NEWS
DPRP Uses Court to Restrain NMDPRA from Meddlesomeness
The Dangote Petroleum Refinery and Petrochemicals (DPRP) has secured an order of the Federal High Court Lagos, restraining the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA) from enforcing its directive suspending the loading and truck-out of petroleum products at the refinery.
Justice Akintayo Aluko issued the interim injunction on Monday in a fresh legal battle between the refinery and the petroleum regulator over NMDPRA’s regulatory powers within the free zone where the refinery operates.
The court also restrained NMDPRA, its officers, agents, and representatives from entering, sealing, shutting down, restricting access to, obstructing, suspending, disrupting, inspecting, supervising, sanctioning or otherwise interfering with Dangote Refinery’s operations at the Lekki Free Zone pending the determination of the refinery’s motion on notice.
The order followed an ex-parte application filed by Dangote Petroleum Refinery and Petrochemicals FZE in suit No. FHC/L/CS/1174/2026.
READ ALSO: Group Credits PINL with Safeguarding Environment, Farms
The refinery is challenging NMDPRA’s August 24, 2026 directive suspending the loading and truck-out of petroleum products from its facilities.
Dangote’s application was argued by a legal team led by Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SANs), Olawale Akoni and Abimbola Akeredolu.
Moving the application, Akeredolu urged the court to grant the reliefs sought, relying on a 42-paragraph affidavit deposed to by Wale Aroge, a written address, and documentary exhibits marked A1 to A6.
In his ruling, Aluko held that the materials placed before the court raised serious issues requiring determination, particularly whether NMDPRA possessed regulatory or oversight powers over operations within free zones.
The judge stated that Dangote’s case was that NMDPRA lacked regulatory powers capable of affecting operations within free zones, including the Dangote Industrial Free Zone.
Aluko also referred to a March 2, 2026 letter written by the Attorney-General of the Federation, which, according to the judge, “clearly stated” that NMDPRA was not entitled to exercise regulatory powers or oversight functions over operations within free zones.
The judge said he had also considered NMDPRA’s August 24 letter through which the regulator purported to exercise such powers.
“The important question, therefore, is whether the defendant can or should be allowed to exercise such regulatory authority pending the determination of the substantive issues before the court,” Aluko held.
He said the depositions contained in paragraphs 17 to 32 of Dangote’s affidavit disclosed “serious issues for determination” and demonstrated an urgent need for judicial intervention.
According to the judge, the purpose of the application is to preserve the subject matter of the dispute pending the determination of the motion on notice.
“What the plaintiff has asked this court to do is to preserve the res pending the determination of the motion on notice,” he said.
Aluko further held that the court had an inherent power and duty to preserve the subject matter of litigation and prevent a situation in which it could be destroyed or altered before the substantive application was determined.
The judge said Dangote had satisfied the legal conditions required for the grant of an interim injunction.
He held, “The law is settled on the conditions which an applicant must satisfy to be entitled to an order of interim injunction. Those conditions have been considered and stated in this ruling, and I find that they have been satisfied in the present case.”
The court also took note of Dangote’s undertaking to indemnify NMDPRA in damages should it subsequently be established that the interim order ought not to have been granted.
“Accordingly, I find merit in the application, and the same is hereby granted in terms of the reliefs sought,” Aluko ruled.
The judge directed Dangote to file a formal undertaking as to damages and ordered that the interim order and notice of the court be served on NMDPRA.
The order effectively bars NMDPRA from implementing the August 24 directive or taking the specified enforcement measures against the refinery, pending the hearing of the motion on notice.
Aluko adjourned the suit till September 9, 2026 for hearing of the motion on notice.
The latest case is separate from another suit filed by Dangote Refinery challenging the issuance and renewal of fuel import licences to NNPC Limited and several petroleum marketers.
The earlier suit, marked FHC/L/CS/857/2026, came up before Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke on Monday but was adjourned until October 7 following the judge’s absence due to indisposition.
Dangote is challenging the issuance and renewal of the licences, contending that they were issued in breach of an earlier order made by the court on April 29 directing the parties to maintain the status quo as it existed on April 2, 2026.
The refinery is seeking, among other reliefs, an order setting aside the licences and restraining the Attorney-General of the Federation and relevant regulatory agencies from issuing or renewing import licences for Premium Motor Spirit (PMS), Automotive Gas Oil (AGO), and Jet A1 pending the determination of the suit.
Dangote contended that continued issuance of the licences undermined domestic refining and violated Section 317(9) of the Petroleum Industry Act, which it interpreted as permitting petroleum imports only where there was a proven shortfall in domestic supply.
The refinery, which has an installed capacity of approximately 650,000 barrels per day, maintains that it has sufficient capacity to meet Nigeria’s domestic refined petroleum product requirements.
It has relied on regulatory data which, according to the company, show that domestic production of petrol and diesel exceeds national consumption.
Dangote had argued that the refinery was established to meet Nigeria’s refined petroleum requirements, generate export surpluses, and support the development of a major market for Nigerian crude oil.
The NNPC Limited, however, urged the court to dismiss the suit, arguing that the Petroleum Industry Act and Federal Government Backward Integration Policy do not impose a blanket prohibition on fuel imports.
The state-owned oil company maintained that petroleum imports remained permissible where necessary to guarantee national supply security.
The NNPC Ltd also contended that the NMDPRA acted within its statutory powers in issuing the disputed licences, arguing that the law permits the licensing of companies with local refining capacity or an established track record in petroleum trading.
It further maintained that the PIA did not prohibit fuel imports except where there was a verified domestic supply surplus, arguing that imports remain a legitimate mechanism for maintaining product availability and stabilising prices.
NEWS
Heritage Energy on Ways of Unlocking Oil Industry Investment
Strategy for unlocking Nigeria’s oil industry investment must focus on access to capital, technology, markets and regulatory certainty, in addition to physical assets.
These views were shared by the Heritage Energy Operational Services Limited (HEOSL) in a goodwill message at the Association of Energy Correspondents (NAEC) Energy Energy Conference 2026, in Lagos, themed: “Access to Assets: Empowering Players and Driving Growth.”
Delivering the message on behalf of the CEO, Ado Oseragbaje, General Manager, Government, Joint Venture & External Relations, Heritage Energy, Ohioze Unuigbe, commended the NAEC for convening what he described as a strategic platform for dialogue on issues shaping Nigeria’s energy sector.
READ ALSO: NCDMB, Renaissance Empower 60 with Oil & Gas Technical Skills
According to him, the conference theme is both timely and strategic at a period when the industry is seeking to increase production and attract investment.
“Access to assets must go beyond physical access to oil and gas resources. It must also include access to capital, infrastructure, technology, markets, skilled talent, regulatory certainty and strong partnerships. These are essential to unlocking investment, increasing production and strengthening Nigeria’s energy security,” he said.
Unuigbe noted that while access to an asset is critical, real value is created by how effectively, safely and responsibly the asset is operated.
He disclosed that Heritage Energy’s Operational Management System (OMS) provides the discipline for responsible operations, by bringing together People, Plans, Processes and Performance to embed operational excellence, strengthen accountability and manage risk.
This, he said, is particularly important in a complex environment such as OML 30, where sustainable performance depends on effective collaboration among staff, partners, regulators, host communities and other stakeholders.
He stressed that sustainable value creation goes beyond production to include safety, environmental stewardship, responsible asset management, local capacity development and meaningful host community engagement, alongside investment in infrastructure, technology and Nigeria’s gas resources.
“No operator can achieve this alone. Government, regulators, investors, operators, partners, host communities and the media all have important roles to play. Trust, transparency and constructive engagement must remain at the heart of these relationships,” he added.
The Heritage Energy GM also lauded the role of the energy media in promoting informed discourse, transparency and accountability, calling for continued collaboration to support accurate and balanced reporting.
“Nigeria’s energy opportunity is significant. Our collective task is to ensure that access to assets translates into access to opportunity, value creation and sustainable growth,” Unuigbe stated.
He reaffirmed Heritage Energy’s commitment to responsible operations, operational excellence and stakeholder collaboration in building a stronger and more sustainable Nigerian energy industry.
NEWS
Fuel Discount: Presidency Explains Why Atiku’s Production Subsidy Proposal May Fail
The Presidency has explained why former Vice President Atiku Abubakar’s proposed production subsidy for locally refined petrol could be difficult to implement, arguing that Nigeria lacks sufficient freely available crude oil to sustain the policy.
President Bola Tinubu’s Special Adviser on Media and Public Communications, Sunday Dare, made the position known in a statement issued on Sunday, October 11, 2026, titled “Atiku’s Demagoguery in the Face of Tinubu’s Logical Policies.”
Dare was responding to Atiku’s criticism of the Federal Government’s 30-day petrol discount offered through the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC) Retail and its proposed fuel price modulation framework.
SEE ALSO: PETROAN Expects Fuel Discount to Combat Inflation
Atiku had described the temporary discount as a publicity stunt, questioning its sustainability and accusing Tinubu of adopting his economic proposal without incorporating the production subsidy he advocated.
However, the presidential aide argued that Atiku’s proposal failed to adequately account for Nigeria’s crude oil production arrangements, existing contractual obligations and the financial implications of subsidising petroleum products.
According to Dare, Nigeria produces approximately 1.8 million barrels of crude oil daily, but the Federal Government does not have unrestricted access to the entire volume.
He said joint ventures and production-sharing contracts, alongside production costs, royalties and profit-sharing arrangements, significantly reduce the quantity of crude available to the state.
“After accounting for these statutory and contractual obligations, Nigeria has fewer than 700,000 barrels per day of unencumbered ‘free crude’ to give away,” Dare stated.
He argued that using crude oil to fund a broad production subsidy without sufficient freely available supplies could undermine government revenues and expose the country to financial risks.
Dare maintained that domestic refineries, including the Dangote Petroleum Refinery, require substantial volumes of crude oil, making it difficult for the government to meet their needs solely from crude available for unrestricted allocation.
He argued that domestic refiners would still need to obtain additional crude through other arrangements, including purchases from international markets.
The presidential aide warned that a production subsidy without adequate crude supplies and clearly defined financial safeguards could recreate some of the problems associated with Nigeria’s former petrol subsidy regime.
He said such a policy could encourage opaque transactions, fraudulent claims and financial losses if its implementation was not properly structured.
Atiku has advocated shifting government support away from subsidising imported petrol towards supporting qualifying domestic refiners through preferential crude oil pricing, with the aim of reducing costs for consumers.
The proposal has become a subject of political and economic debate as Nigerians continue to grapple with high petrol prices and the wider cost-of-living crisis.
Presidency Defends 30-Day Petrol Discount
Dare also rejected the suggestion that NNPC Retail’s decision to forgo its profit margin temporarily amounted to a restoration of the former petrol subsidy.
He said the discount was initially introduced as part of activities marking Nigeria’s 66th Independence anniversary before being extended for another 30 days.
According to him, the arrangement allows NNPC Retail to absorb short-term market pressures without reinstating the previous system of government-funded fuel subsidies.
The presidential aide also defended the proposed N1,350-per-litre ceiling on ex-gantry costs, describing it as a mechanism to moderate sudden increases in fuel prices.
Under the framework outlined in the statement, refiners and importers would absorb temporary cost increases above the ceiling and recover those costs when market conditions improve.
Dare argued that the measure could help reduce the impact of abrupt fuel price changes on transport fares and household expenses.
The presidential aide further defended the administration’s broader economic reforms, including petrol subsidy removal and foreign exchange market reforms introduced in 2023.
He cited the expansion of compressed natural gas infrastructure, direct cash transfers to vulnerable households, support for small businesses and increased federal allocations to states and local governments as part of the government’s response to economic pressures.
Dare maintained that the administration was pursuing a combination of market-based pricing and targeted interventions to manage the effects of international oil market volatility.
He argued that the country needed structural economic measures rather than temporary interventions that could place additional pressure on public finances.
NEWS
‘Don’t Rush the Refinery’ – Kenyan Presidential Candidate Warns Dangote
Kenyan presidential candidate Patrick Osoi has warned Nigerian billionaire Aliko Dangote against rushing to establish a proposed $16 billion refinery in Kenya, insisting that local businesspeople can undertake the project.
Osoi made the remarks while addressing supporters at a Lions Movement event, according to a video circulating online.
He said he expected Dangote to return to Nigeria by February 2027, when he anticipates being sworn in as Kenya’s president.
SEE MORE: Ndindi Nyoro Gives Ruto 14 Days to Disclose Dangote Refinery Deal
“I want to tell Aliko Dangote, please don’t rush to start the refinery because, when I’m sworn in as President of Kenya next year, you will be heading back to Nigeria,” Osoi said.
He argued that Kenya had businesspeople capable of establishing a refinery without depending on the Nigerian industrialist.
“We Kenyans have business people who can start the refinery. We also have business people in this country who can do that job. This is what we stand for. This is the home of all movements,” he added.
Osoi’s comments come amid plans by Dangote to establish a $16 billion oil refinery in Lamu, Kenya, with a proposed processing capacity of 700,000 barrels of crude oil per day.
Dangote and Kenyan President William Ruto performed the groundbreaking ceremony for the project on September 30, 2026.
The refinery is expected to take approximately 40 months to complete and serve Kenya and other East African countries, with the aim of strengthening regional refining capacity and reducing dependence on imported petroleum products.
However, the project has encountered opposition from some local residents over land ownership, compensation and environmental concerns.
A Kenyan court has also ordered the maintenance of the status quo in a land dispute involving the development.





