Connect with us

Politics

Atiku, PDP Limits Witness Count To 100 In Tribunal Hearing

Published

on

 

The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar, have announced their intention to present a limited number of witnesses, not exceeding 100, during the proceedings at the Presidential Election Petitions Tribunal (PEPT).

 

Both the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar, along with the All Progressives Congress (APC) represented by President-elect Bola Tinubu, are engaged in legal proceedings challenging the outcome of the February 25 election.

 

During a court session in Abuja on Saturday, Chris Uche, the counsel for Atiku and the PDP, informed the court that all parties involved had convened, discussed, and reached a consensus regarding the number of witnesses to be presented, as well as the duration and manner of their examination.

 

Uche further stated that despite being granted a seven-week period to call witnesses, they anticipate requiring only three weeks due to the narrowing scope of the issues at hand.

 

It was agreed upon by all parties involved in the lawsuit to streamline the number of witnesses and allocate specific durations for each party to present their witnesses.

 

Regarding the presentation of evidence, it was agreed that the lead witness would be allocated 30 minutes for their testimony, which would involve the submission and identification of relevant documents.

 

The proposal suggested granting 15 minutes to each respondent for cross-examination, as well as five minutes for the re-examination of the lead witness by the petitioners.

 

Additionally, it was proposed that other witnesses presented by the petitioners would have 10 minutes for their testimony, followed by 10 minutes for cross-examination by the respondents.

 

As for the star witnesses of the respondents, namely the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Bola Tinubu, and the All Progressives Congress (APC), it was proposed that they would be given 30 minutes each for their testimonies. In turn, the respondents would have 30 minutes for cross-examining their own witnesses.

 

INEC confirmed that it has two witnesses who are prepared to testify, while the counsel representing the President-elect stated that they have 39 witnesses ready to present their testimonies.

 

In the case of the President-elect, it was required that the report of any star witness be provided to the opposing parties 48 hours prior to the hearing.

 

Furthermore, it was mandated that the schedule of documents to be filed should be shared with all parties before the commencement of witness testimonies.

 

The examination of experts or star witnesses was set to be conducted within a time frame of 20 minutes, while respondents were allotted 30 minutes for cross-examination. Re-examination, if necessary, was scheduled for five minutes.

 

Additionally, for non-expert or regular star witnesses, the allocated time for examination was set at 10 minutes, followed by a 15-minute cross-examination, and a five-minute re-examination.

 

Similar rules and timeframes were established for the All Progressives Congress (APC), with the only difference being the number of witnesses it intends to present, which is 25.

Politics

Political Earthquake in Zamfara as Gov Lawal Dumps PDP for APC

Published

on

Governor Dauda Lawal of Zamfara State has explained that the persistent crisis and legal disputes within the Peoples Democratic Party compelled him to defect to the All Progressives Congress.

The governor’s defection was formally announced on Monday by his deputy, Mani Mummuni, after a stakeholders’ meeting held at the Government House in Gusau.

In a statement issued by the governor’s spokesperson, Sulaiman Bala Idris, the move was described as a necessary step taken in the interest of the state and supported by political stakeholders across Zamfara.

SEE ALSO: JUST IN: PDP Crisis Deepens as Appeal Court Upholds Ban on Ibadan Convention

According to the statement, Governor Lawal had remained committed to the PDP despite the ongoing leadership crisis and had made several efforts to reconcile factions within the party.

However, attempts to achieve peace and unity reportedly failed, leading to prolonged legal battles.

The development followed a judgment by the Court of Appeal in Abuja, which dismissed an appeal filed by the PDP challenging an earlier ruling of the Federal High Court.

The earlier judgment had restrained the Independent National Electoral Commission from recognising the outcome of the party’s national convention held in Ibadan, Oyo State.

The governor was said to have informed political stakeholders during a series of meetings that he would make a final decision about his political future after the appellate court delivered its ruling.

Following the judgment, Lawal concluded that joining the APC would better position him to continue what he described as the “Zamfara Rescue and Rebuild Mission.”

His defection marks a significant shift in the political landscape of Zamfara State and could influence political alignments ahead of the 2027 general elections.

Continue Reading

Politics

Appeal Court Deals Major Blow to Aiyedatiwa’s Re-election Hopes in Ondo

Published

on

The Court of Appeal in Abuja has handed a significant setback to Ondo State Governor Lucky Aiyedatiwa, dismissing his appeal challenging a Federal High Court ruling that questioned his eligibility to contest the upcoming governorship election.

A three-member panel delivered a unanimous judgment on Monday, affirming that the trial court acted correctly when it allowed Dr Akindele Egbuwalo, the plaintiff, to amend his originating summons.

ALSO READ: No Shake-Up in Ondo: Aiyedatiwa Denies Plot To Remove Deputy Gov

Justice Uchechukwu Onyemenam, who read the lead judgment, said the governor failed to show that the High Court’s decision caused any miscarriage of justice or denied him a fair hearing.

The appeal was therefore dismissed for lacking merit, and the court awarded ₦2 million in costs against Aiyedatiwa.

The ruling reinforces the November 24, 2025, Federal High Court decision in Akure, which granted Egbuwalo permission to challenge Aiyedatiwa’s eligibility for re-election.

Earlier, the Court of Appeal also rejected an application by Aiyedatiwa to set aside a January 27, 2026, order staying proceedings in the case before the Federal High Court.

The appellate court clarified that the stay was a lawful exercise of its jurisdiction aimed at protecting the integrity of the proceedings.

The panel further emphasized that attempting to overturn its own order would be akin to sitting on appeal over its own decision.

The governor’s remaining option, the court noted, is to challenge the ruling at the Supreme Court. Another ₦2 million in costs was awarded against Aiyedatiwa.

 

Continue Reading

Politics

JUST IN: PDP Crisis Deepens as Appeal Court Upholds Ban on Ibadan Convention

Published

on

#NigeriaDecides: FCT PDP Chairman Dies In Accident

The crisis rocking the Peoples Democratic Party has deepened following a ruling by the Court of Appeal in Abuja which upheld a ban on the party’s proposed national convention in Ibadan, Oyo State.

A three-man panel of the appellate court on Monday dismissed an appeal filed by a faction of the party led by former Minister of Special Duties, Kabiru Turaki, challenging the jurisdiction of the Federal High Court to hear a suit concerning the controversial convention.

The Turaki-led faction had approached the Court of Appeal after a Federal High Court barred the party from holding its planned national convention scheduled for November 14 and 15, 2025.

SEE MORE: Fubara Moves to Rebuild Cabinet as R/Assembly Screens Nine Commissioner Nominees

The lower court also restrained the Independent National Electoral Commission from recognising or validating the proposed convention.

However, delivering judgment, the appellate court ruled that the Federal High Court had the authority to entertain the case, rejecting the argument that the matter was purely an internal affair of the party.

According to the court, the appellants could not present what it described as a clear violation of the party’s constitution and the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria as merely an internal party issue.

The panel subsequently dismissed the appeal and awarded a cost of N2 million against the appellants.

The ruling is part of judgments delivered in nine harmonised appeals filed by the Turaki-led faction over the dispute surrounding the convention.

The latest court decision is expected to further intensify the internal wrangling within the opposition party as it continues to grapple with leadership disputes and preparations ahead of the 2027 general elections.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2022. Biztellers, powered by Alphaxristi.

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x