Connect with us

NEWS

Certificate Saga: Atiku, Obi Decry BBC Clearing Tinubu

Published

on

2023: Obi, Atiku, Tinubu, Others to Pay N10m for posters as Anambra issues campaign guidelines

The public stand-off on the authenticity of the certificates of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has seen the camps of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) standard bearer, Atiku Abubakar and his Labour Party (LP) counterpart, Peter Obi, decry the BBC’s report that there is no evidence to back the forgery allegation the president.

This follows the BBC’s Global Disinformation Team declaring in a fact-checking report published on Wednesday that there was no evidence that President Tinubu forged the Chicago State University (CSU) certificate he submitted to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) as part of documentation for the contest the February presidential election.

According to the BBC’s report, the allegation that President Tinubu submitted a forged CSU certificate to the INEC was false.

The Global Disinformation Team maintained that it fact-checked the most widely circulated claims to arrive at its conclusion.

Recall that the allegation of certificate forgery levelled against President Tinubu has been shaking the polity with his main rivals in the last election – Atiku and Obi taking on the former Lagos State governor on the matter.

Reports that the ex-Lagos State governor’s certificate was faked had gone viral on social media following the US court ordered release of his CSU academic records.

The release of the president’s academic documents is the culmination of a judicial case filed in August by former Vice President Atiku, who is seeking to overturn President Tinubu’s electoral victory at the Supreme Court.

The former VP, had accused President Tinubu of falsifying the CSU diploma of Bachelor of Science in Business Administration awarded in 1979 that he submitted to the INEC.

In a move to strengthen his election petition appeal filed at the apex court, the PDP standard bearer asked an Illinois, Chicago court to compel the CSU to release the President’s academic records, including a copy of any diploma issued by CSU in 1979, a copy of the diploma the CSU gave to President Tinubu in 1979, copies of diplomas with the same font, seal, signatures, and wording awarded to other students that are similar to what CSU awarded to him in 1979.

He also demanded documents from the CSU that were certified by Jamar Orr, who was then a staff member of the CSU.

Despite Atiku’s application being vehemently opposed by President Tinubu’s lawyers on the grounds of privacy concerns, the US court decided it should proceed and the school subsequently released the academic records.

In line with the court ruling, Atiku’s lawyer, Angela Liu, questioned the CSU registrar, Caleb Westberg, in a deposition.

The report read, “Some social media users in Nigeria allege that the deposition and the diplomas released by CSU confirm that the diploma submitted to INEC by Mr Tinubu was forged.

“This claim was also repeated by one of Mr Abubakar’s lawyers, Kalu Kalu, at a press conference last week.

“We found there was no evidence to support this claim. Many social media users in Nigeria have been sharing false or misleading posts about the deposition of Caleb Westberg, the current CSU Registrar.”

It continued that the CSU issued ‘three different diplomas’ for President Tinubu, none of which could be seen as fake.

“The CSU released several diplomas issued between 1979 and 2003. We analysed all of them.

“There are three different diplomas for Mr Tinubu that we refer to throughout our analysis:

“The original one from 1979, which he has said in the past was lost when he went into exile in the 1990s. The second one that he submitted to INEC, supposedly a replacement diploma from CSU (it is similar to diplomas issued by CSU in the 1990s).

“Additionally, CSU holds another replacement diploma for Mr Tinubu that they say is probably from the early 2000s that he never collected. The allegations on social media are based on a comparison between the document Mr Tinubu submitted to INEC and the 1979 diplomas released by CSU.’’

During Westberg’s deposition, the BBC noted that Atiku’s lawyer focused on the copy of the diploma President Tinubu submitted to the electoral commission and suggested that it was unlike any of the diplomas released by the CSU.

“However, while Mr Westberg agreed with Ms Liu that the diploma in question does not look like the samples from 1979, he stated that the certificate actually looks like three of the diplomas CSU released to Mr Abubakar. Our analysis confirms this.

“It turns out that the discrepancy in the appearance of the diploma is down to it having been re-issued in the 1990s. Mr Westberg said the template of CSU’s diploma has changed several times over the years. He said any request for a new diploma would resemble the current template at that time, no matter when the student graduated.

“As such, if Mr Tinubu had reordered his diploma in the late 1990s, what he would have been given would look like what was obtainable then.’’

Referring to a claim made by a fact-checking organisation in Nigeria that the diploma President Tinubu submitted was not from CSU as its diplomas do not include the phrase “with honours” under the degree name, the BBC said it found that while this was not reflected in the other diplomas released by CSU, “it does appear in Mr Tinubu’s diploma issued in the early 2000s, which was authenticated by Mr Westberg during his deposition.

“It has the words “with honours” – a match with the diploma with the same detail submitted by the president to INEC.”

However, Atiku’s Special Assistant on Public Communications, Phrank Shaibu, in a statement, described the report as a hatchet job.

He claimed that the report “is part of President Tinubu administration’s propaganda programme.”

Shaibu said, “Sometime last week when the National Broadcasting Commission issued a final warning to Arise News TV, we pointed out that the Tinubu administration was on the verge of launching a full-blown propaganda and also intimidating ‘uncooperative’ media houses into discrediting and downplaying the CSU scandal.

“Sadly, we never imagined that it would be the BBC that would become the willing tool.”

Shaibu lampooned the BBC for allegedly attempting to “bamboozle Nigerians with a jaundiced report when the details are clear for everyone to see.”

Atiku’s aide alleged that the BBC investigation was carried out with a predetermined goal, which is to absolve President Tinubu of the certificate forgery allegations.

Shaibu called on the BBC and other fact-checkers to be more circumspect, adding that their job was too sensitive to entertain errors.

The media aide, who advised media organisations to invest more in investigative journalism, noted that “If the BBC had invested in proper investigative journalism, it would have been the one uncovering some of Tinubu’s scandals instead of relying on Atiku for information on Tinubu’s certificates.”

On their part, the leadership of the Labour Party said they were not moved by the report of the British media outfit, which to them was mere damage control to change the certificate saga narrative.

National Legal Adviser, Labour Party, Kehinde Edun, maintained that regardless of what anyone may say, the president must take responsibility “for the mess he is putting the country through.”

He noted, “They (BBC) are entitled to their opinion. As far as we are concerned, this issue has become so messy and too dirty. In fact, in this circumstance, we even sympathise with Tinubu because he put himself in too many problems by not coming out clean about so many things.

“If you look at what Peter Obi said today, he was actually showing some form of empathy by saying that this man (Tinubu) should just clean up his mess for the sake of the country.’’

NEWS

‘Not Off the Table’ — FG Threatens Retaliation Against South Africa Over Xenophobic Attacks on Nigerians

Published

on

The Federal Government has warned that retaliatory measures against South African interests in Nigeria remain under consideration following the recent wave of xenophobic attacks targeting Nigerians and other foreign nationals in South Africa.

Minister of Foreign Affairs, Bianca Ojukwu, expressed the government’s frustration on Monday, accusing South African authorities of failing to adequately protect Nigerians from harassment, intimidation, and attacks.

Speaking to State House correspondents in Abuja, Ojukwu rejected claims that most Nigerians affected by the violence were undocumented migrants, insisting that many of them are law-abiding residents engaged in legitimate businesses.

“To say that Nigerians who are in South Africa doing legitimate business are illegal migrants is absolutely untrue,” she said.

The minister noted that Nigerians were unhappy with the treatment being meted out to them despite Nigeria’s historic support for South Africa during the struggle against apartheid.

SEE ALSO: Atiku Knocks FG’s ‘Sluggish’ Handling of South Africa Xenophobic Violence

“Nigeria is not happy because Nigeria sacrificed much for the South African struggle for independence. Nigeria committed funds and resources to aid South Africa. My generation demonstrated and protested in support of South Africa. Nigerians are not happy about how they have been treated,” Ojukwu stated.

When asked whether Nigeria could impose restrictions on South Africans living or doing business in the country, the minister said such measures had not been ruled out.

“That is a situation we are considering. This is a decision that has to be taken at the highest level of government, but it is not off the table,” she said.

Meanwhile, the Federal Government has activated a crisis response mechanism through the Nigerian Mission in Pretoria and the Nigerian Consulate in Johannesburg to assist citizens affected by the attacks.

Ojukwu disclosed that President Bola Tinubu had directed relevant agencies to ensure the safe evacuation of Nigerians willing to return home.

According to her, the number of citizens seeking repatriation continues to rise as the situation worsens in parts of South Africa.

She explained that both Nigerian and South African authorities were carrying out screening and documentation processes to facilitate the return of affected citizens.

The minister also assured that returnees would receive support upon arrival in Nigeria through collaboration with the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) and other government agencies.

In a related development, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced the postponement of the planned evacuation of 270 Nigerians from South Africa, citing unforeseen logistical challenges.

The ministry’s spokesperson, Kimiebi Ebienfa, said the flight, originally scheduled to depart Johannesburg on Monday, had been rescheduled for Wednesday to allow authorities complete necessary arrangements.

Ebienfa disclosed that more than 1,000 Nigerians had already been screened and cleared for possible evacuation.

He also clarified that, unlike previous evacuation exercises, the Federal Government would fully fund the operation and would not depend on donations from private individuals.

“The Nigerian government will not wait for philanthropists to donate their planes before doing what it is supposed to do and evacuate its citizens facing trouble anywhere in the world,” he said.

The latest developments came after South African President Cyril Ramaphosa addressed the nation on the growing anti-migrant tensions, condemning attacks on foreign nationals while promising stricter enforcement of immigration laws.

Ramaphosa urged citizens to reject violence and resolve concerns through lawful means.

“We must end illegal migration and secure our communities. However, we must overcome these challenges through peace and love, not through fear, anger or violence,” he said.

The Federal Government has reiterated its commitment to protecting Nigerians abroad and ensuring the safe return of those affected by the ongoing crisis.

Continue Reading

NEWS

Agip Retirees Lament over 17 Years Outstanding Pension after Oando Takeover 

Published

on

Leaf Investment Emerges Substantial Investor in Oando

Former staff members of the Nigerian Agip Oil Company (Oando Energy Resources Nigeria Limited), have staged a peaceful protest demanding payment of their pension salary, which has not been paid in the last 17 years.

The senior citizens, who protested under the platform, Agip Oil Company Pensioners Association of Nigeria (AOCPAN), accused the management of the company of unilaterally stopping the payment without any reason. The retirees, who brandished placards with different inscriptions, lamented that their members were dying in numbers because of hardship and inability to meet their daily needs.

They condemned the inhumanity of Oando’s management towards the vulnerable retirees, stressing that the company has blocked its gate concerning any issues about the retirees.

Some of their demands are: “Oando management is strategically out to exterminate the retirees through zero welfare support for the retirees.

“Oando bought the assets and liabilities of Agip; but, has trickishly taken the assets and abandoned the major liabilities – the retirees of Agip that bought.”

Chairman of the group, Engr. Elder Paul Sito, who addresses newsmen at the front of the company in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, yesterday, alleged spouses of late retirees were denied access to medical services which are supposed to be for lifetime.

According to Elder Paul, the management of the company does not have a welfare plan for the retirees, adding that senior citizens have been abandoned without any economic and welfare support.

ALSO READ: Loss of 5 Rigs Threaten Govt’s Revenue

Speaking further, the chairman claimed that the management has refused to follow the steps of other companies concerning retirees’ welfare.

He said: “The reasons for the protest are many; we were retirees of Agip Oil Company and as a retiree, there is a pension act concerning retirees. There are welfare and pension monthly payments for these retirees. We received this pension welfare or pension salary for years until it stopped in 2009.

“Management unilaterally stopped it. We don’t even know why, they gave us reasons that are not obtainable in the world, the reason is that because a new management came, they were looking for documents to show that the payment they have been doing should continue (a payment that they were making should continue, they are looking for a document to approve that payment) and because they didn’t see it they stopped unilaterally?”

Paul explained further: “And the association picked it up, when the association was so new and its major focus was on increase in minimum wage, which they continued with the management.

And at that time, we never had what we now call (HIPAN) Hydrocarbon Industry Pensioners Association of Nigeria – the gathering of all the five companies’ retirement representatives.

“They meet and check their books to see who is doing less and who is doing more, so that those who are doing less will go back to their management and inform them appropriately like it has always been done when we were in service and that continued until 2009 when they stopped it.

“Up till today, we have never gotten a dime. In 2023, we came out like this and they gave us 1% or less; in 2024, we also came out, they gave us another half of 1%; and now, they have cut short the welfare for our deceased spouses which was supposed to be for life, they have cut it short to two years.”

The chairman emphasized: “We are asking them to reinstate it. It is for life, every other IOC (International Oil Company) is serving for life. “We are saying whatever the retirees of each of these companies get during negotiations should be applied to the retirees in Oando.”

He lamented: “All this while, we have been suffering, we have written letters to them telling them that we want to meet so that we can give them our charter of demand; we did that last year July. they replied that okay, they have heard from us officially, that they’ll go and look for it, they went and kept looking at it for months. When our letters will not be replied anymore.

“We planned to come out and they heard of it and they immediately called us for a meeting. We went and they still promised us and up till now, they brought nothing. The other oil companies are increasing pensioners salaries every year, but here, it’s a different story.”

One of the retirees, who simply gave her name as Mrs. Regina, lamented that the stipend they receive from the company is of no value to the current economic condition in the country.

High Chief Oluwa Oluwaneye said: “You can see me, I was not like this, I was a good player and a good wrestler and now what God gave to me to satisfy my family, I can’t provide it again because of the condition.

“I entered this Agip in 1955. He (owner of Oando) said he is fit to buy the company; he should know that the people who worked in the company and gave him the power to come and buy, he should empower them.”

Continue Reading

NEWS

Loss of 5 Rigs Threaten Govt’s Revenue

Published

on

A sharp decline in oil drilling activities which has led to the loss of five active rigs within a month might be threatening Nigeria’s revenue outlook.

According to a report by the African Energy Council (AEC), the slump in Nigeria’s rig count has raised concerns over future crude production, government earnings and fiscal stability.

The report revealed that Nigeria’s active rig count dropped from 17 in March to 12 in April 2026, representing a decline of nearly 30 per cent in just one month and signalling weakening upstream investment and exploration activities.

Rig count, a key indicator of oil and gas exploration and production activities, measures the number of drilling rigs actively operating within a country or region.

Industry experts often regard it as a leading indicator of future production levels. The development comes at a time when Nigeria is struggling to meet its crude oil production targets and relies heavily on petroleum earnings to finance government expenditure.

ALSO READ: Dangote Named Africa’s Most Admired Brand for 8th Consecutive Year

According to the report, the decline in rig activity poses a direct threat to the Federal Government’s 2026 budget benchmark of 1.84 million barrels per day (bpd), especially as actual production stood at about 1.48 million bpd in April 2026.

The AEC noted that while the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC) reported 31 active rigs during the period, the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) placed the figure at 12.

It explained that the discrepancy likely reflects differences in counting methodologies, including whether rigs on standby are classified as active.

Despite the differing figures, the Council stressed that both data sets point to a downward trend in drilling activity.

The think tank warned that with only 12 active rigs operating in April, Nigeria’s future production capacity is under severe threat unless urgent measures are taken to reverse the decline.

It further observed that the country’s rig count had already fallen from 15 in 2024 to 13 in 2025, indicating that several potential barrels that should have contributed to current production were never drilled.

“AEC views Nigeria’s upstream retreat with serious concern. A 41.7 per cent single-month rig count collapse, compounding revenue losses exceeding $3.1 billion, and a widening gap between NNPC’s 2030 ambitions and ground-level drilling activity signal a sector in structural distress rather than a cyclical downturn,” the report stated.

While Africa drills forward, Nigeria drills back. Without urgent policy action, Nigeria risks permanently ceding both its relevance within OPEC and its opportunity to monetise reserves before the global energy transition narrows that window.

The warning comes against the backdrop of mounting fiscal pressures. Oil revenues account for roughly 60 per cent of government earnings, meaning lower production could translate into wider budget deficits and increased borrowing.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2022. Biztellers, powered by Alphaxristi.

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x