NEWS
Resolution In Sight For OML 25 Dispute After Seven-Year Standoff
After seven years of tension and protests, the dispute over OML 25, a vital oil flow station in Kula Kingdom, Rivers State, may be nearing resolution.
Stakeholders, including the Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC), Belema Oil, the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC Ltd), host community leaders, and government officials, convened in Port Harcourt for a decisive meeting aimed at finalizing plans to reopen the facility, which has been shut since 2017.
OML 25, with a production capacity of approximately 45,000 barrels of oil per day, was closed following mass protests by youths and women from Offoiama, Ngeji, Belema, and Kula communities.
READ ALSO: Dangote Group, Subsidiaries Steal Show At NECA’s 2024 Visible Impact Awards
The protesters accused the SPDC of neglecting the region, citing a lack of basic amenities and employment opportunities despite over 50 years of oil exploration in the area.
In 2019, the Federal Government brokered an eight-point agreement to address the grievances.
Key provisions included the allocation of 7% equity shares to Belema Oil and assurances of employment opportunities for the youth.
However, SPDC cited security concerns, which delayed the implementation of the agreement and kept the facility closed.
During the recent meeting, stakeholders revisited the 2019 agreement, focusing on unresolved issues and discussing strategies for resuming operations.
The gathering included notable figures such as the Paramount Ruler of the Sara-Igbe Dynasty, Anabs Sara-Igbe, alongside representatives from regulatory bodies and Rivers State government officials.
While community leaders voiced apprehensions about SPDC’s planned divestment from the facility, youth representatives expressed dissatisfaction with the exclusion of community remediation efforts in the original agreement.
These unresolved issues remain a key point of negotiation.
Efforts to obtain comments from SPDC and government representatives on the timeline for reopening OML 25 proved unsuccessful as both parties declined interviews.
Despite the challenges, the reopening of OML 25 is anticipated to significantly boost Nigeria’s daily oil production, currently estimated at 1.8 million barrels.
For the host communities, the meeting rekindles hope for a resolution to the protracted dispute and the establishment of a fairer and more beneficial relationship with SPDC.
NEWS
Who Is Running Nigeria? ADC Demands Answers Over Tinubu, Shettima’s Absence
The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has demanded clarification over who is currently exercising the constitutional powers of the President as President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and Vice-President Kashim Shettima remain outside Nigeria.
The opposition party, in a statement issued on Tuesday by its National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, said Tinubu’s continued absence had raised questions about compliance with Section 145 of the Nigerian Constitution.
SEE ALSO: Shettima Arrives Yola to Condole With Bamanga Tukur’s Family
The ADC said the provision requires the President, when proceeding on vacation or otherwise unable to discharge the functions of his office, to transmit a written declaration to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, after which the Vice-President performs the functions of Acting President.
According to the party, Tinubu left Nigeria on August 30 and has now been away for more than 21 days.
“President Tinubu left Nigeria on 30 August and has now been away for more than 21 days. We therefore demand to know whether the required declaration was transmitted by the President,” the ADC said.
The party also questioned why the National Assembly had not addressed the issue if such a declaration had not been transmitted.
The ADC rejected the Presidency’s description of Tinubu’s stay abroad as a “working vacation”, arguing that the phrase does not create a separate constitutional category.
“There is no constitutional category known as a ‘working vacation’. Presidential authority cannot be transferred by convenience, protocol or press statement,” the party said.
The opposition party also dismissed the suggestion that Secretary to the Government of the Federation, George Akume, could effectively represent the President in the discharge of presidential responsibilities.
“Representing the President at events and ceremonies does not confer constitutional powers. The Secretary to the Government of the Federation is a mere appointee of the President,” it said.
The ADC stressed that attending official functions or delivering speeches on behalf of the President was different from exercising the constitutional powers of the President or Acting President.
“Representation is not governance. Attendance at official functions is not presidential authority,” the party added.
The controversy comes as Vice-President Shettima is in New York for the United Nations General Assembly, where he is representing Nigeria.
The ADC said the simultaneous absence of the President and Vice-President was particularly concerning given what it described as Nigeria’s security, unemployment and cost-of-living challenges.
The party also criticised Tinubu’s continued stay in Paris while French President Emmanuel Macron travelled to New York for the UN General Assembly.
“The irony would be amusing if it were not a national disgrace,” the ADC said, arguing that the situation created poor optics for Nigeria.
Macron had hosted Tinubu at a private dinner at the Élysée Palace in Paris before travelling to New York for the UN General Assembly.
The ADC therefore called on the Presidency and the National Assembly to answer what it described as a fundamental constitutional question.
“Who presently exercises the constitutional powers of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, and under what provision of the Constitution?” the party asked.
NEWS
Stop Exporting Raw Minerals, Start Building Wealth From Your Resources – Tinubu to Africa
President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has called on African countries to unite and end the export of raw mineral resources, urging the continent to focus on local processing, manufacturing and value addition.
Tinubu made the call on Tuesday in New York, United States, while declaring open the 3rd Africa Minerals Strategy Group (AMSG) High-Level Roundtable on Critical Minerals Development in Africa, held on the sidelines of the ongoing 81st Session of the United Nations General Assembly.
The high-level meeting, which was chaired by Tinubu, was themed, “From Resources to Wealth: Continental Cooperation for Mineral Value Addition, Data Sovereignty, Innovative Financing and Critical Minerals Security.”
ALSO READ: Shettima Arrives Yola to Condole With Bamanga Tukur’s Family
Represented by Vice President Kashim Shettima, Tinubu told African leaders and stakeholders that the continent must move away from its long-standing position as a supplier of raw materials and develop industries capable of processing its mineral resources locally.
“For generations, Africa has furnished the materials of prosperity elsewhere. Our duty is to ensure that the future being fashioned from African minerals has room for African ambition,” the President said.
Tinubu expressed concern that mineral-rich communities across Africa continue to suffer from inadequate infrastructure, limited employment opportunities and insufficient participation in the wealth generated from their natural resources.
He noted that rising global demand for clean energy, artificial intelligence and advanced manufacturing had made African critical minerals such as cobalt, copper, lithium and rare earth elements increasingly important to global supply chains.
According to the President, Africa’s response should include mineral processing and refining, battery production, component manufacturing, African technologies and the development of competitive skills.
“The worth of a mine must be counted in the lives it improves,” Tinubu said.
“Jobs, industries, infrastructure, technology transfer, African enterprise participation and prosperity retained across generations must measure our progress from resources to wealth.”
Tinubu Warns Against African Fragmentation
The President said no African country could achieve the desired transformation of its mineral sector alone.
He warned that countries competing against one another by offering lower royalties, weaker local-content requirements and excessive concessions could undermine the continent’s collective bargaining power.
“Fragmentation leaves us exporting raw materials and buying finished goods at a premium. Cooperation gives our markets scale, our industries integration, our financing reach and our negotiations authority,” he said.
Tinubu called for greater continental cooperation, saying African countries must negotiate collectively where their interests converge and ensure that partnerships with external investors strengthen rather than undermine African industrial capacity.
“Reliability must never mean dependency, and partnership must never demand inequality,” he added.
President Highlights Nigeria’s Mining Reforms
Tinubu also highlighted reforms in Nigeria’s mining sector, saying the country must require local value addition for new mining licences, strengthen geological data and investor access, organise artisanal miners into cooperatives, combat illegal mining and improve regulatory accountability.
He disclosed that revenue from Nigeria’s mining sector rose from approximately ₦6 billion in 2023 to over ₦38 billion in 2024, and further to between ₦68.1 billion and ₦70 billion in 2025.
The President also pointed to major foreign investment commitments and the development and commissioning of large-scale lithium processing capacity in Nasarawa State as evidence of the opportunities available in the sector.
He said his administration’s mining policy was designed to ensure that minerals extracted in Nigeria contribute to the country’s industries, workers, skills and communities.
According to Tinubu, ongoing reforms have demonstrated that “firm terms can attract serious capital.”
Tinubu Backs Continental Minerals Framework
The President also endorsed the Continental Integration and Economic Assurance Declaration (CIEAD) adopted at the roundtable.
He said the declaration should create a predictable and investment-ready environment for Africa’s strategic mineral corridors through harmonised policies, responsible investment and shared infrastructure.
Tinubu, however, stressed that the declaration must go beyond a ceremonial signing and be backed by clear timelines, financing, implementation mechanisms and public accountability.
“Africa’s power resides in its people, markets and ingenuity. No outsider will organise our continent or place our industrial interests above their own,” he said.
“We must integrate our markets, mobilise African capital and negotiate with one voice wherever our interests converge.”
He added: “Our industrial growth can strengthen global prosperity, the energy transition and secure supply chains. Minerals confer no automatic prosperity; vision, investment and industry must earn it. Political will must turn mineral promise into enduring African wealth.”
Alake Calls for More African Countries to Join AMSG
Earlier, AMSG Chairman and Nigeria’s Minister of Solid Minerals Development, Dele Alake, said the group was proposing the Continental Integration and Economic Assurance Declaration as a framework for establishing a unified architecture for Africa’s critical and solid minerals value chains.
Alake urged African countries that have yet to join the AMSG to become members, stressing the importance of coordinating efforts, ideas and resources to develop the continent’s natural resources.
He said Africa’s mineral ambitions could not be achieved through policy implementation alone, arguing that integrated partnerships covering financial transactions and infrastructure development were also necessary.
Kenya’s Minister of Blue Economy and Maritime Affairs, Hassan Ali Joho, also emphasised the importance of domestic resource mobilisation for solid mineral development.
Joho called for transparency, competitiveness and greater alignment of licensing procedures among AMSG members while respecting the sovereignty of individual countries.
Representatives of Liberia, Chad and Tanzania, alongside other stakeholders, also contributed to the discussions.
NEWS
‘A Nation Cannot Escape the Bill’ — Atiku Questions Tinubu’s Third UNGA Absence
Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has questioned President Bola Tinubu’s third consecutive absence from the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), demanding an explanation for the president’s decision not to attend the global gathering.
Atiku made the remarks in a statement issued by his Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication, Phrank Shaibu, as Vice President Kashim Shettima leads Nigeria’s delegation to the 81st UNGA in New York.
According to Atiku, Tinubu was absent from the 79th UNGA in 2024 and the 80th session in 2025, and has again stayed away from the 81st session in 2026.
ALSO READ: ‘Calling Tinubu Bola, Giving Him Orders Is Insolence’ — Sunday Dare Blasts Atiku
The former vice president said the repeated absences could no longer be regarded as a coincidence or routine delegation, arguing that they required an explanation.
Atiku also questioned whether Tinubu’s documented history with United States law-enforcement agencies had become a burden on Nigeria’s foreign relations.
“The United Nations General Assembly is one of the world’s most important diplomatic gatherings. It brings together the representatives of the UN’s 193 member states and provides a unique platform for presidents and prime ministers to defend their countries’ interests, negotiate partnerships and shape global decisions on trade, security and development,” Atiku said.
He acknowledged that Shettima could represent Nigeria at the gathering but maintained that the vice president’s representation could not permanently substitute for the president’s personal authority and visibility.
“Vice President Shettima may represent Nigeria capably, but representation by delegation cannot permanently substitute for the personal authority, visibility and responsibility of the president,” he said.
“Tinubu cannot continue to treat Nigeria’s seat at the world’s biggest diplomatic table as though it were an inconvenient appointment that can be endlessly outsourced.”
Atiku further argued that UNGA was not simply a ceremonial event, noting that important bilateral meetings, investment discussions, trade negotiations and development-financing engagements take place on the sidelines of the gathering.
“Presidential absence on the global stage has consequences. UNGA is not merely a ceremonial gathering or an annual photo opportunity,” he said.
“Its side-lines are where leaders hold decisive bilateral meetings, court investors, negotiate trade partnerships, mobilise development finance and make the case for their countries.”
The former vice president said Nigeria could lose investment and other economic opportunities as a result of the president’s continued absence.
“When a president makes himself absent from that stage for three consecutive years, his country loses opportunities. Investment does not follow silence. International capital does not pursue a country whose leader repeatedly abandons the room in which consequential economic relationships are being built,” Atiku said.
He linked the issue to investment, employment and capital inflows, arguing that reduced investment could increase pressure on the naira and contribute to higher costs for Nigerians.
“The cost is eventually transferred to ordinary citizens: fewer investments mean fewer businesses and fewer jobs. Reduced capital inflows place additional pressure on the local currency,” he said.
“A weaker naira raises the cost of imports, production, transportation and food. These are among the economic pressures now punishing Nigerian families through the worst cost-of-living crisis in living memory.”
Atiku concluded by saying that while the president could regard attendance at UNGA as a matter of personal prerogative, Nigeria would ultimately bear the consequences of the decision.
“Tinubu may consider attending UNGA a matter of personal prerogative, but the economic and diplomatic consequences of his absence are being paid by Nigerians. A President may surrender his seat, but a nation cannot escape the bill,” he said.





