Politics
APM’s Petition: Court Adjourns Judgment Indefinitely
In a highly anticipated judgment, the Presidential Election Petition Court delivered its decision on Friday regarding the petition filed by the Allied Peoples Movement (APM).
The APM had sought the disqualification of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu from the February 25 presidential election on the grounds of unlawful nomination.
The Court, after hearing the final arguments presented by the involved parties, decided to adjourn the verdict indefinitely.
APM’s petition focused on nullifying Tinubu’s election, asserting that his Vice Presidential candidate, Kashim Shettima, had unlawfully accepted nominations for two different constituencies.
Shettima initially received a nomination from the All Progressives Congress (APC) as a candidate for the Borno Central Senatorial District.
However, after Kabiru Masari, the initial Vice Presidential candidate to Tinubu, withdrew from the race, Shettima was subsequently nominated by the APC as Tinubu’s Vice Presidential candidate.
APM argued that this double nomination violated electoral regulations.
The Court’s decision will have significant implications for the presidential election, as it will determine whether President Tinubu’s candidacy stands or if it will be invalidated based on the allegations put forth by the APM.
The Allied Peoples Movement (APM) raised concerns regarding a potential breach of the Electoral Act by Kashim Shettima and the All Progressives Congress (APC) through their alleged double nomination.
The APM’s counsel, Andrew Malgwu SAN, urged the court to utilize the applicable laws to invalidate the nominations of both President Tinubu and Shettima, citing the nominations as unlawful, illegal, and unjustifiable.
On the other hand, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), the first respondent in the petition, requested the Court to dismiss the petition due to its lack of merit.
INEC argued against the APM’s claims during the proceedings on Friday, asserting that the allegations did not hold sufficient grounds for the petition to proceed.
The All Progressives Congress (APC), represented by Lateef Olasunkanmi Fagbemi SAN, strongly urged the court to dismiss the petition on all grounds, characterizing it as frivolous, irritating, and unwarranted.
Fagbemi contended that the petition was invalid from the beginning, citing a Supreme Court judgment that prohibits political parties from interfering in the internal affairs of other parties, particularly regarding nomination issues.
Likewise, President Tinubu and Vice President Shettima, represented by the esteemed Chief Wole Olanipekun SAN, argued that the APM’s petition should not have been filed in the first place.
They demanded the outright dismissal of the petition, asserting that it lacked legal basis and merit.
During the court proceedings, Chief Wole Olanipekun informed the Court that the APM’s petition should have been withdrawn voluntarily following the Supreme Court’s pronouncement that no party has the authority to meddle in the nomination process of another party’s candidates for elective positions.
Olanipekun suggested that the APM should have acted honorably and withdrawn the petition accordingly.
Following the conclusion of the proceedings, Justice Haruna Simon Tsammani, the Presiding Justice of the Court, adjourned the judgment indefinitely.
Justice Tsammani assured the gathering of lawyers present in the courtroom that they would be notified as soon as the judgment was prepared and ready for delivery.
Politics
“PDP Can’t Unseat Tinubu with Wike in Charge” — Ulasi Blows Hot, Threatens Exit
A chieftain of the Peoples Democratic Party, Dan Ulasi, has warned that the party stands little chance of defeating President Bola Ahmed Tinubu in the 2027 general elections if Nyesom Wike continues to play a leading role while allegedly supporting the ruling government.
Ulasi, who spoke during an interview on Arise TV on Thursday, expressed deep concern over what he described as a “contradictory situation” within the PDP, stressing that such internal inconsistencies could weaken the party’s credibility and chances at the polls.
ALSO READ: ‘I Didn’t Mean It Literally’ — Nyesom Wike Clears Air as Atiku Abubakar Fires Back
“I don’t see my party as presently constituted challenging Tinubu with Wike as national leader,” Ulasi said, warning that he may be forced to leave the party if the issue is not addressed.
The PDP stalwart argued that Wike cannot effectively serve as a leader in the opposition while maintaining close ties with President Tinubu, describing the situation as “unconstructive” for a party seeking to reclaim power at the national level.
He further questioned what role Wike would play if another candidate emerges as the PDP’s presidential flag-bearer ahead of the 2027 election, asking whether the former Rivers State governor would actively participate in party rallies or align with the ruling party’s activities.
Ulasi warned that the party’s next meeting could be his last if its leadership fails to provide satisfactory explanations, insisting that he cannot continue to be part of a process riddled with contradictions.
In a related development, Ulasi revealed that Peter Obi had visited him several times this year, including a recent meeting following an appearance in Enugu.
He spoke positively about Obi’s vision for Nigeria, noting that the former presidential candidate offers a sense of hope for the country’s future, although he stopped short of declaring any political alignment.
Reflecting on his longstanding ties to the PDP, Ulasi recalled his role during the party’s formation alongside late former Vice-President Alex Ekueme and other founding members.
Despite his deep connection to the party, he maintained that he would rather step aside than remain in a system he considers inconsistent.
He added that if he eventually exits the PDP, he has no plans to join another political party, stating that he would instead operate as a private consultant.
Politics
Drama in Ogun APC as Gbenga Daniel Claims He Was Barred From Meeting
There was tension within the Ogun State chapter of the All Progressives Congress (APC) on Monday after former Governor and Senator representing Ogun East, Otunba Gbenga Daniel, alleged that he was barred from attending a stakeholders’ meeting of the party held in Ijebu Ode.
The meeting, which took place at Adeola Odutola Hall, was reportedly convened to bring together key party stakeholders, including current and former local government chairmen, councillors, and serving as well as former lawmakers from both state and national levels.
However, the senator, in a viral video circulating online, claimed he was denied entry into the venue despite being part of the expected attendees.
ALSO READ: “APC Failure in Disguise?” — Dickson Tears Into ADC Coalition
Speaking from his branded campaign bus parked at the venue, Daniel expressed disappointment over the situation, saying he and his team were stopped from accessing the meeting.
He further questioned the legitimacy of any resolutions reached at the gathering, suggesting that the outcome of the meeting should not be considered valid.
As of press time, the Ogun State APC leadership had yet to issue an official response to the allegation.
Politics
Who Leads ADC? Supreme Court to Hear Mark’s Appeal in Heated Party Rift
The lingering leadership crisis within the African Democratic Congress (ADC) is set for a crucial legal test as the Supreme Court of Nigeria prepares to hear an appeal filed by former Senate President, David Mark.
Mark is challenging a legal action brought by a former Deputy National Chairman of the party, Nafiu Bala, over the control and leadership structure of the ADC.
The case, scheduled for hearing on Tuesday, is expected to determine the direction of the party amid deepening internal divisions.
SEE MORE: 2027: Why ADC, Opposition Leaders Stormed INEC in Abuja
Through his lawyer, Realwan Okpanachi, Mark is seeking an order to stay the execution of a Court of Appeal judgment delivered on March 12, pending the final resolution of the matter.
He also urged the apex court to restrain the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from making any alterations to the party’s leadership as currently constituted under his faction.
In addition, Mark is asking the court to suspend further proceedings in a related suit before the Federal High Court in Abuja, presided over by Justice Emeka Nwite.
The dispute dates back to a September 4, 2025 ruling by the Federal High Court following an ex parte application filed by Bala, which has since fueled competing claims to the party’s leadership.
The ADC has, in recent months, been embroiled in a bitter factional crisis, with rival camps asserting legitimacy.
The situation has been worsened by conflicting court orders and administrative uncertainty surrounding who truly leads the party.
Tensions escalated after INEC reportedly removed Mark as the party’s national chairman from its official records, sparking protests by his loyalists.
The demonstration drew prominent political figures, including former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, ex-Osun State Governor Rauf Aregbesola, former Anambra State Governor Peter Obi, and former Rivers State Governor Rotimi Amaechi.
In response, the Bala-led faction staged a counter-protest, insisting on recognition by INEC as the legitimate leadership of the party.
As the battle shifts to the Supreme Court, political observers say the outcome could decisively shape the future of the ADC, particularly as political alignments begin to take form ahead of upcoming elections.





