Politics
PEPT: Atiku Challenges INEC’s Support For Tinubu
Former Vice President and People’s Democratic Party (PDP) candidate in the last presidential election, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, berated the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) on Friday for defending the qualifications of President-elect Asiwaju Bola Tinubu.
Atiku argued that it was inappropriate for the electoral body to support Tinubu, whose victory in the election is currently under scrutiny in court.
The PDP candidate who secured the second position in the February 25 presidential election, accused INEC of engaging in a proxy battle on behalf of Tinubu.
Atiku, represented by a team of lawyers led by Chief Chris Uche, SAN, called on the Presidential Election Petition Court in Abuja to dismiss a counter affidavit and preliminary objection filed by the Commission in response to his petition.
Atiku argued that INEC was not legally equipped to defend the controversies surrounding Tinubu’s educational qualifications, age, and alleged indictment in a drug-related case in the United States of America (USA).
According to Atiku, the electoral commission did not possess the necessary legal authority to address these matters.
Atiku contended that INEC, as the impartial entity that conducted the election, should maintain a neutral stance in the case.
During the court proceedings, Atiku’s lawyer informed the court that there were seven pending applications, one of which involved INEC’s request to remove 32 paragraphs from the petition that pertained to Tinubu’s qualifications.
Uche, SAN, prayed the court to not only dismiss INEC’s preliminary objection but to also declare it as a gross abuse of the judicial process.
“All that INEC has done is to ask for averments that were against Tinubu to be struck out. INEC is fighting a proxy war for Tinubu, which a neutral umpire is not expected to do. This is very wrong my lords,” Atiku’s lawyer added.
On the other hand, INEC, represented by a team of lawyers led by Mr. Abubakar Mahmood, SAN, as the first respondent in the case, urged the court to either strike out the aforementioned paragraphs or dismiss the entire petition due to a lack of competence. INEC’s legal team made this request during the proceedings.
Similarly, Tinubu’s lawyer, Chief Wole Olanipekun, SAN, and the lawyer representing the APC, Prince Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, also highlighted the processes they had filed, requesting the dismissal of the petition.
Following these arguments, the five-member panel led by Justice Haruna Tsammani adjourned the case until Saturday to conclude the pre-hearing session.
The court announced that its ruling on all the preliminary objections would be delivered before the final judgment on the case.
Politics
Political Earthquake in Zamfara as Gov Lawal Dumps PDP for APC
Governor Dauda Lawal of Zamfara State has explained that the persistent crisis and legal disputes within the Peoples Democratic Party compelled him to defect to the All Progressives Congress.
The governor’s defection was formally announced on Monday by his deputy, Mani Mummuni, after a stakeholders’ meeting held at the Government House in Gusau.
In a statement issued by the governor’s spokesperson, Sulaiman Bala Idris, the move was described as a necessary step taken in the interest of the state and supported by political stakeholders across Zamfara.
SEE ALSO: JUST IN: PDP Crisis Deepens as Appeal Court Upholds Ban on Ibadan Convention
According to the statement, Governor Lawal had remained committed to the PDP despite the ongoing leadership crisis and had made several efforts to reconcile factions within the party.
However, attempts to achieve peace and unity reportedly failed, leading to prolonged legal battles.
The development followed a judgment by the Court of Appeal in Abuja, which dismissed an appeal filed by the PDP challenging an earlier ruling of the Federal High Court.
The earlier judgment had restrained the Independent National Electoral Commission from recognising the outcome of the party’s national convention held in Ibadan, Oyo State.
The governor was said to have informed political stakeholders during a series of meetings that he would make a final decision about his political future after the appellate court delivered its ruling.
Following the judgment, Lawal concluded that joining the APC would better position him to continue what he described as the “Zamfara Rescue and Rebuild Mission.”
His defection marks a significant shift in the political landscape of Zamfara State and could influence political alignments ahead of the 2027 general elections.
Politics
Appeal Court Deals Major Blow to Aiyedatiwa’s Re-election Hopes in Ondo
The Court of Appeal in Abuja has handed a significant setback to Ondo State Governor Lucky Aiyedatiwa, dismissing his appeal challenging a Federal High Court ruling that questioned his eligibility to contest the upcoming governorship election.
A three-member panel delivered a unanimous judgment on Monday, affirming that the trial court acted correctly when it allowed Dr Akindele Egbuwalo, the plaintiff, to amend his originating summons.
ALSO READ: No Shake-Up in Ondo: Aiyedatiwa Denies Plot To Remove Deputy Gov
Justice Uchechukwu Onyemenam, who read the lead judgment, said the governor failed to show that the High Court’s decision caused any miscarriage of justice or denied him a fair hearing.
The appeal was therefore dismissed for lacking merit, and the court awarded ₦2 million in costs against Aiyedatiwa.
The ruling reinforces the November 24, 2025, Federal High Court decision in Akure, which granted Egbuwalo permission to challenge Aiyedatiwa’s eligibility for re-election.
Earlier, the Court of Appeal also rejected an application by Aiyedatiwa to set aside a January 27, 2026, order staying proceedings in the case before the Federal High Court.
The appellate court clarified that the stay was a lawful exercise of its jurisdiction aimed at protecting the integrity of the proceedings.
The panel further emphasized that attempting to overturn its own order would be akin to sitting on appeal over its own decision.
The governor’s remaining option, the court noted, is to challenge the ruling at the Supreme Court. Another ₦2 million in costs was awarded against Aiyedatiwa.
Politics
JUST IN: PDP Crisis Deepens as Appeal Court Upholds Ban on Ibadan Convention
The crisis rocking the Peoples Democratic Party has deepened following a ruling by the Court of Appeal in Abuja which upheld a ban on the party’s proposed national convention in Ibadan, Oyo State.
A three-man panel of the appellate court on Monday dismissed an appeal filed by a faction of the party led by former Minister of Special Duties, Kabiru Turaki, challenging the jurisdiction of the Federal High Court to hear a suit concerning the controversial convention.
The Turaki-led faction had approached the Court of Appeal after a Federal High Court barred the party from holding its planned national convention scheduled for November 14 and 15, 2025.
SEE MORE: Fubara Moves to Rebuild Cabinet as R/Assembly Screens Nine Commissioner Nominees
The lower court also restrained the Independent National Electoral Commission from recognising or validating the proposed convention.
However, delivering judgment, the appellate court ruled that the Federal High Court had the authority to entertain the case, rejecting the argument that the matter was purely an internal affair of the party.
According to the court, the appellants could not present what it described as a clear violation of the party’s constitution and the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria as merely an internal party issue.
The panel subsequently dismissed the appeal and awarded a cost of N2 million against the appellants.
The ruling is part of judgments delivered in nine harmonised appeals filed by the Turaki-led faction over the dispute surrounding the convention.
The latest court decision is expected to further intensify the internal wrangling within the opposition party as it continues to grapple with leadership disputes and preparations ahead of the 2027 general elections.





