Connect with us

Politics

Prof Jega Slams Politicians Over Dividends Of Democracy

Published

on

I Am Afraid Of The Result Of 2023 Election - Jega

 

Wretched governance has been fingered as the main reason for the paucity of dividends of democracy for the citizenry since the advent of the current democratic dispensation in Nigeria in 1999.

 

A former Chairman, Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Prof Attahiru Jega made the assertion in Ilorin, Kwara State, on Monday.

 

His stand was expressed in a paper he presented at the retreat put together by the National Institute for Legislative and Democratic Studies (NILDS).

 

Prof Jega decried that though Nigeria could boast of many parading themselves as leaders, but good leaders still remained in short supply in the country.

 

The paucity of good leaders is compounded by the near absence of strong institutions that would help the citizens who invest so much optimism in democracy to reap handsomely therefrom, he noted.

 

He said, “Nigeria has been on a trajectory of liberal democratic development continuously for 23 years, since 1999 when the military returned to the barracks.

 

“While every four years we have routinely elected representatives into the legislative and executive arms of government, there is consensus that these elements of liberal democratic development have not yet translated into substantive socioeconomic development that satisfies the needs and aspirations of the overwhelming majority of citizens.

 

“For the past 23 years, the country has been under democratic rule, but the so-called dividends of democracy have not yet been desirable for the majority of Nigerian Citizens.

 

“Unfortunately, there has been bad leadership, not that there are no good leaders in the country but they are in short supply while the Democratic institutions are also weak.

 

“In general, leadership at all tiers of the Nigerian federation has not been good; it has been essentially bad and undemocratic; characterized by bad, rather than good, democratic governance.

 

“Many national organizations and institutions have been afflicted/affected by this tendency towards bad governance.

 

“The basic things we require in good governance are good leaders that can be transformational and transitional if we are to achieve good dividends of democracy.”

 

The political scientist who made his mark at the Bayero University, Kano (BUK) made bared his mind in his paper titled: “Importance of Personal Leadership Competencies in an Organization in Transition”.

 

He maintained that key qualities of leadership in a democratic context stated that the country required a leader with good representation, responsible and responsiveness, integrity and honesty adding that such a leader must have cognate experience and competence, in addition to understanding democratic governance.

 

He must be a leader who can inspire and motivate the followership, the professor asserted.

 

“We also need institutions that can inspire good governance”, the former INEC chairman said.

 

On his part, Director General, NILDS, Prof Abubakar Sulaiman said that Nigeria cannot afford to fail its citizenry in its over two decades of democratic evolution.

 

He asserted that the pessimism expressed by Western apologists about the survival of democracy in Nigeria should serve as a motivation to consolidate on the gains recorded, instead of setting the country backwards.

 

It is not all gloom, though, as Prof Sulaiman, a former Minister of Planning, pointed out that with 23 years of uninterrupted democracy, Nigeria has already proven her critics, most of whom are of the Western world, wrong.

 

He noted that democracy is not akin to the Western world but customized and domiciled according to people’s environment, pointing out that Nigeria has its own brand of democratic system.

 

Prof Sulaiman admitted the attendant shortcomings of the Nigeria’s democracy but insisted that they are not sufficient to belittle her democracy.

 

“Divergent opinions and views are allowed in any clime. And for the so-called apologists of democracy worldwide who believe that Nigeria cannot survive with its democracy, we don’t need to look outside, we don’t need to entertain fear because we can’t afford to fail our people.

 

“We have started democracy in almost 24 years now. When we first started, people never thought we would get to where we are now. For some people to have this kind of phobia, and pessimism and say Nigeria cannot survive, be it in the area of security, or political system, it is for us as a people to put that one behind us and see that, perhaps as something that could ginger us to move forward. That we have done in the last 24 years.

 

“We are not perfect as a democracy, we have our shortcomings and inadequacies here and there, but those things are not substantial enough for anybody to condemn the country as a democracy.

 

“I think we have done so much and I hope with the new government and with our democratic credentials, we stand a chance to do better, going forward.

 

“I’m not disturbed by the pessimism of the apologists of the Western world. Democracy is not akin to the Western world. It is customized and domiciled in your own environment. So, we have our own brand of democracy. To the best of my knowledge, I think we have been able to do it. We have done so much and we can still do so much”, the NILDS boss said.

 

Biztellers reports that the retreat was put together to afford the management staff of the institute ample opportunity to key into the agenda of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and the National Assembly under the leadership of Senator Godswill Akpabio.

 

“We at NILDS must therefore understand the nature of the fundamental changes and be in a good position to provide the necessary support to the National Assembly and other democratic institutions in line with our statutory role,” Prof Sulaiman added.

Politics

2027: South Should Complete 8 Years Before North Takes Over — Shehu Sani

Published

on

Former Kaduna Central Senator, Shehu Sani, has said the 2027 presidential contest should be dominated by Southern candidates, arguing that the South should be allowed to complete an eight-year tenure before power returns to the North in 2031.

Sani made the declaration on Thursday in a post on X, as debate over zoning and the rotation of presidential power continues ahead of the 2027 general election.

SEE MORE: 2027: Wike’s 419ners, Lazy Remarks Against APC Gov in Bad Taste — Aliyu

He listed President Bola Tinubu, former Anambra State Governor Peter Obi, African Action Congress presidential candidate Omoyele Sowore, Oyo State Governor Seyi Makinde, Social Democratic Party candidate Adewole Adebayo and former Cross River State Governor Donald Duke among the Southern politicians who should contest the 2027 presidential election.

“The 2027 political contest should be between Tinubu, Peter Obi, Sowore, Makinde, Adebayo, Duke and other Southern Candidates,” Sani said.

“The South should complete its eight years. Its not constitutional but it’s equitable.

“We should not bury our heads in the sand and deny the realities and complexities of our history.”

Sani further argued that the North should have what he described as an “unchallengeable right” to the presidency in 2031 if the South completes its eight years.

“The North should have an unchallengeable right in 2031,” he stated.

He also warned politicians opposed to respecting power rotation in 2027 that the principle could similarly be disregarded when the presidency is expected to return to the North.

“Those who say there shouldn’t be respect for the principle of Rotation of power in 2027, should know that it WILL NOT be respected in 2031,” Sani added.

 

 

Continue Reading

Politics

2027: Wike’s 419ners, Lazy Remarks Against APC Gov in Bad Taste — Aliyu

Published

on

A chieftain of the All Progressives Congress, APC, Farouk Aliyu, has described the language used by the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, FCT, Nyesom Wike, against some APC governors as being in “bad taste.”

Aliyu was reacting to Wike’s description of some governors as “419ners” and “lazy” amid the political realignment ahead of the 2027 general elections.

Speaking in an interview on Arise TV on Thursday, the APC chieftain said members of the ruling party rejected Wike’s remarks.

SEE ALSO: 2027: PDP Drops Fresh Revelation on Wike’s Support for Tinubu

“The language Nyesom Wike used to describe governors as ‘419ners’ or ‘lazy’ is in bad taste. All members of the APC reject that comment,” Aliyu said.

Wike, a former governor of Rivers State, has remained active in the political developments ahead of the 2027 elections despite being a member of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP.

He was one of the five PDP governors who formed the G5 during the 2023 election period and openly supported President Bola Tinubu, the APC candidate, during the presidential election.

Following Tinubu’s emergence as president, Wike was appointed Minister of the FCT, a position he has held under the APC-led Federal Government while remaining a PDP member.

His political position ahead of 2027 has continued to attract attention, particularly over his support for Tinubu and his reported efforts to build a broader political coalition.

Wike has previously criticised APC governors who opposed his political moves, questioning their commitment to delivering electoral support for Tinubu.

However, Aliyu said the APC was willing to accommodate politicians from other parties who wanted to support the ruling party.

“However, as a party, the APC welcomes anyone, including Wike and others from different parties, who is willing to support the APC,” he said.

According to him, the party’s concern was to maintain a coordinated campaign structure ahead of the elections.

“But we want a unified campaign structure at the national level and across the states,” Aliyu added.

Continue Reading

Politics

2027: Obi Wants to Transform Nigeria After 8 Years of Failure in Anambra — Onanuga

Published

on

Presidential aide Bayo Onanuga has questioned Peter Obi’s promise to transform Nigeria, citing what he described as the former Anambra State governor’s record during his eight years in office.

Onanuga made the remarks on Thursday while reacting to the ongoing controversy over Obi’s administration and the financial liabilities allegedly left behind in Anambra State.

“The evidence is clear. If a small, homogenous state like Anambra could not be transformed despite $4.05 billion in spending and massive borrowing, how can the same manager promise to fix a complex federation of 36 states and the FCT?

SEE MORE: ‘This Is Serious’ — Keyamo Reacts as Anambra Govt Releases Fresh Debt Claims Against Peter Obi

“Mr. Obi’s eight years was an unmitigated failure, now masked by revisionism. He should desist from deceiving Nigerians with sanctimonious sermons. The desperation is even clearer in his reported four-year single-term pact with his running mate, in direct contradiction of the two-term, eight-year provision of the 1999 Constitution.”

The comments followed a fresh escalation of the dispute between Obi and the Anambra State Government over the financial position he left behind when he handed over power on March 17, 2014.

The Anambra State Government, through Commissioner for Information and Value Reorientation Law Mefor, recently released details of what it said were eight external loans linked to projects under Obi’s administration.

According to the state government, the loans had an outstanding balance of $92.35 million, valued at about N127.4 billion at the official exchange rate as of June 30, 2026.

The government said the original external borrowings amounted to about $123.77 million.

The state also said Obi’s administration spent about $4.05 billion over its eight years in office, a figure it said was equivalent to about N5.4 trillion at the current exchange rate.

It argued that the loans covered areas including malaria control, erosion management, healthcare, education, community development and agriculture.

The controversy intensified after Obi rejected the allegations and maintained that his administration cleared more than N35 billion in historical gratuities and arrears.

Obi also said he left office without outstanding salaries, pensions, gratuities or debts owed to contractors for duly executed and certified projects.

He further disputed the state’s account of an alleged N2.13 billion ecological fund, saying the money had been left untouched in a First Bank account for the Oko/Umuchiana erosion crisis.

Obi challenged anyone with evidence contradicting his account to produce it, saying he would stop campaigning for the 2027 presidential election if his claims were disproved.

The Anambra Government, however, disputed his explanation, saying the account Obi identified was an Internally Generated Revenue Consolidated Revenue Account and that its records did not show the N2.13 billion he referenced.

The Presidency subsequently entered the dispute, with Onanuga challenging Obi to honour his pledge to withdraw from the 2027 presidential race if the claims against his administration were established.

Obi’s media aide, Idris Zekeri Jnr, meanwhile, said a team of former officials who worked with Obi was preparing a detailed response to the Anambra Government’s claims.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2022. Biztellers, powered by Alphaxristi.

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x