NEWS
JUST IN: Tribunal Strikes Out Sections Of Obi, LP’s Election Petition
The Presidential Election Petition Court, PEPC, based in Abuja, has rejected the claim made by the Labour Party, LP, and its candidate, Mr. Peter Obi, regarding the alleged rigging of the 2023 presidential election in favor of President Bola Tinubu.
In a preliminary ruling delivered by Justice Abba Mohammed, the court determined that Obi and the LP did not provide credible evidence to substantiate their accusation that the election on February 25 was tainted by significant corrupt practices.
The court noted that although the Petitioners asserted that the election had irregularities, they were unable to specify the exact locations where these alleged infractions occurred.
The court also pointed out that despite Obi and the LP’s claim that the election was rigged in 18,088 polling units nationwide, they were unable to provide the specific locations of these polling units.
Additionally, the court ruled that Obi’s allegation that fictitious results were submitted to President Tinubu and the APC by the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, lacked sufficient evidence to be substantiated.
Furthermore, the court emphasized that the Petitioners failed to specify the figures they alleged were deducted from their election results in various states across the federation, including Ondo, Oyo, Rivers, Yobe, Borno, Tabara, Osun, and Lagos.
The court also noted that the Petitioners did not provide details regarding the polling units where over-voting was said to have occurred or the precise numbers of unlawful votes credited to Tinubu by the INEC.
The court emphasized that even though Obi and the LP had stated their intention to rely on spreadsheets, forensic reports, and expert analysis from their expert witnesses, they did not attach these documents to the petition or provide them to the Respondents, as legally required.
Furthermore, the court noted that the petition contained significant allegations related to violence, non-voting, vote suppression, fictitious recording of election results, and corrupt practices.
However, the Petitioners did not provide specific details or particulars regarding the polling units where these incidents allegedly occurred.
The court determined that various sections of the petition containing the allegations were deemed “vague, imprecise, nebulous, and lacking in specific details.”
Consequently, the court decided to strike out paragraphs 9, 60, 61, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 76, 77, 78, 83, and 89 of the petition.
However, it’s important to note that the court dismissed the argument put forth by the Respondents claiming that Obi was not validly nominated by the LP to participate in the presidential election.
The court acknowledged that the Respondents presented the argument that Obi had departed from the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, on May 24, 2022, and subsequently joined the LP on May 27, 2022.
According to the Respondents, as of May 30, 2022, Obi was not a valid member of the LP, and therefore, he could not have legitimately participated in the LP’s presidential primary election.
They contended that his name should not have been included in the LP’s membership register submitted to INEC, as this should have been done 30 days prior to the primary election.
In its ruling, the court asserted that matters related to party membership are considered internal affairs of a political party and are not subject to judicial review.
The court further emphasized that it is the exclusive right of the LP to determine who qualifies as its member. It stated that the Respondents lacked the legal standing to challenge or question Obi’s membership status within the LP.
The court also ruled that, in contrast to the argument made by Tinubu and the APC, the Petitioners were not required to include Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, who came second in the election, or his party, the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, as parties to the case.
It clarified that both Atiku and the PDP were not statutory Respondents or necessary parties to the petition.
With the preliminary issues settled, the Chairman of the five-member panel, Justice Haruna Tsammani, is presently delivering the court’s judgment on the substantive matter.
A suit challenging President Bola Tinubu’s controversial appointment of a Sole Administrator for Rivers State suffered a setback on Thursday as the President and the Attorney-General of the Federation, Prince Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, failed to appear or send legal representation before the Federal High Court sitting in Abuja.
The matter, brought before Justice James Omotosho, was instituted by Abuja-based legal practitioner, Mr. Johnmary Jideobi, who is urging the court to declare the appointment of Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ekwe Ibas (Rtd) as unconstitutional and to nullify the suspension of the state’s elected Governor and Deputy Governor.
READ MORE: BREAKING: HURIWA Urges Supreme Court To Dispense Justice Quick On Rivers Emergency Rule
Although the Attorneys-General of Lagos, Bayelsa, Taraba, and Edo states were present and announced their appearances, the absence of legal representation for both the President (1st Defendant) and the AGF (2nd Defendant) drew attention during the proceedings.
Plaintiff’s counsel, Mr. Chimezie Enuka, confirmed to the court that all parties—except the Attorneys-General of Zamfara and Bauchi states—had been properly served with the originating processes and hearing notice.
Following a consensus among the present legal teams, Justice Omotosho adjourned the matter to June 11, 2025, and ordered that fresh hearing notices be issued to all defendants.
The suit, filed under number FHC/ABJ/CS/572/2025, has Tinubu, the AGF, and the 36 state Attorneys-General listed as defendants. Jideobi is asking the court to set aside all decisions and actions taken by Ibas in the name of a Sole Administrator, arguing they lack any constitutional basis.
In his affidavit in support of the suit, the plaintiff asserted that President Tinubu does not possess the constitutional powers to suspend elected state officials or to appoint unelected figures to govern in their place.
“As a Nigerian lawyer and all through my years of practice, I have never seen the word ‘Sole Administrator’ in the amended 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria,” Jideobi stated.
“I know that neither the 1st Defendant nor the 2nd Defendant appointed the Governor and Deputy-Governor of Rivers State of Nigeria and that no Governor or Deputy Governor in Nigeria is an appointee of the 1st and 2nd Defendants,” he added.
The plaintiff contends that the only constitutionally recognized grounds for removing or interrupting the tenure of elected Governors and their deputies are outlined in Sections 180, 188, 189, 305, and 306 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended.
He is therefore seeking a declaration from the court that the President has “NO constitutional authority to either remove, suspend or otherwise tamper with the tenure of a duly elected Governor and Deputy Governor of a State and appoint a sole Administrator [or any other substitute howsoever called or described].”
Jideobi warned that unless the court intervenes, “removal of duly elected Governors and Deputy-Governors may become the pastime of the President, thereby opening the floodgate of anarchy capable of consuming this nation.”
He added: “I have instituted this suit in the public interest, in the defence of the Rule of Law and accentuation of the supremacy of the Constitution… It will be in the interest of justice for this Honourable Court to grant the prayers contained on the face of this Originating Summons.”
Among the specific reliefs sought are an order setting aside the suspension of the Governor and Deputy Governor of Rivers State, a nullification of Ibas’ appointment, and a directive ordering him to vacate the Government House immediately.
In a dramatic show of solidarity, members of the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) staged a picket outside the Federal Ministry of Mines and Steel Development’s headquarters in Abuja.
The protest was sparked by the ministry’s refusal to comply with a court order for the reinstatement of Comrade Victor Ekpaha, who was dismissed from his position more than 20 years ago.
READ ALSO: Tariff Hike Protest: Telecoms Union Backs NLC’s Suspension Of Protest
The workers’ action resulted in the shutdown of the ministry’s operations, as they called for Ekpaha’s immediate reinstatement and the payment of his full salary, allowances, and other benefits for the over two decades that the case has been unresolved.
The NLC has expressed its determination to continue pressuring the ministry until the court ruling is respected and Ekpaha is fully compensated for the years of unpaid entitlements.
The union has also emphasized the broader issue of labor rights and justice, urging the government to address such longstanding grievances.
More to follow………………
The Dangote Refinery has announced a N15 reduction in its ex-gantry loading cost, bringing it down to N865 per litre from the previous price of N880.
The new price, confirmed by a pro forma invoice and verified by petroleumprice.ng, was communicated to customers in a notice on Thursday morning.
This price adjustment follows earlier reports that the 650,000 barrels-per-day refinery was expected to lower its petrol loading costs by the end of this week.
The reduction is expected to further drive down fuel prices in the country, providing some relief to consumers.
READ MORE: ECCIMA Applauds Dangote’s Impact On Nigeria’s Economy
Chinedu Ukadike, National Publicity Secretary of the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN), assured the public that the price drop aligns with the Federal Executive Council’s recent directive on the Naira-for-Crude agreement.
“We are confident that this price reduction will be beneficial for the Nigerian people,” Ukadike said.
In a related development, the Federal Executive Council has authorized the full implementation of the long-suspended Naira-for-Crude agreement with local refiners.
This policy aims to reduce Nigeria’s reliance on foreign exchange for petroleum imports and boost local refining capacity.
The Ministry of Finance released a statement following a meeting between Finance Minister Wale Edun and Dangote Refinery officials.
The statement emphasized that the Naira-for-Crude initiative is a long-term policy, not a temporary measure.
“The initiative is designed to support sustainable local refining, enhance energy security, and reduce the country’s dependency on foreign currency for petroleum products,” the Ministry’s statement read.
Nigeria’s New Model Of Democracy – Govt By Tribesmen
Nnamdi Kanu’s N50bn Lawsuit Against FG Struck Out Over Lack Of Prosecution
Tinubu, AGF Snub Suit Seeking To Sack Rivers’ Sole Administrator
I Want To Fight Anthony Joshua – Portable
NLC Shuts Down Ministry Of Mines Over 20-Year-Old Unlawful Dismissal
