Connect with us

NEWS

Reps declines consideration of Foreign Affairs budget over Constitutional breach

Published

on

Reps asks Nigerian Army to secure its FOBs HQ of 2nd Division Garrison in Ibarapa, Oyo State

By John Danjuma

For allegedly abusing the provisions of the Appropriation Act 2022 and the 1999 Constitution (As amended) by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs has turned down the consideration and defense of the 2023 budget of the Ministry

Reps to Mount Diplomatic Pressure for Ekweremadu

Speaker of the House of Representatives of Nigeria, Femi Gbajabiamila

Chairman of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Yusuf Buba Yakub, gave the indication when the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Geoffrey Onyeama and his team appeared before committee for the defense of the ministry’s budget.

Yakub insisted that the committee will only consider the budget if the infractions observed are remedied by the ministry.

Read also>>>Senate sets aside Defence Ministry’s budget over minister’s refusal to honour invitation

He said according to Section 80 (1-4) Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999(As Amended), the National Assembly possesses the powers to authorise the expenditure of all revenue receipts, including those that have gone into the Consolidated Revenue Fund and to oversight how these funds are spent.

Buba said all funds appropriated to MDAs like the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and others, must be accounted for before such ministry is able to come to request for another such appropriation, hence, the budget defense session.

He however said that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has continued to direct Missions to retain and spend monies in their capital accounts without any waivers from the National Assembly in breach of Section 7 of the Appropriation Act 2022.

“It beats every logic that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has deliberately refused to abide by the laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and by other statutes of the land, including the Standing Orders of the House.”

“The question this Committee is asking the Minister of Foreign Affairs is: Is he bigger than Nigeria and its laws? Or how else will one explain the constant flagrant abuse of the laws of the land even when we have continued to write letters to the Ministry reminding it of relevant provisions of our laws that demand abiding by.

“According to Section 10 of the Appropriations Act 2022 (as Amended), Missions and Embassies have been empowered to constitute their Tender Board for the purpose of the procurements they need to make.

“We have called the attention of the Minister to this Act, but he has continued to direct the Missions not to obey this law in spite of receiving about four letters on the issue, including the latest one of 6 September 2022.

“In addition to the above, Section 7 of the Appropriations Act 2022 (As Amended), captures, inter alia, that “The Minister of Finance shall ensure that funds appropriated under this Act are released to the appropriate agencies and or organs of government as and when due, provided that no funds for any quarter of the fiscal year shall be deferred without prior waiver from the National Assembly”.

“In total disregard for the above, the Ministry has continued to direct Missions to retain and spend monies in their capital accounts without any waivers from the National Assembly.

“A 23rd September 2022 letter by this Committee that was sent to the Ministry, as a reminder to earlier ones, still did not stop the Ministry from flouting the laws of the land.

“Being aware that administrative charges have been approved at the Missions by Mr President, this Committee, in line with Section 80 (3 and 4) CFRN (As Amended) has also observed that in total disregard to what the law says, the Minister has continued to authorise the spending of monies generated through administrative charges at the Missions without being appropriated by the National Assembly.

“In conclusion, it is important to note that this Committee has continued to draw the attention of the Ministry to the above noted infractions, but all to no avail”, he said.

He therefore ruled that for the committee to consider the 2023 budget, the Ministry must direct all Missions to abide by Section 10 of the 2022 Appropriations Act (as Amended) and furnish the National Assembly with the 2023 budget proposals in respect to targeted revenues from administrative charges at the missions and embassies.

He also ruled that the ministry should furnish the committee with the list of unspent funds under the capital component of the Missions’ allocations for the necessary waivers of the National Assembly.

In his response, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Geoffrey Onyeama denied the allegations that the ministry has been flouting the constitution and the provisions of the Appropriation Act 2022.

“I did not in anyway tell them to disregard these requirements regarding the administrative charges we are also in the process of explaining to them what they have to do to send it for appropriation before spending, not just spending anyhow.

“Also, on unspent funds under capital seeking wavers for them to be able to apply it under other heads again, we have brought this to their attention and again, we are in the process of developing template for all the missions to follow.

“I would like to beg Mr. Chairman that contrary to your assertion, the ministry is in no way trying to flout the laws of the land and trying to appropriate to itself powers that it does not have. We have here and we can submit to this committee evidence of directives we have given to the missions”, he said.

NEWS

Obi Asks World Bank, Banks to Verify Anambra Debt Claims

Published

on

Former Anambra State Governor Peter Obi has called on the World Bank and Nigerian banks to verify records relating to the debt claims made against his administration, insisting that the figures being presented by the state government should be subjected to documentary scrutiny.

Obi made the call during an interview on Arise TV’s Prime Time programme on Thursday, September 24, 2026, while responding to the Anambra State Government’s claims over loans allegedly incurred during his eight-year tenure.

ALSO READ: 2027: Peter Obi Disowns OK Movement Campaign Council, Says ‘It Is Wrong’

The former governor specifically urged the World Bank to provide records showing the actual drawdowns from the facilities linked to Anambra, rather than relying on the total amount originally approved or contracted.

“Please publish these documents. I’m urging you, please. The World Bank is in Abuja; they can give you the history of the drawdowns,” Obi said.

He also challenged the relevant Nigerian banks to verify the financial records he said were contained in his 2014 handover documents.

“The banks mentioned here are Nigerian banks; you have access to their headquarters. Ask them whether this money was there,” he added.

Obi’s comments came amid a dispute over the Anambra Government’s earlier claim that eight external loan facilities associated with his administration had an outstanding balance of about N127.4bn as of June 30, 2026.

The state had linked the loans to projects in areas including education, healthcare, erosion control and malaria prevention.

The former governor disputed the presentation, arguing that approved loan facilities should not automatically be treated as money borrowed or spent if the funds were not actually drawn down.

He maintained that some of the funding arrangements involved Federal Government-backed concessionary financing and said the World Bank records could establish when the money was accessed.

The controversy has since shifted towards the actual amount drawn from some of the facilities.

Anambra State Commissioner for Information and Value Reorientation, Law Mefor, reportedly acknowledged during an Arise TV appearance that the government had not properly verified the amount actually drawn from a $123m facility before citing the larger figure. He said the government would seek clarification from the relevant authorities.

The development has added another layer to the disagreement between Obi and the Anambra Government over the state’s financial position at the end of his administration.

Obi has consistently maintained that he left office in March 2014 without outstanding salaries, pensions, gratuities or certified contractor obligations, while the state government has continued to dispute aspects of his account of the state’s inherited liabilities.

Continue Reading

NEWS

‘Where Is the President?’ — Peter Obi Questions Tinubu’s Prolonged Absence

Published

on

Presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), Peter Obi, has questioned President Bola Tinubu’s prolonged absence from Nigeria, saying Nigerians deserve to know the President’s whereabouts amid the country’s security challenges.

Obi made the remarks on Arise TV on Thursday while discussing the President’s absence from the country and the situation surrounding other senior government officials.

According to Obi, the issue was not simply that Tinubu was outside Nigeria, but that he had remained abroad beyond the period initially announced for his trip.

ALSO READ: ‘Borrowed Funds Not Spent Cannot Be Counted as Debt Left Behind’ -Peter Obi

“It’s not just that he’s out of the country. He’s out of the country beyond the days he was supposed to be. Beyond the days they even said he was going for,” Obi said.

He also noted that Vice-President Kashim Shettima was outside the country, while Senate President Godswill Akpabio was also reportedly abroad and the Senate was not in session.

“The Vice President is not in the country. And I understand the Senate President is out of the country, the Senate is not in session,” he said.

Obi expressed concern about the situation against the backdrop of insecurity and recent incidents involving the deaths of suspected illegal miners in Niger State.

“We don’t need this level of rascality at this moment in time, when Nigerians are being kidnapped, being killed, things are… we need a country where we have somebody, where we have competence, capacity, and compassion,” he said.

Referring to the deaths recorded in Niger State, Obi said the presence of the country’s chief executive was particularly important during a crisis.

“Look at Niger State now, where 10 people… where some young people have died for nothing,” he said.

The former Anambra State governor argued that while there is a chain of command within government, delegation should not replace the physical presence of the country’s leader during critical situations.

“It is… the CEO being present is critical at a time of crisis. Not delegation. Yes, you have a chain of command,” Obi said.

He subsequently asked where the President was and insisted that Nigerians should be informed.

“Where is the President? Nigerians ought to know,” he said.

Obi also said that, if elected president in 2027, he would make his whereabouts publicly known whenever he travelled.

“If I travel today, I tell people where I am. When I become President, Charles, people will know where I am 24 hours,” he said

“That is public space, public office,” Obi added.

The comments come amid continuing public debate over the absence of the President and Vice-President from Nigeria.

Continue Reading

NEWS

‘Borrowed Funds Not Spent Cannot Be Counted as Debt Left Behind’ – Peter Obi

Published

on

The presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) for the 2027 election, Peter Obi, has challenged the way government borrowing is accounted for, arguing that funds borrowed but not actually drawn down should not be treated as debt left behind by an administration.

Obi made the remarks during an interview on Arise TV on Thursday while explaining his position on borrowing during his tenure as governor of Anambra State.

“That is a wrong public accounting. Even if I had gone to bank and borrowed money, but I did not spend the money, you cannot call it debt I left,” Obi said.

RELATED NEWS: 2027: Obi Wants to Transform Nigeria After 8 Years of Failure in Anambra — Onanuga

He illustrated his argument with a hypothetical ₦10 billion loan facility, saying that where only ₦500 million was actually drawn, it would be inaccurate to describe the entire ₦10 billion as money owed.

“They gave me a loan of 10 billion Naira, and Charles, I only drew down 500 million. You cannot say I’m owing 10 billion, because you know the amount,” he said.

The NDC candidate said such a practice would amount to improper public-sector accounting.

“That’s why I said it is not proper public sector accounting,” Obi said.

He also cited the former Director-General of the Debt Management Office, Abraham Nwankwo, whom he said served for 10 years, in support of his claim about his borrowing record as Anambra governor.

Obi recalled that Nwankwo invited him to his send-off ceremony and publicly explained why he had selected Obi as chairman of the event.

“He announced it to everybody in that party that the reason why he made me chairman is because I was the only governor in Nigeria who never came to his office for approval to borrow money,” Obi said.

Anambra Debt Controversy

Obi’s comments come against the backdrop of continuing debate over the debt profile he left behind after serving as Anambra State governor from 2006 to 2013.

The former governor has consistently defended his administration’s financial record, while figures and claims about Anambra’s debt during and after his tenure have generated public debate.

 

 

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2022. Biztellers, powered by Alphaxristi.

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x