Connect with us

International News

How 61-Year-Old Doctor Lost American Citizenship Gained By Birth

Published

on

 

Medical practitioner, son of an Iranian Diplomat, Siavash Sobhani has been informed by that his American citizenship by birth was not duly acquired.

The respected medic who has lived in North Virginia most of his life was stripped of his American citizenship when he filed an application for the renewal of his passport.

The US State Department in February, formally informed Sobhani that he ought not to have been awarded a citizenship at birth.

He was informed via a letter that children born in the US to parents enjoying diplomatic immunity do not automatically become citizens of the US.

The letter added that Sobhani enjoyed diplomatic immunity from the jurisdiction of the US at the time of his birth and so he did not acquire citizenship.

His father was a diplomat at the Iranian Embassy when he arrived the world in the US.

He was already over 61 years old, been married and well settled in the US when this stark reality began to stare him in the face.

Incidentally, this would be his first experience with this problem in his more than thirty years of practicing medicine.

Each time he need to renew his passport all his life, the US State Department had always verified that he was an American citizen.

The doctor, who has already turned 62, was already contemplating retirement, having practiced medicine for over 30 years.

It was gathered that Sobhani and his spouse had planned to travel the world for a year in search of a neighbourhood where they could purchase a house.

With this sudden turn of events, he must now apply for lawful permanent residence and comply with the State Department’s guidelines before he could travel outside the US.

Speaking with The Washington Post, Sobhani lamented that he had incurred over USD 40,000 in legal expenses, which offers no guarantee that the matter could be resolved in his favour.

He said, “I’m waiting for an interview, but does that mean I wait another year for an interview? Then another three years for the next step? Then another 10 years before I can travel outside of the country?”

His earnest desire is underlined by the fact that he’d sought intervention in political circles. Sobhani had petitioned the senator from Virginia and his congressional representative, for their intervention.

Another twist to the fate of Sobhani is that his public stance against the Iranian regime has made it precarious for him to return to or live there.

Click to comment
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

International News

Why UK Is Moving to Restrict Children’s Access to Social Media

Published

on

The United Kingdom is considering sweeping new restrictions that could limit or completely block children under the age of 16 from accessing social media platforms, as part of a broader push to improve online safety and reduce excessive screen time among young users.

The proposal, currently under government consultation, is being led by Prime Minister Keir Starmer and focuses on addressing concerns over how teenagers interact with platforms such as Instagram and TikTok.

ALSO READ: UK Says ‘No Entry’ to Kanye West Ahead of Big Comeback Show

Officials say the move is driven by growing evidence and public concern that algorithm-driven feeds and “endless scrolling” features may be negatively affecting children’s sleep patterns, concentration levels, and overall well-being.

The government is also reviewing whether additional measures such as app curfews and time limits should be introduced.

Technology Secretary Liz Kendall said the consultation has already attracted widespread public input, with tens of thousands of responses from parents, teenagers, and advocacy groups.

She noted that the government is particularly interested in feedback on addictive platform design features and the use of AI tools targeting younger users.

The UK is also studying policies already implemented in other countries. Australia has introduced stricter age-based restrictions, while Greece and Indonesia have also moved toward tighter regulation of children’s access to social media.

Authorities emphasize that no final decision has been made, but the consultation process is expected to shape future legislation on how tech companies operate and how young users are protected online in the digital age.

Continue Reading

International News

You Won’t Believe What Trump Said About Pope Leo

Published

on

U.S. President Donald Trump has sparked global reactions following his remarks about Pope Leo XIV after the Pope’s recent anti-war message calling for peace in conflict-hit regions.

The controversy began after Pope Leo XIV delivered a strong appeal at the Vatican, urging world leaders to end ongoing wars and prioritise dialogue over violenceviolence.

ALSO READ: Melania Trump to Preside Over UN Council as Middle East Burns

The pontiff warned against the “idolatry of power” and called for global cooperation to restore peace.

Reacting to the message, Trump told reporters he is “not a big fan” of Pope Leo XIV, describing him as “very liberal” and questioning his views on crime and international security.

The U.S. President further criticised the Pope’s stance on global conflicts, suggesting his message overlooks serious security challenges linked to rising geopolitical tensions, including nuclear concerns.

In a follow-up post on Truth Social, Trump intensified his criticism, accusing the Pope of taking a weak position on foreign policy matters and suggesting political factors influenced his leadership position.

The comments have since triggered widespread debate across political and religious circles, adding to ongoing tensions between Washington and the Vatican over issues such as immigration policy, military action, and global diplomacy.

While both sides have previously denied any formal rift, the latest exchange has renewed global attention on their differing positions regarding war and peace efforts.

Continue Reading

International News

Israel Says Slain Al Jazeera Journalist Was Hamas Operative

Published

on

The Israeli military said on Thursday that Mohammed Wishah, an Al Jazeera journalist killed in a strike in Gaza on Wednesday, was a Hamas operative “operating under the guise of a journalist.”

According to Israeli forces, Wishah was “a key terrorist in Hamas’ rocket and weapons production headquarters” and had been planning attacks against soldiers in the area.

The military said he used his journalist identity to advance Hamas’ operations against Israel.

ALSO SEE: Israel Kills Iran Intel Chief, Tehran Threatens Retaliation

Al Jazeera, the Qatar-based broadcaster, strongly condemned the killing. In a statement, the network described the attack as a “heinous crime of targeting and killing” its correspondent and insisted the strike was deliberate, not accidental.

The channel vowed to pursue “all necessary legal action to prosecute those responsible for the killing of its correspondents and staff in Gaza.”

Media rights organization Reporters Without Borders also condemned the incident, stating that Wishah’s name now joins “more than 220 journalists killed in two and a half years by Israeli forces in Gaza, at least 70 of whom were killed while performing their duties.”

The killing occurred despite a US-backed ceasefire in Gaza that has been in effect since October 2025, highlighting ongoing tensions and frequent accusations of truce violations by both Israel and Hamas.

Al Jazeera listed Wishah among 11 of its journalists killed in Gaza since the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on southern Israel that triggered the Gaza war.

Past incidents include the killing of Mohammad Salama in August 2025 and the deaths of four Al Jazeera staff and two freelancers outside Al-Shifa hospital in Gaza City earlier that year, prompting widespread condemnation.

 

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2022. Biztellers, powered by Alphaxristi.

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x