Connect with us

Business

SERAP, BudgIT, 136 Nigerians Ask Court To Order Tinubu To Stop Cybersecurity Levy

Published

on

The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP), BudgIT and 136 concerned Nigerians have filed a lawsuit against the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) “over its failure to withdraw the patently unlawful ‘Circular’ directing all banks and other financial institutions to deduct from customers’ account a ‘cybersecurity levy’.”

Recall that the CBN had last week directed banks to implement a levy of 0.5% (0.005) equivalent to a half percent of all electronic transactions, and to remit the levy to the ‘national cybersecurity fund.’ The CBN relied on the Cybercrime Act 2015 [as amended]. The directive is to be implemented by Monday, May 20, 2024.

In the suit number FHC/L/CS/822/2024 filed last Friday at the Federal High Court, Lagos, the Plaintiffs are asking the court to determine “whether the CBN Circular dated 6th May 2024, directing financial institutions to deduct from customers’ accounts a cybersecurity levy is unlawful and therefore ultra vires the CBN.”

The Plaintiffs are also asking the court to determine “whether the CBN Circular dated 6th May 2024, directing financial institutions to deduct from customers’ accounts a cybersecurity levy and section 44(2)(a) of the Cybercrimes Act are not in breach of sections 14(2), 44(1) and 162(1) of the Nigerian Constitution 1999 [as amended], and therefore unconstitutional, null, and void.”

The Plaintiffs are asking the court for “a declaration that the CBN Circular dated 6th May 2024 directing all banks and other financial institutions to deduct from customers’ accounts a cybersecurity levy is contrary to the provisions of the Cybercrimes Act and ultra vires the CBN, and therefore is illegal null and void.”

The Plaintiffs are seeking “an order of interim injunction restraining the CBN, its office, agents, privies, assigns, or any other persons acting on its instructions from enforcing the Circular dated 6th May 2024, pending the hearing and determination of the motion on notice filed contemporaneously in this suit.”

The suit filed on behalf of the Plaintiffs by their lawyer Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa, SAN, read in part: “The CBN Circular is unlawful and an outright violation of the provisions of the Nigerian Constitution and the country’s international obligations.

“Unless the reliefs sought are granted, the CBN will enforce its Circular directing banks to deduct from customers’ accounts a cybersecurity levy. Millions of Nigerians with active bank accounts would suffer irreparable damage from the unlawful deduction of cybersecurity levies from their accounts.

“The provisions of the Cybercrimes Act on payment of cybersecurity levy strictly apply only to businesses listed in the Second Schedule to the Act. These provisions make no reference to bank customers, contrary to the CBN Circular to all banks and other financial institutions.

“The Nigerian government has a legal responsibility to ensure the security and welfare of the people, as provided for under section 14(2)(b) of the Nigerian Constitution and human rights treaties to which Nigeria is a state party.

“The CBN Circular is also a blatant violation of Nigerians’ human rights including the right to property guaranteed under section 44 of the Nigerian Constitution and article 14 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights to which Nigeria is a state party.

“We urge the Honourable (Court) to grant the reliefs sought in the public interest and the interest of justice as well as to prevent arbitrariness and ensure the rule of law in the country.

“Any deduction of cybersecurity levy from Nigerians’ accounts would be contrary to the provisions of section 44(2)(a) of the Cybercrimes Act 2015 as amended by the Cybercrimes Prohibition, Prevention etc) (Amendment) Act 2024 and ultra vires the CBN, and therefore illegal, null and void.

“Section 162 (1) of the Nigerian Constitution provides that all revenues collected by or on behalf of the Government of the Federation are mandatorily required to be paid into the Federation Account save the revenue excepted by the provisions of the section.

“The National Cybersecurity Fund established by section 44(1) of the Cybercrimes Act 2015 [as amended] into which it is required to be paid the levy of 0.5% chargeable on all electronic transactions instead of the Federation Account is unconstitutional, null, and void.

“The CBN Circular is a breach and misinterpretation of Sections 44(2)(a) and 58 of the Cybercrimes Act [as amended], in that it purports to incorporate customers of the bank (neither defined by the Act nor designated by the CBN as financial institutions) as those to pay the cybersecurity levy.

“The Plaintiffs are customers of commercial banks in Nigeria with accounts domiciled with many commercial banks in Nigeria. The CBN is the statutory agency charged with the overall control and administration of the monetary and financial sector policies of the Federal Government.

“The Plaintiffs are included in the statistics of Nigerians with active bank accounts as the Plaintiffs are owners of accounts in different Banks and other financial institutions.

“As of 30 April 2024, commercial banks in Nigeria already charge exorbitant fees for electronic transactions, including Electronic Transfer Charges at N53.75 on any amount above N10,000, Stamp Duty of N50 on every transaction and Account Maintenance Charge deducted per month.”

The Plaintiffs are therefore asking the court for the following reliefs:

“A DECLARATION that the Circular issued by the CBN and dated 6th May 2024 directing all banks and other financial institutions to deduct from customers’ accounts cybersecurity levy is manifestly misleading, extorting and a breach and misinterpretation of the provisions of Section 44, 58 and Second Schedule of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, ETC) (Amendment) Act 2024 and ultra vires the CBN, and therefore is illegal, null and void.

“A DECLARATION that the Circular issued by the CBN and dated 6th May 2024 directing all banks and other financial institutions to deduct from customers’ accounts cybersecurity levy and section 44(2)(a) of the Cybercrimes Act are inconsistent with, and a breach of the provisions of Section 14(2), 44 (1) 162 of the Nigerian Constitution 1999 [as amended] and therefore unconstitutional, null and void.

“AN ORDER setting aside the Circular issued by the CBN and dated 6th May 2024 directing all banks and other financial institutions to deduct from customers’ accounts cybersecurity levy, for being misleading, extorting and a breach of the provisions of Section 44, 58 and Second Schedule of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, ETC) (Amendment) Act 2024.

“AN ORDER setting aside the Circular issued by the CBN and dated 6th May 2024 directing all banks and other financial institutions to deduct from customers’ accounts cybersecurity levy and section 44(2)(a) of the Cybercrimes Act, for being inconsistent with, and a breach of the provisions of Section 14(2), 44 (1) and 162 of the Nigerian Constitution 1999 [as amended] and therefore unconstitutional, null and void.

“AN ORDER restraining the Central Bank of Nigeria, including its agents, assigns, privies and or representatives or such other persons acting on its behalf, from enforcing the Circular issued by the CBN and dated 6th May 2024 against all banks and other financial institutions and their customers.

“ANY ORDER(S) that the Honorable Court may deem fit to make in the circumstance of this suit.”

No date has been fixed for the hearing of the suit.

Business

CBN Extends Suspension Of Cash Deposit Fees

Published

on

In an effort to ease financial transactions, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has extended the suspension of cash deposit processing fees from September 30, 2024, to March 31, 2025.

In a letter addressed to banks and financial institutions, signed by the Director of Banking Supervision, Adetona Adedeji, the CBN referenced its previous directive, which had initially suspended the fees until September 30, 2024.

Read Also: Nnamdi Kanu’s Trial Delayed As Justice Nyako Steps Down

The suspension applies to cash deposits exceeding N500,000 for individuals and N3 million for corporate accounts.

Hitherto, individual accounts are charged a 2% processing fee, while corporate accounts incur a 3% fee on excess deposits.

The CBN reiterated that all regulated financial institutions are required to continue accepting cash deposits from the public without any charges during this extended period.

The letter reads, “Further to our letter dated May 6, 2024, referenced BSD/DIR/PUB/LAB/016/023, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) hereby extends the suspension of processing charges on cash deposits above N500,000 for individuals and N3,000,000 for corporates. The previous suspension, set to expire on September 30, 2024, has now been extended until March 31, 2025.”

“This suspension pertains to the 2% and 3% fees outlined in the ‘Guide to Charges by Banks, Other Financial Institutions and Non-Bank Financial Institutions,’ issued on December 20, 2019.”

Recall that in 2019, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) unveiled a plan to introduce fees on cash deposits and withdrawals, set to take effect from September 19, 2019.

The bank explained in a publicly shared circular that the move was part of efforts to limit cash usage and improve the collection of government revenues.

At first, these charges were only applicable to customers in Lagos, Ogun, Kano, Abia, Anambra, Rivers, and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT).

The CBN also outlined that the policy would be rolled out nationwide by March 31, 2020, as part of its cash-less initiative.

In December 2023, the CBN instructed banks and other financial institutions to halt the application of fees on large cash deposits.

This temporary suspension was originally planned to last until September 30, 2024.

Continue Reading

Business

Dangote, Gates Headline Relaunch Of Capital Campaign For Africa

Published

on

 

The Capital Campaign for the Africa Center was relaunched at the sidelines of the ongoing United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) in New York on Wednesday.

To highlight its importance, Africa’s richest man, President Dangote Group, Alh Aliko Dangote and Co-Chair, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Bill Gates led other notable captains of industry from Africa and the United States of America (USA) graced the event.

ALSO READ: The Tale Of Dangote And Arsenal Football Club

Prominent among those spotted therein include, Chairman, Oriental Energy Resources, Mohammed Indimi; Group Executive Director, Commercial Operations, Dangote Industries Limited (DIL), Fatima Aliko Dangote and Co-Chair, Africa Center, Chelsea Clinton.

Also the elite group are, President/Chief Executive Officer, DIL, Aliko Dangote; Co-Chair, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Bill Gates; Commissioner for Cultural Affairs, New York City, Laurie Cumbo and Chairman, Afreximbank, Benedict Oramah.

Continue Reading

Business

Dangote not truthful on petrol prices in Saudi Arabia- Findings

Published

on

Fresh findings have revealed that the Founder of Dangote Refinery, Alhaji Aliko Dangote may have lied on live bloomberg interview while  asserting that petrol pump price was 40 percent higher in Saudi Arabia than in it is in Nigeria.
The billionaire, who said this in an interview with Bloomberg, claimed that the product is 40% cheaper in Nigeria than in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, known as the second largest producer of crude in the world, with about 9 refineries.
The imbalance of this statement prompted several checks by multiple platforms and organisations, including Biztellers.com.ng, which launched a review of the billionaire’s statement during his recent bloomberg live interview.
Biztellers.com.ng findings reveals that a gallon of petrol currently sells for US$2.48 which when divided into 4 liters accordingly, comes down to US$0.62, and when converted to naira at the open market rate of N1,670 comes down to N1,036 a liter, this is against the current average pump price in Nigeria is about N1100 especially in the far north.
Lagos based online publication, Platform Africa, using data from Saudi Arabia and other reputable global statistic websites and online platforms showed that the claim by the Nigerian oil mogul is wrong.
For instance price tracking sites like statista, and tradingeconomics showed that petrol was actually more expensive in Nigeria than in Saudi Arabia as of today, Wednesday, September 25, and the day the billionaire made the statement.
PMS in Saudi is sold for 2. 33 Saudi Riyal equivalent to 62 cents / litre according to tradingeconimics while the PMS Average price in Nigeria is N1100/litre that is about 67 cents/litre, using the present exchange rate of Naira to dollar.
In Russia, the price per litre of petrol is 64 cent while it goes for 65 cent in Indonesia.
How 63 cent per litre in Saudi is 40% cheaper compared to 67 cent per litre in Nigeria will be left for Africa’s richest man to explain.
However, based on the verifiable figures by the petrol product price tracking institutions, Mr. Dangote is not correct.
PMS is more expensive in Nigeria than in Saudi as of today, Wednesday, September 25, 2024.
Beyond this, an earlier report by Bloomberg showed that contrary to claim by the billionaire on need for Nigeria to totally end petrol subsidy, Saudi Arabia spends $7,000 per person on energy subsidies, highest in G-20 economies.
The kingdom’s total spending on fuel subsidies soared over the past two years, hitting the highest among the Group of 20 economies on a per capita basis, the Bloomberg report has shown.
This, which came amid the harsh impact of petrol subsidy removal by the Bola Tinubu administration, which has cited the unsustainable nature of the decades-long payments, also punctured the claims by Alhaji Dangote that the Nigerian government has to hand over totally from subsidising petrol for its citizens
In 2022, Nigeria spent about $10 billion for the purpose.
The report published in 2023 indicated that Saudi Arabia spent almost $7,000 per person, equivalent to about 27 per cent of economic output, across both explicit and implicit energy subsidies, according to a paper published by the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
Fossil fuel subsidies soared globally since 2020 to $7 trillion last year as governments took measures to protect consumers and businesses from a spike in prices following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, according to the IMF paper.
It estimated that cutting fossil fuel subsidies could help reduce carbon dioxide emissions, deaths from air pollution, and boost government revenues.
“Fossil fuels in most countries are priced incorrectly,” Simon Black, Antung Liu, Ian Parry and Nate Vernon wrote in the IMF working paper. “Unfortunately, current prices are routinely set at levels that do not adequately reflect environmental damages and, in some cases, not even supply costs,” they added.
China-which spent $2.2 trillion – was the biggest provider of subsidies in absolute terms, followed by the US and Russia, according to the IMF. Saudi Arabia spent a total of $253 billion on subsidies last year, it added.
The IMF has been urging Saudi Arabia to push ahead with measures to cut the government subsidy bill and take steps to protect the welfare of low-income households through increased and targeted social spending. The spending has made Saudi fuel one of the cheapest in the world.
In 2021, the government set a cap for the domestic cost of gasoline to soften the impact of higher living costs on citizens, just months before prices soared to over $100 a barrel.
In its Article IV Consultation, the IMF said that the kingdom’s work on subsidy reforms is “continuing unabated through planned step price increases that will lead to their elimination by 2030.”
Implicit subsidies, which the IMF defined as undercharging for the environmental cost of fossil fuel burning and lost tax revenue, made up the bulk of the global total. Explicit subsidies, or selling fuels as below supply costs, had a share of just 18 per cent.
Continue Reading

Copyright © 2022. Biztellers, powered by Alphaxristi.