Energy
Petrol’s Pump Price Skyrockets From 6 Kobo To 61,700 Kobo
The astronomical increment of the pump prices of Premium Motor Spirit (PMS) also known as, petrol has seen it rise from 6 Kobo/litre in 1970 to 61,700/litre as at August 27, 2023.
Data sourced from various online sources by Biztellers indicate that the pump price of petrol has been increased a record 29 times since the Gen Yakubu Gowon regime fixed the price at 6 kobo in 1970.
It stood at that rate for three years before the same government adjusted it to 8 Kobo in 1973.
And by 1978, when the then Gen Olusegun Obasanjo adjusted the pump price to 15 Kobo, Nigerians cried out in anguish.
The first civilian government to tinker with the pump price of petrol was the President Shehu Shagari regime, which adjusted it to 20 Kobo/litre.
That was in 1983 after Shagari had managed the 15 Kobo price it inherited from Obasanjo for more than four years, dating back to 1978.
The price stability was maintained during the tenure of the Gen Muhammadu Buhari military regime of 1984. Even his successor, Gen Ibrahim Bagandiga didn’t adjust the price until 1986, when it was adjusted to 39 Kobo/litre.
Two years down the line, Gen Babangida increased it again to 42 Kobo, before adjusting it to 68 Kobo in 1990 and 70 Kobo in 1991.
Increases in pump price of petrol had always attracted public outcry with civil society rising in one accord against the move by government.
The Interim Government led by Ernest Shonekan jerked it up from 70 Kobo to N5/litre in 1992 with the attendant public uprising enough to consume the government.
Gen Sanni Abacha shoved Shonekan aside and reduced the pump price to N3 25 Kobo, only to jerk it up to N15 in 1994 amidst fuel scarcity that threatened the economy.
When the masses rose up against the move, Gen Abacha reduced it to N11/litre in 1995, before Gen Adulsalam Abubakar who took over after the demise of Gen Abacha pegged the pump price of petrol at N25 in 1998.
The level of public outcry that greeted the move, compelled Gen Abubakar to reduce it to N20/litre 1999.
When Chief Olusegun Obasanjo was elected President in 1999, he tinkered with the pump price of petrol six times in his eight-year tenure.
He first adjusted it to N50/liter in 2002, the back to N22/litre and up to N26/litre the same year, before moving it up to N42/litre in 2003, N65/lite in 2004 and N75/litre in 2007.
Obasanjo’s successor, President Umar Yaradua, in an apparent response to public lamentation, reduced the pump price of petrol to N65/litre.
Yaradua’s tenure was short-lived, and his success, President Goodluck Jonathan, who was in office for about six years, tinkered with the pump price of petrol for three times.
Under Jonathan, Nigerians saw the pump price of petrol move to N141/litre in 2010, back to N97/litre the same year, and down to N87/litre in 2011.
The pump price of petrol had become a tool in the hands of politicians and those desperate to hang on to power had to pander to popular sentiments, hence, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) under President Jonathan’s leadership had to toy with the idea of reducing pump price of petrol.
Then came the All Progressives Congress (APC) with President Muhammadu Buhari in 2015.
The former military ruler was in power for eight years, taking his two four-year terms as President, within which period he tinkered with the pump price of petrol several times in a fluctuating manner that tended to reflect his government’s negotiating power with restive civil society groups.
In 2015, President Buhari increased the petrol to N141/litre and in 2016 to N165/litre, before pegging it at N180/litre in 2020, where it was until he left office in May 2023.
N180/litre was where the President Bola Ahmed Tinubu administration met it and on May 29, 2023, before the popular ‘subsidy is gone’ anchor mounted pressure on the prices and saw it hit the roof.
President Tinubu’s less than three-month tenure has seen pump price of petrol adjusted twice from N180 where he met it to N480/litre in June to N617/litre where it is hovering at the moment.
Sadly, it does appear that the current price per litre is a mere suggestion around which marketers could weave their profit, though some do so unscrupulously.
Recall that Commissioner for Special Duties, Enugu State, Emeka Ajogwu, on Friday, while on an unscheduled visit to some petrol stations in the Enugu metropolis to ascertain the alleged metre manipulation by filling station owners, cautioned them against ‘sharp practices’.
According to him, “Over 20 filing stations visited adjusted their metres and sold between N600- N620 per litre, respectively.
“It was confirmed that for every 20 litres of petrol bought, consumers were shortchanged to the tune of N768.60, N702, N682.00, N575.00, N441.60, N480.00, and N256.20 respectively.”
Sadly, this situation is replicated across Nigeria, and the pressure on the Foreign Exchange Market in addition to fluctuating global crude prices tend to guarantee that these incessant increment would continue in the domestic market.
Energy
Middle East Push, G7’s Strategic Reserve Release Arrest Oil Prices
Oil prices on Monday went south, after crude exports from the Middle East rose above pre-war levels, while the Group of Seven nations pledged to release 100 million barrels of crude and diesel from emergency reserves.
Brent crude futures fell by $1.20, or 1.17 percent, to $101.05 a barrel, while West Texas Intermediate crude declined by $1.16, or 1.27 percent, to $89.95 per barrel, according to Reuters.
Middle Eastern crude exports exceeded pre-war levels on four of the seven days in the final week of September, shipping data showed, despite attacks on vessels passing through the strategic Strait of Hormuz.
The increase in exports, combined with the G7’s planned release of emergency stocks, helped put downward pressure on crude prices.
The G7 countries agreed on Friday to release 100 million barrels of diesel and crude from emergency reserves and pledged to refrain from energy export restrictions following pressure from United States President Donald Trump.
READ ALSO: Ndindi Nyoro Gives Ruto 14 Days to Disclose Dangote Refinery Deal
However, the scale of the additional supply remained uncertain.
IEA Executive Director, Fatih Birol, said last week that member countries had already released about two-thirds of the 400-million-barrel volume.
Meanwhile, supply concerns remained elevated as fighting continued across parts of the Middle East.
Saudi Aramco Chief Executive Officer, Amin Nasser, also warned that crude oil and refined fuel supplies were expected to remain stretched.
He said rebuilding global stockpiles after emergency withdrawals could take two years.
The United States Strategic Petroleum Reserve fell to 283 million barrels last week, its lowest level since October 1982, according to data from the US Department of Energy.
The supply outlook was further complicated by the continuing conflict involving Saudi Arabia and Iran-backed Houthi forces in Yemen.
Yemeni government forces attacked Houthi positions in the Dhubab district overlooking the Bab el-Mandeb Strait on Monday, according to two military sources.
The development came a day after the internationally recognised government launched a campaign to retake Houthi-held territory.
Meanwhile, OPEC+ postponed a review that would determine its 2027 oil output quotas after the war involving Iran disrupted projects aimed at expanding production capacity across the Middle East.
Energy
Global Oil Market Gets Breather from G7 Oil Release
The Group of Seven (G7) has resolved to release up to 100 million barrels of crude oil and petroleum products from strategic stocks.
An analyst at Argus Media, Sarah Raffoul, has expressed the view that this might mount pressure on European diesel prices in the short term.
Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States, constitute the G7, though the European Union (EU) also participates in the group’s meetings.
READ ALSO: Petrol Tanker Fire Ravages Houses, Vehicles in Calabar
The G7 concerns itself with major global economic, energy, security and international issues.
According to Raffoul, the coordinated release, which includes a front-loaded diesel release, is likely to ease immediate supply concerns and weaken risk premiums as additional barrels become available during the early part of the winter season.
“The measure is likely to reduce prompt market tightness and weaken risk premiums as additional barrels become available during the early part of the winter season, although the final breakdown between crude and products has yet to be disclosed,” she said.
Raffoul added that the impact is expected to be felt mostly in October and November, when most of the released volumes are likely to reach the market.
She said the announcement also reduces concerns over export restrictions and includes commitments to maximise refinery utilisation, further improving confidence in near-term diesel availability.
However, Raffoul said the release does not fundamentally change the broader supply outlook because the additional barrels are being drawn from existing inventories rather than new production.
“The additional barrels are being drawn from existing inventories rather than new production, meaning the measure provides temporary relief rather than a lasting increase in supply,” she said.
She noted that several factors continue to support diesel fundamentals, including unplanned refinery outages in Asia, uncertainty surrounding Chinese export volumes and continued restrictions on Russian diesel exports.
“Europe also remains reliant on imports to balance its diesel market, leaving it exposed to disruptions in global trade flows,” Raffoul said.
She said the stock release is likely to cap further price increases and ease immediate supply concerns, but is unlikely to eliminate them entirely.
“OECD European diesel inventories remain relatively low by historical standards, while strengthening jet fuel markets have pushed the European jet-diesel regrade back into positive territory,” she said.
Raffoul added that the development suggests diesel values may need to strengthen relative to current levels to restore the normal relationship between the two products.
She said stronger refinery runs, Chinese export policy and sustained stock releases could leave the market more comfortably supplied than currently expected.
“On the other hand, further refinery disruptions, weaker exports, stronger winter demand or delays to inventory rebuilding could allow tightness to deepen once the effect of the stock release begins to fade,” she said.
Raffoul said the announcement points to softer European diesel prices in the near term, but noted that underlying fundamentals suggest any weakness is more likely to reflect a reduction in supply risk than a meaningful loosening of market balances.
Energy
Nigeria-US Mineral Pact Better Structured Than Oil JVs With IOCs – Obiaraeri
Investment banker, development economist and former Imo State deputy governorship candidate, Dr. Nnaemeka Onyeka Obiaraeri, has described the 2026 Nigeria-US Solid Mineral Framework Agreement as structurally superior to Nigeria’s post-independence oil and gas joint-venture arrangements with international oil companies (IOCs).
Obiaraeri made the assertion in a post on X on Friday while comparing the newly signed minerals framework with Nigeria’s longstanding arrangements in the oil and gas sector.
According to him, the minerals agreement is different because of its emphasis on local value addition and processing.
SEE ALSO: Dangote Blames Marketers, IOCs for Lamu Refinery Protests
“The 2026 US-Nigeria Solid Mineral Framework Agreement is structurally superior to Nigeria’s post-independence Oil and Gas arrangements with International Oil Companies (IOCs),” Obiaraeri stated.
He argued that while oil joint ventures have primarily involved the extraction and export of crude oil, with limited domestic refining capacity historically, the new mining framework seeks to ensure that Nigeria does not remain merely a source of raw materials.
“The JV contract with the IOCs primarily involves the extraction and export of raw crude oil with minimal local refining capacity, whereas the new mining pact explicitly attempts to prevent Nigeria from remaining a mere source of raw materials,” he said.
Obiaraeri also said the framework comes with protection for the lives and participation rights of host communities.
He linked the issue to insecurity and illegal mining, alleging that indigenous communities have suffered deaths and hardship as a result of activities involving bandits and illegal mining networks.
“The Solid Mineral MOU also comes with protection of lives and participation rights of the host communities,” he said.
Recall that Nigeria and the United States signed a mineral investment framework in New York on September 24, 2026, aimed at attracting American investment into Nigeria’s estimated $700 billion mineral resources.
The agreement was signed by Minister of Solid Minerals Development, Dele Alake, and US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau at Nigeria’s Mission House in New York.
The framework provides for cooperation in areas including geological data and exploration, mineral development and processing, infrastructure and technical capacity.
The Federal Government said the agreement is intended to promote a value-addition-driven mineral value chain and create greater opportunities for Nigerian businesses.
Nigeria’s oil and gas sector, meanwhile, has historically operated under several contractual arrangements involving the government and foreign oil companies, including joint ventures and production-sharing contracts.
Under the joint-venture model, NNPC Limited and IOC partners participate jointly in the development of petroleum assets according to their respective interests and the terms of the applicable agreements.
NNPC Limited, for instance, operates a joint venture with Chevron Nigeria Limited, with Chevron holding a 40 per cent interest and NNPC Limited holding the remaining 60 per cent in the relevant assets.
The partnership covers exploration and development activities in the Niger Delta.
Nigeria also uses production-sharing contracts for some petroleum developments, particularly in deepwater projects.
In August 2026, President Bola Tinubu approved a new deep-offshore investment framework intended to unlock up to $50 billion in investment, with NNPC Limited acting as the government’s nominated counterparty under the applicable production-sharing contracts.
Against this background, Obiaraeri said the new minerals framework provides an opportunity for Nigeria to adopt a different approach to its natural resources.
He argued that, rather than simply extracting and exporting resources, Nigeria should ensure that more processing, industrial activity and economic value remain within the country.
“I remain Nnaemeka Onyeka Obiaraeri,” he said, adding that he speaks “truth to power” and seeks to proffer solutions to national and subnational challenges.





