International News
S’African Gov’t Not Confiscating Any Land – Ramaphosa To Trump
President Cyril Ramaphosa has refuted claims by U.S. President, Donald Trump that South Africa is “confiscating” land, insisting that the country’s land reform policies are legally and constitutionally guided.
In a statement on Monday, Ramaphosa responded to Trump’s remarks, which suggested the South African government was seizing land without compensation and “treating certain classes of people VERY BADLY.” Trump also threatened to cut U.S. funding to South Africa.
“The South African government has not confiscated any land,” Ramaphosa said. “The recently adopted Expropriation Act is not a confiscation instrument.”
READ MORE: Why Burkina Faso Is Assuaged From Ravaging Trump Effect -Hundeyin
The legislation, signed into law last month, allows the government to expropriate land in specific circumstances with “nil compensation” in cases deemed to be in the public interest.
Land ownership remains a sensitive issue in South Africa, where white landowners still hold the majority of farmland despite the end of apartheid three decades ago.
Critics, including South African-born billionaire Elon Musk, a close Trump ally, have condemned the policy.
However, Ramaphosa defended the act as a “constitutionally mandated legal process that ensures public access to land in an equitable and just manner as guided by the constitution.”
Despite Trump’s warning about cutting U.S. funding, Ramaphosa’s office downplayed the potential impact, stating that apart from the PEPFAR anti-HIV/AIDS initiative—which contributes 17% of South Africa’s HIV/AIDS funding—”there is no other significant funding that is provided by the United States in South Africa.”
Ramaphosa emphasized the importance of maintaining strong ties with Washington, stating, “The US remains a key strategic political and trade partner for South Africa.”
He also expressed willingness to engage with Trump’s administration to clarify South Africa’s land reform policies. “We look forward to engaging with the Trump administration over our land reform policy and issues of bilateral interest.
“We are certain that out of those engagements, we will share a better and common understanding over these matters.”
International News
Why UK Is Moving to Restrict Children’s Access to Social Media
The United Kingdom is considering sweeping new restrictions that could limit or completely block children under the age of 16 from accessing social media platforms, as part of a broader push to improve online safety and reduce excessive screen time among young users.
The proposal, currently under government consultation, is being led by Prime Minister Keir Starmer and focuses on addressing concerns over how teenagers interact with platforms such as Instagram and TikTok.
ALSO READ: UK Says ‘No Entry’ to Kanye West Ahead of Big Comeback Show
Officials say the move is driven by growing evidence and public concern that algorithm-driven feeds and “endless scrolling” features may be negatively affecting children’s sleep patterns, concentration levels, and overall well-being.
The government is also reviewing whether additional measures such as app curfews and time limits should be introduced.
Technology Secretary Liz Kendall said the consultation has already attracted widespread public input, with tens of thousands of responses from parents, teenagers, and advocacy groups.
She noted that the government is particularly interested in feedback on addictive platform design features and the use of AI tools targeting younger users.
The UK is also studying policies already implemented in other countries. Australia has introduced stricter age-based restrictions, while Greece and Indonesia have also moved toward tighter regulation of children’s access to social media.
Authorities emphasize that no final decision has been made, but the consultation process is expected to shape future legislation on how tech companies operate and how young users are protected online in the digital age.
International News
You Won’t Believe What Trump Said About Pope Leo
U.S. President Donald Trump has sparked global reactions following his remarks about Pope Leo XIV after the Pope’s recent anti-war message calling for peace in conflict-hit regions.
The controversy began after Pope Leo XIV delivered a strong appeal at the Vatican, urging world leaders to end ongoing wars and prioritise dialogue over violenceviolence.
ALSO READ: Melania Trump to Preside Over UN Council as Middle East Burns
The pontiff warned against the “idolatry of power” and called for global cooperation to restore peace.
Reacting to the message, Trump told reporters he is “not a big fan” of Pope Leo XIV, describing him as “very liberal” and questioning his views on crime and international security.
The U.S. President further criticised the Pope’s stance on global conflicts, suggesting his message overlooks serious security challenges linked to rising geopolitical tensions, including nuclear concerns.
In a follow-up post on Truth Social, Trump intensified his criticism, accusing the Pope of taking a weak position on foreign policy matters and suggesting political factors influenced his leadership position.
The comments have since triggered widespread debate across political and religious circles, adding to ongoing tensions between Washington and the Vatican over issues such as immigration policy, military action, and global diplomacy.
While both sides have previously denied any formal rift, the latest exchange has renewed global attention on their differing positions regarding war and peace efforts.
International News
Israel Says Slain Al Jazeera Journalist Was Hamas Operative
The Israeli military said on Thursday that Mohammed Wishah, an Al Jazeera journalist killed in a strike in Gaza on Wednesday, was a Hamas operative “operating under the guise of a journalist.”
According to Israeli forces, Wishah was “a key terrorist in Hamas’ rocket and weapons production headquarters” and had been planning attacks against soldiers in the area.
The military said he used his journalist identity to advance Hamas’ operations against Israel.
ALSO SEE: Israel Kills Iran Intel Chief, Tehran Threatens Retaliation
Al Jazeera, the Qatar-based broadcaster, strongly condemned the killing. In a statement, the network described the attack as a “heinous crime of targeting and killing” its correspondent and insisted the strike was deliberate, not accidental.
The channel vowed to pursue “all necessary legal action to prosecute those responsible for the killing of its correspondents and staff in Gaza.”
Media rights organization Reporters Without Borders also condemned the incident, stating that Wishah’s name now joins “more than 220 journalists killed in two and a half years by Israeli forces in Gaza, at least 70 of whom were killed while performing their duties.”
The killing occurred despite a US-backed ceasefire in Gaza that has been in effect since October 2025, highlighting ongoing tensions and frequent accusations of truce violations by both Israel and Hamas.
Al Jazeera listed Wishah among 11 of its journalists killed in Gaza since the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on southern Israel that triggered the Gaza war.
Past incidents include the killing of Mohammad Salama in August 2025 and the deaths of four Al Jazeera staff and two freelancers outside Al-Shifa hospital in Gaza City earlier that year, prompting widespread condemnation.





