Connect with us

Energy

FG, Independent Marketers, Labour At Daggers Drawn Over Fuel Price

Published

on

Palpable fear of mass tumult against the Nigerian Government owing to harsh economic realities might have forced the hand of the authorities in making public statements that there would be no further increase in the pump price of Premium Motor Spirit, popularly called petrol.

But this has not gone down well with the independent marketers, who insist that given the current market realties, there would be costs that the government has to take up or would be passed to the people.

In plain language, the marketers are insisting that either subsidy is reinstated or market forces would continue to determine the prices of products.

Biztellers served you a report that the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL) made it clear that it was not considering an upward adjustment in the pump price of petrol.

The state oil company, took its verified X (initially Twitter) handle, @nnpclimited late Monday to make the assertion.

The tweet, seen in several quarters as a move to douse tensions, was addressed to customers.

It reads, “Dear esteemed customers, we at NNPC Retail value your patronage, and we do not have the intention to increase our PMS pump prices as widely speculated.

“Please buy the best quality products at the most affordable prices at our NNPC Retail Stations nationwide.”

Being sensitive to the fact that he had been sitting on a keg of gunpowder, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu followed up on the tweet by NNPCL with his own tweet, assuring that there would be no hike in the pump prices.

On Tuesday, President Tinubu in an attempt at reassuring the populace, declared that there would not increase in the pump price of petrol.

President Tinubu at his verified official X handle, @NGRPresident tweeted, “Mr President and the industry stakeholders who have been widely consulted and convinced, based on information before them, that we can maintain current pricing without reversing our deregulation policy by swiftly cleaning up existing inefficiencies within the midstream and downstream Petroleum sector.

“This is why there is no increase in prices at this time”.

The statement, which was per say, issued under the seal of President Tinubu under the subject, “On the Purported Pending Increase in Fuel Prices” was signed by Official Spokesperson to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, Ajuri Ngelale.

Many informed Nigerians have been reacting to the posturing from government quarters – the NNPCL and the Presidency, in a way that has made it begin to sound like a grandstanding by the authorities.

For instance, the statement from President Tinubu had spoken about consulting and convincing stakeholders with available information.

It also pointed to ‘cleanup’ of certain areas of the midstream and downstream sector without letting the world know what was required, who would be responsible and how long it would take.

The first salvo against the attempt to pool the wool over the people’s eyes was from fiery Nigerian journalist, Rufai Oseni, who asked for details of what it cost to get petrol to the pump for dispensing to consumers.

He took to his verified X handle, @ruffydfire to call attention to the fact that information being bandied in the public might have been inadequate.

He tweeted, “Dear NNPC, kindly let us know how you calculate petrol prices in Nigeria, stating inspection cost, Landing from Amsterdam or Rotterdam to Togo or to Nigeria, then state other cost components that make up the final price, factor in fx fluctuations.

“Thank you”.

Another sensitive aspect is that those in power want the world to believe that the market has been deregulated and will remain so but the reality on ground speaks differently.

Fuel queues are already beginning to show in certain parts of Nigeria, including Lagos and Abuja, while price hike is manifest with independent marketers having adjusted pump prices in different locations in tune with realities.

The base pump price of petrol has shifted from N612/litre to N670/litre. It was gathered that that the minimum price applied to NNPCL Retail outlets and some other filling stations, while others determined what prices to sell at.

Expectations are rife that this adjustment would see petrol being sold at above N800/litre at filling stations across Nigeria in locations outside Lagos and Abuja.

It had been hovering around N750/lite in those locations before this recent impact of foreign exchange and Brent price at the global market.

As that is playing out, Ngelale shared a graphic presentation of pump prices of petrol across West Africa, depicting Nigeria as the lowest.

Interestingly the second and more important salvo had come from the stakeholders that President Tinubu’s statement claimed were consulted and convinced.

The Independent Oil Marketers have taken the position that only a return to the subsidy regime would see the current price maintained.

Secretary, Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria, Abuja-Suleja, Mohammed Shuaibu, on Tuesday, opined that government should reconsider reversing itself because the subsidy removal has come with adverse economic impact.

He said, “Let them not do the needful. (Else, there) will see the consequences. We learned this morning that Kenya, which equally removed subsidy and noticed that its effect was so hard on the citizens, has again resumed the subsidy regime for the period of two months,”

He added, “Government is about the people and must have a listening ear. For Nigeria, how can we be an oil producing nation with four refineries and all of them are down?

“When he (President Tinubu) announced it (subsidy removal), we said it was going to bring problems. Are we not feeling the consequences of that announcement now? It is forex that largely determines the cost of petroleum products here.

“Marketers are not willing to import products again. So, if the government is going to relax the removal of subsidy for a while, it should better do that as a matter of urgency.”

While the government quarters and the relevant stakeholders are engaged in what now appears to be mind games and structured perception management messaging, Oseni on Tuesday shared what he considered the presenting landing cost of petrol in Nigeria.

He tweeted, “A breakdown of the landing cost of petrol showed that while product cost, as of yesterday (Monday August 14, 2023), was N627.82 per litre, finance cost was N11.61, and operations/administrative cost, N12.32, bringing the total landing cost to N651.75 per litre”.

As things stand, it appears that the reality confronting Nigerians is sterner economic hardship which would follow additional increases in the pump prices of petrol.

Alternatively, the government would have to swallow her pride and go back to subsidy.

Analysts are of the opinion that all outlets serving petrol below the calculated landing cost must have an avenue to recoup the outlay, which signals the obituary of the subsidy removal policy of the President Tinubu administration.

Given that organised labour, through the Nigerian Labour Congress (NLC) had placed relevant stakeholders on notice of immediate industrial action any time pump price of petrol is increased, it portends that a lot of wisdom would be required to avert crises in the present circumstances.

2 Comments
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
รับจด อย ด่วน

995814 663275You produced some decent points there. I looked on the web for that problem and discovered most people is going together with with the internet internet site. 784445

Diyyyyala yarmok
10 months ago

855527 29463Exceptional weblog here! Also your web site loads up quite fast! What host are you employing? Can I get your affiliate link to your host? I wish my web site loaded up as rapidly as yours lol xrumer 758163

Energy

Middle East Push, G7’s Strategic Reserve Release Arrest Oil Prices

Published

on

Oil prices on Monday went south, after crude exports from the Middle East rose above pre-war levels, while the Group of Seven nations pledged to release 100 million barrels of crude and diesel from emergency reserves.

Brent crude futures fell by $1.20, or 1.17 percent, to $101.05 a barrel, while West Texas Intermediate crude declined by $1.16, or 1.27 percent, to $89.95 per barrel, according to Reuters.

Middle Eastern crude exports exceeded pre-war levels on four of the seven days in the final week of September, shipping data showed, despite attacks on vessels passing through the strategic Strait of Hormuz.

The increase in exports, combined with the G7’s planned release of emergency stocks, helped put downward pressure on crude prices.

The G7 countries agreed on Friday to release 100 million barrels of diesel and crude from emergency reserves and pledged to refrain from energy export restrictions following pressure from United States President Donald Trump.

READ ALSO: Ndindi Nyoro Gives Ruto 14 Days to Disclose Dangote Refinery Deal

However, the scale of the additional supply remained uncertain.

IEA Executive Director, Fatih Birol, said last week that member countries had already released about two-thirds of the 400-million-barrel volume.

Meanwhile, supply concerns remained elevated as fighting continued across parts of the Middle East.

Saudi Aramco Chief Executive Officer, Amin Nasser, also warned that crude oil and refined fuel supplies were expected to remain stretched.

He said rebuilding global stockpiles after emergency withdrawals could take two years.

The United States Strategic Petroleum Reserve fell to 283 million barrels last week, its lowest level since October 1982, according to data from the US Department of Energy.

The supply outlook was further complicated by the continuing conflict involving Saudi Arabia and Iran-backed Houthi forces in Yemen.

Yemeni government forces attacked Houthi positions in the Dhubab district overlooking the Bab el-Mandeb Strait on Monday, according to two military sources.

The development came a day after the internationally recognised government launched a campaign to retake Houthi-held territory.

Meanwhile, OPEC+ postponed a review that would determine its 2027 oil output quotas after the war involving Iran disrupted projects aimed at expanding production capacity across the Middle East.

Continue Reading

Energy

Global Oil Market Gets Breather from G7 Oil Release

Published

on

The Group of Seven (G7) has resolved to release up to 100 million barrels of crude oil and petroleum products from strategic stocks.

An analyst at Argus Media, Sarah Raffoul, has expressed the view that this might mount pressure on European diesel prices in the short term.

Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States, constitute the G7, though the European Union (EU) also participates in the group’s meetings.

READ ALSO: Petrol Tanker Fire Ravages Houses, Vehicles in Calabar

The G7 concerns itself with major global economic, energy, security and international issues.

According to Raffoul, the coordinated release, which includes a front-loaded diesel release, is likely to ease immediate supply concerns and weaken risk premiums as additional barrels become available during the early part of the winter season.

“The measure is likely to reduce prompt market tightness and weaken risk premiums as additional barrels become available during the early part of the winter season, although the final breakdown between crude and products has yet to be disclosed,” she said.

Raffoul added that the impact is expected to be felt mostly in October and November, when most of the released volumes are likely to reach the market.

She said the announcement also reduces concerns over export restrictions and includes commitments to maximise refinery utilisation, further improving confidence in near-term diesel availability.

However, Raffoul said the release does not fundamentally change the broader supply outlook because the additional barrels are being drawn from existing inventories rather than new production.

“The additional barrels are being drawn from existing inventories rather than new production, meaning the measure provides temporary relief rather than a lasting increase in supply,” she said.

She noted that several factors continue to support diesel fundamentals, including unplanned refinery outages in Asia, uncertainty surrounding Chinese export volumes and continued restrictions on Russian diesel exports.

“Europe also remains reliant on imports to balance its diesel market, leaving it exposed to disruptions in global trade flows,” Raffoul said.

She said the stock release is likely to cap further price increases and ease immediate supply concerns, but is unlikely to eliminate them entirely.

“OECD European diesel inventories remain relatively low by historical standards, while strengthening jet fuel markets have pushed the European jet-diesel regrade back into positive territory,” she said.

Raffoul added that the development suggests diesel values may need to strengthen relative to current levels to restore the normal relationship between the two products.

She said stronger refinery runs, Chinese export policy and sustained stock releases could leave the market more comfortably supplied than currently expected.

“On the other hand, further refinery disruptions, weaker exports, stronger winter demand or delays to inventory rebuilding could allow tightness to deepen once the effect of the stock release begins to fade,” she said.

Raffoul said the announcement points to softer European diesel prices in the near term, but noted that underlying fundamentals suggest any weakness is more likely to reflect a reduction in supply risk than a meaningful loosening of market balances.

Continue Reading

Energy

Nigeria-US Mineral Pact Better Structured Than Oil JVs With IOCs – Obiaraeri

Published

on

Investment banker, development economist and former Imo State deputy governorship candidate, Dr. Nnaemeka Onyeka Obiaraeri, has described the 2026 Nigeria-US Solid Mineral Framework Agreement as structurally superior to Nigeria’s post-independence oil and gas joint-venture arrangements with international oil companies (IOCs).

Obiaraeri made the assertion in a post on X on Friday while comparing the newly signed minerals framework with Nigeria’s longstanding arrangements in the oil and gas sector.

According to him, the minerals agreement is different because of its emphasis on local value addition and processing.

SEE ALSO: Dangote Blames Marketers, IOCs for Lamu Refinery Protests

“The 2026 US-Nigeria Solid Mineral Framework Agreement is structurally superior to Nigeria’s post-independence Oil and Gas arrangements with International Oil Companies (IOCs),” Obiaraeri stated.

He argued that while oil joint ventures have primarily involved the extraction and export of crude oil, with limited domestic refining capacity historically, the new mining framework seeks to ensure that Nigeria does not remain merely a source of raw materials.

“The JV contract with the IOCs primarily involves the extraction and export of raw crude oil with minimal local refining capacity, whereas the new mining pact explicitly attempts to prevent Nigeria from remaining a mere source of raw materials,” he said.

Obiaraeri also said the framework comes with protection for the lives and participation rights of host communities.

He linked the issue to insecurity and illegal mining, alleging that indigenous communities have suffered deaths and hardship as a result of activities involving bandits and illegal mining networks.

“The Solid Mineral MOU also comes with protection of lives and participation rights of the host communities,” he said.

Recall that Nigeria and the United States signed a mineral investment framework in New York on September 24, 2026, aimed at attracting American investment into Nigeria’s estimated $700 billion mineral resources.

The agreement was signed by Minister of Solid Minerals Development, Dele Alake, and US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau at Nigeria’s Mission House in New York.

The framework provides for cooperation in areas including geological data and exploration, mineral development and processing, infrastructure and technical capacity.

The Federal Government said the agreement is intended to promote a value-addition-driven mineral value chain and create greater opportunities for Nigerian businesses.

Nigeria’s oil and gas sector, meanwhile, has historically operated under several contractual arrangements involving the government and foreign oil companies, including joint ventures and production-sharing contracts.

Under the joint-venture model, NNPC Limited and IOC partners participate jointly in the development of petroleum assets according to their respective interests and the terms of the applicable agreements.

NNPC Limited, for instance, operates a joint venture with Chevron Nigeria Limited, with Chevron holding a 40 per cent interest and NNPC Limited holding the remaining 60 per cent in the relevant assets.

The partnership covers exploration and development activities in the Niger Delta.

Nigeria also uses production-sharing contracts for some petroleum developments, particularly in deepwater projects.

In August 2026, President Bola Tinubu approved a new deep-offshore investment framework intended to unlock up to $50 billion in investment, with NNPC Limited acting as the government’s nominated counterparty under the applicable production-sharing contracts.

Against this background, Obiaraeri said the new minerals framework provides an opportunity for Nigeria to adopt a different approach to its natural resources.

He argued that, rather than simply extracting and exporting resources, Nigeria should ensure that more processing, industrial activity and economic value remain within the country.

“I remain Nnaemeka Onyeka Obiaraeri,” he said, adding that he speaks “truth to power” and seeks to proffer solutions to national and subnational challenges.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2022. Biztellers, powered by Alphaxristi.

2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x