Connect with us

NEWS

Why Atiku Is Angry With Me, Ortom Explains

Published

on

 

Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, the former vice president and presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), according to former governor of Benue state Samuel Ortom, is upset with him over a number of things, including his membership in the G-5 Integrity Group, his insistence on a southern president, and the implementation of the grazing law in Benue state.

The former governor responded to a recent statement attributed to a Special Assistant on Public Communication to the PDP presidential candidate, Mr. Phrank Shaibu, who allegedly lambasted members of the G-5 group for working against the victory of the PDP Presidential candidate in the election, in a statement released on Wednesday in Makurdi by his media assistant, Terver Akase.

In the statement, Mr. Shaibu had alleged that the G-5 governors were only seeking relevance, appointments, and protection from prosecution stressing that the decision of the G-5 governors not to support Atiku had nothing to do with patriotism.

Debunking the claim, Mr. Akase said: “We read a statement credited to the former Vice President and 2023 presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party, Atiku Abubakar, claiming that the immediate past Governor of Benue State, Samuel Ortom and his colleagues in the G-5 worked against him during the last election but have ongoing corruption cases at the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC and are being protected by President Bola Tinubu.

“We are not sure that the Special Assistant on Public Communication to the PDP presidential candidate got his consent before making the statement; because if he did, he would have refrained from blaming the G-5 for his loss at the polls.

“Alhaji Atiku Abubakar ought to be worried more that he has gone into history as the first presidential candidate of a leading political party to be rejected by key stakeholders including five sitting Governors and many other members of his party.

“The question that should bother him is, why did the G-5 and other members of the Integrity Group reject his candidacy? The group stood for justice, equity and fairness that the 2023 presidency must go to the southern part of the country and Nigerians saw the indisputable facts contained in the position of the Integrity Group and voted for a presidential candidate from the south.

“Atiku is angry because Governor Ortom and his colleagues in the G-5 refused to be used by him as ‘Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs)’ to circumvent and thwart the resolve of Nigerians to produce a President from the southern region.

“Another reason for Atiku’s attack on Chief Ortom is the former Benue State Governor’s boldness to speak truth to his face and rebuke him for making unstatesmanlike comments regarding the killing of Benue people by Fulani herdsmen. Atiku is on record to have expressed bitterness towards Ortom for daring to enact a law to prohibit open grazing of livestock in the state.

“The former Vice President’s diatribe against Chief Ortom can therefore be understood as the manifestation of frustration for losing the 2023 election. His failure to humble himself and unite the PDP, opting to remain haughty even when the signals were clear that he was heading for defeat summarized his performance in the last election.”

“Atiku lacks the moral ground to accuse anyone else of corruption. The words of his erstwhile principal, the former President, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo have remained indelible and incontrovertible.”

The statement referred to the book, ‘My Watch’ by former President Olusegun Obasanjo on pages 191-192 to buttress ex-Governor Ortom’s perception of the former Vice President.

According to Akase, “the role of anti-graft agencies is to investigate allegations of corruption. Whenever they invite someone, such a person has to honour the invitation. As a man who believes in the rule of law, Chief Ortom willingly visited EFCC when the Commission sought clarifications on the actions of his administration.

“We urge Nigerians to disregard the allegation by Alhaji Atiku Abubakar against the former Benue State Governor as it is unfounded and tantamount to cheap blackmail.”

NEWS

Fresh Evacuation: 271 Nigerians Set to Return from South Africa Tuesday

Published

on

The Federal Government has confirmed that another batch of 271 Nigerians will arrive in the country on Tuesday as part of its ongoing voluntary evacuation programme from South Africa ahead of planned anti-immigration protests.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs disclosed that an Air Peace aircraft departed Nigeria on Monday to evacuate Nigerians who voluntarily registered to return home amid growing concerns over demonstrations expected to begin on June 30.

Spokesperson for the ministry, Kimiebi Ebienfa, said the aircraft left Nigeria at about 3:00 p.m. on Monday and was scheduled to arrive in South Africa around 9:00 p.m. local time.

SEE MORE: June 30 Protest: Ramaphosa Urges South Africans to Reject Violence, Demonstrate Lawfully

According to him, the return flight will depart South Africa at midnight and is expected to land at the Murtala Muhammed International Airport in Lagos on Tuesday morning.

“Air Peace aircraft will depart Nigeria today, Monday, June 29, 2026, at 3:00 p.m. and is expected to arrive in South Africa at approximately 9:00 p.m. local time.

The return flight is scheduled to depart South Africa at 12:00 midnight and is expected to arrive at Murtala Muhammed International Airport, Lagos, on Tuesday morning,” Ebienfa stated.

He confirmed that 271 Nigerians are expected on the latest evacuation flight.

The evacuation follows President Bola Tinubu’s approval of a voluntary repatriation programme earlier this month to ensure the safe return of Nigerians willing to leave South Africa before the planned anti-immigration protests.

Earlier, the Federal Government approved five Air Peace evacuation flights after more than 500 Nigerians were screened for repatriation.

Before this latest operation, 328 Nigerians had already been evacuated in two batches. The first flight returned 262 Nigerians on June 11, while a second batch of 66 returnees arrived in Lagos on June 25.

Authorities said the evacuation exercise is being coordinated by the Federal Government in collaboration with Air Peace and other relevant agencies to ensure the safe return of all registered Nigerians.

Continue Reading

NEWS

June 30 Protest: Ramaphosa Urges South Africans to Reject Violence, Demonstrate Lawfully

Published

on

South African President Cyril Ramaphosa has called on citizens planning to participate in the June 30 anti-immigration protests to conduct themselves peacefully and within the bounds of the law, warning that violence, intimidation and vigilantism will not be tolerated.

In a message to the nation on Monday titled “Protest is both a right and a responsibility,” Ramaphosa acknowledged widespread public concerns over undocumented immigration, border management, pressure on public services and criminal syndicates exploiting the country’s immigration system.

SEE MORE: Why South African Opposition Leader Malema Was Sentenced to 5 Years in Prison

He said these concerns were legitimate and deserved to be addressed, but stressed that constitutional rights must not be used as a justification for unlawful conduct.

“The right to protest is enshrined in our Constitution. It is a credit to our robust democratic order that people are able to express their grievances openly. But the right to protest and freedom of expression does not allow people to threaten or intimidate others, or to engage in acts of vandalism or violence,” Ramaphosa said.

The South African leader disclosed that his administration was implementing reforms aimed at strengthening border management, improving the integrity of visa and asylum systems, increasing enforcement against undocumented immigration and tackling corruption that has weakened immigration control.

According to him, the government is determined to correct failures in the immigration system and hold accountable anyone who has enabled illegal immigration through corrupt practices.

Ramaphosa also revealed that consultations had been held with traditional leaders, labour unions, business groups, religious organisations and other stakeholders, many of whom expressed support for government efforts while calling for tolerance and respect for the rule of law.

Reiterating that peaceful protest remains a fundamental democratic right, the president warned that anyone involved in criminal activities during the demonstrations would face legal consequences.

“Those who intend to protest should do so peacefully, lawfully and with respect for the rights, dignity and safety of others. Where there is criminal conduct, those responsible will be held accountable and the law will take its course,” he said.

Ramaphosa further reminded citizens that many foreign nationals residing in South Africa are in the country legally and make valuable contributions to the economy and society through work, education, investment and family life.

He condemned attempts by private individuals to enforce immigration laws, describing such actions as vigilantism.

“The authority to demand identification and enforce immigration laws belongs to government law-enforcement officers acting within the Constitution—not to private individuals. Whatever the motivation, taking the law into one’s own hands is vigilantism and has no place in our constitutional democracy,” he stated.

The president urged South Africans not to repeat painful chapters of the country’s history, where people were stopped, profiled and humiliated based on suspicion.

He assured citizens that law-enforcement agencies were prepared to maintain public order while safeguarding the constitutional right to peaceful protest.

Ramaphosa concluded by calling for unity, urging South Africans to choose dialogue over confrontation and justice over vengeance as the country navigates the immigration debate.

Continue Reading

NEWS

NELFUND Declares War on Universities Over Tuition Refund Scandal, Unapproved Fee Hikes

Published

on

Things To Know About New Student Loan Act

The Nigerian Education Loan Fund (NELFUND) has vowed to take decisive action against tertiary institutions accused of withholding students’ tuition refunds and imposing unapproved fee increases despite benefiting from the Federal Government’s student loan scheme.

The Fund disclosed this in a statement issued on Monday by its Director of Strategic Communications, Oseyemi Oluwatuyi, following reports that some institutions had failed to refund students who paid their tuition fees before NELFUND later settled the same fees directly with the schools.

ALSO READ: NELFUND Shares Key Roles In Advancing SDGs At Nigerian Tertiary Institutions Conference

According to the agency, the alleged refusal or delay in refunding affected students is unacceptable and runs contrary to the objectives of the student loan programme.

NELFUND also expressed concern over reports that some universities and other higher institutions have arbitrarily increased tuition and other institutional charges, warning that such practices place unnecessary financial pressure on students and undermine the purpose of the scheme.

The Fund stressed that the student loan initiative, introduced by the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, was designed to remove financial barriers to higher education and ensure that eligible Nigerian students can pursue their academic goals without undue hardship.

To address the situation, NELFUND said it has begun engaging with the affected institutions and relevant authorities to ensure that all eligible students receive their refunds without further delay.

The agency further revealed that measures are being put in place to ensure tuition fees and other institutional charges remain fair, transparent, and consistent with the objectives of the Federal Government’s education financing programme.

Reaffirming its commitment to students, NELFUND stated that it would continue to protect the interests of beneficiaries while preserving the integrity of the student loan scheme.

The Fund also warned that it would not allow exploitative practices by institutions to deny students the full benefits of the Federal Government’s landmark education intervention.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2022. Biztellers, powered by Alphaxristi.

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x