Connect with us

NEWS

Lawyer Petitions Court To Declare Rivers Sole Administrator’s Appointment Null

Published

on

A lawsuit has been filed at the Federal High Court in Abuja, challenging the appointment of Vice Admiral Ibokette Ibas (Rtd.) as the Sole Administrator of Rivers State.

The legal action seeks to nullify his appointment and bar the President from making similar decisions in other states.

The suit, numbered FHC/ABJ/CS/572/2025, was initiated on Tuesday by Abuja-based lawyer Johnmary Jideobi, who argues that the appointment violates Nigeria’s 1999 Constitution.

The President of Nigeria, Bola Tinubu, is listed as the 1st defendant, while the Attorney-General of the Federation, Vice Admiral Ibas (Rtd.), and the Attorneys-General of the 36 states are named as the 2nd to 39th defendants.

Jideobi is urging the court to declare all decisions made by Ibas in his capacity as Sole Administrator unconstitutional and of no effect.

READ ALSO: Tinubu Swears In Ibas As Rivers Sole Administrator

He is also seeking an order preventing the President from appointing Sole Administrators in any state across Nigeria.

Through a team of lawyers led by Chimezie Enuka, the plaintiff is asking the court to rule on the following:

“Whether the President has the constitutional power to remove, suspend, or interfere with the tenure of an elected governor or deputy governor.

“Whether the suspension of the Rivers State Governor and Deputy Governor on March 18, 2025, was lawful.

“Whether the Constitution permits the appointment of a Sole Administrator to govern a state.

Jideobi contends that the only lawful means of removing a governor are outlined in Sections 180, 188, 189, 305, and 306 of the 1999 Constitution, none of which provide for the appointment of a Sole Administrator.

The plaintiff is asking the court to: overturn the suspension of the Rivers State Governor and Deputy Governor, Invalidate the appointment and swearing-in of Ibas as Sole Administrator, Order Ibas to immediately vacate the Government House in Rivers State and Issue an injunction stopping the President from appointing Sole Administrators in any Nigerian state.

In a 32-paragraph affidavit, Jideobi insists that Nigeria operates a federal system of government, where elected governors are not subject to presidential removal.

“As a lawyer, I have never seen the term ‘Sole Administrator’ in the 1999 Constitution,” he asserted.

He further argued that allowing the President to make such appointments could set a dangerous precedent, potentially leading to political instability in the country.

No hearing date has been scheduled yet. 

Click to comment
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWS

‘After Three Years of Your Treatment, Why Is It Harder to Buy Food?’ — Atiku to Tinubu

Published

on

Former Vice President and 2027 presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), Atiku Abubakar, has challenged President Bola Tinubu over the worsening cost of living, asking why Nigerians are finding it increasingly difficult to afford food after three years of his administration.

Atiku made the remarks in his Independence Day state-of-the-nation addresson Thursday while responding to Tinubu’s national broadcast marking Nigeria’s 66th Independence anniversary.

Tinubu had described Nigeria as a patient undergoing painful treatment, while declaring that the country had moved beyond the emergency phase and entered an “age of prosperity.”

SEE ALSO: Nigeria@66: Tinubu Has Plunged Nigeria Into Its Worst Cost-of-Living Crisis – Atiku Slams Tinubu

But Atiku questioned the impact of the reforms on ordinary Nigerians.
“Bola, where is the prosperity?” Atiku asked.

He said a president could announce a new chapter in a speech, but could not simply announce food onto a family’s table or money into a worker’s pocket.

“Bola, you call Nigeria a patient with cancer. After three years of your treatment, why is it harder for Nigerians to buy food, pay for medicine, or even get to work?” he asked.

Atiku also questioned why government revenues could rise while Nigerians’ purchasing power continued to decline.

“Why does your government have more money while the people can afford less?” he asked.

The ADC presidential candidate further argued that a slower rise in prices does not restore the purchasing power families have already lost, while economic growth and rising exports must translate into improved living conditions.

He also criticised the removal of fuel subsidy, saying it was implemented without adequate protection for families who would bear the consequences.

According to Atiku, the policy contributed to higher petrol and transportation costs, which subsequently affected the cost of moving food and other goods.

“Three years later, the pain has an address in every home. Bola Tinubu, where is the benefit?” he asked.

Atiku also raised concerns over insecurity, saying armed groups had killed thousands and displaced families, while farmers, parents and other Nigerians continued to live with fear.

He nevertheless urged Nigerians not to surrender to despair, saying the country still had a path to recovery.

“Despair is not a strategy. We have a path to recovery, and we must take it,” he said.

Continue Reading

NEWS

Nigeria@66: Tinubu Has Plunged Nigeria Into Its Worst Cost-of-Living Crisis – Atiku Slams Tinubu

Published

on

PDP Threatens INEC Over Delay In Presidential Election Results

Former Vice President and 2027 presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), Atiku Abubakar, has accused President Bola Tinubu’s administration of plunging Nigeria into what he described as the country’s most severe cost-of-living crisis.

Atiku made the accusation in his Independence Day message as Nigeria marks 66 years of independence on Thursday.

According to him, millions of Nigerians are still struggling to access basic necessities, including food, decent wages and personal safety.

ALSO READ: Nigeria@66: ‘You Wrecked Livelihoods’ — Sowore Fires Back at Tinubu

He said, “Since after independence, millions of Nigerians are fighting for things a free country should never put beyond their reach: food on the table, a living wage that lasts the month, and a safe journey home.”

Atiku said the situation had worsened during Tinubu’s three years in office, alleging that families were increasingly being forced to skip meals, delay medical treatment and borrow money to survive until payday.

“Families are not merely tightening their belts; they are skipping meals, delaying treatment, and borrowing to survive until payday or whenever,” he said.

The former vice president also criticised what he described as the government’s repeated call for Nigerians to endure the hardship.

“And what has this government asked of them? More patience. More sacrifice,” Atiku stated.

His comments come amid continuing political debate over the effects of the Tinubu administration’s economic reforms and the rising cost of living.

 

Continue Reading

NEWS

‘What Does 4% Growth Mean to Hungry Nigerians?’ — Dalung Slams Tinubu’s Speech

Published

on

Former Minister of Youth and Sports, Solomon Dalung, has criticised President Bola Tinubu’s 66th Independence Day address, describing it as “rhetorical, wishful, ambitious” and “very, very disappointing and empty.”

Dalung made the remarks on Channels Television’s The Morning Brief on Thursday, shortly after the President addressed Nigerians to mark the country’s 66th Independence anniversary.

The former minister said Tinubu’s speech should have focused more on concrete achievements recorded by his administration since assuming office in 2023.

SEE ALSO: INEC’s Objections Can’t Stop ADC From 2027 Elections — Dalung

According to him, the President should have addressed critical issues affecting Nigerians, including insecurity, agriculture, the economy, unemployment, hunger, poverty and foreign policy.

“But all that the president has done was to tell Nigeria the same stories: ‘Oh, be patient and expect our reforms will yield,’” Dalung said.

He also questioned the impact of the economic growth figures cited by the administration, arguing that such statistics should translate into improved living conditions for ordinary Nigerians.

“So if we have recorded 4% economic growth, how has that been able to affect an average Nigerian? Because it has to be translated into putting something before the ordinary Nigerians.
.

“How does that 4% affect the cost of transportation and the purchasing power of Nigerians?” he asked.

Dalung said the government should move beyond presenting economic statistics and demonstrate how its reforms are affecting citizens.

He also criticised the President’s reference to Nigeria as a cancer patient when he assumed office, asking when Nigerians would begin to see the results of the treatment.

“The question is, when shall the cancer victim recover? Because it does appear that the surgery has put him in a coma,” he said.
The former minister further faulted Tinubu for what he described as inadequate attention to insecurity, particularly the plight of Nigerians in captivity.

“The president completely abandoned Nigerians who are in captivity,” Dalung said, adding that Plateau State was experiencing what he described as “a full-blown war” due to recurring attacks and mass burials.

He also recalled how an Independence Day address he heard in 1977 gave him hope because he could directly connect government policies with the support he received, including transportation, instructional materials, food and bedding.

Dalung argued that Tinubu’s address failed to create a similar connection with Nigerians.

He concluded that the speech was “more or less very rhetorical and ambitious” rather than practical and reflective of the realities confronting citizens.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2022. Biztellers, powered by Alphaxristi.

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x