Connect with us

NEWS

ASUU Accuses FG of Plot to Deprive Nigerian Youths Education

Published

on

Students appeal to ASUU to suspend 7 months-old strike

By Edozie Obasi-Eze

There’s a new twist in the industrial action which has grounded academic activities in government owned universities in Nigeria since February 14.

One of the major actors, the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) has put it before the Nigerian Government that it is deliberate in its efforts to ensure that Nigerian youths don’t gain access to qualitative education.

The labour union, leveled the accusation on Wednesday, in a statement jointly signed by its Chairman, Muhammad Sani Gaya and Secretary, Murtala Muhammad.

While calling on the citizenry to resist the ulterior motive of applying hunger to frustrate a just struggle for quality and affordable education, the ASUU averred that the body language and antics of the Federal Government constituted to it clear indications that the FG was focused on destroying education in the country, especially at tertiary level.

It stated, “We are prepared and determined to continue enduring the torture and negative media campaign against our struggle in order to liberate ourselves, the young and upcoming generations of Nigerians from the deliberate efforts to deny them access to quality and affordable education.

“Indeed, education is the only weapon that can change society, denying our youth education is akin to destroying the nation. The intention of the FG to destroy university education in Nigeria should be vehemently resisted.”

The ASUU noted that the use of hunger to coerce its members to suspend its indefinite strike has failed in the past and definitely will not yield any fruit.

“For the avoidance of doubt, the union is resolute, determined, focused and ready to continue the struggle in order to salvage the Nigerian public universities from imminent collapse.

“Unfortunately, the FG is blessed with enough wrong people at the right places. Irritably, the Minister of Education, Adamu Adamu, is badly informed of the university system and dilettante with the primary duties of an academic staff.

“The public may note that based on laws establishing universities, an academic staff is employed to teach, conduct research and render community service. So, when ASUU embarked on strike, only the teaching component stopped, thus, the issue of imposing “no work no pay” doesn’t rightly and legally apply to academic staff,” ASUU pointed out.

The labour body maintains that its demands cannot in any way be said to be self-serving.

READ ALSO: Presidency working toward stabilising education, keeping students in schools

“As a body of intellectuals, our union demands repositioning of our universities for greater efficiency in national development and technological advancement.

“Also, massive and sustained funding for our universities; a reversal of apparent decay in the university system; and, enhanced and competitive remuneration for overworked academic staff in Nigerian universities.

“Nigerians should join ASUU to ask the Federal Government to tow the path of honour by respecting the agreement it freely entered with our union.”

The ASUU considers it ‘paradoxical’ that while the FG has acknowledged that its demands were genuine and patriotic, yet the FG has demonstrated no political will, but instead had remained “nonchalant and ill-intention towards salvaging the University System from imminent collapse arising from the comatose created by the above highlighted issues.

“It is quite disheartening that ASUU, this time, is dealing with an insincere and dishonest FG that claims to be fighting corruption but is surrounded by corrupt elements whose major preoccupation is denying the citizenry reasonable living standard and quality education.’’

NEWS

2027 Elections: FG Warns Politicians Against Promises on Fuel Subsidy

Published

on

The Federal Government has warned politicians against making promises that could reverse Nigeria’s economic reforms, insisting that it will not restore fuel subsidy amid renewed debate over the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited’s (NNPC) petrol discount.

The Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Taiwo Oyedele, disclosed this during an interview on Channels Television on Friday, saying the government would not bring back subsidies on petroleum products.

“This government is not bringing back subsidy on fuel products. We need to be clear,” Oyedele said.

ALSO READ: NNPC Petrol Discount: Oyedele Explains How Lower Margins Could Boost Profits

The minister also criticised politicians who, according to him, make promises to win elections without fully considering the implications of implementing them.

He suggested that some politicians make sweeping promises during election campaigns only to offer excuses when confronted with the realities of governance.

“I think I would pardon people who say all manner of things because they want to get elected. It’s almost like ‘whatever I need to say, when I get there, I’ll give excuses.’ But we have the data,” he said.

Oyedele added that he felt a personal responsibility not to remain silent about the economic realities known to the government or allow populist positions to push Nigeria in the wrong direction.

“I feel the personal responsibility that I cannot see what I see and keep quiet, or populism to move our country in the wrong direction,” he said.

NNPC Petrol Discount Sparks Fresh Subsidy Debate

The minister’s remarks come amid renewed debate over fuel subsidy following the Federal Government’s announcement of a 30-day petrol discount at NNPC retail stations.

The initiative was introduced as a temporary measure to provide relief to Nigerians amid elevated global crude oil prices and concerns about the cost of petroleum products.

NNPC Retail had also announced a N66-per-litre petrol discount to mark Nigeria’s 66th Independence Anniversary, with the offer scheduled to run until October 31, 2026, across its retail stations nationwide.

The company maintained that the discount was a customer-relief initiative and did not represent a return to the petroleum subsidy regime.

The distinction has become central to the debate, with the government insisting that temporary price relief at NNPC stations does not amount to restoring the subsidy policy abolished in May 2023.

The administration has maintained that the current arrangement differs from the former subsidy system, under which the government intervened to cover part of the cost of petrol.

FG Defends Economic Reforms

During the interview, Oyedele also referred to a World Bank update, saying the institution had acknowledged a reduction in poverty levels and increased spending on infrastructure, particularly roads.

He urged Nigerians not to reverse the progress he said had been made, arguing that the country was approaching a point where the benefits of ongoing reforms should begin to emerge.

 

 

 

Continue Reading

NEWS

Kaduna Moves to Clear 5-Year Promotion Backlog for 24,000 Teachers

Published

on

The Kaduna State Universal Basic Education Board (SUBEB) has commenced a promotion exercise for 24,000 eligible staff as part of efforts to clear outstanding teachers’ promotions dating back to 2021.

The development was disclosed on Friday as the administration of Governor Uba Sani intensifies efforts to address promotion backlogs, recognise teachers’ years of service and improve staff welfare across the state.

The exercise covers outstanding promotions from 2021 to 2026 and is expected to provide eligible teachers and other staff with opportunities for career progression.

SEE ALSO: Kaduna Clears N18bn Pension Arrears, Raises Agric Funding to N100bn

According to the announcement, eligible personnel will undergo an assessment process, after which promotions will be implemented for those who successfully meet the requirements.

The initiative is part of efforts to strengthen the education sector by recognising the contributions of teachers and supporting their professional development.

The state government has emphasised the importance of investing in teachers, noting that a motivated and valued teaching workforce is essential to building a stronger education system.

The exercise is also expected to address long-standing staff concerns relating to career advancement within the state’s basic education sector.

 

Continue Reading

NEWS

Fuel Discount: Sam Amadi Predicts No Immediate Drop in Transport Fares

Published

on

The Director of the Abuja School of Social and Political Thoughts, Dr Sam Amadi, has predicted that the Federal Government’s ₦60-per-litre petrol discount is unlikely to translate into an immediate reduction in transport fares, questioning its ability to ease the economic hardship facing Nigerians.

Amadi said the intervention, introduced through Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC) retail stations, was too insignificant to make a meaningful difference in the lives of citizens struggling with rising living costs.

He made the remarks during an interview on Arise News on Friday, October 9, 2026.

ALSO READ: Fuel Subsidy: Atiku Showing Symptoms of Desperation — Afegbua

The Federal Government recently introduced a 30-day petrol discount window as part of a 10-point intervention announced by the Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Taiwo Oyedele.

Under the arrangement, NNPC Retail will forgo its profit margin and sell petrol at cost price, with the expected reduction estimated at ₦60 per litre.

The government said the temporary measure was designed to cushion the impact of global oil price shocks and reduce transportation costs, particularly for commercial transport operators.

Oyedele also clarified that the initiative was not a return to the fuel subsidy regime.

However, Amadi expressed doubts about whether the discount would provide meaningful relief, arguing that its economic impact would be minimal.

“Will transport costs change tomorrow? I predict they will not change. As a matter of fact, it’s so insignificant that you might even see some transport costs going higher as people respond to it disproportionately,” he said.

The policy expert added that the intervention was unlikely to significantly improve the living conditions of Nigerians facing the consequences of rising transportation and other household expenses.

“I don’t think this is going to touch the lives of the people. Politically-economically speaking, it’s meaningless. Politically, maybe marginally useful,” he said.

Amadi Criticises Government’s Economic Policies

Beyond the petrol discount, Amadi criticised the government’s approach to economic reforms, arguing that the removal of petrol and electricity subsidies, alongside the floating of the naira, had contributed significantly to Nigeria’s cost-of-living crisis.

He described the petrol discount as a belated response to mounting public dissatisfaction with the administration’s economic policies.

“First, I think it’s a face-saving strategy. Again, the government has been too late, too little. The World Bank recently came back to subsidy as a tool. So the government’s religious taboo around subsidy was a wrong idea,” Amadi said.

He also argued that the manner in which the petrol subsidy was removed had worsened the economic difficulties experienced by households and businesses.

“Secondly, it’s clear—as Atiku and others have argued—that the drastic, reckless manner in which subsidy was removed, compounded with the removal of electricity subsidies and the floating of the naira, is the source of the current cost of living crisis,” he added.

According to Amadi, the government’s latest intervention also appears to be a response to growing political pressure, particularly in Northern Nigeria, where calls for the restoration of fuel subsidies have gained attention.

He maintained that the ₦60 reduction could offer the government some political advantage without imposing the substantial fiscal burden associated with restoring the former subsidy regime.

“This government is smart. The state governors don’t want subsidy back because their fiscal buoyance depends on it. So if it’s ₦60 only for NNPC for transporters, the fiscal impact is almost nothing to the government.

“At the same time, they hope to play a political game: less fiscal loss, more political gain. But it’s nothing,” he said.

2027 Elections Could Shape Fuel Pricing Debate

Amadi further suggested that political considerations ahead of the 2027 general elections could be influencing the government’s approach to petrol pricing.

He argued that the administration was attempting to respond to public concerns about fuel costs while avoiding a full return to the subsidy system.

The policy expert also questioned the implications of the intervention for the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA), noting that its implementation still had unresolved issues.

He said the government could explore different pricing mechanisms and targeted interventions to make petrol more affordable without necessarily undermining market forces.

“The government is running into trouble regarding the PIA. Don’t forget that we haven’t reached full-scale implementation; there are still a lot of blind spots. In this case, they’re responding to politics, and maybe they should, because this is bound to be a major issue going into 2027,” Amadi said.

 

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2022. Biztellers, powered by Alphaxristi.

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x