Politics
Rivers Crisis: Impeachment of Fubara Lacks Constitutional Basis — Advocacy Group
A civic watchdog, the Good Governance Advocacy Centre (GGAC), has faulted the ongoing impeachment proceedings against Rivers State Governor, Siminalayi Fubara, and his deputy, Ngozi Odu, describing the move as unconstitutional and politically motivated.
In a statement issued on Thursday in Port Harcourt, the advocacy group said findings from its 72-hour forensic and legal review revealed no act of gross misconduct capable of warranting the removal of the governor or his deputy under Nigeria’s Constitution.
RELATED NEWS: JUST IN: Two Rivers Assembly Members Withdraw Impeachment Against Fubara
The statement, signed by GGAC Country Representative, Dr Zaccheus Ocha, explained that the organisation conducted a detailed procedural and factual analysis of the allegations raised by the Rivers State House of Assembly and found them to be weak, speculative, and driven by political interests.
According to the group, the impeachment notice failed to meet the constitutional threshold required to initiate removal proceedings, noting that most of the allegations fell within the lawful discretionary powers of the executive arm of government.
“The Good Governance Advocacy Centre has concluded a 72-hour independent review which establishes that no act of gross misconduct has been committed by Governor Siminalayi Fubara or his deputy,” the statement read.
“What is being presented as impeachment is, in reality, a political project designed to serve personal and factional interests rather than protect constitutional order.”
GGAC disclosed that its review examined the impeachment notice, relevant constitutional provisions—particularly Section 188 of the 1999 Constitution—as well as financial records cited by lawmakers, stressing that none of the claims met the standard of grave violation required for impeachment.
The group also linked the impeachment attempt to the lingering political feud between Governor Fubara and his predecessor, Nyesom Wike, describing the crisis as an extension of unresolved power struggles following the transition of power in the state.
“The unfolding events in Rivers State indicate that the impeachment proceedings are not taking place in isolation,” the statement noted.
“Our findings show that the actions of the House of Assembly are deeply rooted in post-transition power tussles and resistance to the governor’s efforts to assert institutional independence.”
GGAC further alleged that the state legislature had become a tool in a broader struggle to retain control of political structures in the state, warning that impeachment was being used as a coercive weapon to force political submission.
It cautioned that the misuse of impeachment for political vendettas poses a serious threat to democratic stability, not only in Rivers State but across the country.
The advocacy group also criticised the speed with which the impeachment process was initiated, raising concerns over due process, fair hearing, and lack of genuine dialogue.
“The rush to impeachment without meaningful attempts at reconciliation reinforces the conclusion that the process is punitive rather than corrective,” the group said.
GGAC warned that continuing with the impeachment could plunge Rivers State into prolonged political instability, distract governance, and undermine economic and security priorities in the oil-producing state.
The group called on members of the Rivers State House of Assembly to immediately suspend the impeachment proceedings and embrace dialogue, urging elders, political leaders, and civil society groups to intervene to prevent what it described as an avoidable constitutional crisis.
“Rivers State does not need another season of manufactured instability. The interests of the people must take precedence over personal ambitions and unresolved political grievances,” the statement added.
Politics
“PDP Can’t Unseat Tinubu with Wike in Charge” — Ulasi Blows Hot, Threatens Exit
A chieftain of the Peoples Democratic Party, Dan Ulasi, has warned that the party stands little chance of defeating President Bola Ahmed Tinubu in the 2027 general elections if Nyesom Wike continues to play a leading role while allegedly supporting the ruling government.
Ulasi, who spoke during an interview on Arise TV on Thursday, expressed deep concern over what he described as a “contradictory situation” within the PDP, stressing that such internal inconsistencies could weaken the party’s credibility and chances at the polls.
ALSO READ: ‘I Didn’t Mean It Literally’ — Nyesom Wike Clears Air as Atiku Abubakar Fires Back
“I don’t see my party as presently constituted challenging Tinubu with Wike as national leader,” Ulasi said, warning that he may be forced to leave the party if the issue is not addressed.
The PDP stalwart argued that Wike cannot effectively serve as a leader in the opposition while maintaining close ties with President Tinubu, describing the situation as “unconstructive” for a party seeking to reclaim power at the national level.
He further questioned what role Wike would play if another candidate emerges as the PDP’s presidential flag-bearer ahead of the 2027 election, asking whether the former Rivers State governor would actively participate in party rallies or align with the ruling party’s activities.
Ulasi warned that the party’s next meeting could be his last if its leadership fails to provide satisfactory explanations, insisting that he cannot continue to be part of a process riddled with contradictions.
In a related development, Ulasi revealed that Peter Obi had visited him several times this year, including a recent meeting following an appearance in Enugu.
He spoke positively about Obi’s vision for Nigeria, noting that the former presidential candidate offers a sense of hope for the country’s future, although he stopped short of declaring any political alignment.
Reflecting on his longstanding ties to the PDP, Ulasi recalled his role during the party’s formation alongside late former Vice-President Alex Ekueme and other founding members.
Despite his deep connection to the party, he maintained that he would rather step aside than remain in a system he considers inconsistent.
He added that if he eventually exits the PDP, he has no plans to join another political party, stating that he would instead operate as a private consultant.
Politics
Drama in Ogun APC as Gbenga Daniel Claims He Was Barred From Meeting
There was tension within the Ogun State chapter of the All Progressives Congress (APC) on Monday after former Governor and Senator representing Ogun East, Otunba Gbenga Daniel, alleged that he was barred from attending a stakeholders’ meeting of the party held in Ijebu Ode.
The meeting, which took place at Adeola Odutola Hall, was reportedly convened to bring together key party stakeholders, including current and former local government chairmen, councillors, and serving as well as former lawmakers from both state and national levels.
However, the senator, in a viral video circulating online, claimed he was denied entry into the venue despite being part of the expected attendees.
ALSO READ: “APC Failure in Disguise?” — Dickson Tears Into ADC Coalition
Speaking from his branded campaign bus parked at the venue, Daniel expressed disappointment over the situation, saying he and his team were stopped from accessing the meeting.
He further questioned the legitimacy of any resolutions reached at the gathering, suggesting that the outcome of the meeting should not be considered valid.
As of press time, the Ogun State APC leadership had yet to issue an official response to the allegation.
Politics
Who Leads ADC? Supreme Court to Hear Mark’s Appeal in Heated Party Rift
The lingering leadership crisis within the African Democratic Congress (ADC) is set for a crucial legal test as the Supreme Court of Nigeria prepares to hear an appeal filed by former Senate President, David Mark.
Mark is challenging a legal action brought by a former Deputy National Chairman of the party, Nafiu Bala, over the control and leadership structure of the ADC.
The case, scheduled for hearing on Tuesday, is expected to determine the direction of the party amid deepening internal divisions.
SEE MORE: 2027: Why ADC, Opposition Leaders Stormed INEC in Abuja
Through his lawyer, Realwan Okpanachi, Mark is seeking an order to stay the execution of a Court of Appeal judgment delivered on March 12, pending the final resolution of the matter.
He also urged the apex court to restrain the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from making any alterations to the party’s leadership as currently constituted under his faction.
In addition, Mark is asking the court to suspend further proceedings in a related suit before the Federal High Court in Abuja, presided over by Justice Emeka Nwite.
The dispute dates back to a September 4, 2025 ruling by the Federal High Court following an ex parte application filed by Bala, which has since fueled competing claims to the party’s leadership.
The ADC has, in recent months, been embroiled in a bitter factional crisis, with rival camps asserting legitimacy.
The situation has been worsened by conflicting court orders and administrative uncertainty surrounding who truly leads the party.
Tensions escalated after INEC reportedly removed Mark as the party’s national chairman from its official records, sparking protests by his loyalists.
The demonstration drew prominent political figures, including former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, ex-Osun State Governor Rauf Aregbesola, former Anambra State Governor Peter Obi, and former Rivers State Governor Rotimi Amaechi.
In response, the Bala-led faction staged a counter-protest, insisting on recognition by INEC as the legitimate leadership of the party.
As the battle shifts to the Supreme Court, political observers say the outcome could decisively shape the future of the ADC, particularly as political alignments begin to take form ahead of upcoming elections.





