Politics
Lagos Guber Petition: Sanwo-Olu Close Defence Against Gbadebo Rhodes-Vivour
Lagos State Governor, Babajide Sanwo-Olu, and his Deputy, Dr Obafemi Hamzat, concluded their defence in an election petition filed against them by the Labour Party (LP) and its Governorship candidate, Gbadebo Rhodes-Vivour.
The LP and Rhodes-Vivour are disputing the victory of Sanwo-Olu and Hamzat in the March 18 governorship poll.
The petitioners are challenging the eligibility of Hamzat to run in the election, claiming that he renounced his Nigerian citizenship and pledged allegiance to the U.S. The All Progressives Congress (APC) is also named as a respondent in the petition.
During the proceedings, Fuad Ade-Oki, the APC Chairman for Lagos State, testified as a defence witness before the tribunal.
He submitted several documents, including Hamzat’s complete personal information as recorded on the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) Form EC9, as well as the oath he signed on his nomination form.
These forms included the “Summary of Result from Registration Areas,” “Summary of Results from Local Government Areas,” and the “Declaration of Result.”
Led by the APC’s lead counsel, Mr Abiodun Owonikoko (SAN), Ade-Oki informed the tribunal that he personally witnessed the moment when Sanwo-Olu and Hamzat filled out the INEC Form EC9, which contained their personal information and the oaths they took on their nomination forms.
He stated that these oaths were administered at the Ikeja High Court Registry.
Ade-Oki also confirmed that Sanwo-Olu and Hamzat paid the required fee for their nomination forms and signed the corresponding oaths.
He noted that two documents, with identification numbers 003960120 and 00408841, contained identical facts and reflected the same receipt number.
To substantiate his testimony, the witness submitted the oath declaration page of Form EC9, along with the associated receipts, through the APC’s counsel.
However, the counsel representing the Labour Party (LP), Mr Idowu Benson, raised an objection to the admissibility of the documents presented by Fuad Ade-Oki.
Benson stated that he would reserve his reasons for objection until his final address to the tribunal.
In response to the objection, the tribunal, presided over by Justice Arum Ashom, provisionally admitted the documents but stated that it would hear and consider the objections at a later stage.
Following Ade-Oki’s testimony, the tribunal discharged him from further proceedings.
Subsequently, it was announced by another counsel, Banire, that the defence would be closing its case on behalf of Sanwo-Olu and Hamzat.
Politics
Political Earthquake in Zamfara as Gov Lawal Dumps PDP for APC
Governor Dauda Lawal of Zamfara State has explained that the persistent crisis and legal disputes within the Peoples Democratic Party compelled him to defect to the All Progressives Congress.
The governor’s defection was formally announced on Monday by his deputy, Mani Mummuni, after a stakeholders’ meeting held at the Government House in Gusau.
In a statement issued by the governor’s spokesperson, Sulaiman Bala Idris, the move was described as a necessary step taken in the interest of the state and supported by political stakeholders across Zamfara.
SEE ALSO: JUST IN: PDP Crisis Deepens as Appeal Court Upholds Ban on Ibadan Convention
According to the statement, Governor Lawal had remained committed to the PDP despite the ongoing leadership crisis and had made several efforts to reconcile factions within the party.
However, attempts to achieve peace and unity reportedly failed, leading to prolonged legal battles.
The development followed a judgment by the Court of Appeal in Abuja, which dismissed an appeal filed by the PDP challenging an earlier ruling of the Federal High Court.
The earlier judgment had restrained the Independent National Electoral Commission from recognising the outcome of the party’s national convention held in Ibadan, Oyo State.
The governor was said to have informed political stakeholders during a series of meetings that he would make a final decision about his political future after the appellate court delivered its ruling.
Following the judgment, Lawal concluded that joining the APC would better position him to continue what he described as the “Zamfara Rescue and Rebuild Mission.”
His defection marks a significant shift in the political landscape of Zamfara State and could influence political alignments ahead of the 2027 general elections.
Politics
Appeal Court Deals Major Blow to Aiyedatiwa’s Re-election Hopes in Ondo
The Court of Appeal in Abuja has handed a significant setback to Ondo State Governor Lucky Aiyedatiwa, dismissing his appeal challenging a Federal High Court ruling that questioned his eligibility to contest the upcoming governorship election.
A three-member panel delivered a unanimous judgment on Monday, affirming that the trial court acted correctly when it allowed Dr Akindele Egbuwalo, the plaintiff, to amend his originating summons.
ALSO READ: No Shake-Up in Ondo: Aiyedatiwa Denies Plot To Remove Deputy Gov
Justice Uchechukwu Onyemenam, who read the lead judgment, said the governor failed to show that the High Court’s decision caused any miscarriage of justice or denied him a fair hearing.
The appeal was therefore dismissed for lacking merit, and the court awarded ₦2 million in costs against Aiyedatiwa.
The ruling reinforces the November 24, 2025, Federal High Court decision in Akure, which granted Egbuwalo permission to challenge Aiyedatiwa’s eligibility for re-election.
Earlier, the Court of Appeal also rejected an application by Aiyedatiwa to set aside a January 27, 2026, order staying proceedings in the case before the Federal High Court.
The appellate court clarified that the stay was a lawful exercise of its jurisdiction aimed at protecting the integrity of the proceedings.
The panel further emphasized that attempting to overturn its own order would be akin to sitting on appeal over its own decision.
The governor’s remaining option, the court noted, is to challenge the ruling at the Supreme Court. Another ₦2 million in costs was awarded against Aiyedatiwa.
Politics
JUST IN: PDP Crisis Deepens as Appeal Court Upholds Ban on Ibadan Convention
The crisis rocking the Peoples Democratic Party has deepened following a ruling by the Court of Appeal in Abuja which upheld a ban on the party’s proposed national convention in Ibadan, Oyo State.
A three-man panel of the appellate court on Monday dismissed an appeal filed by a faction of the party led by former Minister of Special Duties, Kabiru Turaki, challenging the jurisdiction of the Federal High Court to hear a suit concerning the controversial convention.
The Turaki-led faction had approached the Court of Appeal after a Federal High Court barred the party from holding its planned national convention scheduled for November 14 and 15, 2025.
SEE MORE: Fubara Moves to Rebuild Cabinet as R/Assembly Screens Nine Commissioner Nominees
The lower court also restrained the Independent National Electoral Commission from recognising or validating the proposed convention.
However, delivering judgment, the appellate court ruled that the Federal High Court had the authority to entertain the case, rejecting the argument that the matter was purely an internal affair of the party.
According to the court, the appellants could not present what it described as a clear violation of the party’s constitution and the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria as merely an internal party issue.
The panel subsequently dismissed the appeal and awarded a cost of N2 million against the appellants.
The ruling is part of judgments delivered in nine harmonised appeals filed by the Turaki-led faction over the dispute surrounding the convention.
The latest court decision is expected to further intensify the internal wrangling within the opposition party as it continues to grapple with leadership disputes and preparations ahead of the 2027 general elections.





