NEWS
Fmr SGF Babachir Cleared Of N544m Contract Fraud
Babachir Lawal, a former secretary to the government of the federation, has been cleared of the N544 million in contract fraud charges that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) had brought against him.
On Friday, the Court declared that the anti-graft agency had utterly failed to construct a case against the former SGF.
Justice Charles Agbaza ruled on Babachir Lawal’s no-case motion, finding that the EFCC had asserted that none of the 11 witnesses who gave testimony for the EFCC had established any elements of any crime.
The judge ruled that the EFCC had not proven Babachir Lawal to have been a member of the Ministerial Tenders Board or the Presidential Initiative for North East PINE, either of which awarded the disputed contract or vetted and approved it.
Justice Agbaza further ruled that the EFCC had failed to connect Babachir Lawal to the Bureau of Public Procurement (BPP), which had granted a certificate of no objection to the contract prior to its award.
For lack of evidence connecting them to the alleged offenses, the judge dismissed and acquitted all of the defendants in the 10-count criminal charges.
The EFCC brought charges against Babachir Lawal before Justice Charles Agbaza together with his younger brother, Hamidu Lawal; Suleiman Abubakar; Apeh Monday; and two businesses, Rholavision Engineering Limited and Josmon Technologies Limited.
They were charged with a 10-count fraud-related charge involving the removal of evasive plant species worth N544 million, to which they entered a not-guilty plea.
On Monday, November 30, 2020, Babachir Lawal, the former secretary to the government of the federation, was re-arrested by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) before Justice Agbaza.
One of the charges read, “That you, Engineer Babachir David Lawal, while being the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF) and a director of Rholavision Engineering Ltd on or about the 22nd August 2016 at Abuja, in the Abuja Judicial Division of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory did knowingly hold indirectly a private interest in the contract awarded to Josmon Technological Ltd but executed by Rholavision Engineering Ltd for the removal of invasive plant species and simplified irrigation to the tune of N258,132,735.99 (Two Hundred and Fifty-eight Million, One hundred and Thirty-two Thousand, Seven Hundred and Thirty-five Naira, Ninety-nine kobo) only, by the office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (OSGF) though the Presidential Initiative for North East (PINE) and thereby committed an offense punishable under Section 12 of the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act, 2000.”
NEWS
Again, Dangote Reduces PMS Gantry Price to N1,125/Litre
The Dangote Petroleum Refinery and Petrochemicals (DPRP) has announced a further reduction in the gantry price of Premium Motor Spirit (PMS), commonly known as petrol, from N1,175 to N1,125 per litre.
A statement from the company on Thursday has it that this latest adjustment reflects the refinery’s ongoing commitment to ensuring price stability, improving affordability, and supporting Nigeria’s energy security objectives.
ALSO READ: NBS: Kerosene Price Dips as Diesel, Petrol Costs Rise
The price review underscores Dangote Refinery’s responsiveness to prevailing market conditions and its efforts to pass on cost efficiencies to downstream partners and consumers.
“Dangote Refinery remains focused on its broader mission of contributing to economic growth, enhancing fuel availability, and fostering a more competitive and sustainable petroleum sector in Nigeria,” the statement added.
NEWS
Why SEC Ordered Immediate Refunds Over Dangote Refinery IPO Promotions
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has explained why it directed capital market operators to immediately refund funds collected from investors in connection with a purported Initial Public Offering (IPO) by Dangote Petroleum Refinery & Petrochemicals FZE.
In a public notice issued on Tuesday, the Commission revealed that it had observed the circulation of advertisements, flyers, digital banners, and electronic messages across social media and investment platforms inviting members of the public to invest in the refinery through an alleged IPO.
ALSO READ: ‘Nigerian Marketers Import Dangote Fuel Via Lome Hub’
According to the SEC, the purported offer has not received regulatory approval, as the Commission has neither received nor approved any application from Dangote Petroleum Refinery & Petrochemicals FZE for a public offering.
The regulator expressed concern that some registered capital market operators were actively promoting the unapproved offer and soliciting subscriptions from prospective investors.
Explaining the reason for its directive, the SEC stated that the campaign was misleading and amounted to market manipulation capable of creating false expectations among investors and undermining confidence in Nigeria’s capital market.
The Commission noted that invitations encouraging members of the public to open accounts, pre-fund investments, or reserve guaranteed share allocations for the alleged IPO violate provisions of the Investments and Securities Act as well as existing market regulations.
As a result, the SEC ordered all registered operators, including stockbrokers and promoters of digital investment platforms, to immediately cease all advertising and promotional activities relating to the purported offer.
The Commission further directed operators to remove all related promotional materials from their websites, social media pages, and other communication channels within 24 hours.
In addition, firms were instructed to stop accepting deposits, investment commitments, account registrations, or expressions of interest linked to the alleged public offering.
To protect investors from potential losses, the SEC ordered any operator that had already collected funds in connection with the purported IPO to refund such monies within 24 hours.
The regulator warned that any operator that fails to comply with the directive risks facing sanctions under the Investments and Securities Act 2025 and the SEC Rules and Regulations.
The Commission also advised Nigerians to rely only on information released through approved regulatory channels and to ignore unofficial promotional campaigns or investment solicitations concerning the refinery.
SEC added that if Dangote Petroleum Refinery & Petrochemicals FZE eventually decides to proceed with a public offering and secures regulatory approval, an authorised prospectus will be published in line with the law.
The directive comes amid reports that the Dangote Group is considering listing a 10 per cent stake in its $20 billion refinery through a Pan-African IPO expected in 2026.
NEWS
‘Tissue of Lies’ — Dangote Refinery Explodes Over Claims of Fuel Re-Importation Through Togo
Dangote Petroleum Refinery has strongly dismissed allegations that its petroleum products are exported to Lomé, Togo, and later re-imported into Nigeria, describing the claims as a “tissue of lies” and lacking both factual and commercial basis.
In a statement released by its management on June 23, 2026, the refinery said the allegations were not supported by available trade flows or commercial logic, insisting that reports suggesting its products are routed through Togo before returning to Nigeria are false.
SEE ALSO: Crude Supply Crisis Hits Dangote
The company stated that although it typically avoids responding to what it described as baseless and unsubstantiated claims, it was compelled to address the issue to set the record straight and preserve the facts for posterity.
“As a matter of policy, we do not respond to baseless and unsubstantiated claims, given our current determination and focus in ensuring energy security in Nigeria and Africa as a whole. However, we have decided to clear the air on these ill-motivated web of falsehoods for posterity,” the statement read.
Dangote Refinery said one of its primary objectives is to maintain and strengthen its position as a leading supplier of refined petroleum products in Nigeria, noting that facilitating imports that directly compete with its own products would contradict its business goals.
According to the company, its sales contracts and tender agreements expressly prohibit buyers from reselling or re-importing products into Nigeria.
The refinery further argued that the economics of such a trade arrangement make no sense.
It explained that transporting petroleum products from the refinery to Lomé and subsequently back into Nigeria would cost between $82 and $90 per metric tonne, significantly reducing profitability and making such transactions commercially unattractive.
It added that it does not provide export discounts large enough to offset those logistics costs or create any viable arbitrage opportunity between export and domestic markets.
“Simply put, there is no evident commercial incentive for a producer to incur additional shipping, storage, financing and handling costs only for the product to return and compete in its largest and closest market,” the company said.
Dangote Refinery also highlighted its strict product traceability and compliance measures, revealing that it maintains detailed records of all product sales, including lifting locations, nominated vessels, counterparties and destination declarations where applicable.
The company maintained that any suggestion it knowingly facilitates the re-importation of its products is inconsistent with its contractual restrictions and established compliance procedures.
Reaffirming its commitment to Nigeria’s energy independence, the refinery said it has consistently advocated for reducing the country’s dependence on imported petroleum products, warning that increased imports undermine local refining efforts, place pressure on foreign exchange reserves and weaken domestic industrial development.
“It would therefore be inconsistent with both the refinery’s commercial interests and its publicly stated position to support or encourage practices that increase imports into Nigeria,” the statement added.
The refinery concluded that there is neither a strategic rationale nor a commercial incentive for it to export products to neighbouring countries for subsequent re-importation into Nigeria, stressing that the allegations are not supported by the economics of the trade, contractual arrangements, product traceability records or its long-standing commitment to strengthening domestic refining capacity.





