Connect with us

Business

ALSCON: Nigeria’s case of self-inflicted economic sabotage?

Published

on

By Yemie ADEOYE

“I am the greatest obstacle to my greatest dreams.”

–Craig D. Lounsbrough

LAGOS-THE Aluminium Smelter Company of Nigeria, popularly called ALSCON, is Unarguably one of the largest Aluminium smeltering company ever to be sited on the continent of Africa, and also unarguably one of the most strategically located on the planet.

With the proximity of this plant to neighboring African countries around the Gulf of Guinea like Ghana, Togo, Benin, Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Sao Tome, it can be easily seen that this plant would be an economic booster to Nigeria.

Nigeria’s financial loss to the controversy

The plant was designed to produce 193,000 tons of Aluminium annually at optimal capacity. As at 1997, a ton of Aluminium was sold at 3000USD. What this means is that at full capacity ALSCON was designed to generate approximately 600 million USD annually.

However with the current market price of about US$2,108 per metric ton according to Statista, the plant will be generating a minimum of US$406,844,000 per year, and with a good well structured and business inclined management, the company is capable of generating about a billion dollars annually in the very near future. Sadly, since this bid happened 16 years ago, Nigeria has not generated a dime from ALSCON, thereby defeating the sole essence of the bid process.

President Muhammadu Buhari

Chief Justice of Nigeria Ibrahim Tanko Muhammad

The controversy that has surrounded and grounded the activities of this huge economic infrastructure is preposterous, unimaginable for an economy begging for investments and could at best be described as a self-inflicted economic sabotage.

Nigeria goes cap in hand to china, IMF, world Bank, Paris Club and any other institution or country that has capacity to spare a loan, while it continues to systemically and installmentally destroy its money-generating infrastructures. How can this ever be rationalized?

 

A brief history of the controversy

  1. In 2004, the Bureau of Public enterprise, BPE called for bids from interested investors willing to purchase the Aluminum Smelter Company of Nigeria, ALSCON in Ikot-Abasi, Akwa-Ibom state, south-south Nigeria.
  2. The American BFI Group led by a Nigerian-American professional, Dr. Reuben Jaja also came down to Nigeria to Bid for the aluminum smelting plant and emerged the winner, after putting up a bid of $410 million.
  3. Surprisingly and under controversial circumstances, the BFIG, which was declared winner was not handed the needed documents by Government in order to proceed to the payment stage, and the Russian company, UC Rusal which came second during the bid with a far lesser bid of about $250 million was handed the share purchased agreement, SPA, with all the agreed annexures which would make the plant a successful investment. This allegedly happened under seemingly shady and very controversial circumstances.
  4. The BFIG immediately went to court to seek redress. The Group lost at the high court and moved to the appeals court, it again lost the case and moved to the Supreme Court where it finally got judgment in its favour in 2012. The judgment was unanimous by all five justices of the apex court.
  5. Since receiving the Supreme Court judgment in 2012, the BPE has refused to honour the judgment of the court, and in the last eight years since the judgment, the BFIG has gone back to court severally to enforce the Supreme Court judgment, which is in its favour. This culminated in the federal court judgment of December 17, 2019 instructing the BPE to comply with the judgment of the Supreme Court and hand over the SPA to the BFI Group according to the Supreme Court judgment of 2012. The federal high court went further to order the remand of the Director General of the BPE in prison custody for 30 days as a deterrent and for his failure to honour the Supreme Court judgment.

NASS

Director General of the BPE, Alex Okoh

Dr. Reuben Jaja, President of the BFI Group

In 2005, the senate committee on commercialization and privatization issued an order rebuking the presidency for revoking the bid and selling to the Russians at a reduced price, and described the conduct of the presidency as “fraud and corruption against the nation”

The House of Representatives issued another order in 2015 demanding that the Share Purchase Agreement, SPA, which is the bone of contention, should be handed over to the BFIG with all the 17 annexures included in it. In all the BFIG says it has four orders of the national assembly in its favour and saying almost the same thing, why isn’t anyone listening for sixteen years?

Sixteen years of litigation has gone by between the Bureau of Public Enterprise, BPE, and the preferred winner of the bid, the BFI Group, with all the courts of the land, including the Supreme Court sticking to one narrative, which is that the BPE should hand over all relevant and necessary documents to the BFIG, which must include the annexures in order for the group to effect the 10 percent payment according to the laws.

Now, how difficult could it be to obey the rule of law, which governs every normal society? This writer has sighted several documents including court judgments, which alludes to the fact that there is a duly orchestrated strategy to undermine the judiciary of this country and bring it to ridicule before every prospective investors around the world, thereby undermining the national economy of this great nation.

Nigeria’s current reality

Currently, Nigeria is ranking in the negative on all developmental indices. With over 10 million out of school children scattered all over the country. Also ranking as the “poverty capital of the world, it is said that if the country is unable to change its current trajectory, it will be home to 110 million people living in extreme poverty by the year 2030, as against the 90 million people currently in that state of life.

How can a country with such liability amidst infrastructure deficits afford to treat foreign investors who are here to help lift its economy with such disdain and wickedness? What message does this protracted anomaly send to the international community, investor nations and organizations and even to us as a nation?

Now the plant, which was at 30 percent production capacity, is currently down to a paltry 5 percent. The staff strength, which was over 800 about 15 years ago, is now abysmally down to less than 30 people. A company that was valued at about US$1.5 billion has been devalued to around US$100 million dollars according to the KPMG audited financial reports.

The BFI Group

This group is not just an American group with interest in treating a Nigerian infrastructure as the Russians currently do, but a Nigerian professional leads it with deep roots to this country, as the great grandson of the famous king Jaja of Opobo Kingdom in present day Rivers state and with very towering global attainments, especially in the United States of America where he worked with several organizations including the United States federal reserve Bank. e was a lead banking law enforcement participant on various delegations including the U.S. Financial Institution Experts delegation to the Republics of Russia and Hungary.

The gentleman is an asset to Nigeria if only we can recognize one when we see it, and his biggest problem is probably his inability to transact business in the Nigerian. When asked he has said severally that the Group is guided by the foreign corrupt Practices Act of the United States.

After seeing several interviews granted by the president of the BFI group, Dr. Reuben Jaja, including the one he had on the Energie Platform radio show, it does not only leaves much to be desired, but makes it very difficult to decipher how we intentionally shoot ourselves in the foot by making very simple issues become so knotty and difficult.

There is a Supreme Court Judgment issued and written in English. The judgment was very clear, and one wonders how such a judgment can be so flagrantly disregarded by an agency of government without any form of reprimand or call to order? Either by the presidency or the Attorney General of the federation, especially as the agency in question, the BPE, is under the presidency. This sad development can only tarnish the country’s image before the international community and prospective investor nations and organizations if allowed to continue unchecked.

The President of the BFIG made it clear on national television with documents to show, that he and his group have always been ready and willing to pay for this plant as stipulated by law, all they seek from the BPE is the sixteen page share purchase agreement, SPA with the 17 annexures inclusive as directed by the courts, and the moment this duly signed document is handed to the group, they will proceed to comply with the stipulated 2 weeks for payment.

According to him, since the take over of the Plant by the Russian UC Russal, they have continued to strip off the valued assets of the plant and have been intercepted on occasions by the Nigerian Army, which handed over the accosted four trucks to the Nigerian police, all filled with valued assets of the plants.

It is worthy of note that this exact scenario played out in Ajaokuta steel plant when the Indian company, GINL was in charge of the plant. It is on record that the villagers accosted the officials of the company while attempting to cart away assets of the steel plant.

Unanswered Questions

The questions now begging for answers are: what is the offence of the BFIG after it paid the requisite US$1 million expression of interest fee and went ahead to win the bid?

Why is it so difficult to hand over the requested documents even after the pronouncement of the Supreme Court of Nigeria, which is final on all litigations and cannot be appealed?

Could this be the case in a true democracy and in an egalitarian society?

Who is afraid of the BFIG? What does this say about our integrity as a nation?

If the BPE is right and justified in this case, why will the federal High court Abuja commit the Director General of the BPE, Mr. Alex Okoh to a 30-days jail sentence in December of 2019 for failing to comply with the supreme court judgment?

What is the supposed role of the National Assembly in this case of gross economic sabotage on the nation?

What is the role of the presidency, the Inspector General of police, and the Attorney General of the federation and minister of justice under whose watch a unanimous judgment of the Supreme Court is being so flagrantly disobeyed and disregarded by an agency of government?

Nigeria’s past experiences with notable investors

This attitude to foreign investors, especially the ones we invite into our country for economic reasons must stop for image sake, and for the sake of all we hold dear as a nation.

Since the return to civil rule about 20 years ago, Nigeria has had some very sad, but notable experiences with foreign investors, which has not been helpful to our image as a nation.

First it was Sir Richard Branson and the Virgin group, which entered into a partnership with the country to form the Virgin Nigeria Airline, his views about Nigeria after the crash of this partnership is quite sad and a very terrible blow to the Nigerian brand.

We also recall the Ajaokuta steel plant controversy. A major economic booster for Nigeria, which was allowed to rot away even at 98 percent completion. We gave it to the Indian company, GINL, but of course, it also landed in the courts for litigation, even as the federal government seems to be at the receiving end, begging for renegotiations and out of court settlement, as the state of the plant remains moribund!

Very recently, the case of P&ID emerged and has continued to embarrass Nigeria internationally as that supposed economically viable partnership has also gone up in flames and gone from arbitration to litigation in far away United Kingdom.

Now, we have the BFIG in our courts for sixteen whole years. That is a lifetime! It is enough time to revamp and rebuild the entire infrastructure of Nigeria. What sort of nation are we building? Can we really lay claim to a civil society if court orders are shabbily treated with this sort of flagrant disregard even for a judgment of the highest court of the land?

I seize this opportunity and moment to call on Mr. President, the National Assembly and the inspector General of Police, The Attorney General and minister of Justice to grant this issue the attention that it deserves and require. It is a case of monumental national importance, as the image and integrity of our nation is on the line.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Click to comment
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Business

NNPC Ltd Exploration Spending Down 87%

Published

on

The Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC Ltd) slashed additions to its exploration and evaluation assets by 87.7 percent to N78.8 billion in 2025, from N640.5 billion in 2024, according to its latest Annual Financial Report (AFS).

In the same vein, the national oil company’s gas flaring charges during the period under consideration fell by 62.2 percent from N1.32 trillion in 2024 to N499 billion in 2025, the financial report indicated.

However, the decline in exploration funding may not be unconnected with the slowdown in the search for hydrocarbons in underexplored areas, including the Chad Basin, Benue Trough, Bida Basin and Sokoto Basin, all in the northern part of Nigeria.

Despite billions of naira committed to the programme, projects such as Kolmani, straddling Bauchi and Gombe States; drilling and appraisal activities such as the Wadi-2 exploratory well in Borno and exploration activities and seismic data gathering in Nasarawa State have yet to reach breakthrough levels.

READ ALSO: 200 Imo Teachers Benefit from NCDMB’s Effective Curriculum Training

To compound the matter. President Bola Tinubu’s Executive Order 9 of 2026, has now suspended the state oil major’s collection and management of the 30 percent Frontier Exploration Fund (FEF) and ordered that the money be remitted directly to the Federation Account for distribution among the federal, state and local governments.

On gas flaring, the group’s total charges declined to N499 billion from N1.32 trillion in 2024. The amount comprised N247.8 billion in flare fees, down from N708.6 billion, and N251.2 billion in penalties for flaring above approved limits, compared with N610.4 billion previously.

The fees are statutory charges based on limits approved by the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC) under Section 104 of the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA). Despite the reduction, penalties accounted for approximately half of the group’s total gas flaring charges.

At the parent company level, gas flaring charges dropped to N317.3 billion from N1.04 trillion.

The decline came as the NNPC Ltd paid N11.56 trillion to settle royalties, rentals and gas flare obligations during the year, more than four times the N2.83 trillion recorded in 2024.

The reduction in outstanding liabilities also reflected a N1.18 trillion write-back of excess provisions from earlier years. Consequently, the group’s outstanding liability under the category fell by 86.2 percent to N1.27 trillion from N9.21 trillion.

Royalty charges, however, increased by 4.1 percent to N4.66 trillion, while the levy payable to the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) rose by 29.2 percent to N514.7 billion.

Overall, total additions across intangible asset classes fell by 88.6 percent to N79 billion, from N692.7 billion in 2024, while additions to mineral rights were nil, compared with N46.3 billion a year earlier.

Mineral rights represent rights associated with exploring for or extracting oil and gas from specified acreage.

In Nigeria’s petroleum industry, these rights are linked to legally recognised entitlements to undertake petroleum operations, subject to applicable laws, lease terms and regulatory approvals. The absence of additions means the NNPC Ltd recorded no new expenditure in that asset category during the year.

The report also showed that mineral rights valued at N16.4 billion relating to oil mining leases 64 and 66 were removed after being fully impaired. An impairment occurs when an asset’s recorded value is no longer considered recoverable under applicable accounting rules.

The report also disclosed lower spending on selected operational activities, as rig site and stimulation expenses declined to N2.9 billion from N16.5 billion earlier recorded by the national oil company. Besides, the AFS showed that allocated technical and production costs fell to N144.4 billion from N489.6 billion, while crude handling and port charges declined to N1.06 trillion from N1.52 trillion.

However, direct well expenses increased by 65.9 percent to N4.15 trillion from N2.50 trillion, while depreciation of oil and gas properties rose by 15 percent to N3.71 trillion. Spending on safety, environmental and pollution control activities also increased to N74.5 billion from N2.3 billion.

In the same vein, labour costs charged to the cost of sales rose more than fourfold to N254.5 billion from N59.7 billion, while insurance and security expenses increased to N213.9 billion from N182.2 billion.

Elsewhere, the NNPC Ltd’s financials showed that investments in subsidiaries in the parent company’s accounts declined to N6.23 trillion from N6.65 trillion, with the three refineries carried at a combined value of N2.72 trillion.

The wider group recorded weaker revenue performance, with revenue falling by 23.4 percent to N34.52 trillion in 2025 from N45.08 trillion a year earlier. In the same vein, Anoh Gas, in which the NNPC Ltd holds a 50 percent interest, recorded a loss of N4.86 billion.

Continue Reading

Business

Petrol Price Hike Looms as Oil Hits $110/barrel

Published

on

Nigeria Earns N12.4tn from Crude Oil in 11 Months – Report

Nigeria faces fresh pressure on petrol and diesel prices following a sharp rally in global crude oil prices to nearly $110 per barrel at the weekend.

Already, industry experts are warning that sustained increases could raise domestic fuel costs despite expanding local refining capacity.

For Nigerian businesses, sustained increases in diesel and petrol prices could raise the cost of running generators, transporting goods and operating equipment. Manufacturers, farmers and transport operators could pass some of the additional expenses to consumers, while higher haulage costs could increase the prices of food and other essential goods.

The development, analysts note, presents a dilemma for Africa’s largest oil producer, which stands to earn more from crude exports but remains vulnerable to rising energy costs that could further squeeze households, manufacturers, transport operators and other businesses.

Brent crude, the international benchmark, rose 3.72 per cent to about $109.90 per barrel, while West Texas Intermediate, the US benchmark, gained 3.51 per cent to $101.40 per barrel. Murban crude also advanced 3.08 per cent to $113.40 per barrel, according to market data published by Oilprice.com.

The rally followed escalating geopolitical tensions and attacks on energy infrastructure, heightening fears of supply disruptions and sustained pressure on global energy markets.

Publicity Secretary of the Crude Oil Refiners Association of Nigeria (CORAN), Mr. Eche Stephen Idoko, while commenting on the development, said the central concern was the contradiction of an oil-producing country potentially earning more from crude exports while its citizens remained exposed to higher energy costs.

“Ordinarily, rising crude prices should be good news for Nigeria’s revenues and foreign exchange position. However, the benefits could be substantially undermined by rising costs of transportation, manufacturing, agriculture and ultimately the general cost of living,” Idoko said.

READ ALSO: NIPCO Gas Licences, NNPC Ltd Management Face Reps Probe

He argued that higher crude prices also increase the cost of feedstock for Nigerian refiners, stressing that domestic refining alone cannot insulate consumers from international oil price movements.

According to him, the naira-for-crude arrangement addresses the currency of settlement but does not necessarily reduce the underlying cost of crude oil.

Idoko called for a commercially sustainable domestic crude supply and pricing framework, arguing that local refiners should not have to bear unnecessary logistics, financing and transactional costs associated with crude supply arrangements.

He also questioned how much of the additional revenue accruing to Nigeria from higher crude prices would translate into reducing the structural cost of supplying energy to Nigerians.

For CORAN, he said, the priority should be to strengthen domestic refining competitiveness rather than rely on further government-administered retail discounts or price ceilings.

Idoko noted that there was a real risk of higher fuel prices if crude oil remained at elevated levels, although the extent of any increase would depend on exchange rates, international petroleum product prices, refining margins and domestic supply conditions.

Executive Secretary and Chief Executive Officer of the Major Energies Marketers Association of Nigeria (MEMAN), Mr. Clement Isong, also identified rising international product prices and distribution expenses as potential sources of additional pressure on domestic fuel prices.

In a webinar presentation titled “Structuring Nigeria’s Domestic Market Distribution Framework” delivered at the weekend, Isong said the final price paid by consumers reflected not only international product prices and foreign exchange movements, but also freight, financing, transportation, regulatory charges and distribution costs.

He further warned that rising diesel prices could compound the cost of distributing petrol because diesel is a critical input in road transport and the movement of petroleum products.

According to the presentation, petrol prices rose by 33 per cent to N1,378 per litre between January and October 2026, while automotive gas oil, commonly known as diesel, increased by 36 per cent to N1,853 per litre.

Isong said higher diesel prices increased the cost of transporting petroleum products, including petrol, adding to distribution expenses and wider economic pressures.

The latest crude oil rally could intensify these pressures if it translates into higher international petroleum product prices and replacement costs for refiners and marketers. Any impact on pump prices, however, would depend on movements in international product prices, exchange rates, refining margins and domestic supply conditions.

The pressure on refined products is also being compounded by tight global diesel supplies. According to the market report published by Oilprice.com on October 16, the International Energy Agency warned that diesel supplies could remain tight into 2027, with inventories unlikely to be rebuilt before the third quarter of next year.

Global diesel production reportedly fell by 1.7 million barrels per day year-on-year to 27.2 million barrels per day, highlighting the pressure on supplies of a fuel widely used in transportation, manufacturing, agriculture and electricity generation.

Isong added that Nigeria also needed a more efficient distribution system to minimise avoidable expenses between refineries and consumers.

He recommended that domestic refineries serve as a major source of supply as production becomes commercially available, with imports used to bridge domestic supply deficits through competitive procurement based on the lowest evaluated price.

He also called for predictable bulk supply arrangements, transparent pricing methodologies and better coordination among suppliers, depot operators, transporters and purchasers to reduce operational delays and logistics costs.

The MEMAN chief executive further advocated supply-chain cost reductions, targeted and temporary relief for essential economic activities, and reduced dependence on petrol and diesel through alternatives such as compressed natural gas, electric vehicles and small-scale solar power.

He maintained that efforts to reduce costs should preserve market-based pricing.

Also commenting, energy policy analyst and partner, Bloomfield Law Practice, Mr. Ayodele Oni, posited that Friday’s $110 is not a new crisis.

“Brent topped $120 in April, and Nigerians have already absorbed much of this shock. The real question is whether $110 becomes the floor,”.

Oni argued that in a deregulated market, there is no subsidy buffer, so a sustained rise will reach the pump, warning that if Brent holds above $105 for a few weeks, the recent easing of gantry prices will reverse.

According to him, domestic refining softens the blow by removing freight, import costs and foreign exchange demand for imported fuel, saying without the Dangote refinery, the pass-through today would be far steeper.

“Price shocks come from abroad. Our vulnerability to them is a choice,”.
Courtesy – The Sun Nigeria

Continue Reading

Business

Renaissance Capital Sees Significant Upside in Dangote Refinery, Lifts Valuation by 33.4%

Published

on

Leading investment research firm Renaissance Capital Africa (RCA) has upgraded its valuation of Dangote Petroleum Refinery and Petrochemicals (DPRP) to N700.41 per share, implying a 33.4 percent upside from the refinery’s IPO offer price of N525 per share.

According to RCA, the valuation increase reflects the refinery’s exceptional earnings performance in the first nine months of 2026, driven by stronger refining margins and better-than-anticipated operational results. Revenue, EBITDA and net profit all exceeded the firm’s expectations during the period.

READ ALSO: Dangote Refinery IPO Elicits Participation in 90 Countries Globally

In its October 16, 2026, update, titled “Stronger Refining Margins Drive Earnings Outperformance,” the investment firm cited robust refining margins and stronger operating results as key drivers of the enhanced valuation.

The remarkable investor interest comes against the backdrop of the refinery’s strong operational and financial performance. For the nine months ended September 30, 2026, the DPRP reported revenue of US22.5 billion and net profit of US4.7 billion, representing one of the strongest financial performances recorded by an African industrial enterprise in recent years.

The results marked a significant turnaround from the corresponding period in 2025, when the company recorded a loss of US117.2 million. Revenue grew by 144 percent from US9.2 billion, while EBITDA increased nearly nine-fold to US5.5billionfromUS627.6 million. Operating cash flow rose more than ten-fold to US$3.68 billion, underscoring the refinery’s growing ability to generate substantial earnings and cash flow from its operations.

The company also strengthened its balance sheet considerably, moving from a net debt position of US1.73 billion as of September 2025 to a net cash position of US651 million by September 2026, reflecting improved liquidity and financial resilience.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2022. Biztellers, powered by Alphaxristi.

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x