Politics
BREAKING: Tribunal Announces Date For Judgment On Obi, Atiku’s Petition Against Tinubu
The Court is set to announce its decisions on the petitions filed by Atiku Abubakar, Peter Obi, and the Allied People Movement challenging President Bola Tinubu’s declaration and election victory on Wednesday, September 6, 2023.
The court had previously withheld its decision after the petitioners, including the Peoples Democratic Party, Atiku Abubakar, and Peter Obi, as well as the Labour Party, wrapped up their cases in June, having presented 40 of the 150 witnesses initially listed in their petitions.
Additionally, the court had deferred judgment on petitions filed by the Allied Peoples Movement (APM) against President Tinubu’s election win.
The court has consolidated these three petitions challenging the President-elect, Bola Tinubu.
During the presentation of the trial schedule and pre-hearing report, the court opted to combine the petitions filed by various political parties. These petitions are identified as CA/PEPC/05/2023, CA/PEPC/04/2023, and CA/PEPC/03/2023.
The court’s decision to merge them was motivated by the fact that these petitions all addressed interconnected issues related to the election.
On March 1, 2023, around 4:00 am, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) declared Senator Bola Ahmed Tinubu as the winner of the February 25, 2023 presidential election.
INEC based this declaration on the grounds that the All Progressives Congress (APC) received the highest number of votes in the election and that Senator Tinubu met the legal requirement of securing at least one-quarter of the votes in each of at least two-thirds of all states in the Federation, including the Federal Capital Territory (FCT).
In the results proclaimed on March 1, 2023, Tinubu secured 8,794,726 votes, constituting 36.61% of the total votes cast in the election, ultimately emerging as the winner.
Atiku, who secured the second position, garnered 6,984,520 votes, accounting for 29.07% of the votes cast. Meanwhile, Obi followed closely with 6,101,533 votes, representing 25.40% of the votes cast during the disputed election.
Rabiu Kwankwaso, the candidate from the NNPP, landed in fourth place with 1,496,687 votes, equating to 6.40% of the votes cast. Princess Chichi Ojei, the sole female presidential candidate in the election, received only 25,961 votes and did not contend for the top four positions.
However, in their separate cases, both Obi and Atiku are challenging the election primarily based on INEC’s alleged failure to conduct electronic transmission of results from the polling units. They argue that this omission has legal implications for the validity of the election.
Additionally, they contend that Tinubu did not secure both a majority of votes cast in the election and the required 25 percent of votes cast in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), which they assert is a constitutional prerequisite for a candidate to be declared the winner of the election.
Another issue raised by the petitioners revolves around the APC vice-presidential candidate, Kashim Shettima, who was nominated for two positions—vice-president and senatorial candidate for Borno Central. This dual nomination is a point of contention in their petitions.
Politics
Rivers 2027: APC Stakeholders Move to Secure Fubara’s Second Term
Stakeholders of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Rivers State have taken a decisive step toward the 2027 governorship election by purchasing the expression of interest and nomination forms for Governor Siminalayi Fubara.
The move, announced on Friday, was led by a delegation headed by a member of the House of Representatives, Awaji-Inombek Abiante, who described the action as a collective decision by party stakeholders across the state.
According to Abiante, the gesture reflects widespread confidence in Fubara’s leadership and a growing demand for continuity among Rivers residents.
READ ALSO: Fubara Shares Palliatives at Community Affected by Gas Emission
“This decision is rooted in the will of the people. It is not about personal ambition or financial strength, but about sustaining a leadership that has shown commitment to development,” he said.
He noted that the governor’s administration has recorded notable progress in infrastructure, particularly in previously hard-to-reach riverine communities.
Abiante cited improved access in areas such as Andoni, as well as the rehabilitation of key public facilities, including the State Secretariat, as indicators of performance.
The lawmaker also highlighted what he described as improved welfare for citizens and a leadership style that is both responsive and people-focused.
“This is a governor who understands the needs of his people and takes action. The support he is receiving is a reflection of that connection,” he added.
Abiante, however, clarified that the governor neither initiated nor influenced the purchase of the forms, stressing that the move was purely driven by stakeholders.
The development comes amid ongoing political realignments in Rivers State following the rift between Fubara and his predecessor, Nyesom Wike.
The fallout had earlier caused divisions within the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and reshaped the political dynamics in the state.
Fubara’s subsequent defection to the APC has further intensified political activities as he works to consolidate support ahead of the next election cycle.
The nomination forms are expected to be formally presented to the governor as consultations and alignments within the party continue.
Politics
Major Blow to David Mark Camp as Court Voids ADC Congress Moves
The Federal High Court in Abuja has dealt a significant setback to the Senator David Mark-led caretaker leadership of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), voiding its moves to organise state congresses ahead of the 2027 general elections.
In a judgment delivered on Wednesday, Justice Joyce Abdulmalik barred the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from recognising or participating in any congress conducted by committees set up by the Mark-led caretaker group.
The court further restrained the interim leadership from interfering with the tenure and functions of duly elected state executives of the party, affirming that only constitutionally recognised structures have the authority to organise such congresses.
SEE ALSO: Who Leads ADC? Supreme Court to Hear Mark’s Appeal in Heated Party Rift
Justice Abdulmalik ruled that the responsibility for conducting state congresses rests squarely with the party’s state executive committees, not the national caretaker body.
She held that the tenure of the ADC’s State Working Committees and State Executive Committees remains valid and subsisting until properly conducted congresses and a national convention are held.
The decision followed a suit filed by aggrieved party members, who challenged the legality of the caretaker committee’s plan to oversee state congresses scheduled for April 2026.
The plaintiffs argued that the move violated the party’s constitution and undermined internal democratic processes.
In her ruling, the judge agreed with the plaintiffs, stating that neither the 1999 Constitution (as amended) nor the ADC constitution empowers a caretaker or interim national leadership to appoint committees for the purpose of conducting state congresses.
She emphasised that although courts are generally cautious about interfering in the internal affairs of political parties, intervention becomes necessary where there is clear evidence of constitutional or statutory violations.
“The court has a duty to intervene where breaches of the law are established,” she ruled, dismissing arguments challenging the court’s jurisdiction in the matter.
Justice Abdulmalik also referenced Section 223 of the 1999 Constitution, which mandates political parties to conduct periodic elections based on democratic principles, alongside provisions of the ADC constitution that define the tenure and powers of party officials.
The court concluded that the actions of the Mark-led caretaker committee lacked legal backing and accordingly nullified any processes initiated toward conducting the disputed congresses.
Politics
“PDP Can’t Unseat Tinubu with Wike in Charge” — Ulasi Blows Hot, Threatens Exit
A chieftain of the Peoples Democratic Party, Dan Ulasi, has warned that the party stands little chance of defeating President Bola Ahmed Tinubu in the 2027 general elections if Nyesom Wike continues to play a leading role while allegedly supporting the ruling government.
Ulasi, who spoke during an interview on Arise TV on Thursday, expressed deep concern over what he described as a “contradictory situation” within the PDP, stressing that such internal inconsistencies could weaken the party’s credibility and chances at the polls.
ALSO READ: ‘I Didn’t Mean It Literally’ — Nyesom Wike Clears Air as Atiku Abubakar Fires Back
“I don’t see my party as presently constituted challenging Tinubu with Wike as national leader,” Ulasi said, warning that he may be forced to leave the party if the issue is not addressed.
The PDP stalwart argued that Wike cannot effectively serve as a leader in the opposition while maintaining close ties with President Tinubu, describing the situation as “unconstructive” for a party seeking to reclaim power at the national level.
He further questioned what role Wike would play if another candidate emerges as the PDP’s presidential flag-bearer ahead of the 2027 election, asking whether the former Rivers State governor would actively participate in party rallies or align with the ruling party’s activities.
Ulasi warned that the party’s next meeting could be his last if its leadership fails to provide satisfactory explanations, insisting that he cannot continue to be part of a process riddled with contradictions.
In a related development, Ulasi revealed that Peter Obi had visited him several times this year, including a recent meeting following an appearance in Enugu.
He spoke positively about Obi’s vision for Nigeria, noting that the former presidential candidate offers a sense of hope for the country’s future, although he stopped short of declaring any political alignment.
Reflecting on his longstanding ties to the PDP, Ulasi recalled his role during the party’s formation alongside late former Vice-President Alex Ekueme and other founding members.
Despite his deep connection to the party, he maintained that he would rather step aside than remain in a system he considers inconsistent.
He added that if he eventually exits the PDP, he has no plans to join another political party, stating that he would instead operate as a private consultant.





