NEWS
Dangote Describes PENGASSAN’S Strike as Guerilla Warfare Against Nigerians
. . . Challenges PENGASSAN, NUPENG to Publish Audited Accounts
The management of Dangote Petroleum Refinery has described the declaration of strike by the Petroleum and Natural Gas Senior Staff Association (PENGASSAN) as a bully and guerrilla tactics meant to hold Nigerians to ransom for selfish agenda.
Dismissing as tissues of lies, the claims of mass sack made the PENGASSAN in its statement on Saturday night upon which it premised the call on its members to embark on strike, Dangote Refinery said what the Association has embarked upon is tantamount to act of terror.
These were detailed in a statement by the company during the weekend made available to Biztellers.
While highlighting the possible consequences of the strike on hapless Nigerians, Dangote Refinery management in a statement titled “Lawless PENGASSAN: Its lies and Terror Tactics”, said PENGASSAN could not justify its decision to hold over 230 million Nigerians to ransom by cutting off their essential supplies of petroleum products–kerosene, cooking gas, petrol, diesel, aviation fuel, amongst others.
It stated that the resolve by the Association to bully tactics could not justify the threat to the lives of persons, including infants and aged persons, who need the petroleum products and attendant necessities for their life-support systems in the hospitals, in care homes, and the Nigerian workers whose lives and livelihood are to be put at risk with the strike.
The Dangote Refinery management, therefore, called on the Federal Government and its agencies, as well as all Nigerians, to stare down the PENGASSAN and put a stop to the machinations and blackmail tactics of its oligarchs and sponsors.
“Assuming that there are Dangote Refinery workers or ex-workers who are affronted by or aggrieved over the organization’s decisions, they surely have remedies that they can pursue in accordance with their employment contracts. PENGASSAN should not and must not be allowed to incite those employees or ex-employees neither should it interpose itself between them and Dangote Refinery. PENGASSAN’s terrorist tactics must be defeated by the Nigerian people. It is in our interest to so do.
“PENGASSAN must not be allowed to persist in its bullying tactics against Nigerians. The Nigerian security and law enforcement agencies must provide security for the Nigerian workers in the oil and gas sector – all the facilities, installations and offices – so they can continue to provide their essential services to the Nigerian nation without let or hindrance by or from PENGASSAN and its co-travelers”, the refinery management stated.
The statement read “In our release, we pointed out that “over 3,000 Nigerians continue to work actively in our Petroleum Refinery” and that “we continue to recruit Nigerian talent through our various graduate trainee programs and experienced hire recruitment process”.
It also averred that the PENGASSAN has not joined issues with Dangote Refinery on these factual assertions; rather it continues to peddle the falsehood that Dangote Refinery has sacked “all Nigerians working in the refinery and” presumably hired “over 2,000 Indians” to replace them. That is complete falsehood. We also stated in the release that there is an “on-going reorganization within” the Dangote Refinery which has resulted in the discharge of “a very small number of staff” and that the “exercise is not arbitrary” but is being carried out “in the best interest of the Refinery”.
“These facts have not been rebutted by PENGASSAN neither has its oligarchs attempted to meet with Dangote Refinery to verify the truth. Rather it continues to peddle the falsehood that we have sacked “over 800 members” of PENGASSAN “for joining PENGASSAN”.
Assuming that was a fact, which it is not, would that justify the terror and guerrilla tactics that the Association is now unleashing on Nigerians? Would that justify holding over 230 million Nigerians to ransom by cutting off their essential supplies of petroleum products – kerosene, cooking gas, petrol, diesel, aviation fuel, amongst others? Would that justify threatening the lives of persons, including infants and aged persons, who need the petroleum products and attendant necessities for their life-support systems in the hospitals, in care homes, etc. Would that justify the bully tactics of putting the livelihoods of Nigerian workers – the very people that the PENGASSAN falsely professes to represent – and their extended dependents, at risk? And when we talk about Nigerian workers whose livelihoods are at risk, this goes well beyond the workers of Dangote Refinery and encompasses all Nigerian workers, including all the PENGASSAN members “across all offices, companies, institutions, and agencies” who are being commanded by the Association’s fiat, to down tools simply because the oligarchs within the Association believe it is fanciful to cut their noses to spite Dangote Refinery.
“This is a bully tactic that the Nigerian State and people must not succumb to or allow. As the Association rightly pointed out in its Release, “no man or company” – and we must add, or Association, be it PENGASSAN or any other – “no matter how highly placed” or entrenched, “is above the law and cannot be called to order by the national institutions”.
The oligarchs in the PENGASSAN have proved themselves to be terrorists and have turned the Association into a bully organization. It is time they be called to order. Indeed, over time, the Association has consistently proved itself as serving interests other than those of Nigerians and Nigerian workers, and a few illustrative examples would suffice:
“When in 2007 the Federal Government sold its moribund refineries in Port Harcourt and Kaduna to Blue Star Consortium led by Dangote Group at US$750million, it was this same bully Association, PENGASSAN and its co-travelers one of whom is the Nigeria Union of Petroleum and Natural Gas Workers (“NUPENG”) that vociferously sabotaged the process. It is now obvious to everyone that the FGN’s decision at the time was the right one and that PENGASSAN and NUPENG ignominiously wrote their names on the wrong pages of history. (See Annexures 1 and 2)
“More recently, PENGASSAN with its co-travelers loudly celebrated the purported rehabilitation of the Port Harcourt Refinery. Nigerians now know that the purported rehabilitation was a ruse and that PENGASSAN was knowingly celebrating a scam on Nigerians. PENGASSAN has also been in the forefront of opposing the amendment of the Petroleum Industry Act, 2021 in a manner that would allow the Federal Government to restructure the equity holdings of some of its upstream Joint Venture assets and thereby provide much-needed liquidity for the Government while injecting private-sector funding and expertise for the management of the assets. This is reminiscent of the inglorious role of the same PENGASSAN and its allies in aborting the sale of the Port Harcourt and Kaduna refineries in 2007.
“Dangote Group is the highest employer of labour in Nigeria and the highest contributor to the tax revenues of Nigeria and its sub-nationals. What comparable social responsibility has PENGASSAN, with its billions of Naira in monthly check-off dues and subscriptions, lived up to? Can it publish publicly its account for the last 10 years and list out its corporate responsibility activities within that timeframe?
ALSO READ: BREAKING: Dangote Cries Out Against PENGASSAN’s Supply Cut Directive
“Dangote Refinery is a national asset that must be protected by the Nigerian State and its people. It must not be threatened by the PENGASSAN oligarchs and their co-travelers. The threatened action by the Association against Dangote Refinery threatens the economic recovery and energy security of Nigeria. We must not allow the Association and its co-conspirators to sabotage and imperil the economic recovery and energy security of the country. The economic recovery of Nigeria must not be derailed and/or reversed by PENGASSAN. To paraphrase the perverted and abused sayings of the Association, no Association, not even PENGASSAN, “is bigger than our country”. “An injury” to Dangote Refinery by PENGASSAN, “is an injury to all”.
“We conclude by reasserting the opacity and lack of transparency in the operations of PENGASSAN as evident in its failure or inability to publish its audited accounts over the years. Why has the watchdog which the Association and its partner, NUPENG, profess to be, failed these several years to publish their respective audited accounts and be accountable to their members and the Nigerian people?
“We challenge both PENGASSAN and NUPENG to publish for the Nigerian public, within 7 (seven) days of this publication, their respective 10 (ten) years audited accounts, failing which they should permanently bury their heads in shame.”
NEWS
‘Don’t Rush the Refinery’ – Kenyan Presidential Candidate Warns Dangote
Kenyan presidential candidate Patrick Osoi has warned Nigerian billionaire Aliko Dangote against rushing to establish a proposed $16 billion refinery in Kenya, insisting that local businesspeople can undertake the project.
Osoi made the remarks while addressing supporters at a Lions Movement event, according to a video circulating online.
He said he expected Dangote to return to Nigeria by February 2027, when he anticipates being sworn in as Kenya’s president.
SEE MORE: Ndindi Nyoro Gives Ruto 14 Days to Disclose Dangote Refinery Deal
“I want to tell Aliko Dangote, please don’t rush to start the refinery because, when I’m sworn in as President of Kenya next year, you will be heading back to Nigeria,” Osoi said.
He argued that Kenya had businesspeople capable of establishing a refinery without depending on the Nigerian industrialist.
“We Kenyans have business people who can start the refinery. We also have business people in this country who can do that job. This is what we stand for. This is the home of all movements,” he added.
Osoi’s comments come amid plans by Dangote to establish a $16 billion oil refinery in Lamu, Kenya, with a proposed processing capacity of 700,000 barrels of crude oil per day.
Dangote and Kenyan President William Ruto performed the groundbreaking ceremony for the project on September 30, 2026.
The refinery is expected to take approximately 40 months to complete and serve Kenya and other East African countries, with the aim of strengthening regional refining capacity and reducing dependence on imported petroleum products.
However, the project has encountered opposition from some local residents over land ownership, compensation and environmental concerns.
A Kenyan court has also ordered the maintenance of the status quo in a land dispute involving the development.
NEWS
NLC Ultimatum: Wage Demands Can Be Resolved in Two Weeks – HR Expert
Minna Onomroba Abell, Registrar of the Chartered Institute of Human Resource and Strategic Management, has said wage-related demands by the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) can be negotiated within two weeks, urging the Federal Government and organised labour to reach an agreement through constructive engagement.
Abell made this known during an interview on Arise News on Sunday, while assessing the feasibility of the NLC’s demands and its two-week ultimatum to the Federal Government.
SEE ALSO: Spike in Petrol Price Moves NLC to Demands Emergency Palliatives
He explained that while some of the demands could be addressed within the stipulated period, others would require more time because of prevailing economic conditions and the measures needed for implementation.
“On the wage aspect, negotiations and all that, yes, those can be achieved in two weeks,” he said.
According to him, the government could invite labour unions and other representatives to a roundtable discussion to review existing wages and awards and consider additional incentives, including tax relief measures.
He said such discussions would provide an opportunity for both parties to examine workers’ concerns and identify areas where immediate progress could be made.
However, Abell ruled out the possibility of returning to the economic conditions and price arrangements that existed when negotiations were held in 2024, citing changes in exchange rates, crude oil prices and the operational status of Nigeria’s refineries.
“But asking the government to go back to 2024 when the negotiation was held, it is not possible because there are a lot of factors that will lead to that,” he said.
The human resource expert also questioned conflicting claims about the operational capacity of Nigeria’s refineries, arguing that the issue should be considered in discussions about persistent increases in petrol prices.
He criticised labour representatives over what he described as an inconclusive struggle, questioning their previous claims about the operational status of the refineries.
“And I want to draw the attention of the NLC that they’ve been fighting a war or do I put it a war now? They’ve been fighting an unjust fight or inconclusive fights. Let me put it inconclusive,” he said.
Abell argued that labour representatives had previously told Nigerians that the refineries were operating at full capacity, only for subsequent developments to raise questions about their actual performance.
“They are the same people who went and came to tell Nigerians that the refineries are working to full capacity. And today, we find out that the refineries are not working to full capacity,” he said.
He further argued that full-capacity refinery operations could reduce the country’s reliance on imported petroleum products.
“So, you cannot be the one telling Nigerians that the refineries are working in full capacity and also come back that to say that the refineries are not working, because if they are working to full capacity, this importations of fuel and all that might not really be there as such,” he added.
Abell maintained that resolving the disagreements over wages and fuel prices would require proper engagement between the Federal Government and organised labour.
He urged both parties to reach an agreement that takes prevailing economic realities into account while addressing workers’ demands.
“The issue is that there should be an agreement and a proper discussion between the Federal Government and the labour unions to achieve these goals they are talking about,” he said.
He added that although some demands could be addressed immediately, others might require longer-term measures to ensure lasting results.
“However, there are some certain goals or demands that can be achieved in the immediate, but at the long run it will also fail,” Abell said.
His remarks come amid the NLC’s demands for action by the Federal Government on workers’ welfare and petrol prices, with the union giving the government a two-week ultimatum to address its concerns.
NEWS
CNG Initiative: Why Tinubu’s Gov’t Moved Beyond Plan for 3,000 Buses – Coker
The Federal Government changed its initial plan to deploy 3,000 buses in favour of a broader Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) initiative after reviewing how best to address Nigeria’s transportation challenges, Tosin Coker, Chief Operating Officer of the Presidential CNG and Electric Vehicles Initiative, has said.
Coker explained that the initial plan, announced in July 2023, was subsequently reviewed, leading to the establishment of the Presidential CNG Initiative in October 2023.
SEE ALSO: CNG Can Cut Fuel Cost From N200,000 to N40,000 — FG
Speaking during an interview on Sunday, he said the government recognised that deploying buses alone would not adequately address the transportation needs of Nigerians, particularly in densely populated cities such as Lagos.
According to him, the revised strategy was designed to reach more people by expanding beyond buses to include vehicle conversion kits, tricycles and other interventions aimed at reducing transportation costs.
“The announcement that $100 million was being set aside was made in July 2023, and the plan was to go ahead with 3,000 buses,” Coker said.
He explained that further consideration of the plan revealed the need for a broader approach, which informed the establishment of the initiative.
“When the initiative was set up, that moved to not just buses, because we realised it’s not just buses that move people around, and we couldn’t reach everyone with just even 3,000 buses,” he said.
Coker noted that although deploying 3,000 buses in Lagos would make a difference, the number would still fall short of the city’s transportation requirements.
“Believe me, 3,000 buses, if you drop them in Lagos today, will do something, but it’s nowhere near enough for what Lagos needs,” he added.
Coker disclosed that the initiative began its rollout towards the end of 2023, with the procurement of approximately 25,000 vehicle conversion kits and about 600 buses, alongside tricycles.
He said the expanded approach was intended to reach more Nigerians, improve their transportation experience and reduce the amount they spend on commuting.
According to him, the change in strategy resulted in a broader programme that seeks to encourage the adoption of CNG-powered vehicles rather than relying solely on the deployment of buses.
Coker said the shift from the initial 3,000-bus proposal to the wider initiative was necessary to ensure that more people could benefit from the government’s intervention.
Coker Explains CNG Infrastructure Funding
The Presidential CNG and Electric Vehicles Initiative chief also addressed funding for infrastructure, explaining that government interventions were being complemented by mechanisms designed to encourage private-sector investment.
He said funding for CNG infrastructure was being provided through interventions under the initiative and mechanisms such as the Midstream and Downstream Gas Infrastructure Fund.
According to Coker, private organisations can apply for funding to invest in infrastructure across the CNG sector and its value chain.
He emphasised that private-sector participation would be crucial to expanding the infrastructure needed to support the adoption of CNG-powered vehicles across the country.
FG Urges States to Invest More in Transportation
Coker also called on state governments to increase their involvement in improving transportation, stressing that the Federal Government could not be expected to address every challenge on its own.
He explained that the distribution of buses to states formed part of the Federal Government’s intervention to make an initial impact in selected locations.
However, he maintained that state governments needed to complement the federal initiative with their own investments and policies.
“The Federal Government cannot be the one expected to do everything. We will intervene, we will catalyse, show what is possible, and support as much as possible, but states should do more, and we’re enabling them to do that,” he said.
He added that the government intended to create an enabling environment for private-sector participation through appropriate business conditions, training standards and safety measures.
Cheaper Transport Fares Remain the Goal
Coker said the ultimate objective of the initiative was to ensure that Nigerians experienced tangible benefits, particularly through reduced transportation costs.
He noted that the programme’s success should not be measured solely by the number of buses deployed or conversion kits purchased, but by whether commuters and vehicle owners experienced lower costs.
“Nigerians are not interested in the statistics, they just want to know that this is impacting me and I’m paying less for my transportation,” he said.
He cited commuters travelling from Nyanya to the Secretariat in Abuja and from Ikorodu to Ojuelegba in Lagos as examples of people expected to benefit from more affordable transportation.





