Connect with us

Aviation

Japan baffled by U.S. telling airlines to respect new Chinese air zone

Published

on

TOKYO – U.S. State Department guidance to domestic airlines that they comply with China’s new air defense zone in the East China Sea has perplexed Japan, which wonders if it still has the full support of its ally in challenging Beijing’s claims to the airspace.

Japan and the United States had consistently taken a firm stand against China’s designation late last month of an Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) that overlaps the disputed Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea. The islets are administered by Japan but claimed by China.

But if the U.S. government places a priority on the safety of civilian aircraft in the airspace, it means that Tokyo and Washington will have trouble coordinating their responses.

While China praised the State Department’s guidance, a senior Japanese Foreign Ministry official expressed concern.

“The U.S. action may represent Washington’s intention to be interpreted either way, giving consideration to both commercial carriers demanding the safety of flights and the Japanese government,” the official said.

To Japan, the United States appeared to be a reliable ally that supported its firm stance on China’s unilateral action in establishing the zone, and was full of praise when Washington sent two U.S. B-52 bombers into the zone on Nov. 26.

However, the State Department on Nov. 29 announced a policy that U.S. commercial airlines should notify Chinese authorities in advance of their flight plans in the zone.

According to the online version of The New York Times, talks between U.S. government officials and airline executives began on Nov. 27. Two days later, the State Department settled on the guidelines for commercial carriers to follow established international air protocols, apparently for safety concerns for passengers flying through the disputed airspace.

“The U.S. government generally expects that U.S. carriers operating internationally will operate consistently with NOTAMs (Notices to Airmen) issued by foreign countries,” the U.S. State Department said in a statement on Nov. 29.

But it also added: “Our expectation of operations by U.S. carriers consistent with NOTAMs does not indicate U.S. government acceptance of China’s requirements for operating in the newly declared ADIZ.”

The guidance to commercial airlines runs counter to the U.S. Defense Department’s approach with its military aircraft and

took the Japanese government by surprise. When a senior official with the Foreign Ministry learned of the news on Nov. 30, the official said, “Since there is no information available yet, we cannot respond.”

The ministry inquired the U.S. side about the guidance, and was told that there was no confirmation that the U.S. government had made such a request to commercial carriers.

Officials with the prime minister’s office and the Foreign Ministry stressed that Washington has never recognized Beijing’s newly declared air defense zone. The transport ministry reaffirmed that it will adhere to its policy of not asking commercial airlines to give China prior notification.

After Beijing declared the creation of the zone on Nov. 23, Japanese carriers notified Chinese aviation authorities with their flight plans to comply with their demand.

But the Japanese government called on the airlines to halt the notifications on the grounds it does not recognize the zone, which it said Beijing unilaterally established.

The Japanese government went further to make clear its position by flying aircraft from the Self-Defense Force and Japan Coast Guard through the airspace unannounced.

China hailed the State Department’s latest move as a gesture of paying respect to its newly created zone.

China Central Television reported on the guidance for American carriers on Nov. 30, quoting U.S. news outlets’ coverage.

“The Obama administration requested U.S. commercial airlines to comply with China’s rules when they enter the Chinese air defense zone,” CCTV said.

A flurry of messages hailing the development appeared on Weibo microblogging service, Chinese version of Twitter, right after the CCTV reports.

“(President) Obama saved China’s honor,” said one posting. “Finally, the international community acknowledged China’s air defense zone.”

The Chinese air force is set to defend its nation’s claims to the zone. In the Nov. 30 edition, the Global Times, affiliated with People’s Daily, the mouthpiece of the Chinese Communist Party, carried “exclusive” reports on China scrambling fighter jets the day earlier to intercept aircraft.

It said that SDF aircraft took off from Misawa Air Base in Aomori Prefecture, and that EP-3 U.S. surveillance planes were the latest model in the line of the reconnaissance aircraft.

These reports were not included in a statement released by a Chinese air force spokesman on Nov. 29.

These reports, experts say, suggest that Beijing intends to show off its air defense and surveillance capabilities to audiences in and outside China by having local media report on intelligence that authorities gathers on SDF and U.S. military aircraft.

DISPUTE UNLIKELY TO INCREASE MILITARY TENSIONS

The Japanese and U.S. governments agree that given the current situation, military tensions are less likely to heighten around the Senkakus dispute.

An official close to the Japanese government cited a lack of protests by Tokyo and Washington over the Chinese reports of scrambling fighter jets in response to the intrusion of SDF and U.S. military aircraft in the ADIZ.

In autumn last year, Beijing announced that the Chinese military had conducted drills in the East China Sea at a site near the Senkakus, which China calls Diaoyu.

After an analysis of footage of the drills, the Japanese government concluded that video images taken during a separate drill at a different site were used in the announcement.

Subsequently, the Japanese government remains cautious about what Chinese authorities say on developments concerning the ADIZ.

Defense Minister Itsunori Onodera showed skepticism of the veracity of the reports on the Chinese fighter jets’ scramble.

An official close to the SDF said announcements about the scramble represents Beijing’s attempt to project an image of a strong China to the domestic and international audience.

“China cannot afford not to take any action when U.S. military jets fly into the zone,” the official said.

According to the Japanese government, there were no signs to point to the Chinese military spiraling out of control concerning the declaration of the air defense zone. Wording of the event employed in statements from the Chinese foreign ministry and ministry of national defense are coordinated after Beijing’s announcement on the zone on Nov. 23.

Both Tokyo and Washington believe that there is little chance that China will back down and cancel the zone, given that Beijing called the establishment of it as national policy.

But when it comes to the air defense capabilities of China, there is no denying that they lag far behind those of the combined forces of Japan and the United States.

U.S. F-15 fighter aircraft are deployed at the U.S. Air Force’s Kadena Air Base in Okinawa Prefecture. In the event of a contingency, F-22 stealth fighters can arrive at the base in about half a day.

In addition, the U.S. Air Force’s comprehensive strength is massive, and its pilots are well trained. The Air Force can bolster its monitoring activities by flying early warning aircraft equipped with advanced radar systems.

“The Chinese military will be no match,” said a defense analyst.

On the Japanese side, F-15 fighters, the mainstay of the Air SDF, are undergoing upgrades to modernize them.

In contrast, the Chinese air force is believed to lack a sophisticated radar system and the ability to expand the range of its aircraft through air-to-air refueling.

In July, Chinese early warning aircraft reached the Pacific for the first time by way of flying over Japan’s southwestern Nansei Islands, which include the Senkakus.

Analysis by SDF officials, however, show that the Chinese military has yet to obtain the capability to dispatch fighter jets to the region.

In recent years, China has built up its armed forces. The nation’s first aircraft carrier, the Liaoning, conducted its first drill on the high seas in November.

If the Chinese military achieves the capability to have the vessel freely navigate through the East China Sea, military tensions between Japan and China will significantly intensify, according to a senior SDF official.

– ASASHI SHIMBUN

Click to comment
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Aviation

Bird Strike Hinders Air Peace Lagos–Port Harcourt Flight

Published

on

An Air Peace flight from Lagos to Port Harcourt has suffered a disruption, after the aircraft was affected by a bird strike on arrival at the Port Harcourt International Airport.

The airline made the disclosure on Thursday in a statement signed by its spokesperson, Osifo-Whiskey Efe.

He added that the incident necessitated safety checks on the affected aircraft and the deployment of another aircraft to convey passengers on subsequent flights.

ALSO READ: Rivers’ CJ Declines Setting Up Panel for Fubara’s Impeachment

“We deeply empathise with passengers affected by this unforeseen incident and are working diligently to minimise disruptions,” Efe said.

The latest incident adds to the growing challenge of bird strikes faced by local airlines.
In December 2025, Air Peace disclosed that it recorded 49 bird strikes across Nigeria between January and September, stressing that even a single strike could ground an aircraft for weeks.

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the airline, Allen Onyema, had said on Arise TV that bird strikes constituted a major operational challenge, often leading to costly repairs and serious disruptions to flight schedules.

“One bird strike could cripple your aircraft for the next month. At that moment, there is no two ways about it. These bird strikes often lead to costly delays and serious disruptions in flight schedules,” he said.

He added that losses from such incidents compound other challenges facing Nigerian airlines, including heavy taxation and operational constraints.

Continue Reading

Aviation

HURIWA Saddened at 131% Surge in Air Peace, United Nigeria Airfares to Southeast

Published

on

With the firm belief that it is both sadistic and absolutely despicable, the recently announced outrageous hike in airfares to South East from Abuja to Lagos for Yuletide of 2025 by over 131 percent by Air Peace and United Nigeria Airlines, the owners have been asked to immediately have a rethink and review backward these harsh, toxic and unfriendly airfares targeting Igbo passengers exclusively.

Making the charge to the chairmen of Air Peace and United Nigeria airlines, Mr. Allen Ugochukwu and Mr. Obiora Okonkwo, the prominent civil rights advocacy group, Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA) expressed anger that these businesses whose proprietors are Igbo by birth are fond of making it so difficult for hundreds of thousands of Igbo passengers residing outside of the South-East to travel home on Christmas festivities.

The rights group say that for many years now, because Air Peace and United Nigeria Airlines are monopolies and then Igbos have the tradition exclusively in Nigeria of going home to South East from all over the globe during Yuletides, these few airlines have decidedly fixed toxic ticketing airfares for Igbos whereas northerners who also travel during their religious festivities of salah are not subjected to such exploitative treatments.

The HURIWA accused the two airlines of price fixing, which is anti-competition just as the Rights group said it is giving these two Igbo-hating airlines to review backward their toxic and discriminatory airfares within ten working days from today or it will petition the federal government publicly funding consumer rights body[Federal Competition and Consumer Rights Commission) in Abuja.

The HURIWA wonders if these Igbo owners of private airlines known for making their planes available to government for free during emergencies are in a conspiratorial plots with haters of Igbo land who are unhappy at the convivial and happy atmospheres in the South East during Yuletide, just as the rights group has appealed to Igbo governors to immediately intervene and urge Mr. Allen Ugochukwu and Mr Obiora Okonkwo to treat the Igbo just as they treat for instance northern Muslims who also migrate home to northern Nigeria from around the globe during their Muslim festivities because what is good for the goose, is good for the gander.

The HURIWA said that if Air Peace Airlines have gotten involved in many humanitarian efforts of airlifting Nigerians from outside of our shores for free, it becomes of the Airline ought not to maltreat their clients of Igbo extraction.

The HURIWA quoted from the business official website of Air Peace in which it described its latest humanitarian effort to be an addition to a growing list of interventions by Dr. Allen Onyema and Air Peace.

Quoting Air Peace website, HURIWA stated that Air Peace said thus: “In 2019, the airline airlifted 503 Nigerians free of charge from South Africa amidst xenophobic attacks. During the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, Air Peace conducted multiple repatriation flights. In 2022, the airline flew Nigerian evacuees out of war-torn Ukraine. In May 2023, Dr. Onyema again deployed Air Peace aircraft to evacuate 277 stranded Nigerians from Sudan.

As the rescued women prepare to begin a new chapter, supported by medical care and reintegration efforts, one truth stands out: Air Peace is more than just an airline — it is a bridge of hope for Nigerians in crisis, and a national symbol of empathy, courage and service,” HURIWA conclusively quoted Air Peace.

The HURIWA therefore strongly condemns the two airlines for hiking and fixing unaffordable airfares indiscriminately against Igbo passengers, even as the festive season draws near, Air Peace and United Nigeria Airlines have raised their return ticket fares to N677,000, a move that could add financial strain on travellers. The rise in airfares reflects the high demand expected during the holiday rush.

Key Points

Air Peace and United Nigeria increase return ticket fares to N677,000 for the yuletide season.

Airfares on routes to the South-East, including Enugu and Anambra, experience the highest surge.

Ibom Air offers comparatively cheaper tickets, with return fares at N381,600.

Air Peace’s one-way fare for December to January peaks at N350,500.

United Nigeria will also charge N350,500 for select routes between December 11 and the end of the year.

Northern routes, including Lagos-Kano, face smaller increases, with fares starting from N106,900.

Experts predict even higher airfares, with one-way tickets possibly reaching N500,000.

The rise in flight prices signals the start of a challenging holiday travel season, with airfares higher than usual due to increased demand. Travelers must be prepared for the surge, with some routes seeing even higher fare projections.

ALSO READ: NNPCL, Partners Ink 20-year 1.29bscf/d Feedgas Supply Deals

The HURIWA is hereby warning the two airlines to withdraw their price fixing malpractices against Igbos or else the Rights group would seek justice and redress for the millions of Igbos who would return home for the 2025 Yuletide from the Federal Competition and Consumer Rights Commission and the National Human Rights Commission of Nigeria. The HURIWA threatened to drag the two airlines to the Nigerian President through the Honourable Minister of Aviation and Transportation.

Continue Reading

Aviation

Accra Bound Aircraft Loses Engine Mid-Air After Departing NAIA, Abuja

Published

on

By

 

An Abuja-Accra flight experienced technical difficulties mid-air on Friday, forcing it to return to Abuja, shortly after departure.

The Nigerian Safety Investigation Board (NSIB) made the disclosure in a statement, adding that it has launched investigation into what it described as a serious accident.

Director, Public Affairs and Family Assistance, NSIB, Bimbo Olawumi Oladeji stated that preliminary investigations revealed the aircraft experienced an engine number two indication issue.

ALSO READ: BREAKING: Kyari Oversees NNPC Ltd’s Transparent Recruitment Aptitude Test

It was gathered that the aircraft, with registration number 5NKAL which was operating a flight from the Nnamdi Azikiwe Airport, Abuja (DNAA), to Kotoka International Airport, Accra (DGAA).

She explained that four persons were onboard when the incident occurred. The crew immediately requested for a diversion back to Abuja due to the engine indication.

Oladeji added that the crew managed to safely land the aircraft at Abuja Airport at 18:16 UTC.

There were no injuries reported, and all individuals on board are safe.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2022. Biztellers, powered by Alphaxristi.

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x