Connect with us

NEWS

‘No Hidden Subsidy’ – Dangote Refinery Tells Marketers To Pay Own Logistics

Published

on

The management of Dangote Petroleum Refinery has rejected the claim by the Depot and Petroleum Products Marketers Association of Nigeria (DAPPMAN) that it should bear a subsidy cost of more than ₦1.5 trillion.

The company insisted that it would not be compelled to shoulder marketers’ distribution expenses.

In a statement released on Thursday via its official X account, with the headline We Stand By Our Statement on DAPPMAN … Marketers’ ₦1.505trn Subsidy Demand”, the refinery stressed its determination to defend its operations from what it described as misleading narratives.

READ ALSO: Marketers Demand N1.5trn Subsidy to Match Refinery Gantry Price – Dangote

“Dangote Petroleum Refinery stands by its statement on the Depot and Petroleum Products Marketers Association of Nigeria (DAPPMAN), as published on Monday, September 15.

“We wish to emphasise that any party who feels aggrieved with the contents of the publication is free to seek redress in court. We have the right under Nigerian law to defend ourselves against slander, falsehood, and any misleading or concocted story that could damage our reputation,” the company declared.

The dispute centres on DAPPMAN’s argument that moving petroleum products from the Lagos-based refinery to depots nationwide involves huge costs in logistics and coastal shipping.

But Dangote insisted that its responsibility is to sell products from its gantry at production-based prices plus regulated margins, with distribution costs left for marketers to handle.

“Specifically, we note the crux of DAPPMAN’s assertion was that Dangote Petroleum Refinery subsidy on sales of petroleum products (PMS & AGO) to the tune of ₦1.505 trillion (One Trillion, Five Hundred and Five Billion, Six Hundred and Twenty-Five Million Naira), which we are to pay marketers as subsidy.

“We note that petroleum products to marketers are sold at our gantry at prices based on our production costs, plus a regulated margin on products consumed nationwide. DAPPMAN’s claim of subsidy is false and unfounded.

“Our actual logistics cost of distribution is borne by marketers, who bear the cost of transporting products to their depots nationwide.

“We are fully responsible for all supply and consumption volumes of millions of litres of Premium Motor Spirit (PMS) and Automotive Gas Oil (AGO), which is an additional investment cost of ₦1,505,625,000,000 only, as they are effectively asking us to absorb on their behalf,” the statement clarified.

According to the company, marketers want the refinery to take on the burden of coastal transportation, in addition to loading at its gantry.

“Specifically, the marketers are demanding that Dangote Petroleum Refinery take on the cost of moving products to their coastal depots nationwide through coastal vessels, in addition to loading at our refinery gantry, which is already at par with NNPC Ltd, International Oil Companies (IOCs), and other international refineries,” the statement read.

Reiterating that the federal government had removed fuel subsidy in May 2023, the refinery stressed that there was no basis for DAPPMAN’s claim.

“We note that in June this year, we made it clear that there is no subsidy in our pricing template, nor have we entered into any agreement with marketers to subsidise petroleum products.

“We reiterate that subsidy on petroleum products was removed by the Federal Government in May 2023, and as such, we cannot be coerced into absorbing the cost of marketers’ distribution,” the company said.

It also pointed to its own logistics investments, noting that over the past three months it had successfully moved millions of litres of petroleum products across the country.

“Dangote Petroleum Refinery has sufficient logistics to distribute fuel nationwide through road and rail infrastructure, which has been tested in the past three months between June and September.

“The refinery completed a combined 3,478,228 tanker movements over the same period, ensuring sustained supply of petroleum products nationwide,” it said.

The company described DAPPMAN’s allegations as “wrong and misleading,” and assured that fuel would continue to be supplied at the same price from its gantry across the country.

“It is therefore wrong and misleading for marketers to suggest otherwise. We assure Nigerians that we will continue to supply products to all parts of the country at the same price from our refinery gantry.

“We remain committed to ensuring energy security in Nigeria, delivering products at affordable prices, and working with all stakeholders in the downstream sector towards achieving lasting stability in the nation’s petroleum industry,” the statement added.

Dangote also published a breakdown of the ₦1.5 trillion figure being demanded, pointing out that it represented what marketers wanted the refinery to pay in order for them to sell products at the same price in their depots.

The standoff between the refinery and petroleum marketers comes on the heels of a strike declared by the Nigeria Union of Petroleum and Natural Gas Workers (NUPENG), which disrupted supply and reignited national debates over deregulation and subsidy removal.

4 Comments
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kason1185
Kason1185
1 year ago
Kirsten1803
Kirsten1803
1 year ago
droversointeru
11 months ago

Hi, i believe that i saw you visited my blog thus i came to “return the want”.I am attempting to to find issues to improve my site!I assume its adequate to use a few of your concepts!!

NEWS

Who Is Running Nigeria? ADC Demands Answers Over Tinubu, Shettima’s Absence

Published

on

The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has demanded clarification over who is currently exercising the constitutional powers of the President as President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and Vice-President Kashim Shettima remain outside Nigeria.

The opposition party, in a statement issued on Tuesday by its National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, said Tinubu’s continued absence had raised questions about compliance with Section 145 of the Nigerian Constitution.

SEE ALSO: Shettima Arrives Yola to Condole With Bamanga Tukur’s Family

The ADC said the provision requires the President, when proceeding on vacation or otherwise unable to discharge the functions of his office, to transmit a written declaration to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, after which the Vice-President performs the functions of Acting President.

According to the party, Tinubu left Nigeria on August 30 and has now been away for more than 21 days.

“President Tinubu left Nigeria on 30 August and has now been away for more than 21 days. We therefore demand to know whether the required declaration was transmitted by the President,” the ADC said.

The party also questioned why the National Assembly had not addressed the issue if such a declaration had not been transmitted.

The ADC rejected the Presidency’s description of Tinubu’s stay abroad as a “working vacation”, arguing that the phrase does not create a separate constitutional category.

“There is no constitutional category known as a ‘working vacation’. Presidential authority cannot be transferred by convenience, protocol or press statement,” the party said.

The opposition party also dismissed the suggestion that Secretary to the Government of the Federation, George Akume, could effectively represent the President in the discharge of presidential responsibilities.

“Representing the President at events and ceremonies does not confer constitutional powers. The Secretary to the Government of the Federation is a mere appointee of the President,” it said.

The ADC stressed that attending official functions or delivering speeches on behalf of the President was different from exercising the constitutional powers of the President or Acting President.

“Representation is not governance. Attendance at official functions is not presidential authority,” the party added.

The controversy comes as Vice-President Shettima is in New York for the United Nations General Assembly, where he is representing Nigeria.

The ADC said the simultaneous absence of the President and Vice-President was particularly concerning given what it described as Nigeria’s security, unemployment and cost-of-living challenges.

The party also criticised Tinubu’s continued stay in Paris while French President Emmanuel Macron travelled to New York for the UN General Assembly.

“The irony would be amusing if it were not a national disgrace,” the ADC said, arguing that the situation created poor optics for Nigeria.

Macron had hosted Tinubu at a private dinner at the Élysée Palace in Paris before travelling to New York for the UN General Assembly.

The ADC therefore called on the Presidency and the National Assembly to answer what it described as a fundamental constitutional question.

“Who presently exercises the constitutional powers of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, and under what provision of the Constitution?” the party asked.

 

Continue Reading

NEWS

Stop Exporting Raw Minerals, Start Building Wealth From Your Resources – Tinubu to Africa

Published

on

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has called on African countries to unite and end the export of raw mineral resources, urging the continent to focus on local processing, manufacturing and value addition.

Tinubu made the call on Tuesday in New York, United States, while declaring open the 3rd Africa Minerals Strategy Group (AMSG) High-Level Roundtable on Critical Minerals Development in Africa, held on the sidelines of the ongoing 81st Session of the United Nations General Assembly.

The high-level meeting, which was chaired by Tinubu, was themed, “From Resources to Wealth: Continental Cooperation for Mineral Value Addition, Data Sovereignty, Innovative Financing and Critical Minerals Security.”

ALSO READ: Shettima Arrives Yola to Condole With Bamanga Tukur’s Family

Represented by Vice President Kashim Shettima, Tinubu told African leaders and stakeholders that the continent must move away from its long-standing position as a supplier of raw materials and develop industries capable of processing its mineral resources locally.

“For generations, Africa has furnished the materials of prosperity elsewhere. Our duty is to ensure that the future being fashioned from African minerals has room for African ambition,” the President said.

Tinubu expressed concern that mineral-rich communities across Africa continue to suffer from inadequate infrastructure, limited employment opportunities and insufficient participation in the wealth generated from their natural resources.

He noted that rising global demand for clean energy, artificial intelligence and advanced manufacturing had made African critical minerals such as cobalt, copper, lithium and rare earth elements increasingly important to global supply chains.

According to the President, Africa’s response should include mineral processing and refining, battery production, component manufacturing, African technologies and the development of competitive skills.

“The worth of a mine must be counted in the lives it improves,” Tinubu said.

“Jobs, industries, infrastructure, technology transfer, African enterprise participation and prosperity retained across generations must measure our progress from resources to wealth.”

Tinubu Warns Against African Fragmentation

The President said no African country could achieve the desired transformation of its mineral sector alone.

He warned that countries competing against one another by offering lower royalties, weaker local-content requirements and excessive concessions could undermine the continent’s collective bargaining power.

“Fragmentation leaves us exporting raw materials and buying finished goods at a premium. Cooperation gives our markets scale, our industries integration, our financing reach and our negotiations authority,” he said.

Tinubu called for greater continental cooperation, saying African countries must negotiate collectively where their interests converge and ensure that partnerships with external investors strengthen rather than undermine African industrial capacity.

“Reliability must never mean dependency, and partnership must never demand inequality,” he added.

President Highlights Nigeria’s Mining Reforms

Tinubu also highlighted reforms in Nigeria’s mining sector, saying the country must require local value addition for new mining licences, strengthen geological data and investor access, organise artisanal miners into cooperatives, combat illegal mining and improve regulatory accountability.

He disclosed that revenue from Nigeria’s mining sector rose from approximately ₦6 billion in 2023 to over ₦38 billion in 2024, and further to between ₦68.1 billion and ₦70 billion in 2025.

The President also pointed to major foreign investment commitments and the development and commissioning of large-scale lithium processing capacity in Nasarawa State as evidence of the opportunities available in the sector.

He said his administration’s mining policy was designed to ensure that minerals extracted in Nigeria contribute to the country’s industries, workers, skills and communities.

According to Tinubu, ongoing reforms have demonstrated that “firm terms can attract serious capital.”

Tinubu Backs Continental Minerals Framework

The President also endorsed the Continental Integration and Economic Assurance Declaration (CIEAD) adopted at the roundtable.

He said the declaration should create a predictable and investment-ready environment for Africa’s strategic mineral corridors through harmonised policies, responsible investment and shared infrastructure.

Tinubu, however, stressed that the declaration must go beyond a ceremonial signing and be backed by clear timelines, financing, implementation mechanisms and public accountability.

“Africa’s power resides in its people, markets and ingenuity. No outsider will organise our continent or place our industrial interests above their own,” he said.

“We must integrate our markets, mobilise African capital and negotiate with one voice wherever our interests converge.”

He added: “Our industrial growth can strengthen global prosperity, the energy transition and secure supply chains. Minerals confer no automatic prosperity; vision, investment and industry must earn it. Political will must turn mineral promise into enduring African wealth.”

Alake Calls for More African Countries to Join AMSG

Earlier, AMSG Chairman and Nigeria’s Minister of Solid Minerals Development, Dele Alake, said the group was proposing the Continental Integration and Economic Assurance Declaration as a framework for establishing a unified architecture for Africa’s critical and solid minerals value chains.

Alake urged African countries that have yet to join the AMSG to become members, stressing the importance of coordinating efforts, ideas and resources to develop the continent’s natural resources.

He said Africa’s mineral ambitions could not be achieved through policy implementation alone, arguing that integrated partnerships covering financial transactions and infrastructure development were also necessary.

Kenya’s Minister of Blue Economy and Maritime Affairs, Hassan Ali Joho, also emphasised the importance of domestic resource mobilisation for solid mineral development.

Joho called for transparency, competitiveness and greater alignment of licensing procedures among AMSG members while respecting the sovereignty of individual countries.

Representatives of Liberia, Chad and Tanzania, alongside other stakeholders, also contributed to the discussions.

Continue Reading

NEWS

‘A Nation Cannot Escape the Bill’ — Atiku Questions Tinubu’s Third UNGA Absence

Published

on

Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has questioned President Bola Tinubu’s third consecutive absence from the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), demanding an explanation for the president’s decision not to attend the global gathering.

Atiku made the remarks in a statement issued by his Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication, Phrank Shaibu, as Vice President Kashim Shettima leads Nigeria’s delegation to the 81st UNGA in New York.

According to Atiku, Tinubu was absent from the 79th UNGA in 2024 and the 80th session in 2025, and has again stayed away from the 81st session in 2026.

ALSO READ: ‘Calling Tinubu Bola, Giving Him Orders Is Insolence’ — Sunday Dare Blasts Atiku

The former vice president said the repeated absences could no longer be regarded as a coincidence or routine delegation, arguing that they required an explanation.

Atiku also questioned whether Tinubu’s documented history with United States law-enforcement agencies had become a burden on Nigeria’s foreign relations.

“The United Nations General Assembly is one of the world’s most important diplomatic gatherings. It brings together the representatives of the UN’s 193 member states and provides a unique platform for presidents and prime ministers to defend their countries’ interests, negotiate partnerships and shape global decisions on trade, security and development,” Atiku said.

He acknowledged that Shettima could represent Nigeria at the gathering but maintained that the vice president’s representation could not permanently substitute for the president’s personal authority and visibility.

“Vice President Shettima may represent Nigeria capably, but representation by delegation cannot permanently substitute for the personal authority, visibility and responsibility of the president,” he said.

“Tinubu cannot continue to treat Nigeria’s seat at the world’s biggest diplomatic table as though it were an inconvenient appointment that can be endlessly outsourced.”

Atiku further argued that UNGA was not simply a ceremonial event, noting that important bilateral meetings, investment discussions, trade negotiations and development-financing engagements take place on the sidelines of the gathering.

“Presidential absence on the global stage has consequences. UNGA is not merely a ceremonial gathering or an annual photo opportunity,” he said.

“Its side-lines are where leaders hold decisive bilateral meetings, court investors, negotiate trade partnerships, mobilise development finance and make the case for their countries.”

The former vice president said Nigeria could lose investment and other economic opportunities as a result of the president’s continued absence.

“When a president makes himself absent from that stage for three consecutive years, his country loses opportunities. Investment does not follow silence. International capital does not pursue a country whose leader repeatedly abandons the room in which consequential economic relationships are being built,” Atiku said.

He linked the issue to investment, employment and capital inflows, arguing that reduced investment could increase pressure on the naira and contribute to higher costs for Nigerians.

“The cost is eventually transferred to ordinary citizens: fewer investments mean fewer businesses and fewer jobs. Reduced capital inflows place additional pressure on the local currency,” he said.

“A weaker naira raises the cost of imports, production, transportation and food. These are among the economic pressures now punishing Nigerian families through the worst cost-of-living crisis in living memory.”

Atiku concluded by saying that while the president could regard attendance at UNGA as a matter of personal prerogative, Nigeria would ultimately bear the consequences of the decision.

“Tinubu may consider attending UNGA a matter of personal prerogative, but the economic and diplomatic consequences of his absence are being paid by Nigerians. A President may surrender his seat, but a nation cannot escape the bill,” he said.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2022. Biztellers, powered by Alphaxristi.

4
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x