Business
SERAP Takes Legal Action Against FG Over 50% Telecom Tariff Hike
The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has taken legal action against the Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN) on what it termed “the arbitrary, unconstitutional, unlawful, unfair, and unreasonable 50 percent telecom tariff hike by the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC).”
Biztellers reports that the NCC was joined in the suit as Defendant.
Recall that the NCC recently approved a 50 percent hike in telecom tariffs, which by implication would see the average price of calls will rise to N16.5 per minute from N11; the cost of 1GB of data to N431.25 from N287.5/GB; and SMS rates to N6 from N4.
ALSO READ: Super Eagles Await Group Stage Fate As AFCON Draw Holds In Morocco
In the suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/111/2025 filed last Friday at the Federal High Court, Abuja, the SERAP is asking the court to determine “whether the unilateral decision by the NCC to authorise telcos to hike telecom tariffs by 50 percent is not arbitrary, unconstitutional, unlawful, unfair, unreasonable and inconsistent with citizens’ freedom of expression and access to information.”
In addition, the SERAP is asking the court for “a declaration that the unilateral decision by the NCC to authorise telcos to hike telecom tariff by 50 percent is arbitrary, unfair, unreasonable and inconsistent and incompatible with citizens’ freedom of expression and access to information, and therefore unconstitutional and unlawful.”
The SERAP is also seeking “an order of interim injunction restraining the NCC, its officers, agents, privies, assigns, or any other person or persons acting on its instructions from further implementing, enforcing and doing any act to give effect to the decision of the NCC authorizing telecom tariff hike by 50 percent.”
In the suit, the SERAP is arguing that: “The legal and constitutional provisions as well as international standards on freedom of expression and access to information constitute the repository of legality. The requirements of legality constrain the exercise of statutory powers by the NCC to authorise any increase in telecom tariffs.”
The suit filed on behalf of the SERAP by its lawyer Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa, SAN, read in part: “The demands of legality impose clear duties of fairness and reasonableness on the NCC in the exercise of its powers to authorize the telecom tariff hike by 50 percent, which is the subject-matter of this suit.
“The NCC is required under the legal provisions on consumers’ rights and constitutional and international standards on freedom of expression and access to information to base its decision on reasonable interpretations of its enabling statutes and guidelines and other relevant legal frameworks, and to follow due process.
“The exercise of the statutory powers of the NCC in approving the telecom tariff hike is a grave violation of the provisions of the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act 2018, the Nigerian Constitution 1999 [as amended] and the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights to which Nigeria is a state party.
“These legal and constitutional provisions and international human rights standards recognize that every individual has the right to an equal opportunity to receive, seek and impart information through any communication medium without discrimination.
“The constitutional and democratic anomalies complained of by SERAP is more apparent when the said unilateral decision of the NCC approving a 50 percent increase in telecommunication tariffs is juxtaposed with the apparent procedural breaches of the condition-precedent for any approval of increase.
“The NCC is the statutory agency charged with the responsibility of promoting and implementing the national communications or telecommunications policy in Nigeria.
“The latest patently unconstitutional and unlawful increase in telecommunication tariffs is coming on the heels of a recent report by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), which shows that some 133 million Nigerians are poor.
“The NBS report also shows that over half of the population of Nigeria are multi-dimensionally poor and cook with dung, wood or charcoal, rather than cleaner energy.
“The increase in telecommunication tariffs is a fundamental breach of due process of law, as the purported approval by the NCC failed to meet the high threshold of consultation with key stakeholders, especially the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission, which is the primary consumer protection agency in Nigeria.
“The increase in telecommunication tariffs is coming at a time when Nigerians are deeply burdened by the cost of living crisis. The cost of living crisis has resulted in low quality of life, unemployment and deaths, as many socially and economically vulnerable people scramble for free food in public and religious gatherings.
“The present-day economic realities in Nigeria include chronic poverty amongst a high percentage of citizens and the growing inability of several state governments to pay salary and pensions of workers, especially as the country still suffers from the removal of fuel subsidy, electricity tariff hike and inflated cost of food in the market.”
The SERAP is therefore asking the court for the following reliefs:
A DECLARATION that the unilateral decision of the NCC approving the increase of telecommunications tariff by 50 percent is arbitrary, unfair, unreasonable, and a deliberate attempt to stifle the constitutional and international human rights of citizens to freely express themselves and share information, and breach of sections 104 and 127 of the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act 2018, section 39 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 [as amended] and Article 9 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act and Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to which Nigeria is a state party.
AN ORDER setting aside the unilateral decision of the NCC approving the increase of telecommunications tariff by 50 percent contained in a press statement published by the NCC on 20th January 2025 for being arbitrary, unfair, extortive, unreasonable, unconstitutional and a breach of the provisions of Sections 104 and 127 of the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act 2018, section 39 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 [as amended], Article 9 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act and Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to which Nigeria is a state party.
AN ORDER restraining the NCC, its agents, assigns, privies and or representatives or such other persons acting on its behalf, and all telecommunication companies in Nigeria from implementing and/or enforcing the unilateral decision of the NCC approving the increase of telecommunications tariff by 50 percent as contained in a press statement published by the NCC on 20th January 2025.
AND FOR SUCH FURTHER ORDER(S) that the Honorable Court may deem fit to make in the circumstance of this suit.
No date has been fixed for the hearing of the interim application and the substantive suit.
Business
NGA Calls for Risk Reduction Policies to Lift Oil, Gas Industry
The Nigerian Gas Association (NGA), has opined that a predictable fiscal and regulatory environment are ingredients essential to de-risking investments and accelerating project delivery in the oil and gas sector.
This was detailed in a statement released by NGA at the end of its maiden Legal Forum emphasised that investor confidence will be shaped by the robustness of commercial and contractual structures across the gas value chain, strengthened contractual clarity, and efficient dispute resolution mechanisms.
In his opening address, President of the NGA, Aka Nwokedi, underscored the urgency of aligning Nigeria’s legal architecture with its strategic gas ambitions, noting that the sector’s next phase of growth will be defined by the strength, clarity, and credibility of its regulatory environment.
“Nigeria’s gas resources present a defining opportunity for economic transformation, but realising this potential will depend on building a legal framework that is transparent, predictable, and globally competitive”, he stated.
Discussions throughout the Forum reflected a clear and consistent theme: that Nigeria’s opportunity now lies in execution.
ALSO READ: IEA: Nigeria Has Only 1.42m bpd Production Capacity, Zero Spare Output
While the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) has established a transformative foundation for sector reform, participants emphasised that its true impact will be determined by disciplined implementation, regulatory coherence, and institutional alignment.
The need to eliminate ambiguity and strengthen enforcement emerged as central to unlocking sustained investment.
As global energy systems continue to evolve, the Forum reinforced natural gas as Nigeria’s most strategic lever for balancing economic growth, energy security, and emissions reduction. Participants highlighted that legal and regulatory frameworks must evolve accordingly, moving beyond policy intent to embed clear, enforceable standards on carbon management, ESG obligations, and sustainability.
“In an increasingly competitive global market, such clarity will be critical in attracting long-term capital.”
The Forum also acknowledged the policy direction of the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu in advancing gas development through infrastructure expansion and increased domestic utilisation.
Stakeholders noted that sustained policy stability will serve as a critical signal to both domestic and international investors evaluating long-term opportunities in Nigeria’s gas sector.
Beyond its technical depth, the NGA Legal Forum marked an important step in bridging the longstanding gap between legal frameworks and industry realities, creating a structured platform for continuous engagement, practical alignment, and forward-looking policy development.
Business
Middle East Crisis Sparks Most Severe Supply Shock in History — IEA
The International Energy Agency (IEA) is of the view that the current Middle East crisis has destabilised global oil markets.
It pointed out that the ugly incident has cut demand expectations and triggered what it described as the most severe supply shock in history.
This was set out in its latest Oil Market Report, in which it asserted that the global oil demand is now projected to contract by 80,000 barrels per day in 2026, a sharp reversal from last month’s forecast growth of 730,000 bpd.
It added that a projected 1.5 million barrels per day drop in Q2 2026 would mark the steepest quarterly decline since the COVID-19 pandemic.
ALSO READ: ExxonMobil Proposes Mega Deepwater Investments in Nigeria
According to the IEA, early demand destruction is already visible in the Middle East and Asia-Pacific, where consumption of naphtha, LPG and jet fuel has fallen sharply. It attributed this to rising prices, scarcity of supplies, and weakening industrial and aviation activity.
It pointed out that on the supply side, global oil output plunged by 10.1 mbpd in March to 97 mbpd, as continued attacks on energy infrastructure and restrictions in the Strait of Hormuz disrupted exports. OPEC+ production reportedly fell by 9.4 mbpd, while non-OPEC supply also weakened despite gains in the United States and Brazil.
The crisis, it was learnt, has also hit refining operations, with global crude throughputs constrained by feedstock shortages and damaged infrastructure. The IEA said refineries in the Middle East and Asia reportedly cut runs by around six mbpd, while global crude processing is now expected to decline by one mbpd on average in 2026.
Prices have also surged to historic levels, with Brent crude trading around $100 per barrel and physical crude briefly touching $150 per barrel, as refiners scramble for alternative supplies. Middle distillates in Asia reached record highs above $290 per barrel, reflecting extreme tightness in product markets, according to the report.
Inventories were said to have fallen sharply, with global observed stocks dropping by 85 million barrels in March. The IEA said supply routes through the Strait of Hormuz have been severely disrupted, cutting flows from over 20 mbpd before the conflict to about 3.8 mbpd.
While some exports have been rerouted through Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Iraq–Türkiye pipelines, these alternatives have not offset losses exceeding 13 mbpd, the agency said, adding that floating storage has increased in the Middle East as stranded cargoes build up offshore.
The IEA stressed that restoring full flows through the Strait of Hormuz remains the most critical factor in stabilising global energy markets, warning that prolonged disruption could deepen the supply shock, worsen inflationary pressures, and further weaken global oil demand.
Business
Stakeholder Commends NMDPRA for Averting Aviation Fuel Crisis
An oil sector advocacy group has commended the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA), for stabilising the aviation fuel market, noting that its recent intervention helped ease tensions across the aviation sector and averted potential disruptions to flight operations.
This was detailed in a statement on Tuesday under the signature of the centre’s Executive Director, Tunde Adeyemi.
It averred that the regulator’s clarification on fuel availability and pricing came at a critical time, when uncertainty over Jet A1 costs had heightened anxiety among airline operators and other stakeholders.
Adeyemi noted that confirmation of over 70 days’ aviation fuel sufficiency reflects a strong supply position and underscores the resilience of Nigeria’s downstream petroleum framework.
Adeyemi said the regulator’s data-driven disclosure helped counter widespread speculation, including claims of a potential spike in aviation fuel prices that had raised fears of flight disruptions and higher airfares.
“The timely intervention by the Authority provided much-needed clarity and helped calm frayed nerves within the aviation ecosystem. At a time when misinformation could have escalated into a crisis, the regulator chose transparency and facts, which is commendable,” he said.
ALSO READ: NUPRC Assures Refiners of Crude Supply, Urges CORAN to Bid for Oil Blocks
He added that aviation fuel remains a major cost driver for airlines in Nigeria, making stability in supply and pricing critical to the sector’s sustainability.
According to him, the Authority’s emphasis on the deregulated nature of the Jet A1 market is key to shaping realistic expectations, as pricing is influenced by global oil trends, foreign exchange fluctuations, and logistics costs.
“It is important for stakeholders to understand that aviation fuel pricing is market-driven. What the regulator has done is provide clarity that supports informed decision-making,” he said.
The group also highlighted the growing role of domestic refining in moderating fuel prices, noting that locally refined aviation fuel is being sold slightly below international benchmarks — an indication of improving local capacity.
It urged stakeholders across the aviation fuel value chain to avoid spreading unverified claims capable of distorting market realities or undermining confidence in the sector.
“Responsible engagement is critical. All parties must work together to sustain stability and ensure that recent gains are not reversed by panic or misinformation,” Adeyemi added.





