The dust is yet to settle on the issue of ₦11.2 trillion receivables debited to the Federation by state oil major, the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC Ltd) raised by former Vice President Atiku Abubakar.

A pressure group, the Transparency Network and Public Interest Initiative has tackled the presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), over the questions he raised on the possibility of the fund being coded for government contractors, pipeline protection and President Bola Tinubu’s re-election campaign.

According to the group, the figure recorded in the NNPC Ltd’s accounts represents obligations owed to the company for advances and costs incurred on behalf of the Federation, rather than evidence that the money was funnelled into political activities.

Its spokesperson, Dr Ehizojie Emmanuel Anderson, made the remarks in a statement issued in Abuja on Monday.

Recall that Atiku, running the presidency under the ADC had called for greater disclosure concerning the ₦11.2 trillion recorded in NNPC Ltd’s 2025 accounts as other receivables from the Federation.

In a statement issued on his behalf by the Director of Strategic Communication of the ADC Presidential Campaign Council, Phrank Shaibu, the former Vice President asked the national oil company to disclose how much of the receivables related to protecting Nigeria’s oil and gas infrastructure, the payments made, contractors involved and services provided.

He separately raised questions about whether government contractors had provided financial or material support to Tinubu’s re-election activities.

The allegations of a connection between government contracts and political campaign financing have not been independently established.

Responding to Atiku’s comments, Anderson argued that the accounting treatment of the ₦11.2 trillion needed to be distinguished from payments made to individual contractors.

“These are not hidden campaign funds. They are recorded Federation obligations, disclosed by the company itself, accumulated over time, and tied to advances and the cost of protecting national oil and gas assets under an approved framework,” Anderson said.

He accused the former Vice President of politicising the NNPC Ltd’s financial disclosures and said scrutiny of the national oil company’s operations should be based on its accounts and other documentary evidence.

The NNPC Ltd’s 2025 financial statements recorded approximately ₦11.2 trillion under other receivables from the Federation.

The company’s accounts describe such receivables as relating to advances to the Federation and costs incurred in securing the country’s oil and gas assets.

The figure does not, by itself, establish that ₦11.2 trillion was paid to pipeline surveillance contractors.

Atiku’s argument was that the aggregate figure did not provide sufficient detail to determine how much was specifically spent on pipeline security, who received payments and what results were achieved.

The Transparency Network maintained that NNPC’s disclosure of the receivables showed that the transactions were captured in its financial records.

READ ALSO: Atiku Blows Lid on NNPC Ltd’s ₦11.2trn Receivables, Pipeline Contracts

Anderson also defended the company’s management under Group Chief Executive Officer Bayo Ojulari, arguing that the publication of financial information should encourage evidence-based scrutiny of its operations.

He said the ₦11.2 trillion figure should not be interpreted as evidence of campaign financing without documentary proof establishing such a connection.

“A man who has read the report would not be asking Nigerians to treat a multi-year receivable as proof that NNPC is bankrolling a political campaign,” Anderson said.

Atiku’s statement, however, sought a more detailed disclosure of the components of the receivable and separately questioned the relationship between government contractors and political campaign financing.

He specifically called for the publication of relevant contracts, payment records, procurement information and outcomes associated with oil and gas infrastructure protection.

The former Vice President also raised questions about Tantita Security Services, which has been involved in pipeline surveillance, and demanded disclosure of any financial or material support government contractors may have provided to Tinubu’s re-election activities.

The Transparency Network rejected attempts to draw a connection between the NNPC Ltd’s receivables and political campaign financing without evidence.

Anderson said the company’s reforms under Ojulari should instead be assessed against its financial disclosures, operating performance and compliance with applicable accountability requirements.

“The attack on the oil giant is unnecessary and unwarranted,” he said.

The group also criticised Atiku’s previous position on restructuring and private-sector participation in the national oil industry, while arguing that the NNPC Ltd should be allowed to continue its current reforms.

It called for public debate over the company’s finances to focus on documented expenditure, contractual arrangements and audited financial information rather than political allegations.

The dispute places renewed attention on the level of detail contained in the NNPC Ltd’s financial disclosures.

While the company’s accounts identify the broad nature of its receivables from the Federation, Atiku has argued that Nigerians should be provided with a more detailed breakdown of expenditure associated with protecting oil and gas infrastructure.

The Transparency Network, on the other hand, maintains that the existence of the receivable in the NNPC Ltd’s accounts should not be presented as evidence of political campaign financing without further proof.

Nigeria’s former Vice-President, Atiku Abubakar has decried the whooping sum of ₦11.2 trillion receivables debit to the Federation Account as expenditure on pipeline security and payments to contractors by the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC Ltd).

Alleging that the large sums were being diverted to electioneering campaigns, Atiku, the African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential candidate, called on President Bola Tinubu to disclose details of the transactions.

Specifically, Atiku demanded the publication of contracts, payment records and project outcomes linked to oil and gas infrastructure protection.

READ MORE: The Guardian’s Abuja GM Passes On

In a statement issued on Sunday by Phrank Shaibu, Director of Strategic Communication of the ADC Presidential Campaign Council, Atiku questioned how much of the amount was spent on pipeline surveillance, the beneficiaries of the payments and the results achieved.

“NNPC’s 2024 accounts recorded roughly ₦17.5 trillion across different claims on the Federation, including petrol under-recovery and other receivables linked to advances and asset protection. Its 2025 accounts now show approximately ₦11.2 trillion in other receivables from the Federation,” he said.

Atiku said the figures did not clearly establish the amounts spent specifically on pipeline protection, urging the government to provide a breakdown of the expenditure.

He also compared the ₦11.2 trillion in receivables with the approximately ₦3.1 trillion allocated to the Ministry of Defence in 2025, arguing that Nigerians deserved greater transparency in public spending on security.

The former vice-president further called for disclosure of the contractual arrangements involving companies engaged in major infrastructure and pipeline security projects.

He specifically questioned the pipeline surveillance contract held by Tantita Security Services Nigeria Limited and the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway contract awarded to a company linked to the Chagoury family.

Atiku urged the government to publish relevant contract documents, bidding procedures, evaluation records and payment details to enable Nigerians to scrutinise the awards.

He also called for disclosure of any financial or material support provided by government contractors to Tinubu’s re-election activities, alleging that potential links between public contracts and political financing required clarification.

The ADC presidential candidate said transparency was particularly important amid security challenges, economic hardship and concerns about the government’s use of public resources.

He criticised the administration’s economic policies and called for measures to reduce the cost of living, improve electricity supply and strengthen public safety.

Atiku also faulted Tinubu’s recent remarks about enjoying his stay in Europe, arguing that the comments did not reflect the difficulties confronting many Nigerians.

The former vice-president said his administration, if elected in 2027, would prioritise making living costs more affordable.

The Presidency and the companies mentioned were not represented in the statement, and the allegations concerning contract awards and possible campaign financing were not independently established in the material provided.

Edo State Commissioner for Information and Strategy, Kassim Afegbua, has accused the presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), Atiku Abubakar, of showing “symptoms of desperation” over his promise to restore fuel subsidy if elected president in 2027.

Afegbua made the remarks during an interview while reacting to Atiku’s position on the removal of petrol subsidy and the former vice president’s renewed call for government intervention in fuel pricing.

ALSO READ: 2027: ‘They’ve Shown Peter Obi More Than One Kobo, Yet He Hasn’t Backed Down’ — Afegbua

According to him, Atiku, Peter Obi and President Bola Ahmed Tinubu had all campaigned ahead of the 2023 presidential election on the need to remove fuel subsidy.

“Now, talking about fuel subsidy, I think the ADC candidate is showing symptoms of desperation,” Afegbua said.

He argued that Tinubu, after winning the 2023 election, implemented the removal of the petrol subsidy, adding that anyone seeking its return should be properly scrutinised because, in his view, the previous subsidy regime created opportunities for fraud and contributed to the decline of Nigeria’s refineries.

“Anybody who is planning to bring back subsidy, that person should be examined properly, because that person is trying to bring back subsidy scammers, saboteurs, and buccaneers who held down Nigeria for so long using subsidy and crippled our refineries,” he said.

Afegbua also alleged that the ADC was experiencing financial difficulties and suggested that this was influencing its campaign messaging.

“The ADC, as it were today, is undergoing some financial strain. So they are looking for every opportunity to rake in money and all of that,” he said.

The Edo commissioner, however, acknowledged that Nigerians were still facing the effects of high fuel and transportation costs, pointing to ongoing government interventions, including the planned commissioning of 50 CNG buses in Edo State.

He said the buses, expected to be commissioned on October 15, would be distributed across the three senatorial districts and would provide free transportation for passengers.

Recall that Atiku had on August 20, 2026, pledged to restore petrol subsidy if elected president in the 2027 election.

Speaking during a Facebook Live session, the ADC candidate questioned how the resources previously spent on subsidy had been utilised following its removal.

“I initially did not oppose the removal of the fuel subsidy. But now that it has been removed, where is the money? Where has the subsidy money gone?” Atiku asked.

He subsequently said: “If I win the presidential election, I will restore the subsidy. And anyone who stole Nigeria’s subsidy funds must return the money.”

On August 25, Atiku further reaffirmed that his position had not changed, saying, “When I said I would return to subsidy, I will!”

He later clarified that the proposed intervention would be targeted and focused on supporting domestic production rather than simply returning to the former import-subsidy model.