Connect with us

NEWS

Why We Want Public Officials Salaries Increase By 114% – RMAFC Explains

Published

on

 

The rationale behind the Revenue Mobilization, Allocation and Fiscal Commission’s (RMAFC) suggestion for a review of the country’s political office holders at a higher level was presented on Wednesday.

 

President Bola Tinubu, Senator Kashim Shettima, federal and state legislators, governors, and judicial officials were among the elected public officials whose salaries the commission had proposed increasing by 114%.

 

To be passed by the National Assembly, an executive bill would first need to receive approval from the president and other cabinet members.

 

The public, however, which had anticipated the new administration to make expense reductions in order to address the nation’s low revenue and other economic issues, strongly condemns the decision.

 

But the commission argued that the increment was long overdue, adding that the last time the affected public officials’ salaries were increased was 16 years ago.

 

Speaking with Arise news, a Federal Commissioner of the RMAFC, Mr. Hassan Usman, noted that elected officials as well as the populace were all confronted with the same economic situation.

 

The RMAFC is saddled with the responsibility of determining the appropriate remuneration for political office holders, including the President, Vice President, Governors, Deputy Governors, Ministers, Commissioners, Special Advisers, Legislators and the holders of the offices as mentioned in Sections 84 and 124 of this Constitution.

 

However, as a result of the recommendation, the commission has called on the 36 states’ Houses of Assembly to hasten efforts on the amendment of relevant laws to give room for upward review of remuneration packages for political, judicial and public officers.

 

According to the commissioner, “The consumer price index is for everybody; private and the public”, adding that the scenario formed part of their consideration for the increment.

 

While pointing out that the commission could not fold their hands and watch, “until when the sacrificial lamb is dead or killed”, Usman argued that the salary of Nigeria’s President is one of the lowest when compared and with all the other presidents, adding that the annual salary of the president falls around N7 million.

 

He, however, clarified that the increment was on only the basic salary of the public officials.

 

“We didn’t increase the allowances. All we did was increase the basic salary and then of course the allowances are there the way they are, they are only commensurate percentages of the basic salary,” he said.

 

He further explained that the reviews are in four volumes, involving the federal government and the Federal Capital Territory on one hand and the governors, state legislators as well as local governments on the other.

 

“Volume one entails the review of the federal government and the FCT , volume two for the state government and the local government, volume three is for the judiciary from top to bottom and volume four; is for the legislature, from the federal legislature to the state and even local government council.

 

“The volumes are there, we have submitted them, they are just recommendations. We have submitted to the office of Mr President and he is going to take them to the National Assembly for the federal government and FCT and those for the states would be legislated upon by the state houses of assembly”, he added.

 

Earlier, the RMAFC had revealed that it recommended a 114 per cent increase in the salaries of elected politicians, including the president, vice president, governors, lawmakers as well as judicial and public office holders.

 

He said the last remuneration review was conducted in 2007, noting that it culminated in the, “certain political, public and judicial office holders (salaries and allowances, etc) (Amendment) Act, 2008.”

 

Shehu said, “It empowers the revenue mobilisation, allocation and fiscal commission to determine the remuneration appropriate for political office holders, including the president, vice-president, governors, deputy governors, ministers, commissioners, special advisers, legislators and the holders of the offices mentioned in sections 84 and 124 of the constitution of the federal government.

 

“Sixteen years after the last review, it is imperative that the remuneration packages for the categories of the office holders mentioned in relevant sections of the 1999 constitution (as amended) should be reviewed.

 

“Pursuant to the above, your excellency may please recall that on Wednesday, 1st February, 2023, the commission held a one-day zonal public hearing on the review of the remuneration package simultaneously in all the six geo-political zones of the country. The aim of the exercise was to harvest inputs/ideas from a broad spectrum of stakeholders.”

 

He said the commission had objectively and subjectively reviewed the salary packages in the reports, adding that it adheres to the rules of equity and fairness, risk and responsibilities, national order of precedence among others.

 

“The subjective criteria reflected the various expressions by stakeholders through memoranda received, opinions expressed during the zonal public hearings and responses to questionnaires administered.

 

“The objectives of the criteria were obtained from analysis of macro-economic variables particularly the Consumer Price Index (CPI),” he noted.

 

The chairman added that the commission was also guided by some principles, including equity and fairness; risk and responsibilities; national order of precedence; motivation and tenure of office.

 

Shehu said that having considered the impact of the review on the economy, the remuneration of the political, public and judicial office holders in the country was adjusted, “upward by 114 per cent.”

 

The chairman explained that with respect to the judicial office holders, the commission considered the introduction of three new allowances.

 

He listed the allowances to include, “Professional Development Assistant: This is to allow for the provision of two law clerks to all judicial officers in the country.

 

“Long Service Allowance: This is to guarantee seniority/hierarchy between officers who have been on the bench for a minimum of five years and those that are appointed newly.

NEWS

Heritage Energy on Ways of Unlocking Oil Industry Investment

Published

on

Nigeria reaches 42% Nigerian Content as Oil Industry spends $20.4bn on Fabrication, Engineering

Strategy for unlocking Nigeria’s oil industry investment must focus on access to capital, technology, markets and regulatory certainty, in addition to physical assets.

These views were shared by the Heritage Energy Operational Services Limited (HEOSL) in a goodwill message at the Association of Energy Correspondents (NAEC) Energy Energy Conference 2026, in Lagos, themed: “Access to Assets: Empowering Players and Driving Growth.”

Delivering the message on behalf of the CEO, Ado Oseragbaje, General Manager, Government, Joint Venture & External Relations, Heritage Energy, Ohioze Unuigbe, commended the NAEC for convening what he described as a strategic platform for dialogue on issues shaping Nigeria’s energy sector.

READ ALSO: NCDMB, Renaissance Empower 60 with Oil & Gas Technical Skills

According to him, the conference theme is both timely and strategic at a period when the industry is seeking to increase production and attract investment.

“Access to assets must go beyond physical access to oil and gas resources. It must also include access to capital, infrastructure, technology, markets, skilled talent, regulatory certainty and strong partnerships. These are essential to unlocking investment, increasing production and strengthening Nigeria’s energy security,” he said.

Unuigbe noted that while access to an asset is critical, real value is created by how effectively, safely and responsibly the asset is operated.

He disclosed that Heritage Energy’s Operational Management System (OMS) provides the discipline for responsible operations, by bringing together People, Plans, Processes and Performance to embed operational excellence, strengthen accountability and manage risk.

This, he said, is particularly important in a complex environment such as OML 30, where sustainable performance depends on effective collaboration among staff, partners, regulators, host communities and other stakeholders.

He stressed that sustainable value creation goes beyond production to include safety, environmental stewardship, responsible asset management, local capacity development and meaningful host community engagement, alongside investment in infrastructure, technology and Nigeria’s gas resources.

“No operator can achieve this alone. Government, regulators, investors, operators, partners, host communities and the media all have important roles to play. Trust, transparency and constructive engagement must remain at the heart of these relationships,” he added.

The Heritage Energy GM also lauded the role of the energy media in promoting informed discourse, transparency and accountability, calling for continued collaboration to support accurate and balanced reporting.

“Nigeria’s energy opportunity is significant. Our collective task is to ensure that access to assets translates into access to opportunity, value creation and sustainable growth,” Unuigbe stated.

He reaffirmed Heritage Energy’s commitment to responsible operations, operational excellence and stakeholder collaboration in building a stronger and more sustainable Nigerian energy industry.

Continue Reading

NEWS

Fuel Discount: Presidency Explains Why Atiku’s Production Subsidy Proposal May Fail

Published

on

The Presidency has explained why former Vice President Atiku Abubakar’s proposed production subsidy for locally refined petrol could be difficult to implement, arguing that Nigeria lacks sufficient freely available crude oil to sustain the policy.

President Bola Tinubu’s Special Adviser on Media and Public Communications, Sunday Dare, made the position known in a statement issued on Sunday, October 11, 2026, titled “Atiku’s Demagoguery in the Face of Tinubu’s Logical Policies.”

Dare was responding to Atiku’s criticism of the Federal Government’s 30-day petrol discount offered through the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC) Retail and its proposed fuel price modulation framework.

SEE ALSO: PETROAN Expects Fuel Discount to Combat Inflation

Atiku had described the temporary discount as a publicity stunt, questioning its sustainability and accusing Tinubu of adopting his economic proposal without incorporating the production subsidy he advocated.

However, the presidential aide argued that Atiku’s proposal failed to adequately account for Nigeria’s crude oil production arrangements, existing contractual obligations and the financial implications of subsidising petroleum products.

According to Dare, Nigeria produces approximately 1.8 million barrels of crude oil daily, but the Federal Government does not have unrestricted access to the entire volume.

He said joint ventures and production-sharing contracts, alongside production costs, royalties and profit-sharing arrangements, significantly reduce the quantity of crude available to the state.

“After accounting for these statutory and contractual obligations, Nigeria has fewer than 700,000 barrels per day of unencumbered ‘free crude’ to give away,” Dare stated.

He argued that using crude oil to fund a broad production subsidy without sufficient freely available supplies could undermine government revenues and expose the country to financial risks.

Dare maintained that domestic refineries, including the Dangote Petroleum Refinery, require substantial volumes of crude oil, making it difficult for the government to meet their needs solely from crude available for unrestricted allocation.

He argued that domestic refiners would still need to obtain additional crude through other arrangements, including purchases from international markets.

The presidential aide warned that a production subsidy without adequate crude supplies and clearly defined financial safeguards could recreate some of the problems associated with Nigeria’s former petrol subsidy regime.

He said such a policy could encourage opaque transactions, fraudulent claims and financial losses if its implementation was not properly structured.

Atiku has advocated shifting government support away from subsidising imported petrol towards supporting qualifying domestic refiners through preferential crude oil pricing, with the aim of reducing costs for consumers.

The proposal has become a subject of political and economic debate as Nigerians continue to grapple with high petrol prices and the wider cost-of-living crisis.

Presidency Defends 30-Day Petrol Discount

Dare also rejected the suggestion that NNPC Retail’s decision to forgo its profit margin temporarily amounted to a restoration of the former petrol subsidy.

He said the discount was initially introduced as part of activities marking Nigeria’s 66th Independence anniversary before being extended for another 30 days.

According to him, the arrangement allows NNPC Retail to absorb short-term market pressures without reinstating the previous system of government-funded fuel subsidies.

The presidential aide also defended the proposed N1,350-per-litre ceiling on ex-gantry costs, describing it as a mechanism to moderate sudden increases in fuel prices.

Under the framework outlined in the statement, refiners and importers would absorb temporary cost increases above the ceiling and recover those costs when market conditions improve.

Dare argued that the measure could help reduce the impact of abrupt fuel price changes on transport fares and household expenses.

The presidential aide further defended the administration’s broader economic reforms, including petrol subsidy removal and foreign exchange market reforms introduced in 2023.

He cited the expansion of compressed natural gas infrastructure, direct cash transfers to vulnerable households, support for small businesses and increased federal allocations to states and local governments as part of the government’s response to economic pressures.

Dare maintained that the administration was pursuing a combination of market-based pricing and targeted interventions to manage the effects of international oil market volatility.

He argued that the country needed structural economic measures rather than temporary interventions that could place additional pressure on public finances.

Continue Reading

NEWS

‘Don’t Rush the Refinery’ – Kenyan Presidential Candidate Warns Dangote

Published

on

Kenyan presidential candidate Patrick Osoi has warned Nigerian billionaire Aliko Dangote against rushing to establish a proposed $16 billion refinery in Kenya, insisting that local businesspeople can undertake the project.

Osoi made the remarks while addressing supporters at a Lions Movement event, according to a video circulating online.

He said he expected Dangote to return to Nigeria by February 2027, when he anticipates being sworn in as Kenya’s president.

SEE MORE: Ndindi Nyoro Gives Ruto 14 Days to Disclose Dangote Refinery Deal

“I want to tell Aliko Dangote, please don’t rush to start the refinery because, when I’m sworn in as President of Kenya next year, you will be heading back to Nigeria,” Osoi said.

He argued that Kenya had businesspeople capable of establishing a refinery without depending on the Nigerian industrialist.

“We Kenyans have business people who can start the refinery. We also have business people in this country who can do that job. This is what we stand for. This is the home of all movements,” he added.

Osoi’s comments come amid plans by Dangote to establish a $16 billion oil refinery in Lamu, Kenya, with a proposed processing capacity of 700,000 barrels of crude oil per day.

Dangote and Kenyan President William Ruto performed the groundbreaking ceremony for the project on September 30, 2026.

The refinery is expected to take approximately 40 months to complete and serve Kenya and other East African countries, with the aim of strengthening regional refining capacity and reducing dependence on imported petroleum products.

However, the project has encountered opposition from some local residents over land ownership, compensation and environmental concerns.

A Kenyan court has also ordered the maintenance of the status quo in a land dispute involving the development.

 

 

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2022. Biztellers, powered by Alphaxristi.

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x