject to further consideration.
The Presidency further disclosed that the FBI and DEA had produced 399 pages of records in compliance with court orders, although portions of the documents were redacted under exemptions provided by US law.
According to the government, the plaintiff challenged the agencies’ decision to redact parts of the documents and sought their release without the redactions.
The FBI and DEA, through the US Department of Justice, opposed the request, citing legal protections covering certain categories of information.
The Presidency said some of the records relate to grand jury proceedings, which are protected from public disclosure under US law.
It also cited protections covering information connected to certain court orders authorising pen registers or trap-and-trace devices, as well as documents protected by attorney-client and attorney-work-product privileges.
The Presidency’s clarification comes amid heightened political debate ahead of Nigeria’s 2027 general elections, with opposition figures continuing to scrutinise the President’s past and administration.
The government, however, maintained that the US proceedings should not be misrepresented as a criminal trial against Tinubu, stressing that the case concerns the disclosure and withholding of government records.
Dangote Reveals Date for Much-Awaited Refinery IPO
‘Young Nigerians Now Selling Their Kidneys to Survive’ — Atiku Raises Alarm
NGX N-Zero Begins Corporate Climate Baseline Assessments
2027: Obi Has No Chance Against Tinubu Without Opposition Alliance — Okonkwo
Unlocking Africa’s Upstream Lies in Stronger Partnerships – Oando
Presidency Clears Air on Tinubu’s US Court Case
Trump’s Family Unveils New Cryptocurrency Platform
Senate Denies Receiving Petitions Against Tinubu’s Ambassadorial Nominees
Dangote Cement Lights Up Benue Host Communities With CSR Initiatives
Reps Recommend 3-year Jail Term For Aviation minister
Tems Sets New Record On Billboard Hot 100 Chart
