Connect with us

NEWS

Buhari budgets additional 2.557trn for petrol subsidy in 2022

Published

on

Buhari writes senate seeks confirmation of 7 ministerial nominees

 

Buhari budgets additional 2.557trn for petrol subsidy in 2022, asks senate to amend 2022 Appropriation Act

President Muhammadu Buhari has requested the senate for an additional provision for N2.557 trillion naira be appropriated by the National Assembly to fund the petrol subsidy in the 2022 Budget Framework which was revised to provide fully for PMS subsidy.

The Federal Government had soft-pedal on its initial plan to remove subsidy on petroleum products saying it was clear to even the blind and audible to the deaf that the situation of the country does not allow for that at the moment.

In seeking for a soft landing based on the outcry from Nigerians the minister of Petroleum Resources Timipre Sylva and his counterpart in the ministry of Finance Hajia Zainab Ahmad as well as the Group managing Director NNPC limited Mele Kyari met with the national assembly leadership to ammend the law to provide for an extension of subsidy provision beyond June 2022.

The President therefore requested the senate to amend the 2022 Appropriation Act passed by the National Assembly in December, 2021.

The request was contained in a letter dated February 10, 2022, and read during plenary by the Senate President, Ahmad Lawan.

Buhari in his request said it was imperative to remove all capital projects that were replicated in the 2022 Appropriation Act.

He disclosed that 139 out of the 254 projects in the budget totaling N13.24 billion had been identified for deletion.

Buhari, therefore, requested the National Assembly to amend the Appropriation Act to provide for Capital Expenditures in the sum of N106,161,499,052 billion naira; and N43,870,592,044 billion naira for Recurrent Expenditures.

Buhari underscored the need to reinstate four capital projects totaling N1.4 billion in the Executive proposal for the Federal Ministry of Water Resources; and N22.0 billion cut from the provision for the Sinking Fund to retire mature loans needed to meet government’s obligations under already Issued Bonds.

The full text of the letter entitled, “Submission of the 2022 Appropriation Amendment Proposal”, reads:

“As I indicated at the signing of the 2022 Appropriation Act, I forward herewith the Proposals for amendment of the 2022 Appropriation Act (as detailed in Schedules I-V), for the kind consideration and approval by the Senate.

“Let me seize this opportunity to once again express my deep gratitude to the leadership and members of the Senate for the expeditious consideration and passage of the 2022 Appropriation Bill as well as the enabling 2021 Finance Bill.

“It has become necessary to present this amendment proposal considering the impacts of the recent suspension of the Petroleum Motor Spirit (PMS) subsidy removal and the adverse implications that some changes made by the National

Assembly in the 2022 Appropriation Act could have for the successful implementation of the budget.

“It is important to restore the provisions made for various key capital projects in the 2022 Executive Proposal (see details in Schedule l) that were cut by the National Assembly.  This is to ensure that critical ongoing projects that are cardinal to this administration, and those nearing completion, do not suffer a setback due to reduced funding.

“It is equally important to reinstate the N25.81 billion cut from the provision for the Power Sector Reform Programme in order to meet the Federal Government’s commitment under the financing plan agreed with the World Bank.

“In addition, it is necessary to reinstate the four (4) capital projects totaling N1.42 billion in the Executive Proposal for the Federal Ministry of Water Resources that were removed in the 2022 Appropriation Act.

“Furthermore, there is critical and urgent need to restore the N3 billion cut from the provision made for payment of mostly long outstanding Local Contractors’ Debts and Other Liabilities as part of our strategy to reflate the economy and spur growth (see Schedule I).

“You will agree with me that the inclusion of National Assembly’s expenditures in the Executive Budget negates the principles of separation of Powers and financial autonomy of the Legislature. It is therefore necessary to transfer the National Assembly’s expenditures totaling N16.59 billion in the Service Wide Vote to National Assembly Statutory Transfer provision (see Schedule l).

“It is also imperative to reinstate the N22.0 billion cut from the provision for Sinking Fund to Retire Mature Loans to ensure that government can meet its obligations under already issued bonds as and when they mature.

“The cuts made from provisions for the recurrent spending of Nigeria’s Foreign Missions, which are already constrained, are capable of causing serious embarrassment to the country as they mostly relate to office and residential rentals.

“Similarly, the reductions in provisions for allowances payable to personnel of the Nigerian Navy and Police Formations and Commands could create serious issues for government. It is therefore imperative that these provisions be restored as proposed (see Schedule II).

“It is also absolutely necessary to remove all capital project is that replicated in the 2022 Appropriation Act; 139 out of the 254 such projects totaling N13.24 billion have been identified to be deleted from the budget.

“Some significant and non-mandate projects were introduced in the budgets of the Ministry of Transportation, Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation and Office of the Head of Civil Service of the Federation (see Schedule III).

There are several other projects that have been included by the National Assembly in the budgets of agencies that are outside their mandate areas. The Ministry of Finance, Budget and National Planning has been directed to work with your relevant Committees to comprehensively identify and realign all such misplaced projects.

“It is also necessary to restore the titles / descriptions of 32 projects in the Appropriation Act to the titles contained in the Executive Proposal for the Ministry of Water Resources (see Schedule IV) in furtherance of our efforts to complete and put to use critical agenda projects.

“The Appropriation Amendment request is for a total sum of N106,161,499,052 (One hundred and six billion, one hundred and sixty-one million, four hundred and ninety-nine thousand, and fifty-two Naira only) for Capital Expenditures and N43,870,592,044 (Forty-three billion, eight hundred and seventy million, five hundred and ninety-two thousand, and forty-four Naira only) for Recurrent Expenditures.

I therefore request the National Assembly to make the above amendments without increasing the budget deficit. I urge you to roll back some of the N887.99 billion of projects earlier inserted in the budget by the National Assembly to accommodate these amendments.

“However, following the suspension of the PMS subsidy removal, the 2022 Budget Framework has been revised to fully provide for PMS subsidy (see Schedule V). An additional provision of N2.557 trillion will be required to fund the petrol subsidy in 2022. Consequently, the Federation ACCOunt (Main Pool) revenue for the three tiers of government is projected to decline by N2.00 trillion, while FGN’s share from the Account is projected to reduce by N1.05 trillion. Therefore, the amount available to fund the FGN Budget is projected to decline by N969.09 billion.

 

“Aggregate expenditure is projected to increase by N45.85 billion, due to additional domestic debt service provision of N102.5 billion net of the reductions in Statutory Transfers by N56.67 billion, as follows: NDDC, by N12.61 billion from N102.78 billion to N90.18 billion; NEDC, by N5.90 bilion from N48.08 billion to N42.18 billion; UBEC, by N19.08 billion from N112.29 billion to N93.21 billion; Basic Health Care Fund, byN 9.54 billion from N56.14 billion to N46.60 billion; and NASENI, by N9.54 billion from N56.14 billion to N46.60 billion.

 

“Total budget deficit is projected to increase by N1.01 trillion to N7.40 trillion, representing 4.01% of GDP. The incremental deficit will be financed by new borrowings from the domestic market.

 

“Equally, it is imperative that Clause 10 of the 2022 Appropriation Act which stipulates that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU) are authorized to charge and defray from all money standing in credit to the units as revenues, penalties or sanctions at 10% for technical setup and operational cost at the units in this financial year be repealed.

 

“This clause is in conflict with the Act establishing these Agencies, as well as some other laws and financial regulations of the government. These are neither Revenue Generating Agencies nor Regulatory Bodies that generate revenue or charge penalty fees. They are fully funded (Personnel, Overhead and Capital) by Government through Budgetary provisions.

 

“The Fiscal Responsibility Act 2007, as well as the Finance Act 2021, require these Agencies to remit fully any recovered funds to the Consolidated Revenue Fund (CRF). This clause may lay a dangerous precedence, and spark clamours for similar treatment by other anti-corruption agencies.

 

“Also, the Clause 11 which stipulates that “Notwithstanding the provisions of any other law in force, Nigerian Embassies and Missions are authorised to expend funds allocated to them under the Capital components without having to seek approval of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs” should likewise be repealed. It too is inconsistent with extant Financial Regulations and the Public Procurement Act, which set thresholds for approving officers and Parastatal / Ministerial Tenders Boards for awards of Contracts for the procurement of goods and Services. This also amounts to an intrusion of the Legislature into what is an executive function.

 

“Given the urgency of the request for amendments, I I seek the cooperation of the National Assembly for expeditious legislative action on the 2022 Appropriation Amendment Proposal in order to sustain the gains of an early passage of the budget.

“Please accept, Distinguished Senate President, the assurances of my highest consideration.”

NEWS

Alcohol Encourages Banditry, Destroys The Future Of Our Children — NAFDAC

Published

on

The National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) has warned that indiscriminate alcohol consumption poses a serious threat to Nigerians, linking alcohol use to banditry and warning of its damaging effects on the body.

NAFDAC Director-General, Prof. Mojisola Adeyeye, raised the alarm during an interview on Channels Television’s Sunrise Daily on Wednesday.

According to Adeyeye, alcohol can damage vital organs, including the brain, lungs, kidneys and liver, while also posing a threat to the future of Nigerian children and the country’s workforce.

SEE MORE: Yam, Fresh Fruits Not Under NAFDAC’s Control — DG Clarifies

The NAFDAC boss was speaking in defence of the agency’s enforcement of the ban on alcoholic drinks sold in sachets and PET bottles of less than 200 millilitres.

She explained that sachet alcohol was approved about three decades ago but eventually became difficult to control.

“But this monster became uncontrollable. This monster stood out to destroy the future of our workforce, of our children.”

Adeyeye said NAFDAC had taken decisive action to curb the production and distribution of such products, including shutting down three major companies for three weeks and taking enforcement action against individuals involved.

She acknowledged that the ban had faced resistance from some stakeholders, noting that some people demonstrated against the policy in Ibadan.

However, she maintained that the agency’s priority was to protect public health and prevent the long-term consequences of alcohol abuse.

The NAFDAC DG said the National Alcohol Policy launched by the Ministry of Health also includes a ban on sachet alcohol and alcohol sold in PET bottles below 200ml.

She said some Nigerians were focused on the immediate economic impact of the restrictions without considering the long-term consequences.

“They were demonstrating because they are seeing the situation now; they are not seeing into the future that alcohol destroys the brain, it destroys the lungs, it destroys the kidneys, the liver; it encourages banditry,” Adeyeye said.

She added that manufacturers had been required to sign undertakings not to produce alcoholic drinks in sachets or small bottles below the approved threshold.

Adeyeye maintained that although the measures had generated pushback, the agency would continue enforcing the restrictions in what she described as an effort to safeguard the health and future of Nigerians.

Continue Reading

NEWS

Yam, Fresh Fruits Not Under NAFDAC’s Control — DG Clarifies

Published

on

NAFDAC Goes Tough on Micro Packaging of Alcohol

The National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) has clarified that fresh farm produce such as yam, oranges and apples are not under the agency’s direct regulatory control.

NAFDAC Director-General, Prof. Mojisola Adeyeye, explained that the agency regulates processed and semi-processed products, while naturally grown agricultural produce falls under the control of the Ministry of Agriculture.

Adeyeye made the clarification during an interview on Channels Television’s Sunrise Daily on Wednesday.

SEE MORE: How to Spot Fake Colgate Toothpaste as NAFDAC Issues Fresh Warning

“In terms of sister agencies, the civil service is amazing; people like to work in silos. ‘This is my turf, don’t go there.’ No, we are supposed to work corporately.

“For example, the National Food and Safety Policy said that produce from the farm is not under the control of NAFDAC. NAFDAC is in control of semi-processed products,” the NAFDAC DG stated.

She further explained that fresh agricultural products such as apples and oranges are not within NAFDAC’s direct mandate at the farm-produce stage.

“So, in the social media thing that we responded to, they said apples, NAFDAC; oranges, NAFDAC. No, that is under the Ministry of Agriculture, but we are supposed to work together because it is that produce that can be processed, which is under our control.”

Adeyeye, a professor, added: “So, when you take your oranges in the morning, you take your apple, that is not NAFDAC, but everything is about NAFDAC — yam is NAFDAC; fufu is NAFDAC. No.”

The clarification comes amid growing concerns over food safety in Nigeria, particularly allegations surrounding the use of potentially harmful chemicals in the production, preservation and processing of food items.

The NAFDAC DG’s comments also came days after former Vice President Yemi Osinbajo recalled in a viral video how laboratory testing reportedly showed that fresh juice squeezed from oranges by his wife was unsafe for consumption.

While speaking at an Open Day for Gardeners’ seminar themed “Leaving The Earth Better Than We Found It,” Osinbajo reportedly recounted that his wife began experiencing strange headaches after drinking her fresh orange juice every day.

 

Continue Reading

NEWS

Benue Blockade: Why Obi Was Stopped — State Govt Breaks Silence

Published

on

The Benue State Government has denied any involvement in the reported blockade of the presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), Peter Obi, during his visit to the state.

The Commissioner for Information and Culture, Solomon Lorpev, said the government was not officially informed about Obi’s visit and described the failure to notify the state authorities as a breach of protocol.

Speaking on Channels Television’s The Morning Brief on Wednesday, Lorpev rejected claims that Governor Hyacinth Alia or his administration sent people to prevent Obi from travelling within the state.

SEE MORE: FG Aims to Finish Olobiri Museum in 2028

According to the commissioner, the government only became aware of the incident after reports emerged that Obi’s convoy had been stopped along the Makurdi-Gboko federal highway.

Lorpev argued that Obi, being a former governor and presidential candidate, should have informed the state government of his arrival because of the security implications surrounding his movement.

He said the police could not be regarded as acting on behalf of the governor simply because Obi’s party had informed the police of his planned visit.

The commissioner also challenged individuals alleging that government appointees were behind the blockade to provide evidence.

He maintained that the state government was investigating the incident and would issue a statement once the facts were established.

The controversy followed Obi’s arrival in Makurdi on Tuesday for a planned visit to Yelewata, where he intended to sympathise with families affected by the deadly June 2025 attacks.

Obi arrived at the Tactical Air Command airport in Makurdi at about 9 a.m. and was received by NDC governorship candidate Terhemba Shija and other party officials.

However, his convoy reportedly encountered a roadblock mounted by youths along the Makurdi-Gboko federal highway shortly after leaving the airport.

The blockade reportedly caused traffic congestion after the road was closed to motorists.

Reacting to the incident, Obi described the development as “very worrisome” and condemned the use of youths to perpetrate political violence.

He said he had travelled to Yelewata to console victims and show solidarity with families affected by the killings.

The incident has since triggered renewed debate over political freedom, security arrangements and the responsibilities of state authorities during visits by prominent political figures.

While the Benue Government continues to deny responsibility for the blockade, it says its investigation will establish the circumstances surrounding the incident and determine whether any government officials were involved.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2022. Biztellers, powered by Alphaxristi.