Energy
NCDMB Probes John Crane Over Alleged Contract Breach Against Cona Engineering
Following an appeal for intervention from an indigenous company, Cona Engineering and Technical Services, the Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring Board (NCDMB) would be investigating a United Arab Emirates (UAE) company, John Crane Middle East FZE.
It was gathered that the investigation is to ascertain claims of Nigeria’s Cona Engineering that John Crane had serially breached its contractual obligations in clear affront against the local content law of Nigeria.
According to media reports, documents sighted include a complaint letter from Cona Engineering to NCDMB dated 24 June 2024 in which it alleged that the UAE firm was in breach of Nigeria local content law when it unilaterally terminated extant contract between it and Cona, a contract that represents the local content component of John Crane’s business transactions in Nigeria.
In its response to the complaint, the NCDMB through an acknowledgement letter dated 17th October 2024 and signed by its Executive Secretary, Felix Omatsola Ogbe, said the “Board has commenced investigations into the issues raised in your complaint. You will be duly informed of the outcome as soon as the investigations are completed.”
ALSO READ: NNPC Ltd Declares ₦5.4 Trillion PAT
When contacted, the Founder of Cona Engineering, Cyril Amako, said the initial agreement between his company and John Crane was executed in 1996, adding: “I never suspected that John Crane would breach the contract, primarily because John Crane is a multinational company with their head office in the United States. Moreover, John Crane is a member of the Smiths Group which is a highly reputable establishment. However, we became uncomfortable and suspicious when they coerced us to start dealing with their office in Dubai instead of South Africa which we had related with for several years.”
He added, “In the agreement, the Smiths Group emphasized on their respect for the laws of any country where they operate which includes the laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Violation of our contractual agreement started as far back as year 2010 when they started boycotting us and supplied directly to NLNG, NAFCON (now Notore), Eleme Petrochemical company (now Indorama) etc. We reminded them several times in writing about the local content laws of Nigeria but they ignored us.
“In one of the meetings we had with them and with NLNG in attendance, NLNG emphasized to them that they will not accept any direct dealings with John Crane because of the local content laws of Nigeria.”
According to him, he expects the Nigerian government to protect Cona Engineering as a fully indigenous company which ought to be protected by the laws of the country, adding that the matter was officially reported to the NCDMB since year 2024 and that they are still awaiting their response.
He explained that before they resorted to seeking legal redress, they wrote John Crane for account reconciliation but they declined.
“We also engaged the services of a multinational auditing firm, KPMG to reconcile the account between Cona and John Crane. Consequently, KPMG wrote John Crane formally informing them of our retaining them for account reconciliation. Again, John Crane declined and never responded. At this point, Cona had no other option than to approach the court for remedies.
“KPMG contacted them and solicited their cooperation but John Crane declined. The $10million we demanded for in our suit against them is captured from our records of transactions with them for almost three decades including money Cona lost due to their direct supplies to our Nigerian clients,” he highlighted.
He continued: “We feel exploited and used by John Crane to firmly establish, entrench, consolidate, and propagate their long-term business interest in Nigeria. Curiously, the company they chose to replace us with as their Nigerian agent is registered as a local Nigerian company that has majority shareholding by Nigerian-Lebanese nationals.
“It is equally important to note that the Managing Director of John Crane Dubai as at the date of our agreement termination is a Lebanese national as well,” he said.
Energy
N4bn Compensation Dispute Threatens Ikot Abasi Power Project
Nearly 20 years after the Federal Government awarded the contract for the 330kV Ikot Abasi Transmission Line, the Niger Delta Power Holding Company Limited (NDPHC) has turned to the Akwa Ibom State Government to break a N4 billion compensation deadlock threatening the completion of the strategic power project.
The transmission project, awarded in 2006 under the National Integrated Power Projects (NIPP), has remained stalled primarily over unresolved community and wayleave compensation issues.
But, to ensure the completion of the project, NDPHC Managing Director/Chief Executive Officer, Jennifer Adighije, is now seeking the intervention of Akwa Ibom State Governor, Pastor Umo Eno, to clear the outstanding issues and enable the contractor, Anit Energy, to return to site.
Adighije made the appeal during a courtesy visit to the Governor in Uyo, Akwa Ibom State.
READ ALSO: Organised Labour Supports Workers’ Demand for N500 PMS Price, N500,000 Minimum Wage
She disclosed that the latest valuation of the outstanding wayleave obligations was slightly below N4 billion.
The NDPHC boss said the prolonged delay was particularly concerning because the contractor had reportedly completed about 90 per cent of the engineering, procurement and construction procurement for the project.
She added that substantial project materials, including conductors and tower members worth millions of dollars, had already been deployed along the project corridor between Adiasim and Ikot Ekpene, but were still lying across communities as the impasse persists.
“We are therefore pleading for your kind intervention as a shareholder and board member of the company,” Adighije told the governor.
According to her, resolving the outstanding community issues would allow the contractor to remobilise to site and bring the long-delayed project to completion.
NDPHC is now targeting May 29, 2027, for commissioning of the transmission line, subject to the successful resolution of the outstanding compensation and community challenges.
Adighije said NDPHC was keen to support the state’s development ambitions through its role as a major interventionist agency in Nigeria’s electricity sector.
“We want to be part of your ARISE Agenda,” she said, referring to the governor’s development programme.
She also welcomed the establishment of the Akwa Ibom State Electricity Regulatory Commission, saying NDPHC had commenced discussions with the commission on the development of appropriate electricity-market frameworks for the state.
According to her, officials of the commission had visited NDPHC and requested information on the company’s projects in Akwa Ibom, while a joint working group was being established to examine how the assets could be better utilised and electricity access extended to underserved communities.
Also speaking, NDPHC Executive Director, Strategy and Commercial, Mr. Patrick Obahiagbon, commended the Governor’s administration for its development initiatives across the state.
Responding, Governor Eno welcomed the NDPHC initiative and pledged to take the Ikot Abasi project before the State Executive Council for consideration. The governor said the state government would examine the outstanding issues and determine how it could intervene to facilitate the completion of the project.
Energy
Nigeria-Libya Gas Pipeline as FG Eyes New LNG Markets
There are indications that the Nigeria-Libya Gas Pipeline would go from the drawing board to reality, as it has emerged as a major option to help Nigeria break into new markets for her gas reserves.
The Minister of State for Petroleum Resources (Gas), Ekperikpe Ekpo, disclosed this at Gastech 2026 in Bangkok, Thailand, during a high-level engagement with global energy companies, investors and governments on expanding Nigeria’s gas production, infrastructure, domestic utilisation and export markets.
The renewed push for the Nigeria-Libya pipeline topped the agenda for the meeting between Ekpo and Libya’s Minister of Oil and Gas, Dr Khalifa Rajab Abdulsadek.
Under the proposed framework, Nigeria and Libya are expected to explore a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) and establish a joint technical team to assess the feasibility, financing, infrastructure requirements, security considerations and commercial viability of the project.
READ ALSO: ‘Obi Has Nowhere to Hide’ — APC Campaign Council Tackles Peter Obi Over Anambra Record
The NNPC Limited is expected to spearhead Nigeria’s participation in the bilateral initiative. If developed, the pipeline would provide another potential route for transporting Nigerian gas through North Africa to European markets, giving Nigeria an additional platform to monetise its gas resources beyond existing LNG channels.
According to Ekpo, the Federal Government was determined to create an investment environment capable of attracting the capital, technology and strategic partnerships required to convert the country’s gas reserves into economic growth, industrial development and jobs.
“Nigeria is open for business. We have put in place the right fiscal policies and operating environment, and the security of investors and their investments is guaranteed,” he said.
He revealed that the NNPC Limited would play a central role in translating Nigeria’s bilateral energy engagements into commercially viable projects, strategic investments and sustainable development.
The minister’s engagements also revealed plans by major industry players to significantly ramp up domestic gas production and infrastructure.
Energy
Gas Industry Must Commercialise Methane – NLNG
Gas producers must stop treating methane reduction as an environmental cost, because methane released into the atmosphere represents lost gas, lost revenue and lost energy that could otherwise be recovered and sold.
The Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of Nigeria LNG Limited (NLNG) Adeleye Falade, made the declaration during a panel titled “Capturing the Lost Opportunity: Driving Global Alignment on Methane Abatement Across Natural Gas Supply Chains,” at the Gastech 2026 Exhibition and Conference in Bangkok, Thailand.
READ ALSO: Spike in Petrol Price Moves NLC to Demands Emergency Palliatives
Taking from the company’s experience, he highlighted that investments in methane abatement could pay for themselves while improving plant efficiency and asset reliability.
The NLNG CEO said the commercial value of recovering lost gas should become a central part of the global industry’s approach to methane management.
“Every tonne emitted is lost product, lost revenue and lost energy; gas we could have sold. Every molecule of methane avoided is both an emissions reduction and a recovered energy resource.”
According to him, the NLNG’s new boil-off gas compressor and start-up gas recovery project demonstrate the business case for methane reduction, with each project expected to deliver methane reductions of about 10–15 percent while also recording positive projected net present values. “The most compelling business case is the simplest one: the projects that cut our methane also pay for themselves.
“The same discipline that reduces methane also improves asset reliability and plant efficiency. The returns show up in more places than the emissions ledger,” Falade said.
He added that the starting point for methane abatement was credible measurement of gas losses, which enables companies to identify where methane is being lost, channel investment towards the right interventions and independently verify the results.
According to Falade, the NLNG had demonstrated that producers in developing economies could meet globally recognised standards for emissions measurement and reporting, despite infrastructure and other constraints.
He disclosed that the NLNG had achieved Gold Standard recognition under the Oil and Gas Methane Partnership (OGMP) 2.0 and became the first company in Africa to attain Level 5 methane emissions reporting.
Its measurement, reporting and verification system is independently assured by DNV in line with ISO 14064.
The NLNG’s methane-management programme includes site-wide optical gas imaging, a structured Leak Detection and Repair programme, as well as phased deployment of continuous monitoring and real-time emissions dashboards across its plant and vessels.
Falade said methane reduction was also being incorporated into the design of Train 7, which is expected to raise the NLNG’s LNG production capacity from 22 million tonnes per annum to 30 million tonnes.
The commercial case for emissions abatement was not new to Nigeria, he added, pointing to the NLNG’s longstanding role in converting gas that would otherwise have been flared into a marketable product.
According to him, the company’s activities have contributed to reducing Nigeria’s gas-flaring rate from above 65 percent to below 20 percent.
Beyond its own operations, Falade revealed that the NLNG was extending methane-management requirements across its supply chain through its Scope 3 Advocacy Plan.
The company engages feed-gas suppliers and contractors to measure, disclose and reduce emissions, while verified upstream emissions data and emissions-related criteria are incorporated into supplier selection and evaluation.
Falade also called for greater consistency in methane measurement and reporting requirements across jurisdictions, arguing that divergent standards make enforcement uneven and complicate meaningful comparisons between producers.
“The industry does not need weaker standards; it needs stronger, shared ones backed by real measurement,” he said.
On the tension between emissions reduction, energy access and affordability, Falade said developing economies should not be forced to choose between economic development and climate action.
“Developing economies cannot be asked to choose between economic development and emissions reduction. Both must progress together,” he said.
Other panellists were Zubin Bamji of the World Bank, Niels Dijksman of Brunei LNG and Hiroyuki Mori of JOGMEC.
The session was moderated by energy economist Dr Carole Nakhle of Crystol Energy.





