Connect with us

NEWS

Court Halts Sanusi’s Return As Emir Of Kano

Published

on

A new twist has emerged in the political whirlwind surrounding the ancient stool of the Emir of Kano, which saw the Kano State House of Assembly embark on frantic legislative actions to pave way for the return of deposed Sanusi Lamido Sanusi to the throne of his fathers.

A judicial intervention has disrupted the process, with a Federal High Court in Kano having issued an order stopping the Kano State Government from enforcing the Kano State Emirate Council Repeal Law.

The order, by Justice Mohammed Liman granted followed an application by Alh Aminu Babba Dan Agundi, the Sarkin Dawaki Babba of the Kano Emirate.

Consequently, the court slated 3rd of June, 2024 for the hearing of the matter.

The high profile matter has seen the court papers on the matter being widely circulated on the Internet.

Recall that the Kano State House of Assembly, on Thursday, issued a dissolution order to all the four emirate councils in the state created by the administration of the immediate past governor, Umar Ganduje.

To underscore the political plot, Kano State Governor, Abba Yusuf, instantly deployed security operatives to dislodge the Emirs and ordered a return of Sanusi.

In a dramatic fashion Gov Yusuf in complying with legislative resolutions and actions, deposed five emirs appointed by Ganduje and gave them a 48-hour ultimatum to vacate their official residences and palaces.

They royal fathers were directed to hand over all affairs to the state’s Commissioner for Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs.

However, in the latest lawsuit concerning the Emirs’ seat, predicated on fundamental rights the Kano State Government, the Kano State House of Assembly, the Speaker, the Attorney-General, the Commissioner of Police, the Inspector-General of Police, the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC), and the State Security Service, were names as the respondents.

In addition, the court ordered that all court processes be served on the IGP in Abuja.

The judge ruled, “That parties are hereby ordered to maintain status quo ante the passage and assent of the bill into law pending the hearing of the fundamental rights application.

“That in view of the constitutional and jurisdictional issues apparent on the face of the application, parties shall address the court on same at the hearing of the fundamental rights application which is fixed for the 3rd of June, 2024.

“That in order to maintain the peace and security of the state, an interim injunction of this Honourable Court is granted restraining the fifth to eight respondents (CP, IGP, NSCDC and DSS) from enforcing, executing, implementing and operationalising the Kano State Emirate Council (Repeal) Law.

“That parties are hereby ordered to maintain status quo ante the passage and assent of the bill into law pending the hearing of the Fundamental Rights application.

“That this case is adjourned to the 3rd day of June 2024, for hearing of the fundamental rights application.”

“Status quo ante” refers to the previously existing state of affairs.

Biztellers reports that the repealed law, known as the Kano State Emirs (Appointment and Deposition) Law, had created Rano, Karaye, Gaya, and Bichi Emirates in addition to Kano.

The legislative action of the Kano State’s House of Assembly meant that the law passed by the previous assembly was repealed and emirates created thereby dissolved, thus consolidating the Kano Emirate into one under a single ruler.

NEWS

“Stop Spreading Fear” — Presidency Slams Nasboi Over Alleged Fake Terror Clip

Published

on

The Presidency has cautioned popular comedian and content creator, Nasboi, over a viral video he posted online, accusing him of spreading fear with what it described as a misleading terror-related clip.

The Special Assistant to President Bola Tinubu on Social Media, Dada Olusegun, raised the concern in a post on his X handle on Tuesday, saying the footage being circulated does not originate from Nigeria and was wrongly presented in a way that could cause public panic.

ALSO READ: I’m Getting Death Threats For Criticising Wizkid – Nasboi Calls Out

He alleged that the video shared by Nasboi was originally taken from another online page that identified the armed men in the clip as terrorists operating in the Republic of Benin, not Nigeria.

According to him, sharing such content without proper context was irresponsible, especially given the sensitive security situation in the country.
He wrote: “You cannot continue to intentionally use your page to spread fear @iamnasboi for whatever reason you might think you have.

“The video you posted was clearly quoted from a page that says these are Beninese terrorists. This means the footage is from Benin Republic and has nothing to do with Nigeria.

“We have our challenges, but you using your wide reach to spread fear with a fake footage is the highest form of irresponsibility. You can do better!”

The presidential aide did not give further details on when the video first surfaced or whether any official verification was conducted on its origin.

Nasboi had earlier shared the clip with the caption “PRESIDENT @officialABAT,” showing armed men on motorcycles carrying out an attack in a rural setting.

The post sparked mixed reactions online, as users debated whether the footage was genuinely from Nigeria or another West African country.

Although similar videos have previously been linked to extremist groups operating in the Sahel region, there has been no independent confirmation that the viral clip originated from Nigeria.

 

Continue Reading

NEWS

Why FG Scrapped 3-Month Pre-Retirement Leave for Civil Servants

Published

on

The Federal Government has abolished the practice of granting civil servants a mandatory three-month pre-retirement leave, saying the arrangement was based on a wrong interpretation of the Public Service Rules and had no legal backing.

The directive was issued in a circular by the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, Didi Walson-Jack, and sent to ministries, departments and agencies (MDAs), including top government officials across the federal civil service.

According to the circular, what is commonly referred to as “pre-retirement leave” is not recognised in the Public Service Rules. Instead, it is meant to be a structured three-month notice period that some MDAs mistakenly converted into automatic leave.

ALSO READ: ASRI Urges FG to Allocate Crude to Local Refiners

The government explained that this misinterpretation had led to many experienced officers leaving active duty earlier than required, creating avoidable gaps in manpower and affecting service delivery in some institutions.

“The so-called ‘mandatory three-month pre-retirement leave’ has no basis in the Public Service Rules,” the circular stated.

Under the correct rule, retiring officers are required to give three months’ notice before their retirement date. Within that period, they are expected to attend a one-month pre-retirement workshop or seminar, while the remaining time is used to process pension documentation and reconcile service records.

The Federal Government further clarified that officers remain in active service throughout the notice period and are still expected to carry out their official duties, except when attending approved training or granted leave under existing regulations.

“A retiring officer must give three months’ notice before their effective date of retirement. This is a notice requirement, not a leave entitlement,” the directive added.

The Head of Service directed all MDAs to stop the practice of sending officers on compulsory pre-retirement leave before their official retirement dates, insisting that such action is inconsistent with existing regulations.

She also instructed permanent secretaries, directors-general, and agency heads to ensure full compliance and proper dissemination of the corrected interpretation across the civil service.

Nigeria’s civil service retirement framework remains governed by the Public Service Rules and the Pension Reform Act, with officers retiring upon reaching 60 years of age or completing 35 years in service, whichever comes first.

The government said the reform is aimed at standardising procedures, improving efficiency, and ensuring that experienced civil servants continue contributing to government operations until their official exit date.

Continue Reading

NEWS

Was It Arrest or Routine Review? DSS, Okey Ndibe Give Contradicting Accounts Over Lagos Airport Incident

Published

on

Confusion has trailed an encounter between Nigerian author and columnist Okey Ndibe and operatives of the Department of State Services (DSS) at the Murtala Muhammed International Airport, Lagos, with both sides offering conflicting explanations of what happened.

Ndibe confirmed that he was held for more than three hours by DSS operatives before being released. In a post shared on his Facebook page, he expressed appreciation to those who reached out after news of the incident broke.

RELATED NEWS: DSS grilled Okey Ndibe over 2013 watch-list – Source

“I am so grateful for the expressions of concern by many friends, acquaintances and others over my detention earlier today by the DSS at Murtala Muhammed International Airport,” Ndibe wrote.

He added that despite the unexpected encounter, he was treated respectfully by the officers involved.

“The two agents who interacted with me were quite courteous throughout the three-plus hours of my detention,” he said.
Ndibe further confirmed his release, assuring supporters of his wellbeing.

“I’d like to confirm that I’ve been released… I am fine and in excellent spirits. I treasure your messages and gestures of friendship,” he added.

However, the DSS has denied that the author was arrested or detained. In a statement issued by its spokesperson, the agency said its interaction with Ndibe was part of an ongoing review of its security watchlist system.

“The Department of State Services hereby clarifies that it did not arrest or detain Prof Okey Ndibe at Murtala Muhammed International Airport on June 1, 2026 or any other place on that date for that matter,” the statement said.

The agency explained that its current leadership is reviewing long-standing watchlist entries, some dating back to previous administrations, to ensure citizens are not subjected to unnecessary inconvenience.

According to the DSS, “Individuals previously placed on watchlists are routinely invited for interaction as part of a review process that could lead to the downgrading or removal of their watchlist status.”

 

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2022. Biztellers, powered by Alphaxristi.

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x