Energy
Billy Gas Leak: Reps Blames NUPRC, NOSDRA for Inaction
The slow response of the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC) and the National Oil Spill Detection and Response Agency (NOSDRA) to the prolonged gas seepage in Billy Community, Degema Local Government Area of Rivers State, has been strongly condemned.
The House of Representatives Committee on the South South Development Commission (SSDC) handed the condemnation on Thursday, in Abuja, describing the situation as a major environmental and public health emergency that has lingered for nearly eight months.
During an investigative hearing, the lawmakers questioned officials of both agencies over what they described as regulatory lapses and delayed intervention, amid reports that the persistent gas seepage has contaminated water sources, polluted the air, disrupted economic activities and exposed residents to serious health and safety risks.
The probe followed growing concerns over the incident, first reported in late 2025, which has continued unabated despite months of investigations.
Residents of the riverine community have alleged that the emissions have rendered boreholes unsafe, crippled fishing and farming, their primary sources of livelihood, and left families living in constant fear of possible fire outbreaks and other health hazards.
Lawmakers also criticised the absence of key stakeholders, including the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC Ltd), the NNPC Exploration and Production Limited (NEPL), the Rivers State Government, the state’s Ministries of Environment and Health, and the Chairman of Degema Local Government Area.
ALSO READ: Shell Bids Farewell to EVP Nigeria and Country Chair Marno, as Elohor Assumes Role
They argued that the absence of the agencies and operators denied the committee the opportunity to obtain explanations on emergency response efforts, remediation plans and measures taken to protect affected residents.
The Chairman of the Committee, Julius Pondi, said the investigation was being conducted in line with the House’s constitutional oversight powers under Sections 88 and 89 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).
He said the hearing was intended to establish the facts surrounding the incident, assess the response of regulatory agencies and industry operators, and determine the environmental, health and socio-economic consequences of the prolonged gas seepage.
“The committee considered it necessary to invite all relevant stakeholders because of the grave environmental, public health, socio-economic and ecological implications of the incident for the people of Billy Community and the wider South-South region,” Pondi said.
He noted that Billy Community depends largely on fishing, farming and other natural resource-based livelihoods, making the impact of the incident particularly severe.
“As representatives of the Nigerian people, we have a duty to ensure that operators in the oil and gas industry conduct their activities in accordance with extant laws, government regulations and international best practices, while ensuring that host communities are adequately protected from avoidable environmental and safety hazards,” he added.
Pondi said the committee was determined to establish both the immediate and underlying causes of the incident, evaluate emergency response measures and remediation efforts, and assess the wider impact on the affected community.
“I wish to emphasise that this committee approaches this engagement with an open mind. Our objective is neither to prejudge any individual or institution nor apportion blame without due process.
“Rather, we seek to establish the facts, identify operational or regulatory shortcomings where they exist, and make practical recommendations that will strengthen environmental governance and improve regulatory oversight,” he added.
The hearing became tense as lawmakers questioned NOSDRA over why the incident had remained unresolved several months after it was first reported.
Representing the Director-General and Chief Executive Officer of NOSDRA, Chukwuemeka Woke, Cytrus Nkangwung said the agency officially received notification of the incident on 25 November 2025, after reports of gas bubbling first surfaced the previous month.
He explained that the incident differed from a conventional oil spill because the gas was seeping naturally from the ground and water sources rather than escaping from any known oil and gas facility.
The NOSDRA’s Zonal Head, Augustine Bello, told the committee, “This incident is not the regular incident that attracts reporting. It is not a leak from any facility. It is gas bubbling that enveloped the community. When we became aware of it, we reached out to stakeholders within the community. It is different from a conventional oil spill.”
The explanation failed to convince the lawmakers.
The Chairman of the House Committee on Host Communities, Robinson Dekor, expressed frustration that regulators had yet to determine the source of the seepage despite months of investigations.
“I feel sad sitting here listening to what you are telling us today. Gas is bubbling from the ground, and after all these months, you are still telling us you do not know the cause.
“Today is a black day in the history of Nigeria that people’s lives could be on the line for this number of months and nothing has been done about it. You sit here suggesting to us that you do not even know what is responsible for it.
“It is a huge shame that people’s lives are at risk. Do you know how many people have died? Their livelihoods have been destroyed, yet nobody seems to care,” he lamented.
Lawmakers also questioned the absence of emergency relief for residents who have remained exposed to polluted air and contaminated water.
“What happened to the people of Billy?” Pondi asked, wondering why residents had continued to endure the crisis while investigations dragged on.
On his part, Dekor urged the committee to compel all absent operators and government agencies to appear before lawmakers.
“I want to suggest that we compel all these agencies to appear before this committee. Something must be done. People should not die simply because they live in oil-producing communities,” he stressed.
The committee also queried NOSDRA over its request for a N3.4bn presidential intervention fund despite ongoing investigations.
Responding, Bello said the proposed funding was intended to support emergency containment measures, environmental assessment and humanitarian interventions pending the outcome of scientific investigations.
Responding to lawmakers’ concerns, NUPRC maintained that there was no evidence linking the gas seepage to existing oil and gas infrastructure.
The Leader of the commission’s delegation and Director of Development and Production, Joseph Ogunsola, said preliminary scientific findings suggested the gas was naturally migrating from deep underground formations through groundwater pathways and boreholes.
“The result of our evaluation indicates that there is no relationship between any pipeline or facility and the character of the gas seepage. Scientific evidence available to us presently points to a subsurface occurrence rather than a failure of surface infrastructure,” he said.
Ogunsola acknowledged the severe impact of the incident on the community, saying, “Billy Community is severely affected. The water is contaminated; there are reports of air pollution and there are safety concerns.”
He disclosed that the commission had adopted a dual approach involving scientific investigation and humanitarian intervention.
According to him, relief materials have already been delivered through an industry-supported initiative, while a medical outreach and the provision of safe drinking water are expected to commence within two weeks.
“The Commission Chief Executive mobilised the industry because no operator has been found culpable. Nevertheless, we agreed that the industry must rally round and support the people of Billy while investigations continue.
“There is also a planned medical outreach in the next two weeks, while hydrological studies are ongoing to determine how best to provide uncontaminated potable water to the community,” he added.
On the possibility of relocating residents, Ogunsola said the commission had advised the appropriate authorities to consider a managed evacuation based on expert health and safety assessments.
“We cannot today determine the full extent of the impact of this seepage. Laboratory analysis shows there are gases that should not ordinarily be inhaled. The government should therefore consider managed evacuation of the affected residents following an appropriate health and risk assessment,” he said.
Despite the explanations, lawmakers insisted that the prolonged nature of the incident reflected serious shortcomings in environmental regulation and emergency response.
The committee directed all absent operators and relevant government agencies to appear at its next hearing, warning that scientific uncertainty must not become an excuse for delaying urgent intervention.
The Billy gas seepage, first reported in late 2025, is regarded as one of the most unusual environmental incidents in Nigeria’s oil-producing Niger Delta. Unlike conventional oil spills caused by ruptured pipelines or failed facilities, preliminary investigations indicate that the gas is naturally migrating from deep underground formations rather than originating from existing petroleum infrastructure.
While scientific investigations continue, the incident has heightened concerns over environmental safety, public health and regulatory preparedness in Nigeria’s petroleum-producing communities, with lawmakers insisting that immediate relief and stronger regulatory action are needed to protect residents and restore public confidence.
Energy
Tinubu’s SA Preaches Harnessing Oil Production for Industrial Growth
The Special Adviser to the President on Energy, Olu Verheijen, has called for Nigeria to translate increased oil and gas production into broader economic development, saying the country must use its energy resources to strengthen industries, create jobs and improve living standards.
Verheijen said the next phase of Nigeria’s oil and gas development should go beyond increasing production figures to building national productive capacity, stressing that investment recovery must deliver tangible benefits across the economy.
She made the call in an address titled, “Unlocking more barrels: From recovery to national renewal” at the 44th annual international conference and exhibition of the Nigerian Association of Petroleum Explorationists (NAPE), where she outlined exploration, local capacity development and technology as key priorities for the sector.
Her comments came at a time Nigeria’s oil production has recorded steady improvement with the country meeting OPEC production in the last six months.
READ ALSO: RMAFC Reopens Oil Wells Dispute, Begins Verification in Nine States
According to the presidential aide, Nigeria has made progress in restoring investor confidence, but must now translate improved investment conditions into higher production, stronger revenues and economic opportunities.
Using the IMA gas field as an example, Verheijen highlighted the lengthy delays that had constrained the development of Nigeria’s resources. Discovered in 1973, the field reached a final investment decision in September 2026, more than five decades after its discovery.
She said the delay reflected weaknesses in the country’s investment environment rather than a lack of resources, including unclear responsibilities, slow contracting processes, uncompetitive economics and unreliable access to customers.
Verheijen attributed efforts to address these challenges to the policy direction of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, saying the government had worked with ministries, regulators, the Nigerian National Petroleum Company, operators and investors to improve the investment proposition.
She explained that fiscal reforms were designed to reward production, protect existing revenues and provide incentives suited to different resources. In the gas sector, she said, incentives had to be supported by commercial arrangements and access to customers to make projects financially viable.
She cited the opening of opportunities for third-party gas supply to Nigeria LNG as part of efforts to improve the commercial prospects of gas developments.
Verheijen noted that Ubeta and Bonga North reached final investment decisions in 2024, while IMA had since joined the list of projects moving into execution.
She said the government’s responsibility was to ensure the projects were delivered while improving output from existing assets.
On exploration, the presidential adviser said Nigeria needed to replenish its resource base through credible exploration programmes, reliable geological data and development plans that considered infrastructure and markets from the outset.
She added that improved reservoir understanding, infill drilling and enhanced recovery could support near-term production, but should complement rather than replace new discoveries and developments.
Verheijen also urged operators to present clear investment proposals, including the capital, technical capacity and execution plans required to develop their assets.
On local capacity, she said the growing role of Nigerian independent oil companies presented opportunities to expand onshore and shallow-water production, while international companies focused on deepwater and integrated gas projects.
However, she stressed that Nigerian ownership must be matched by strong governance, sound finances, technical competence and responsible environmental and community practices.
“Local content should leave Nigeria more capable after a project than before it began,” she said, adding that the policy should produce engineers capable of leading major developments and fabrication companies able to compete internationally.
She also called for greater adoption of technology, including improved seismic interpretation, reservoir modelling, digital monitoring and methane measurement, to reduce operating costs, improve recovery and make operations safer.
Verheijen said artificial intelligence could strengthen the work of industry professionals but would not replace the need for reliable data and sound technical judgement.
She further argued that oil, gas and power should be treated as parts of one national economic strategy, noting that dependable energy supply was essential for manufacturing, agriculture and job creation.
According to her, oil production can support export earnings and public finances, while gas can supply industries, electricity generation and export markets. However, she warned that gas projects would only be commercially viable if suppliers had confidence that customers would pay.
She identified the resolution of legacy debts in the power sector, improved metering and targeted support for vulnerable electricity consumers as necessary measures to strengthen the energy value chain.
The adviser said Nigeria must also prepare to compete for investment against emerging oil and gas destinations in Africa and elsewhere, adding that temporary disruptions in other producing countries should not form the basis of its investment strategy.
She urged government and industry to ensure that reforms translated into measurable improvements in the lives of Nigerians.
“A family struggling with the cost of living cannot spend a forecast. A business cannot run on a policy announcement,” she said, calling for sustained delivery and accountability.
Verheijen said the country’s progress should continue to be measured by reserves, revenues, reliability and responsibility, adding that the ultimate objective was to build an industry capable of developing Nigeria’s resources and supporting a more productive economy.
Energy
MDGIF Woos Foreign Investors for Nigeria’s $200bn Gas Infrastructure
To bridge Nigeria’s estimated $200 billion gas infrastructure funding gap over the next decade, the Midstream and Downstream Gas Infrastructure Fund (MDGIF) is stepping up efforts to attract private sector and foreign investments.
This was revealed during the commissioning of five Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) daughter and last-mile retail stations established by Ibile Oil and Gas Corporation (IOGC) in collaboration with MDGIF, in Lagos, the Executive Director of MDGIF, Oluwole Adama.
According to Adama, the scale of investment required to develop Nigeria’s gas infrastructure was beyond the financial capacity of the fund, making partnerships with Development Finance Institutions (DFIs), Foreign Investment Funds (FIFs) and private sector players critical to achieving the country’s gas development objectives.
He maintained that the MDGIF is positioning itself as a catalytic institution to de-risk investments, unlock additional financing and encourage businesses to commit capital to infrastructure projects across the gas value chain.
READ ALSO: Shettima Visits Oba of Benin Ahead of APC Presidential Campaign Rally in Edo
He explained that the fund’s mandate went beyond providing direct financing, stressing that its primary responsibility was to create an enabling environment for investments in gas processing plants, gas capture projects, pipelines, CNG refuelling stations, terminals and storage facilities.
“An estimate a few years ago put the investment required to close Nigeria’s gas infrastructure deficit at about $20 billion annually for 10 years. That is approximately $200 billion. What MDGIF can do is limited in terms of the resources available to us, so we see ourselves as a catalytic agent,” he said.
Adama disclosed that the fund had secured a $500 million debt facility and was pursuing additional financing arrangements, including risk guarantees, to attract more investors into the sector.
He said MDGIF had engaged the United States Development Finance Corporation (DFC) on opportunities to mobilise further funding for gas infrastructure projects in Nigeria.
The objective, he explained, was to reduce investment risks, particularly at the early stages of project development, and unlock larger pools of capital from international financiers and private investors.
Adama also disclosed that the fund had supported more than 25 infrastructure projects, with about 18 already commissioned in less than two years.
He noted that the development of gas infrastructure required considerable time, involving project design, engineering, equipment manufacturing, shipping, port clearance and construction, adding that Nigerians should recognise that such investments could not be delivered overnight.
Earlier, the Minister of State for Petroleum Resources (Gas), Ekperikpe Ekpo, said the Federal Government was intensifying efforts to increase domestic gas utilisation and expand infrastructure to make natural gas more accessible to Nigerians.
He disclosed that domestic gas supply had increased from about 1.6 billion cubic feet to 2.2 billion cubic feet daily, attributing the improvement to growing investments in the sector and the government’s policy direction under President Bola Tinubu.
According to him, the government is working with private sector investors to address infrastructure and supply challenges, noting that increased demand for gas would continue to attract investments into the sector.
The minister stressed that the government alone could not establish the infrastructure required to deepen gas utilisation, making private sector participation indispensable.
He commended MDGIF for its catalytic role in supporting infrastructure development and attracting investments into the gas sector.
Also speaking, the IOGC Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, Tayo Gbajumo, said the corporation was expanding its CNG infrastructure in Lagos as part of its mandate to establish 15 stations across the state.
He disclosed that five additional stations had been commissioned in Abule-Egba, Ajah, Oko-Oba, Idimu and Ogolonto, while the remaining six were at various stages of completion and expected to be commissioned by the first quarter of 2027.
Gbajumo said the facilities were designed to improve access to affordable energy, reduce transportation costs for businesses and households, and support the adoption of CNG-powered vehicles.
The five stations, supported by MDGIF, have a combined storage capacity of 45,640 standard cubic metres and are expected to serve approximately 8,400 vehicles daily at full capacity, according to Adama.
Gbajumo commended the Federal Government, the Lagos State Government and MDGIF for their support, saying the partnership demonstrated the importance of collaboration between government institutions and industry stakeholders in expanding gas infrastructure.
Energy
OPEC+ Retains Output at 30.9mbpd
In a confirmation of expectations that more policy adjustments will not occur until 2027, OPEC+ oil-producing countries have voted to keep December production targets steady.
The OPEC+ alliance, yesterday, agreed in principle to keep its combined December oil output targets unchanged at 30.9 million barrels per day (bpd), with Saudi Arabia’s individual target held at 10.5 million bpd.
The resolution was passed at a virtual meeting attended by seven core OPEC+ members- Saudi Arabia, Russia, Iraq, Kuwait, Algeria, Kazakhstan and Oman.
This is as the group continues to struggle with export disruptions from the Middle East crisis, while Gulf members have been boosting exports that have been disrupted for months by the conflict, most are still pumping well below their targets.
OPEC+ comprises the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and allies including Russia. Only the seven members — plus the United Arab Emirates (UAE) until it quit OPEC in May — have been involved in monthly output decisions in recent years.
READ ALSO: Gas Infrastructure Fund Sets Terms for Indigenous Access to Funding
All members of the 21-country group are due to meet on November 29, when it will decide 2027 quotas.
“Today’s decision was the easy one,” said Jorge Leon, an analyst at Rystad. “The much more important test comes at the November 29 ministerial meeting, when OPEC+ will decide its 2027 production framework.”
Oil prices jumped more than two per cent on Friday, with Brent crude settling at almost $118 a barrel, the highest since April, as traders braced for a potential escalation in the Iran war after the US midterm elections.
“OPEC+ faces an extremely difficult call for 2027,” Leon added. “The group has to plan around huge uncertainty over the US-Iran war, the pace of recovery through the Strait of Hormuz, and the size of the surplus that could emerge once disrupted barrels return.”
The seven members have been boosting output targets for much of 2026 and in September completed the phased rollback of a 1.65 million-barrel-per-day supply cut first agreed in 2023. At earlier meetings, they kept the targets steady for October and November.
OPEC+ still has one more layer of production cuts of about two million bpd covering most members through the end of 2026.
The group needs to complete a review of members’ production capacity during the fourth quarter before setting the 2027 baselines that will determine future quotas and shape plans to unwind those cuts, sources have said.
The Iran war has disrupted projects to expand capacity across the Middle East, throwing estimates of future production potential into uncertainty, Reuters reported in October. As a result, the review is now expected to be completed by mid-November.





