Business
US Cuts Nigerian Crude Imports by Nearly 50%
The United States reduced its purchase of Nigerian crude oil sharply in January 2026, with imports dropping by about 47.16 per cent month-on-month, according to the latest data from the U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis.
Figures from the U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services report indicate that U.S. crude imports from Nigeria fell to 1.664 million barrels in January 2026, down from 3.149 million barrels recorded in December 2025. This represents a decline of 1.485 million barrels within one month, showing a significant contraction in Nigeria’s share of the U.S. crude market.
In value terms, the drop was equally steep. The customs value of Nigerian crude imports declined from $217.36m in December to $115.99m in January, while the cost, insurance, and freight value fell from $223.10m to $118.95m over the same period. The difference between the two measures reflects additional costs such as shipping and insurance included in CIF values, which are excluded from customs valuation.
ALSO READ: NLNG Inducts 103 Trainees Into Empowerment Scheme
This means that in January, the CIF value of Nigerian crude was about $2.96m higher than its customs value, compared to a wider gap of about $5.74m in December. The narrowing gap suggests relatively lower freight or insurance costs, or shorter shipping distances within the period.
The contraction comes amid a broader slowdown in total U.S. crude imports, which declined from 198.29 million barrels in December to 188.21 million barrels in January, representing a drop of about 5.1 per cent. Total import value also fell, with customs value decreasing from $11.41bn to $10.56bn, while CIF value dropped from $12.04bn to $11.15bn.
Within Africa, Nigeria lost ground to some peers. While total African crude exports to the U.S. remained flat at 6.933 million barrels, Angola recorded a sharp increase, rising from 575,000 barrels in December to 2.062 million barrels in January.
Ghana also emerged as a new supplier with 738,000 barrels, having recorded no measurable exports in December. By contrast, Libya saw its exports to the U.S. decline from 2.137 million barrels to 1.086 million barrels over the period.
Nigeria’s share of total U.S. crude imports also weakened. The country accounted for roughly 0.88 per cent of total U.S. crude imports in January, down from about 1.59 per cent in December, reflecting the sharp reduction in volumes.
Further analysis of U.S. trade data shows that crude oil remains the dominant component of Nigeria’s exports to the United States. Total U.S. imports from Nigeria stood at $183m in January 2026, compared to $297m in December 2025.
With crude oil imports valued at $115.99m (customs basis) and $118.95m on a CIF basis, crude accounted for approximately 63.4 per cent to 65.0 per cent of total U.S. imports from Nigeria in January. This compares with about 73.2 per cent in December on a customs basis, indicating a relative moderation in crude dominance as overall imports declined.
The PUNCH further observed that the U.S. recorded a goods trade surplus of $419m with Nigeria in January, up from $84m in December. This was driven by a rise in U.S. exports to Nigeria, which increased from $381m to $602m, even as imports from Nigeria declined.
Across Africa, the U.S. posted a trade deficit of $503m in January, reversing a $174m surplus recorded in December. Total U.S. imports from Africa rose from $2.88bn to $3.54bn, while exports to the region edged slightly lower from $3.05bn to $3.04bn.
The PUNCH earlier reported that Nigeria accounted for about 52 per cent of Africa’s crude oil exports to the United States in 2025. According to the previous report, total U.S. crude imports from Africa stood at 89.371 million barrels in 2025, down from 103.631 million barrels in 2024, representing a decline of 14.26 million barrels or 13.8 per cent.
Out of the 89.371 million barrels imported from Africa in 2025, Nigeria supplied 46.618 million barrels, compared to 50.793 million barrels in 2024. This was a drop of 4.175 million barrels or 8.2 per cent year on year.
Despite the lower volume, Nigeria’s share of Africa’s crude exports to the U.S. rose. In 2025, Nigeria’s 46.618 million barrels accounted for 52.2 per cent of Africa’s total shipments, up from 49.0 per cent in 2024, when it exported 50.793 million barrels out of the continent’s 103.631 million barrels.
The PUNCH earlier reported that the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited recorded a profit after tax of N385bn in January 2026, even as crude oil and condensate production rose to 1.64 million barrels per day, according to the firm’s latest monthly operational report.
The January 2026 NNPC Monthly Report Summary, released on Monday, showed that the state-owned energy company generated N2.571tn in revenue during the month while remitting N726bn as statutory payments to the Federation.
This means the company recorded a sharp 47 per cent decline in its monthly revenue, which fell from N4.82tn in December 2025 to N2.57tn in January 2026. This contraction occurred despite a marginal increase in the company’s after-tax profit.
It disclosed that Nigeria produced 1.64 million barrels per day, up from 1.55 million barrels per day recorded in December 2025. This represents an increase of 0.09mbpd, or about 5.8 per cent month-on-month.
The PUNCH observed that the decline in crude exports to the U.S. occurred despite higher production. The trade outcomes come against the backdrop of renewed US protectionist rhetoric and tariff-focused trade policies associated with US President Donald Trump, which have influenced sourcing decisions, pricing structures, and trade flows globally.
Last year, Donald Trump signed an executive order raising Nigeria’s tariff rate from 14 per cent to 15 per cent, with Washington implementing its “reciprocal” tariff regime.
Source – The Punch
Business
Europe, Mediterranean Crises Shouldn’t Affect Africa’s Petroleum Price Benchmark – FG
The Federal Government, through the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority, has said crises in Western Europe and the Mediterranean should not automatically determine petroleum product prices in Nigeria and other African countries, arguing that West Africa needs a regional benchmark that reflects its own market realities.
It said West Africa could no longer afford a situation where disruptions in Western Europe or the Mediterranean automatically influence the prices of petroleum products in African markets, even when the factors behind those disruptions have little or nothing to do with the region.
The Authority Chief Executive, Rabiu Umar, said this on Tuesday at the second West Africa Refined Fuel Market Conference in Abuja, where regulators, refiners, traders, financiers and other industry stakeholders renewed efforts to establish a transparent regional pricing system for refined petroleum products.
The conference is jointly hosted by the Authority, S&P Global Commodity Insights and West Africa Regulator Forum, with the theme: “Funding West Africa Infrastructure & Distribution to Create a Transparent Market for Regional Price Benchmarks.”
The conference is aimed at moving the region from discussions about price discovery to the actual development of a functioning petroleum trading and pricing hub.
Umar said the continued use of external price references meant that petroleum consumers in Nigeria and other West African countries could be affected by disruptions that occurred thousands of kilometres away and were unrelated to the fundamentals of their own markets.
READ ALSO: Oil Prices Jump Further as Hopes for Hormuz Deal Fade
He said the situation was no longer sustainable, particularly as West Africa’s refining landscape was changing rapidly and Nigeria was emerging as a major supplier of refined petroleum products to the region.
The NMDPRA boss, who also doubles as the WARF Chairman, said, “If we look at the refining capacity on the continent and how it has been increasing, it simply doesn’t make sense that if there is a problem in Western Europe or in the Mediterranean, it is going to affect our pricing in Africa.
“There may be issues which have absolutely nothing to do with what is going on here. And prices should be determined on the basis of geopolitical issues, demand and supply, and complexities within the market. So we feel this is a great opportunity for Africa, and West Africa in particular, to really have something that is specific to us. If we have a problem, it is reflected in the pricing. If we don’t have a problem, then we are to be shielded to an extent, I would say, from what is going on in other locations.”
The call comes against the backdrop of renewed volatility in international energy markets following the crisis around the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important oil shipping routes. The latest tensions around the strait have pushed Brent crude sharply higher, with the benchmark reaching above $90 per barrel at points in recent days before easing as markets weighed diplomatic efforts between Iran and Oman.
That distinction, he argued, is at the heart of the campaign for a West African reference market.
He said, “If we look at the refining capacity on the continent and how it has been increasing, it simply doesn’t make sense that if there is a problem in Western Europe or in the Mediterranean, it is going to affect our pricing in Africa. There may be issues which have absolutely nothing to do with what is going on here in the continent. But prices are determined on the basis of geopolitical issues, demand and supply, and complexities within the market. So we feel this is a great opportunity for Africa, and West Africa in particular, to really have something that is specific to us.
“If we have a problem, it is reflected in the pricing. If we don’t have a problem, then we are shielded to an extent, I would say, from what is going on in other locations.”
He explained that the roadmap required reliable financing, refinery capacity, stronger logistics and storage networks, interconnected ports, roads, rail and pipelines, harmonised product regulations and standards, transparent and comparable market data, stronger cross-border cooperation and the mobilisation of regional and international capital.
“A reference price is not by itself a trading hub. A conference is not a market. Regulatory cooperation, important as it is, cannot substitute for physical infrastructure, commercial liquidity, market information, and operational excellence on which a credible trading hub must stand. Africa possesses resources. Africa possesses demand. Africa possesses refining capacity, and that is also expanding. What we must now build is the infrastructure that efficiently connects all three”, he added.
Umar also urged West African countries to stop duplicating infrastructure and instead develop assets based on their comparative advantages.
He said, “This is also why we must think regionally. Not every country needs to replicate every asset that we have. So for example, Nigeria today stands as one of the most tanked countries. If you look at the number of tanks we have versus the consumption that we have, there is absolutely no point.
“If you look at Europe, for example, our region is a trading hub for oil and gas, for all the refined products. Why? The other countries could also have invested in similar infrastructure, which would have led to duplication. The most important thing is what each country’s specific advantage is relative to the region, so that way everybody is doing what they are really, really good at. And this is why we must think regionally. We have to think regionally.”
He also identified differences in petroleum product specifications across countries as another major obstacle to cross-border trade. According to him, varying specifications make it difficult to move products seamlessly from one West African market to another and undermine the development of a single regional market.
“We also have the second issue of what is the quality of products. What is the specification of products from one country to another? We cannot have from here to Nigeria, to Ghana, to the United Republic, even our right-next-door neighbours having different products and specifications. What that does is that it makes trading across the border very, very difficult.”
Umar said regional integration would therefore help optimise existing infrastructure, reduce duplication and direct scarce capital towards projects capable of delivering the greatest regional impact.
“Capital will go where projects are bankable. Risks are understood, regulation is predictable, and returns can be sustained. Our responsibility as governments, regulators, and players is therefore to create the conditions that allow capital to move confidently. For investors, predictability matters. For operators, efficiency matters. For consumers, affordability matters, and reliability. For regulators, safety, integrity, competition, and compliance matter. A sustainable market must accommodate all four”, he stated.
The NMDPRA boss further identified reliable market data as a critical requirement for credible regional price discovery.
He said a benchmark could not be trusted if it was based on an opaque market with limited transactions and unreliable information on supply, demand, inventories and product availability.
“A credible benchmark cannot emerge from an opaque market. Price discovery requires sufficient transactions, willing participants, reliable reporting, and confidence that market information indeed reflects actual commercial activity.
“We must therefore develop a culture in which reliable information on supply, demand, inventories, infrastructure, availability, and legitimate transactions can support better commercial decisions and effective regulation.”
He said the West Africa Regulators Forum had a major role to play in creating an environment where different national markets could operate with sufficient regulatory compatibility to facilitate cross-border trade.
“We do not need every country to have identical laws. We need sufficient compatibility to allow trade to occur safely, transparently, and efficiently. And this is the difference, really, between regulatory uniformity and regulatory integration.”
Umar said the regional roadmap beyond 2026 would focus on five key areas, including improving physical market mobility, financing strategic infrastructure, optimising product standards and regulations, strengthening market data and transparency, and building a complete trading ecosystem.
He said a mature regional market would require refiners, traders, terminal operators, ship owners, marketers, banks, insurers, commodity exchanges, data providers and regulators to operate within an environment of commercial trust.
“And when these elements come together, the benchmarks will learn to be imposed. The market itself will produce the benchmark,” he said.
He said the ultimate objective was to transform West Africa from a region that largely consumes petroleum products priced elsewhere into an increasingly influential centre of price discovery, trading, investment and value creation.
“In 2025, we developed the roadmap. In 2026, we must finance and execute it. In the years ahead, our major success must be a West African market in which products move more efficiently, supply is more secure, investors have greater confidence, regional trade expands, and prices increasingly reflect the fundamentals of our own markets.”
Courtesy – The Punch
Business
PENGASSAN Points to Losses for Govt Refineries’ Closure
Persistent losses led to the shutdown of Nigeria’s state-owned refineries as against claims that they could no longer refine crude oil.
The outgoing President of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Senior Staff Association of Nigeria (PENGASSAN), Festus Osifo, made the assertion, adding that the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC Ltd) had to stop the refineries from operating after it became clear that the cost of processing crude was higher than the market value of the products being produced.
“So, the refineries were actually shut down, not that they were not functioning,” he said.
According to him, the facilities were still producing some petroleum products, but their operations were not commercially viable. Continuing to process crude under those conditions, he said, would only lead to more losses.
READ ALSO: DPRP Slashes PMS to ₦1,165/Litre, Diesel to ₦1,570/Litre
He illustrated the situation with a simple example, saying, “If you put, let’s say, $5 million worth of crude, you feed it through, when the product comes out, you are supposed to get the product of, let’s say, $6 million worth. But when you feed in that crude, what you now get at the end will not be like $4 million. So, you are losing money.”
Osifo said the experience showed that Nigeria needed to focus on making its refineries commercially viable rather than simply keeping them open.
He also supported plans to bring a Chinese company into the ownership structure of the refineries, arguing that increased private-sector participation could reduce government interference and improve efficiency.
According to him, PENGASSAN is advocating that private investors should acquire up to 51 percent of the refineries, while the government retains 49 percent, similar to the ownership structure of Nigeria LNG Limited.
“They are going to buy some shares of government from this refinery. So, for us, we are advocating that, because the company is about 3 in 1 company, so let them buy up to 51 percent. Let government retain 49 percent as it is in NLNG,” he said.
He said private majority ownership would allow the refineries to take important operational and maintenance decisions without having to seek government approval.
“What that is going to do is that the decision-making is going to leave the hand of government, so that if you want to do any maintenance, you don’t need to discuss it in federal council meetings anymore,” he said.
Osifo argued that private investors were more likely to make decisions based on business realities and profitability rather than political considerations.
“And because they are private people, they take business decisions, not decisions made from sentiment, emotions, or political leanings, but decisions that will grow the business,” he said.
On the wider oil and gas sector, Osifo said the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) had introduced important reforms but warned that frequent policy changes could create uncertainty and discourage investment.
He noted that the PIA established the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC), provided for the midstream and downstream regulatory framework and transformed NNPC Ltd into a limited liability company. It also introduced frameworks for host community development and frontier exploration.
However, he expressed concern about subsequent changes to some of the fiscal provisions of the PIA and the use of an executive order to alter provisions of the law.
“For us, one of the ways to attract investment is for you to have some level of certainty,” Osifo said.
He highlighted that investors needed to know the taxes, royalties and other financial obligations they would face before committing money to oil and gas projects.
“But if I’m investing today and I’m doubtful that tomorrow the laws will change and the laws might not favour me, I will be a bit worried about how I carry out my investment,” he said.
Osifo urged the government to allow the PIA and its regulatory framework to operate for a reasonable period before making major changes, noting that oil and gas projects require long-term investments.
“In the oil and gas business, you don’t just invest today and you think you will reap tomorrow. At times, for this investment, you start reaping even after the 30th year,” he said.
Business
Tanzania Eyes Expanded Dangote Investments in Fertiliser, Energy, Infrastructure
The Government of Tanzania has reaffirmed its commitment to deepening economic cooperation with Dangote Group, expressing strong interest in attracting new investments in fertiliser production, energy and industrial infrastructure to support the country’s long-term development agenda.
Minister of State in the President’s Office responsible for Planning and Investment, Hon. Prof. Kitila A. Mkumbo, disclosed this during a visit by a Tanzanian delegation to the Dangote Petroleum Refinery and Petrochemicals in Lagos, Nigeria.
According to the Minister, the visit was aimed at following up on discussions held earlier this year between President Samia Suluhu Hassan and President and Chief Executive of Dangote Industries Limited, Aliko Dangote, regarding the expansion of Dangote Group’s investment footprint in Tanzania.
He noted that Dangote already operates Tanzania’s largest cement manufacturing plant with an investment valued at approximately $800 million, adding that the company continues to play an important role in the country’s industrial development.
“We have come here to make a follow-up on what they deliberated with our President in terms of further Dangote investments in Tanzania,” Mkumbo said.
He explained that Tanzania is particularly interested in Dangote Group’s expertise in fertiliser production and refinery operations, describing the company’s industrial capabilities as critical to supporting East Africa’s economic growth.
Beyond the proposed investments, the Minister said stronger collaboration between Tanzania and Dangote Group would further enhance economic cooperation across Africa under the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA).
ALSO READ: NMDPRA Moots New Policy to Improve Energy Security, Stem Fuel Price-fixing
According to him, although African countries have maintained strong political relationships over the years, the continent must now prioritise economic integration through industrialisation.
“Africa now needs economic liberation, and that can only come through industrialisation,” he said.
Mkumbo described Dangote as Africa’s leading industrialist whose investments are increasingly extending beyond Nigeria to support development across the continent.
He added that Tanzania looks forward to working with Dangote Group as part of a broader vision of accelerating Pan-African industrialisation and strengthening regional manufacturing capacity.
The Minister also highlighted the importance of local refining capacity in improving Africa’s energy security, particularly in light of recent disruptions in global oil markets.
Referring to the impact of tensions around the Strait of Hormuz on global fuel prices, he said increased refining capacity from facilities such as the Dangote Petroleum Refinery would help cushion African economies against external shocks.
According to him, affordable and reliable energy remains one of the most important drivers of economic development, noting that expanded refining capacity across the continent would contribute significantly to lowering energy costs and improving the quality of life for millions of Africans.
The visit forms part of ongoing engagements between the Government of Tanzania and Dangote Group aimed at exploring new opportunities for strategic investment, industrial development and regional economic integration.





