International News
Putin May Seek Revenge On Wagner’s Employer- CIA Director
The director of the CIA, William Burns, has said Russian President Vladimir Putin is trying to buy time as he decides how to handle Yevgeny Prighozin.
The Wagner mercenary group’s leader, Mr. Prigozhin, was in charge of a rebellion that took place in Russia a month ago.
According to William Burns, that revolt showed serious flaws in the authority structure Putin had established.
He warned the Aspen Security Forum that the president of Russia might yet seek revenge on Mr. Prigozhin.
“What we are seeing is a very complicated dance,” the CIA chief said on Thursday.
Mr Prigozhin has moved around but had been in the Belarus capital of Minsk recently as well as Russia, he said when asked about a recent video apparently showing the Wagner boss in Belarus.
Mr Putin is likely to be trying to buy time as he works out how best to deal with the leader of the Wagner group, Mr Burns added.
That mercenary group still has value for Russia’s leadership in places like Africa, Libya and Syria and so it was likely that Mr Putin would try and separate the group from its leader.
“Putin is someone who generally thinks that revenge is a dish best served cold,” Mr Burns said. “In my experience, Putin is the ultimate apostle of payback so I would be surprised if Prigozhin escapes further retribution.”
Earlier this month, US President Joe Biden suggested there was a risk the Wagner boss could be poisoned.
“If I were he I’d be careful what I ate. I’d keep my eye on my menu,” the president quipped.
The CIA director echoed that line saying: “If I were Prigozhin, I wouldn’t fire my food taster.”
The intelligence agency did indeed have advanced knowledge of the mutiny, Mr Burns said, confirming previous reports.
A senior Russian army general, Sergei Surovikin, who was reported to have known about the Wagner mutiny in advance, also does not currently have “freedom of movement”, the CIA chief added.
William Burns confirmed the CIA had advanced knowledge of the mutiny
The mutiny was the most direct assault Mr Putin has seen in his 23 years in power, including by directly challenging the Kremlin’s justification for the war in Ukraine, with Mr Prigozhin saying it had been built on lies, Mr Burns said.
He added that what was most remarkable was that Russia’s leader felt compelled to do a deal with a man who used to be his caterer, the CIA chief said.
Mr Prigozhin is often referred to as “Putin’s chef” as he first came to prominence after providing catering services to Mr Putin and the military before founding the Wagner group.
Mr Putin has projected an image of himself as the arbiter of order in Russia, and so the 36 hours of the mutiny will have left many in the country with the question of “whether the emperor had no clothes or at least why is it taking him so long to get dressed”, Mr Burns said.
This would have resurrected deeper questions in the Russian elite about Mr Putin’s judgement, which have been there since his decision to launch a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
If Ukraine makes further advances on the battlefield then that could lead more Russians to pay attention to Mr Prigozhin’s critique of the war, he said.
It should not come as surprise that Ukraine’s counter-offensive was proving a “hard slog”, the CIA head said, given that offence was harder than defence and the Russians had months to prepare.
“It is going to take time and it is not going to be easy to make progress. I am however an optimist,” Mr Burns said.
In addition, he claimed that by bombing Black Sea commerce and attributing it on the Ukrainians, Russia may have been engaging in a false flag operation.
International News
How the Strait of Hormuz Attack Could Trigger a Fresh Global Oil Shock
A fresh report of an attack on a vessel in the Strait of Hormuz has intensified fears over global oil supplies, as escalating attacks across the Middle East threaten two of the region’s most important energy and shipping corridors.
The British navy-affiliated United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) said early Sunday, that it had received a report of a projectile striking a vessel as it travelled through the Strait of Hormuz.
The latest incident came just a day after Saudi Arabia temporarily shut down its vital East-West oil pipeline following a drone attack, adding another layer of uncertainty to global energy markets.
RELATED NEWS: JUST IN: Iran Blames ‘US Terrorist Enemy’ for Deadly Hormuz Ship Attack
The developments have raised concerns that continued attacks could further restrict oil shipments and push energy prices even higher after Brent crude surged back above $100 a barrel during the past week.
Saudi Arabia Shuts Vital Oil Pipeline
Biztellers report on Saturday that Saudi Arabia announced the temporary closure of its 1,200-kilometre (745-mile) East-West pipeline as a precaution after a drone attack.
Both Riyadh and Baghdad said the drones originated in Iraq, where Iranian-backed militias operate.
The pipeline has become a critical alternative route for Saudi oil exports because the Strait of Hormuz has been largely shut by the ongoing war.
It has been carrying between 4 million and 5 million barrels of oil per day, equivalent to around 4% to 5% of global oil supply.
The pipeline’s role has helped Saudi Arabia avoid some of the disruption that has hit other Gulf oil and gas exporters.
There was no immediate claim of responsibility for the pipeline attack.
Satellite images showed black smoke rising from an area of the pipeline south of Medina. Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Ministry said the attack caused some injuries and damage that was being assessed, but it did not provide details about the impact on oil exports.
U.S. President Donald Trump said on Saturday that Iran was probably responsible for the attack.
Houthi Attacks Add to Energy Supply Fears
The threat to energy infrastructure is also spreading across the Red Sea.
On Saturday, Saudi Civil Defence said a projectile fired by the Houthis injured two people in the Jazan region and damaged several buildings, including a mosque.
The developments came as the Houthis expanded their offensive along the Red Sea, creating an additional challenge for Washington and increasing concerns about the security of the region’s major energy and shipping routes.
Four Yemeni government sources told Reuters that the Houthis seized the strategic island of Perim on Friday, September 11, in the middle of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait — the “Gate of Tears” at the southern entrance to the Red Sea.
The Houthis have been attacking Saudi ships in the area since declaring a blockade in July and have also targeted other Saudi oil facilities.
Saudi Crown Prince Seeks U.S. Military Help
The widening attacks have also created a difficult decision for Washington over whether to directly support Saudi Arabia against the Houthis and risk expanding the war.
Saudi Arabia’s de facto ruler, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, called Trump on Thursday, September 10, and asked for U.S. military assistance in fighting the Houthis, according to three sources who spoke to Reuters.
The sources said the crown prince was told that Washington would not intervene directly for now but would provide intelligence support.
Trump confirmed on Saturday that he had spoken with the crown prince.
He also said the Houthis had contacted his administration and asked Washington not to become directly involved in the conflict.
Meanwhile, oil prices have climbed sharply during the past week, while the retail price of diesel in the United States surged above a record $6 per gallon.
Iran Plays Down Prospects of Oman Talks
The latest attacks came shortly before planned talks involving Iran and Gulf Arab states in Oman.
Iran’s Foreign Ministry announced on Friday, September 11, that Iran would attend a meeting with Gulf Arab states in Oman on Monday, September 14, where the future of the Strait of Hormuz would be discussed.
However, a senior Iranian official speaking to Reuters on Saturday played down expectations of a breakthrough.
The official said the meeting, which was initiated by Oman, would discuss issues including the Strait of Hormuz but was not expected to produce a signed agreement.
Iranian parliament national security committee chief Ebrahim Azizi also warned that Tehran would not consider negotiations useful unless Washington accepted Iran’s conditions.
“As long as the American side does not accept all of Iran’s conditions, dialogue and negotiation are of no use,” Azizi said in a post on X on Saturday.
A source cited by Iran’s Tasnim news agency said an agreement concerning routes through the Strait of Hormuz between Iran and Oman would be presented at Monday’s meeting.
However, the source said the strait would not reopen unless seven conditions conveyed by Iran to the United States were met, without elaborating on the conditions.
Iran wants its control of the Strait of Hormuz to be recognised, which would allow it to collect fees from ships using the waterway.
Washington rejects that demand.
Oman, which controls the opposite bank of the strait, says it is negotiating with the agreement of other regional states.
Before the war began, ships had free and open passage through the Strait of Hormuz.
Global Oil Market Faces Fresh Pressure
The latest vessel attack report, the death and injuries reported aboard an Iranian commercial vessel, Saudi Arabia’s pipeline shutdown and the expanding Houthi offensive have combined to raise concerns about further disruption to the global energy market.
The 1,200-kilometre East-West pipeline had provided an important alternative route for Saudi oil exports while the Strait of Hormuz was largely shut by the war.
With that pipeline now temporarily closed and shipping through the Strait facing renewed security threats, further disruption could place additional pressure on already-tight oil supplies.
For global consumers and oil-importing economies, the developments create the possibility of higher crude prices, increased fuel costs and broader economic pressure if the disruption continues.
International News
Iran Signals Nuclear Policy Shift, Says Quitting NPT Could ‘Put America in Its Place’
Iran has signalled that withdrawing from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and revising its nuclear doctrine are possible options, with a senior parliamentary spokesman describing both steps as “fully achievable.”
Abbas Goudarzi, spokesperson for the presidium of Iran’s parliament, made the remarks on Sunday, saying that only the “logic of power” works with the United States.
READ ALSO: JUST IN: Iran Blames ‘US Terrorist Enemy’ for Deadly Hormuz Ship Attack
According to Iran’s Fars news agency, Goudarzi said that leaving the NPT and reconsidering Iran’s nuclear doctrine would “put America and its followers in their place.”
He described withdrawal from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and a revision of Iran’s nuclear doctrine as “a completely achievable and readily attainable step.”
Goudarzi also warned against trusting the United States, saying that doing so amounts to accepting deception.
“Trusting the United States amounts to accepting deception,” he said.
His comments came after reports on Saturday that a group of Iranian lawmakers had signed a three-urgency plan seeking Iran’s withdrawal from the NPT.
International News
JUST IN: Iran Blames ‘US Terrorist Enemy’ for Deadly Hormuz Ship Attack
An Iranian commercial vessel was struck early Sunday off Qeshm Island near the Strait of Hormuz, killing one person and injuring three others, according to Iranian state-run media.
The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) separately reported that a vessel was hit by a projectile while transiting the Strait of Hormuz, but gave no further details about the incident.
READ ALSO: BRICS Breaks Silence on U.S.-Iran Strikes, Demands ‘Maximum Restraint’
There was no immediate comment from the U.S. military, which has previously carried out strikes against Iranian-flagged vessels as the blockade of Iranian ports continues.
Following the strike, Iranian state broadcaster IRIB, citing Qeshm Governor Amir Teymouri, described the incident as an attack by the “US terrorist enemy.”
The latest incident comes amid escalating tensions around the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial international waterway that has become a major flashpoint since the United States and Israel launched their war against Iran on February 28.
The Strait was previously regarded as an international waterway, but the ongoing conflict has increasingly disrupted shipping and raised concerns over the safety of commercial vessels and global energy supplies.
Iran said Saturday that foreign ministers from regional countries will meet to discuss efforts by Iran and Oman, which lies on the other side of the Strait, to manage shipping through the strategic waterway.
Details later…….





