NEWS
Reps declines consideration of Foreign Affairs budget over Constitutional breach
By John Danjuma
For allegedly abusing the provisions of the Appropriation Act 2022 and the 1999 Constitution (As amended) by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs has turned down the consideration and defense of the 2023 budget of the Ministry
Chairman of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Yusuf Buba Yakub, gave the indication when the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Geoffrey Onyeama and his team appeared before committee for the defense of the ministry’s budget.
Yakub insisted that the committee will only consider the budget if the infractions observed are remedied by the ministry.
Read also>>>Senate sets aside Defence Ministry’s budget over minister’s refusal to honour invitation
He said according to Section 80 (1-4) Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999(As Amended), the National Assembly possesses the powers to authorise the expenditure of all revenue receipts, including those that have gone into the Consolidated Revenue Fund and to oversight how these funds are spent.
Buba said all funds appropriated to MDAs like the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and others, must be accounted for before such ministry is able to come to request for another such appropriation, hence, the budget defense session.
He however said that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has continued to direct Missions to retain and spend monies in their capital accounts without any waivers from the National Assembly in breach of Section 7 of the Appropriation Act 2022.
“It beats every logic that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has deliberately refused to abide by the laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and by other statutes of the land, including the Standing Orders of the House.”
“The question this Committee is asking the Minister of Foreign Affairs is: Is he bigger than Nigeria and its laws? Or how else will one explain the constant flagrant abuse of the laws of the land even when we have continued to write letters to the Ministry reminding it of relevant provisions of our laws that demand abiding by.
“According to Section 10 of the Appropriations Act 2022 (as Amended), Missions and Embassies have been empowered to constitute their Tender Board for the purpose of the procurements they need to make.
“We have called the attention of the Minister to this Act, but he has continued to direct the Missions not to obey this law in spite of receiving about four letters on the issue, including the latest one of 6 September 2022.
“In addition to the above, Section 7 of the Appropriations Act 2022 (As Amended), captures, inter alia, that “The Minister of Finance shall ensure that funds appropriated under this Act are released to the appropriate agencies and or organs of government as and when due, provided that no funds for any quarter of the fiscal year shall be deferred without prior waiver from the National Assembly”.
“In total disregard for the above, the Ministry has continued to direct Missions to retain and spend monies in their capital accounts without any waivers from the National Assembly.
“A 23rd September 2022 letter by this Committee that was sent to the Ministry, as a reminder to earlier ones, still did not stop the Ministry from flouting the laws of the land.
“Being aware that administrative charges have been approved at the Missions by Mr President, this Committee, in line with Section 80 (3 and 4) CFRN (As Amended) has also observed that in total disregard to what the law says, the Minister has continued to authorise the spending of monies generated through administrative charges at the Missions without being appropriated by the National Assembly.
“In conclusion, it is important to note that this Committee has continued to draw the attention of the Ministry to the above noted infractions, but all to no avail”, he said.
He therefore ruled that for the committee to consider the 2023 budget, the Ministry must direct all Missions to abide by Section 10 of the 2022 Appropriations Act (as Amended) and furnish the National Assembly with the 2023 budget proposals in respect to targeted revenues from administrative charges at the missions and embassies.
He also ruled that the ministry should furnish the committee with the list of unspent funds under the capital component of the Missions’ allocations for the necessary waivers of the National Assembly.
In his response, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Geoffrey Onyeama denied the allegations that the ministry has been flouting the constitution and the provisions of the Appropriation Act 2022.
“I did not in anyway tell them to disregard these requirements regarding the administrative charges we are also in the process of explaining to them what they have to do to send it for appropriation before spending, not just spending anyhow.
“Also, on unspent funds under capital seeking wavers for them to be able to apply it under other heads again, we have brought this to their attention and again, we are in the process of developing template for all the missions to follow.
“I would like to beg Mr. Chairman that contrary to your assertion, the ministry is in no way trying to flout the laws of the land and trying to appropriate to itself powers that it does not have. We have here and we can submit to this committee evidence of directives we have given to the missions”, he said.
NEWS
“Stop Spreading Fear” — Presidency Slams Nasboi Over Alleged Fake Terror Clip
The Presidency has cautioned popular comedian and content creator, Nasboi, over a viral video he posted online, accusing him of spreading fear with what it described as a misleading terror-related clip.
The Special Assistant to President Bola Tinubu on Social Media, Dada Olusegun, raised the concern in a post on his X handle on Tuesday, saying the footage being circulated does not originate from Nigeria and was wrongly presented in a way that could cause public panic.
ALSO READ: I’m Getting Death Threats For Criticising Wizkid – Nasboi Calls Out
He alleged that the video shared by Nasboi was originally taken from another online page that identified the armed men in the clip as terrorists operating in the Republic of Benin, not Nigeria.
According to him, sharing such content without proper context was irresponsible, especially given the sensitive security situation in the country.
He wrote: “You cannot continue to intentionally use your page to spread fear @iamnasboi for whatever reason you might think you have.
“The video you posted was clearly quoted from a page that says these are Beninese terrorists. This means the footage is from Benin Republic and has nothing to do with Nigeria.
“We have our challenges, but you using your wide reach to spread fear with a fake footage is the highest form of irresponsibility. You can do better!”
The presidential aide did not give further details on when the video first surfaced or whether any official verification was conducted on its origin.
Nasboi had earlier shared the clip with the caption “PRESIDENT @officialABAT,” showing armed men on motorcycles carrying out an attack in a rural setting.
The post sparked mixed reactions online, as users debated whether the footage was genuinely from Nigeria or another West African country.
Although similar videos have previously been linked to extremist groups operating in the Sahel region, there has been no independent confirmation that the viral clip originated from Nigeria.
NEWS
Why FG Scrapped 3-Month Pre-Retirement Leave for Civil Servants
The Federal Government has abolished the practice of granting civil servants a mandatory three-month pre-retirement leave, saying the arrangement was based on a wrong interpretation of the Public Service Rules and had no legal backing.
The directive was issued in a circular by the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, Didi Walson-Jack, and sent to ministries, departments and agencies (MDAs), including top government officials across the federal civil service.
According to the circular, what is commonly referred to as “pre-retirement leave” is not recognised in the Public Service Rules. Instead, it is meant to be a structured three-month notice period that some MDAs mistakenly converted into automatic leave.
ALSO READ: ASRI Urges FG to Allocate Crude to Local Refiners
The government explained that this misinterpretation had led to many experienced officers leaving active duty earlier than required, creating avoidable gaps in manpower and affecting service delivery in some institutions.
“The so-called ‘mandatory three-month pre-retirement leave’ has no basis in the Public Service Rules,” the circular stated.
Under the correct rule, retiring officers are required to give three months’ notice before their retirement date. Within that period, they are expected to attend a one-month pre-retirement workshop or seminar, while the remaining time is used to process pension documentation and reconcile service records.
The Federal Government further clarified that officers remain in active service throughout the notice period and are still expected to carry out their official duties, except when attending approved training or granted leave under existing regulations.
“A retiring officer must give three months’ notice before their effective date of retirement. This is a notice requirement, not a leave entitlement,” the directive added.
The Head of Service directed all MDAs to stop the practice of sending officers on compulsory pre-retirement leave before their official retirement dates, insisting that such action is inconsistent with existing regulations.
She also instructed permanent secretaries, directors-general, and agency heads to ensure full compliance and proper dissemination of the corrected interpretation across the civil service.
Nigeria’s civil service retirement framework remains governed by the Public Service Rules and the Pension Reform Act, with officers retiring upon reaching 60 years of age or completing 35 years in service, whichever comes first.
The government said the reform is aimed at standardising procedures, improving efficiency, and ensuring that experienced civil servants continue contributing to government operations until their official exit date.
NEWS
Was It Arrest or Routine Review? DSS, Okey Ndibe Give Contradicting Accounts Over Lagos Airport Incident
Confusion has trailed an encounter between Nigerian author and columnist Okey Ndibe and operatives of the Department of State Services (DSS) at the Murtala Muhammed International Airport, Lagos, with both sides offering conflicting explanations of what happened.
Ndibe confirmed that he was held for more than three hours by DSS operatives before being released. In a post shared on his Facebook page, he expressed appreciation to those who reached out after news of the incident broke.
RELATED NEWS: DSS grilled Okey Ndibe over 2013 watch-list – Source
“I am so grateful for the expressions of concern by many friends, acquaintances and others over my detention earlier today by the DSS at Murtala Muhammed International Airport,” Ndibe wrote.
He added that despite the unexpected encounter, he was treated respectfully by the officers involved.
“The two agents who interacted with me were quite courteous throughout the three-plus hours of my detention,” he said.
Ndibe further confirmed his release, assuring supporters of his wellbeing.
“I’d like to confirm that I’ve been released… I am fine and in excellent spirits. I treasure your messages and gestures of friendship,” he added.
However, the DSS has denied that the author was arrested or detained. In a statement issued by its spokesperson, the agency said its interaction with Ndibe was part of an ongoing review of its security watchlist system.
“The Department of State Services hereby clarifies that it did not arrest or detain Prof Okey Ndibe at Murtala Muhammed International Airport on June 1, 2026 or any other place on that date for that matter,” the statement said.
The agency explained that its current leadership is reviewing long-standing watchlist entries, some dating back to previous administrations, to ensure citizens are not subjected to unnecessary inconvenience.
According to the DSS, “Individuals previously placed on watchlists are routinely invited for interaction as part of a review process that could lead to the downgrading or removal of their watchlist status.”






