Energy
Nigeria’s Next President Must Be Brave About Power Sector – CEO, Century Power
By Edozie Obasi-Eze
The crisis-ridden power sector in Nigeria can be easily solved, only if the incoming administration would give the sector the kind of attention it deserves.
Chief Executive Officer, Century Power Generation Limited, Dr Chukwueloka Umeh, expressed the opinion at an online interactive session with media men.
According to him, the next administration, in Nigeria must from its first day in office declare a national emergency on the power sector.
Read also>>>FCTA gets Shortfall in Allocation, as it disburses N2.6b to area councils, stakeholders
Dr Umeh who also serves as an Executive Director of Nestoil Ltd as well as the CEO of Nesto Aviation Services Ltd., warned that the current problems in the sector would continue, or even get compounded, if the next government fails to deploy professionals to head the ministry of power and its agencies.
He observed that Nigeria’s power sector was beset with weak infrastructure, illiquidity as well as the issue of square pegs in round holes, leaving the country with over 200 million persons with just a meagre 4,000mw.
The former General Electric Company official noted with concern that while Egypt for example, with about half of Nigeria’s population is producing 57,000mw, while Nigeria continues to struggle to produce 4,000 megawatts. He described the situation as embarrassing and criminal.
In his words, “We should all hide our heads in shame as a country. Some years ago, Nigeria produced 5000mw and everybody was celebrating. I was like have these people lost their minds?”
Dr Umeh made it clear that whoever becomes the next Nigerian president must understand the critical importance of the sector, cut bureaucracy and free the sector from undue government interference, except in a regulatory role.
“It is my hope that whoever is the next president will understand that they need to do something drastically different. They need to be brave. They need to show political bravery and do the right thing.
“They need to remove government handouts from the industry and just have government as a regulator. The administration needs to make sure that the person in charge of the power industry is somebody that understands the industry.
“We don’t want just an administrator. We need somebody that clearly understands the industry, somebody like Prof Barth Nnaji who was the minister of power under Goodluck Jonathan; who is a player in the industry.
“He understood the industry well, and he had the motivation to make it work. So we need somebody like that running the industry. Whoever is the president next year, needs to treat this industry as an emergency. Which means they need to remove all the red tapes stopping things being done quickly,” he added.
According to the Aerospace Engineer, Nigeria should go beyond mere consultations, committees and conferences to the execution of the blueprint to revamp the sector.
“We need to quickly remove the government’s fingers from every part of the sector: Generation, transmission and distribution, and have those people who are not doing well either removed or they are set clear timelines for to fix the problem.
“The next administration needs to reduce the regulations that are barring new entrants from coming into the industry,” he added.
According to Dr Umeh, the Century Power Generation Limited has for years been pursuing a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with the Nigerian Bulk Electricity Trading Company Limited (NBET) without success despite the ready international funding for its project in the country.
“I can tell you today. We have spent about a year or more trying to get approval to move gas on the existing pipeline. It is one meeting after the other. This thing should take about two weeks to do. It is taking over a year and we go to meetings, you speak English, you generate minutes of meetings and reschedule for another one, just talking and wasting resources.
“So these things need to be made very quick. Remove all the red tape and allow us to do proper business. I tell people it is not rocket science, but even if it is rocket science, we have rocket scientists,” he maintained.
He pointed out that presently, “there are a lot of people in the industry who have no business being in the power industry because they don’t understand the sector.
“There are a lot of supposed experts that when you speak to them for five minutes, it becomes clear that they don’t really know much about the industry.”
In the short term, he disclosed that Century Power would keep pushing to have a power purchase agreement signed and executed by the government, while working on utility scale plants that may not be as large as the 1,500mw Okija power plant owned by the company.
“They are not quite as large as Okija plant. Just about 20 to 100 megawatts to supply directly industrial clusters and Discos, this is what we’ve been working on doing and to make it in such a way that it will be economically viable to us and to the off-takers,” he explained.
Energy
NLNG: How Cooking Gas Offtakers Greed Fuel Scarcity, High Prices
It has come to light that profiteering by major cooking gas offtakers accounted for the recent scarcity and skyrocketing of prices of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LNG) in Nigeria.
The Nigeria LNG Limited (NLNG), has disclosed that it sold LNG at N800 per kilogramme to the major offtakers, who turned round to sell to Nigerians at N2,400 per kg, marking up the product by N1,600 during the recent nationwide scarcity.
It said that some of the offtakers were hoarding product at terminals and creating artificial scarcity, a practice that pushed prices far above regulatory benchmarks and inflicted hardship on households across the country.
These facts were shared by the Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, Adeleye Falade, at the NLNG Facts & Figures Presentation in Lagos.
“What we found out is that a number of people who take products, they will put it in their terminal, and they are part of those that have created the artificial scarcity that has led to the price increase. When the product was being sold at N2,400 per kg in the market, guess how much they were lifting it from us? It was between N800 and N900 per kg,” Falade stated.
The Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA) had recommended that after transportation costs, retail prices should not exceed N1,000 to N1,200 per kg.
“So there’s also some distortion that happened on the sales side, which I know the regulators are working on right now to get control of it,” Falade added.
ALSO READ: Shell Pledges Support for Nigeria’s Energy Journey
The NLNG supplies LPG to the Nigerian market through its vessel, Alfred Temile. More than 15 terminal owners offtake the product as middlemen before selling in bulk to gas plant operators and independent petroleum marketers.
The hoarding at terminal level, according to NLNG’s assessment by one of the big four consulting firms, meant product was not getting to retailers fast enough, tightening supply and inflating prices.
In response, NLNG said it has changed its allocation strategy. “So preference for us is not for those kinds of people, but those that can supply directly to the retailers,” Falade said. The new ranked order prioritises offtakers with storage capacity and a proven direct-to-retail network.
Despite the scarcity at retail level, Falade said NLNG did not have a problem around infrastructure or capability to move its product to the market.
“That’s not a limitation for us… We sell all of our products. We actually have more demand than we’re able to sell. Our challenge was not that people were not able to take the product. Every cooking gas that we made, we had buyers,” he said.
He acknowledged industry-wide infrastructure deficits but said they have not reached the point of stranding NLNG’s output. “There is an infrastructure deficit, but it hasn’t played itself to the point where we become stranded with the product that we have made. No, we haven’t seen it to that extent.”
Annual LPG consumption in Nigeria has grown to 1.8 million tons in 2026 from 1.5 million tons in 2023, underscoring rising dependence on cooking gas as households shift away from firewood and kerosene.
To ease pressure on prices, NLNG said the completion of Train 7 will be the immediate game-changer. The $5 billion project is progressing at Bonny Island in Rivers State with about 16,000 people working daily.
The completion of the Train 7 is going to increase the company’s LNG capacity by 35 per centIt, taking it from 22 MTPA to 30 MTPA. Aside from LNG, the project will also increase NLNG’s LPG production by 50 percent.
Last year NLNG supplied 500,000 tons of LPG to the domestic market. With Train 7 on stream, an additional 250,000 tons will be added annually, taking the total annual supply to 750,000 tons,” the CEO said.
The extra volume is expected to improve availability and moderate the price volatility that has plagued the market in recent months.
Falade said NMDPRA is already working to rein in the LPG market distortion with introduction of NLNG’s ranked offtaker system that is also designed to cut out middlemen who warehouse product instead of distributing it.
Beyond LPG, NLNG said it is fast-tracking a 1.1 MTPA domestic LNG supply project targeted at industries and transport.
The company had in June 2021 announced its plan to begin supplying LNG to the domestic market with an initial 1.1 million metric tons from July 2022. The company went ahead to sign an offtake agreement with three companies including However, that project has been stalled.
Falade said the project remained on course. “We do have a project already working around the domestic LNG supply… It hasn’t changed from the 1.1 MTPA that was declared at that point in time. We are behind on schedule, but we’re still working on it,” Falade said.
Energy
NUPRC Defends 2025 Oil Block Awards
The Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC) has pushed back against criticism of the 2025 oil and gas licensing round.
The Commission argued that reports that portrayed the award of oil blocks as politically influenced distorted a process it described as transparent, competitive and technically driven.
Speaking recently in Lagos at the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) Nigeria Council Executive Masterclass on Energy Journalism at the weekend, the Commission Chief Executive (CCE), Mrs Oritsemeyiwa Eyesan, represented by Mr. Dr. Amba Ndoma Egba, Deputy Director, Acreage Administration, said some media reports failed to reflect the technical and commercial rigour behind the exercise.
“Others, regrettably, reduced a rigorous and competitive technical process to political speculation and unsubstantiated headlines,”.
ALSO READ: Pinnacle Convenes 2026 Vendors’ Forum
In what appeared to be a direct response to public debate surrounding the recently concluded bid round, the Commission said some reports had unfairly reduced a rigorous regulatory exercise to political speculation, warning that such narratives could weaken investor confidence in Nigeria’s upstream petroleum industry.
She warned that inaccurate reporting could widen the gap between regulatory processes and public understanding of the petroleum industry.
The CCE said the licensing round attracted significant global interest, with 50 blocks offered across onshore, offshore, deepwater and frontier basins.
She explained that, after prequalification, 196 applicants advanced to the technical and commercial stages, while 143 companies submitted 200 bids covering 37 assets before the process culminated in the commercial bid conference held on July 21.
The defence comes days after the announcement of winners in the licensing round, which has drawn scrutiny from industry watchers and commentators. NUPRC said the exercise was designed to meet global standards of transparency and competitiveness and formed part of its broader effort to position Nigeria as an investment-friendly upstream jurisdiction.
Beyond the licensing round, the Commission used the forum to announce a more aggressive transparency strategy. It said it would hold regular technical engagements with energy editors and correspondents and continue publishing oil production data, acreage status, rig disposition and operational performance reports on its website.
“If you do not understand our methodology, you cannot accurately report our outcomes. And if you cannot accurately report our outcomes, the public cannot hold us accountable,” Eyesan said.
NUPRC argued that many controversies surrounding the oil sector stem from poor understanding of technical concepts such as reserve classifications, licensing categories and field development obligations.
The Commission urged journalists covering the industry to seek technical clarification before publishing reports on reserves, production or asset awards. Earlier in his welcome address, the Chairman of SPE Nigeria Council, Mr.Francis Nwaochei, said the Masterclass themed: “Engineering the Narrative: Why Technical Knowledge Matters in Energy Journalism” speaks directly to the role that credible journalism plays in shaping public understanding of Nigeria’s energy industry.
“The stories that appear in our newspapers, on television, online platforms and across social media influence public perception, investor confidence and even policy conversations. That is why accuracy matters,”.
He explained that Nigeria’s energy industry is evolving rapidly, hence today’s conversations extend beyond crude oil production but include gas development, energy security, carbon management, digital technologies, local content, infrastructure development, financing, regulatory reforms and the transition to a lower-carbon future.
He argued that, as the industry becomes more complex, reporting on it also requires greater depth and context.
“This Masterclass is not about turning journalists into petroleum engineers. That is not our expectation. Rather, our goal is to inspire you to become even more effective energy journalists by developing the confidence to ask the right questions, conduct due diligence and present accurate, balanced and well-researched reports,”.
Energy
NUPRC Puts Nigeria’s H1 2026 Daily Gas Supply at 2.05bcf
The Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC) has declared that Nigeria’s domestic gas suppliers delivered an average of 2.05 billion cubic feet of gas per day in the first half of 2026.
It added that the figure represents about 65 percent of the Domestic Gas Delivery Obligation (DGDO) target, which points to the persistent gap between gas allocated for domestic use and the actual volumes delivered to industries, power plants and other local consumers, prompting the regulator to introduce a Gas Swap Framework aimed at improving compliance.
The Commission Chief Executive of the NUPRC, Oritsemiyewa Eyesan, made the disclosure during the recently concluded stakeholders’ workshop on the Gas Swap Framework for DGDO in Abuja.
The workshop, organised by the commission, was aimed at deepening stakeholders’ understanding of the proposed Gas Swap Framework as a practical mechanism to improve compliance with the DGDO and obtain industry input before implementation.
ALSO READ: Billy Gas Leak: Reps Blames NUPRC, NOSDRA for Inaction
This was contained in a statement issued on Friday by the Head, Media and Corporate Communications of the commission, Eniola Akinkuotu.
The statement read, “Nigeria’s average Domestic Gas Delivery Obligations performance rose to 2.05 billion cubic feet (Bcf) daily year-to-date ending June 2026.”
Delivering the keynote address through the Executive Commissioner, Development and Production, Enorense Amadasu, Eyesan described the Domestic Gas Delivery Obligation as one of the Federal Government’s most critical policy tools for ensuring that gas produced in Nigeria supports economic growth and domestic industrialisation.
Providing an update on industry performance, she said only 27 out of about 63 producing companies were allocated Domestic Gas Delivery Obligations, while only 23 of the allottees were actively supplying gas to domestic customers.
According to her, average domestic gas delivery stood at 2.05 billion cubic feet per day between January and June 2026 against a 7C1 Domestic Gas Delivery Obligation allocation of 3.16 billion cubic feet per day, translating to a compliance level of about 65 per cent.
Eyesan said the figures showed that allocating more companies to the scheme alone would not guarantee improved domestic gas supply.
She said, “The YTD June 2026 data, however, shows that a broader allocation base does not automatically translate into actual delivery.
“This delivery gap underscores the need for practical, innovative, and market-responsive solutions that protect the integrity of the obligation while enabling real physical delivery of gas to domestic users. It is in this context that the proposed Gas Swap Framework becomes especially important.”
She explained that the proposed Gas Swap Framework was designed to address logistical and infrastructure constraints preventing some producers from meeting their obligations.
According to the commission’s chief executive, the framework will allow operators whose gas is stranded or cannot be easily evacuated to fulfil their DGDO by partnering with operators that already have the infrastructure required to transport and deliver gas to designated domestic customers.
Eyesan said, “With the right commitment and implementation, the framework will help turn obligation into actual supply, make better use of existing assets, support gas-to-power delivery, and build greater confidence in Nigeria’s domestic gas market.”
She urged industry stakeholders to support the initiative, stressing that collaboration between producers, transporters and regulators would be critical to improving domestic gas availability and strengthening Nigeria’s gas value chain.
The DGDO is a regulatory mechanism introduced under Nigeria’s gas policy to ensure that a specified portion of gas produced by upstream companies is reserved for domestic consumption, particularly for electricity generation, industrial manufacturing and other strategic sectors.
The initiative forms part of the Federal Government’s drive to leverage the country’s vast gas reserves to boost economic diversification, deepen industrialisation and improve energy security.
However, industry stakeholders have consistently identified infrastructure limitations, evacuation constraints and commercial challenges as key factors affecting full compliance with the obligation.






