NEWS
IPOB Calls For Ban On Miyetti Allah, Open Grazing To Curb ESN Operations
The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) has stated that it would consider ending the operations of its security arm, the Eastern Security Network (ESN), if the Nigerian government bans the Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association and abolishes open grazing across the country.
This declaration comes amid ongoing tensions around herder-farmer conflicts, particularly in Nigeria’s southeastern and southwestern regions.
READ ALSO: DSS Lifts Restrictions, Nnamdi Kanu Reunites With Legal Team
In a statement, IPOB spokesperson Emma Powerful asserted that the ESN would remain active in defending southeastern Nigeria as long as Miyetti Allah continues to operate and open grazing is allowed.
He highlighted the group’s ongoing mission to protect Igboland from alleged threats posed by herdsmen from the Sahel region.
“The sole purpose for the existence of ESN is to checkmate the excesses of these killer herdsmen from the Sahel and to ensure that no inch of the Land of the Ancients (Igboland) is forcibly taken over and occupied by killers disguised as herdsmen,” the statement read.
Powerful argued that IPOB’s leader, Nnamdi Kanu, and the ESN deserve recognition for their efforts to shield the Southeast from the activities of violent herdsmen, which he claims have caused upheaval in other regions of Nigeria.
“Not many people in Nigeria today know that a sizeable chunk of Yoruba land, Oyo State in particular, is under forcible occupation by these killer herdsmen from the North. This was what some Yoruba agitators were fighting against—or have we all forgotten?” he questioned.
Powerful pointed to alleged forced occupations in Oyo State and the Tiv areas of Benue as evidence, claiming these regions have been significantly impacted by violent encroachments.
He cited examples, such as forests in Oyo now renamed “Gambari,” a name that, he noted, is not indigenous to the Yoruba community. Similarly, he claimed that parts of Benue have been renamed “Katsina Ala,” which he says is a sign of displacement in Tiv lands.
“Today, no Yoruba man would dare enter a forest renamed Gambari in Oyo State that is the heart of the Yoruba race. Is Gambari a Yoruba name? Tiv people of Benue today have forfeited their ancestral land, which has long been renamed Katsina Ala,” he added.
“Every well-meaning Easterner should be grateful to Nnamdi Kanu and ESN for blunting and putting a permanent stop to the relentless advance of killer herdsmen from the Sahel.”
Drawing parallels with Amotekun, a similar vigilante group established to protect Yoruba lands, Powerful emphasized that ESN’s only purpose is to protect the Southeast from similar threats.
“Like the Yoruba Amotekun formed to give legitimacy to the quest to eradicate killer herdsmen from Yoruba farms and forests, ESN is here to protect the people, nothing more, nothing less,” he stated.
He added that while other Nigerians may tolerate herdsmen activities in their regions, IPOB would not allow such a situation in the Southeast.
“If other Nigerians are comfortable with killer herdsmen taking over their forests and farmlands and slaughtering their people at will, that is their prerogative. Such a state of affairs will never be replicated in Biafraland. As long as IPOB exists, Fulani herdsmen will never take over any inch of territory in Biafraland.” he added
NEWS
“Anybody Who Wants to Cause Trouble, We’re Ready” — Dangote Reacts to Kenya Court Order on Lamu Refinery
Africa’s richest man and Chairman of Dangote Industries Limited, Aliko Dangote, has reacted to a Kenyan court order concerning his planned oil refinery project in Lamu County, saying he is prepared to confront anyone seeking to disrupt the investment.
Dangote spoke in Nairobi on Tuesday, September 29, after learning that a court had issued an order restricting construction activities at the site of the proposed refinery.
“Yesterday, when I landed, I saw a report that one court had given an order that we should not do any construction. I said that this is normal for us in Africa. We don’t care. In fact, this is even small,” Dangote said.
ALSO READ: Kenyan Court Halts Dangote Refinery Work
The businessman recalled a similar legal challenge involving one of his investments in Senegal, saying the project there was stopped for about a year before the matter was taken to the Supreme Court.
“In Senegal, they stopped our factory for one year, and we went up to the Supreme Court to get a judgment, so anybody who wants to cause trouble, we are ready for them,” he said.
“We know the people who are doing all these things, and we will face them.”
The comments come amid a legal dispute over land earmarked for Dangote’s proposed refinery in Lamu. Local residents have challenged the project, while the court has issued an order maintaining the status quo pending further proceedings.
Despite the legal challenge, Dangote said the proposed refinery would bring significant economic opportunities to the region.
He said the project could require more than 60,000 people at the height of construction, while the presence of workers and businesses around the facility would stimulate wider economic activity.
“We will try to train a lot of people here because at the height of the project, we will need over 60,000 people on site. When these people are paid their salary, they will need to eat. Other companies will also set up shop,” he said.
Dangote also dismissed concerns that the long-term future of the oil industry would be undermined by the transition towards renewable energy, arguing that petroleum remains important beyond gasoline and other fuels.
The proposed Lamu refinery is expected to have a capacity of about 700,000 barrels of crude oil per day and is projected as a major investment in Kenya’s petroleum sector.
The legal dispute comes ahead of the planned launch-related activities for the project, with the court proceedings expected to continue in October.
NEWS
‘NIDO Worldwide Not Duly Constituted’ – NiDCOM Warns FG
The Nigerians in Diaspora Commission (NiDCOM) has warned the Federal Government, ministries, departments and agencies (MDAs), as well as Nigerian missions abroad, against engaging with a group presenting itself as “NIDO Worldwide.”
The Commission’s latest position comes amid an escalating dispute over the authority of the organisation and its representation of Nigerians in the Diaspora.
The controversy followed a September 18 statement issued in the name of “NIDO Worldwide” concerning 13 audit observations raised against NiDCOM in the Auditor-General for the Federation’s annual report.
SEE ALSO: ‘That’s a False Report’ — Ekene Fires Back at NiDCOM Over India Deportation Claims
The statement demanded explanations from the Commission over the observations.
However, NIDO chapters in Africa, the Americas and the United Kingdom subsequently distanced themselves from the publication, saying they did not authorise or approve it.
The chapters also challenged the authority of individuals who purportedly spoke on their behalf.
Against this backdrop, NiDCOM, in a statement issued on Tuesday, September 29, said the organisation currently presenting itself as “NIDO Worldwide” is not a duly constituted body with the authority to speak for all NIDO chapters across the world.
The Commission said NIDO was established as a non-political, non-governmental organisation serving as an umbrella body for Nigerians in the Diaspora, with country and continental structures.
It, however, noted that the organisation has over the years experienced leadership disputes, factionalisation and fragmentation within some of its structures.
NiDCOM also pointed out that NIDO does not exist in several countries, where other credible and recognised diaspora organisations operate.
The Commission specifically addressed the role of Chibuzor Ubochi, who has presented himself as the leader of “NIDO Worldwide.”
NiDCOM said Ubochi is a factional chairman of one of the continental chapters and currently has a pending court case against him in that regard.
“Consequently, NiDCOM strongly advises the Federal Government of Nigeria, Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs), and Nigerian Missions abroad to exercise extreme caution and avoid falling victim to a phantom organisation calling itself ‘NIDO Worldwide’,” the Commission said.
The Commission urged all factions within NIDO to resolve their differences, put their structures in order and work together in the overall interest of Nigerians in the Diaspora.
It also called on diaspora organisations to refrain from dragging NIDO into political partisanship.
NiDCOM further advised MDAs and Nigerian missions abroad to seek clarification and guidance from the Commission before engaging with any individual or group claiming to represent Nigerians in the Diaspora.
According to the Commission, it maintains a register of duly registered diaspora groups and associations.
The Commission reaffirmed its readiness to work with all duly constituted diaspora organisations and well-meaning Nigerians in the Diaspora, in line with its mandate to harness the human and material resources of Nigerians abroad for Nigeria’s socio-economic development.
NEWS
NELFUND Row: ‘₦20,000 A Month, Not A Year’ — Omokri Replies Dino Melaye
Former presidential aide and political commentator, Reno Omokri, has responded to criticism of the Nigerian Education Loan Fund (NELFUND) by ADC chieftain Dino Melaye, clarifying that the ₦20,000 received by the lowest-paid students under the scheme is a monthly allowance, not an annual payment.
Omokri made this known in a post on X on Tuesday while responding to Melaye’s criticism of the Federal Government’s student loan programme.
RELATED NEWS: ‘NELFUND Is A Haven Of Corruption’ — Dino Melaye Blasts Tinubu Govt
“Dear Distinguished Senator @_dinomelaye, thank you for your feedback. However, please note that the lowest-paid student on the NELFUND Student Loan Scheme receives ₦20,000 a MONTH, not ₦20,000 a YEAR, as you alleged in this video,” Omokri wrote.
He said this means the minimum amount received by such students over a year is ₦240,000.
“In a year, the minimum that students on the program get is ₦240,000,” he added.
Omokri also claimed that more than one million students are beneficiaries of the programme, with many recipients from Northern Nigeria, where he said average annual university tuition is about ₦100,000.
He cited a student of the Federal University, Dutse, Jigawa State, whose annual school fees he said amount to ₦84,000.
“Please find attached an actual screenshot of a monthly NELFUND alert paid to a student admitted to the Federal University, Dutse, Jigawa State, where his total annual school fees are ₦84,000,” Omokri said.
According to him, the payment was made in September 2026, adding that he would privately provide the student’s details to Melaye for verification.
Omokri described the programme as beneficial to Nigerian students, saying it had enabled more than one million students to enrol in universities.
“The NELFUND Student Loan Program is a lifesaver for Nigerian students,” he said.
He also urged critics to avoid turning the programme into a political issue.
“Perhaps, as patriotic citizens who love Nigeria and want the best for her, we can avoid undermining this lofty idea by not politicising it,” Omokri said.
Melaye’s Earlier Criticism
Omokri’s response followed criticism from Melaye, who described NELFUND as a “haven of corruption” and questioned the Federal Government’s claim that it was paying students’ school fees.
Melaye alleged that hundreds of billions of naira allocated to the programme were not being properly accounted for.
“The entire program is a baggage of fraud,” Melaye said, challenging the government to provide greater transparency over the scheme.
He also questioned the adequacy of the ₦20,000 payment, asking: “Which government school today takes ₦20,000 annual school fees?”
Melaye argued that students also have transportation and other educational expenses to meet.
He cited a student living in Suleja and attending the University of Abuja in Gwagwalada, saying the amount “cannot take him from Suleja to Gwagwalada and back home.”
The ADC chieftain further challenged NELFUND to disclose its beneficiaries and provide details of its monitoring and evaluation mechanisms.
“What is the monitoring and evaluation? I challenge them to publish the names of Nigerian students that have benefited from that program,” he said.





