Connect with us

Politics

BREAKING: Tribunal Announces Date For Judgment On Obi, Atiku’s Petition Against Tinubu

Published

on

 

The Court is set to announce its decisions on the petitions filed by Atiku Abubakar, Peter Obi, and the Allied People Movement challenging President Bola Tinubu’s declaration and election victory on Wednesday, September 6, 2023.

 

The court had previously withheld its decision after the petitioners, including the Peoples Democratic Party, Atiku Abubakar, and Peter Obi, as well as the Labour Party, wrapped up their cases in June, having presented 40 of the 150 witnesses initially listed in their petitions.

 

Additionally, the court had deferred judgment on petitions filed by the Allied Peoples Movement (APM) against President Tinubu’s election win.

 

The court has consolidated these three petitions challenging the President-elect, Bola Tinubu.

 

During the presentation of the trial schedule and pre-hearing report, the court opted to combine the petitions filed by various political parties. These petitions are identified as CA/PEPC/05/2023, CA/PEPC/04/2023, and CA/PEPC/03/2023.

 

The court’s decision to merge them was motivated by the fact that these petitions all addressed interconnected issues related to the election.

 

On March 1, 2023, around 4:00 am, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) declared Senator Bola Ahmed Tinubu as the winner of the February 25, 2023 presidential election.

 

INEC based this declaration on the grounds that the All Progressives Congress (APC) received the highest number of votes in the election and that Senator Tinubu met the legal requirement of securing at least one-quarter of the votes in each of at least two-thirds of all states in the Federation, including the Federal Capital Territory (FCT).

 

In the results proclaimed on March 1, 2023, Tinubu secured 8,794,726 votes, constituting 36.61% of the total votes cast in the election, ultimately emerging as the winner.

 

Atiku, who secured the second position, garnered 6,984,520 votes, accounting for 29.07% of the votes cast. Meanwhile, Obi followed closely with 6,101,533 votes, representing 25.40% of the votes cast during the disputed election.

 

Rabiu Kwankwaso, the candidate from the NNPP, landed in fourth place with 1,496,687 votes, equating to 6.40% of the votes cast. Princess Chichi Ojei, the sole female presidential candidate in the election, received only 25,961 votes and did not contend for the top four positions.

 

However, in their separate cases, both Obi and Atiku are challenging the election primarily based on INEC’s alleged failure to conduct electronic transmission of results from the polling units. They argue that this omission has legal implications for the validity of the election.

 

Additionally, they contend that Tinubu did not secure both a majority of votes cast in the election and the required 25 percent of votes cast in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), which they assert is a constitutional prerequisite for a candidate to be declared the winner of the election.

 

Another issue raised by the petitioners revolves around the APC vice-presidential candidate, Kashim Shettima, who was nominated for two positions—vice-president and senatorial candidate for Borno Central. This dual nomination is a point of contention in their petitions.

Politics

“PDP Can’t Unseat Tinubu with Wike in Charge” — Ulasi Blows Hot, Threatens Exit

Published

on

A chieftain of the Peoples Democratic Party, Dan Ulasi, has warned that the party stands little chance of defeating President Bola Ahmed Tinubu in the 2027 general elections if Nyesom Wike continues to play a leading role while allegedly supporting the ruling government.

Ulasi, who spoke during an interview on Arise TV on Thursday, expressed deep concern over what he described as a “contradictory situation” within the PDP, stressing that such internal inconsistencies could weaken the party’s credibility and chances at the polls.

ALSO READ: ‘I Didn’t Mean It Literally’ — Nyesom Wike Clears Air as Atiku Abubakar Fires Back

“I don’t see my party as presently constituted challenging Tinubu with Wike as national leader,” Ulasi said, warning that he may be forced to leave the party if the issue is not addressed.

The PDP stalwart argued that Wike cannot effectively serve as a leader in the opposition while maintaining close ties with President Tinubu, describing the situation as “unconstructive” for a party seeking to reclaim power at the national level.

He further questioned what role Wike would play if another candidate emerges as the PDP’s presidential flag-bearer ahead of the 2027 election, asking whether the former Rivers State governor would actively participate in party rallies or align with the ruling party’s activities.

Ulasi warned that the party’s next meeting could be his last if its leadership fails to provide satisfactory explanations, insisting that he cannot continue to be part of a process riddled with contradictions.

In a related development, Ulasi revealed that Peter Obi had visited him several times this year, including a recent meeting following an appearance in Enugu.

He spoke positively about Obi’s vision for Nigeria, noting that the former presidential candidate offers a sense of hope for the country’s future, although he stopped short of declaring any political alignment.

Reflecting on his longstanding ties to the PDP, Ulasi recalled his role during the party’s formation alongside late former Vice-President Alex Ekueme and other founding members.

Despite his deep connection to the party, he maintained that he would rather step aside than remain in a system he considers inconsistent.

He added that if he eventually exits the PDP, he has no plans to join another political party, stating that he would instead operate as a private consultant.

Continue Reading

Politics

Drama in Ogun APC as Gbenga Daniel Claims He Was Barred From Meeting

Published

on

There was tension within the Ogun State chapter of the All Progressives Congress (APC) on Monday after former Governor and Senator representing Ogun East, Otunba Gbenga Daniel, alleged that he was barred from attending a stakeholders’ meeting of the party held in Ijebu Ode.

The meeting, which took place at Adeola Odutola Hall, was reportedly convened to bring together key party stakeholders, including current and former local government chairmen, councillors, and serving as well as former lawmakers from both state and national levels.

However, the senator, in a viral video circulating online, claimed he was denied entry into the venue despite being part of the expected attendees.

ALSO READ: “APC Failure in Disguise?” — Dickson Tears Into ADC Coalition

Speaking from his branded campaign bus parked at the venue, Daniel expressed disappointment over the situation, saying he and his team were stopped from accessing the meeting.

He further questioned the legitimacy of any resolutions reached at the gathering, suggesting that the outcome of the meeting should not be considered valid.

As of press time, the Ogun State APC leadership had yet to issue an official response to the allegation.

 

Continue Reading

Politics

Who Leads ADC? Supreme Court to Hear Mark’s Appeal in Heated Party Rift

Published

on

The lingering leadership crisis within the African Democratic Congress (ADC) is set for a crucial legal test as the Supreme Court of Nigeria prepares to hear an appeal filed by former Senate President, David Mark.

Mark is challenging a legal action brought by a former Deputy National Chairman of the party, Nafiu Bala, over the control and leadership structure of the ADC.

The case, scheduled for hearing on Tuesday, is expected to determine the direction of the party amid deepening internal divisions.

SEE MORE: 2027: Why ADC, Opposition Leaders Stormed INEC in Abuja

Through his lawyer, Realwan Okpanachi, Mark is seeking an order to stay the execution of a Court of Appeal judgment delivered on March 12, pending the final resolution of the matter.

He also urged the apex court to restrain the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from making any alterations to the party’s leadership as currently constituted under his faction.

In addition, Mark is asking the court to suspend further proceedings in a related suit before the Federal High Court in Abuja, presided over by Justice Emeka Nwite.

The dispute dates back to a September 4, 2025 ruling by the Federal High Court following an ex parte application filed by Bala, which has since fueled competing claims to the party’s leadership.

The ADC has, in recent months, been embroiled in a bitter factional crisis, with rival camps asserting legitimacy.

The situation has been worsened by conflicting court orders and administrative uncertainty surrounding who truly leads the party.

Tensions escalated after INEC reportedly removed Mark as the party’s national chairman from its official records, sparking protests by his loyalists.

The demonstration drew prominent political figures, including former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, ex-Osun State Governor Rauf Aregbesola, former Anambra State Governor Peter Obi, and former Rivers State Governor Rotimi Amaechi.

In response, the Bala-led faction staged a counter-protest, insisting on recognition by INEC as the legitimate leadership of the party.

As the battle shifts to the Supreme Court, political observers say the outcome could decisively shape the future of the ADC, particularly as political alignments begin to take form ahead of upcoming elections.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2022. Biztellers, powered by Alphaxristi.

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x